Unexplicable increase in page load time [closed] - performance

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'll try to be as brief as possible;
My page load time increased 40% and I don't know why, in the atttached image you have the before and after loading times, plus the waterfall view for both the first and the repeated view.
The setup: LNMP VPS, opcache, memcache, joomla with T3 framework template, using joomla file caching
I did the following changes (unfortunately I didn't think about testing after each individual change):
-upgraded to the latest joomla, template, and template engine
-compressed images
-upgraded to PHP 7 (from 5.6)
-everything else is the same, including using the same server for testing and having the same server load
The only explanation I can come up with is that the provider is overloading their servers, making my VPS slower.
Please feel free to write any insight/ideas you have.
Thanks!
Screenshots from webpagetest.org

After extensive testing on various other platforms, using the same setup (I even copy-pasted the config files for php, php-fpm, mysql, etc) I found out that the issue was the hosting company which seems to be overselling.
Using different but identically specced hosting the page now has a first view load time of ~0,9s.

Related

Do I have better performances on a VPS or shared hosting offers? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Its about a long time that I'm asking my self this question but I've never had a truly response. Most of time people tell that it depend on the language and the usage of the website.
From now I'm using a sharing hosting from OVH but I would want to know if hosting my website with dockers on a VPS isn't a better idea ?
I'm talking about the performances (loading time, ect.), would it be faster on a VPS or a dedicated server ? Not really a price problem.
Most of my website are in Php/JS (Laravel).
Thanks for your answer!
Shared Hosting means that others peoples sites runs in same virtual machine with yours. It's cheapest solution for smaller projects. But when other's page on that shared hosting hits hight traffic your page gets slow down as well.
Virtual Private Server means that you have your own machine but it's only virtual. It's good solution for bigger projects, like e-shops and some sites that hits some serious traffic.
Dedicated Server means that you have your own server and you can do whatever you want there (create smaller virtual servers or run without virtualization). It's also most expensive solution.
Some more details here
So answer to your question is VPS should be faster. But shared hosting can be fine as well. Personally i have several project that don't hit much traffic on a shared hosting and them run just good.

How to Manage capacity using Trello? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
We started to play with Trello to manage our manufacturing process. Great tool and we want to keep using it. But we are missing one functionality .
We want every agent to log monthly capacity that will be reduced every day and to have some report that will show how much load we already assigned to this individual. (To be able to plan how much work we can take more and estimate when we can deliver new coming order)
Is it possible to achieve somehow in Trello? We can install additional plugins if required. Or we should look at different options?
According to Trello documentation, there are some available options for this case;
Burndown for Trello
Harvest Chrome Extentation
Hubstaff
Timecamp Chrome Extantation
Reports for Trello
Plus for Trello Chrome Extension
For the whole list, you can visit here

More Items Per Page Amazon [closed]

Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 days ago.
Improve this question
I'm a complete noob, so please explain this to me like I'm 5.
How can I view more items per page on Amazon than the current maximum of 60?
Thank you.
Amazon has items on pages, so either you join them yourself in a userscript with using sample url like this http://www.amazon.com/kitchen-dining/b/?node=284507&page=1, make your own wildcards or something for managing categories and "nodes" and at the end add &page= with a number of a page.
If you want to have 180 items on a page, join page1-page3 content and make yourself your own page-changer using custom pages - 1=page1-page3, 2=page4-page6,...
For infinite scrolling you have to manage it to load the content from pages step-by-step after some trigger(s). To get the last page, simply get content from span.pagnDisabled which is the last number of Best set amazon page.
Or simply use extension for your browser: Chrome

Can I use Elasticsearch free of charge? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I just wanna know if Elasticsearch is free. I know it is open source but I checked the website and I didn't find anything about pricing, though I did found subscription with no pricing. So, is it free for long-term use?
Just to let you know, I'm working with the MERN stack (MongoDB, Express.js, React.js, Node.js) and socket IO.
If Elasticsearch is free, then is it going to work and integrate with my stack smoothly?
If you want managed hosting from elastic.co, they charge you according to several variables. You can find the pricing here: https://www.elastic.co/cloud/elasticsearch-service/pricing
If you want to use the open-source version, stand up your own servers and manage your own deployment, the code is at no cost and can be found here: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch
It's super-important to remember that spinning up VMs on the cloud is NOT free. In fact, you might spend more money on cloud VMs than using elastic.co's managed services. Elasticsearch is a memory hog and I found that very quickly, and with minor load, I had to dedicate 4GBs of RAM just for the Java heap space. Under heavy load, you'd have to dedicate more. All of that costs money.
As far as integrating with your mainly-javascript stack, it shouldn't be a problem. This library is very useful: https://www.npmjs.com/package/elasticsearch
Elasticsearch is free of cost and open source. They charge for services like support, consultancy etc. and for plugins like kibana.

Deploy a server without programming knowledge [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Improve this question
Currently I have a dedicated server with WHM and Joomla running.
I want to transfer it to new server. This new server has high speed bandwidth.
I only have remote access to the new server which has Win 2008 R2 installed and it shows it was installed on a VM.
I need to configure this server to run a domain name with Joomla which will be access by 10k visitors/month.
I have knowledge on WHM and CPanel only. How I can started with any ready made packages?
The reason my management changed the server is for better performance as current dedicated server is slower.
However, I guess the new server is installed on a VM..
Please guide.
The first thing you need to do is not move your Joomla site to a Windows server. The configuration of the server is critical to the performance of Joomla and you will have nagging issues until the end of time trying to run Joomla on Windows. It can be done, but it's a massive headache and there is absolutely no advantage to doing so. There are dozens of reputable hosting companies that have servers configured specifically to run Joomla optimally. Take a look at Rochen (I have over 50 sites on Rochen) or CloudAccess, both have official relationships with the Joomla project and both have very reasonable pricing.
Also, 10k visitors per month does not require a dedicated server unless all of those users are on simultaneously running SQL query heavy apps. You could easily run a site that size on a managed virtual server and have no performance issues at all. I've got sites with hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors running on a single MVS with no issues at all.

Resources