Nginx, PHP-FPM magento configuration gets progressively slower [closed] - magento

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
We have a dedicated 2-server setup running magento EE v. 1.10. We are running nginx, php-fpm, memcache as the major modules. The configuration is based on a white paper that magento put out with a hosting company partner.
The server/site gets progressively slower as longer the server is online. After a fresh php-fpm restart, the performance is acceptable. However, as it progresses, time to first byte gets worse and worse. We've had sys admins here and at the hosting company with no solution. I guess the best way to find help is to ask: Has anyone experienced this problem? We don't believe the issue is related to not having enough server power or memory.

The first place that I would check would be your error logs. Super-sized logs combined with unaddressed (and therefore continually logged) errors can lead to significant load time increases.

Related

Droplets and Billing cycle in the digital ocean [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to deploy my existing Laravel application in the Digital Ocean and this is my first time to go live. I'm choosing droplets shared CPU $5/month my questions are.
Is $5/month is exactly the amount that I will pay for the monthly bill?. If my application is online/accessible forever do I still get to pay $5/month?.
As stated above that I'm using the Laravel framework, can I ssh in the server and install dependencies without a problem?, also can I change the PHP version in the server?.
Please help me this is my first time and I have no idea what to choose if shared or dedicated CPU'S.
Note: My Laravel application is only for my personal use.
Here is my screenshots.
Thank you in advance.
Yes, that is the price that you will pay each month unless you turn on features like automatic backup and etc. which add up a couple of extra $.
You can, however, get billed more if you go over the droplets outbound data transfer. Check it here. But since you said it's only for your personal use, no worries there.
Yes, you can ssh into your server and install whatever you need on it (composer, database, PHP libs).
For every package, you are still billed hourly up to the end of the month which roughly equates to the price on that screenshot. That means that you can play around with your droplet, see how it works, and if you change your mind, you can always delete it, and only be billed for the number of hours that you used it.

Do I have better performances on a VPS or shared hosting offers? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Its about a long time that I'm asking my self this question but I've never had a truly response. Most of time people tell that it depend on the language and the usage of the website.
From now I'm using a sharing hosting from OVH but I would want to know if hosting my website with dockers on a VPS isn't a better idea ?
I'm talking about the performances (loading time, ect.), would it be faster on a VPS or a dedicated server ? Not really a price problem.
Most of my website are in Php/JS (Laravel).
Thanks for your answer!
Shared Hosting means that others peoples sites runs in same virtual machine with yours. It's cheapest solution for smaller projects. But when other's page on that shared hosting hits hight traffic your page gets slow down as well.
Virtual Private Server means that you have your own machine but it's only virtual. It's good solution for bigger projects, like e-shops and some sites that hits some serious traffic.
Dedicated Server means that you have your own server and you can do whatever you want there (create smaller virtual servers or run without virtualization). It's also most expensive solution.
Some more details here
So answer to your question is VPS should be faster. But shared hosting can be fine as well. Personally i have several project that don't hit much traffic on a shared hosting and them run just good.

Unexplicable increase in page load time [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'll try to be as brief as possible;
My page load time increased 40% and I don't know why, in the atttached image you have the before and after loading times, plus the waterfall view for both the first and the repeated view.
The setup: LNMP VPS, opcache, memcache, joomla with T3 framework template, using joomla file caching
I did the following changes (unfortunately I didn't think about testing after each individual change):
-upgraded to the latest joomla, template, and template engine
-compressed images
-upgraded to PHP 7 (from 5.6)
-everything else is the same, including using the same server for testing and having the same server load
The only explanation I can come up with is that the provider is overloading their servers, making my VPS slower.
Please feel free to write any insight/ideas you have.
Thanks!
Screenshots from webpagetest.org
After extensive testing on various other platforms, using the same setup (I even copy-pasted the config files for php, php-fpm, mysql, etc) I found out that the issue was the hosting company which seems to be overselling.
Using different but identically specced hosting the page now has a first view load time of ~0,9s.

Recommendations for linux hosting [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm about to embark on a new project which will require linux hosting, so I was hoping for some recommendations. The full technology stack is yet to be finalised, but it very likely to feature: nodejs, ruby and some form of NoSql(couchDB/mongoDB).
As well as supporting a variety of technologies, the hosting also needs to be scalable. Also, it could do with being as cheap as possible.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Iain
From my personal experience I highly recommend Linode. They're probably the best on the VPS market. If you don't mind starting with a little bigger server, you can try Amazon EC2, which is also a great service.
I haven't had a single problem with Linode in over 2 years, and every time I needed something on tech support, the reply was almost instant.

Deploy a server without programming knowledge [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Improve this question
Currently I have a dedicated server with WHM and Joomla running.
I want to transfer it to new server. This new server has high speed bandwidth.
I only have remote access to the new server which has Win 2008 R2 installed and it shows it was installed on a VM.
I need to configure this server to run a domain name with Joomla which will be access by 10k visitors/month.
I have knowledge on WHM and CPanel only. How I can started with any ready made packages?
The reason my management changed the server is for better performance as current dedicated server is slower.
However, I guess the new server is installed on a VM..
Please guide.
The first thing you need to do is not move your Joomla site to a Windows server. The configuration of the server is critical to the performance of Joomla and you will have nagging issues until the end of time trying to run Joomla on Windows. It can be done, but it's a massive headache and there is absolutely no advantage to doing so. There are dozens of reputable hosting companies that have servers configured specifically to run Joomla optimally. Take a look at Rochen (I have over 50 sites on Rochen) or CloudAccess, both have official relationships with the Joomla project and both have very reasonable pricing.
Also, 10k visitors per month does not require a dedicated server unless all of those users are on simultaneously running SQL query heavy apps. You could easily run a site that size on a managed virtual server and have no performance issues at all. I've got sites with hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors running on a single MVS with no issues at all.

Resources