I'm using MSTest under Visual Studio 2010 to test an ASP.NET MVC 3 project. I have a SQL Express 2005 DB that I'd like it to use and I want a fresh instance of the DB every time, copied from a template I've included in the project. Pretty standard requirements, I would have though, but I can't get this to work.
I've created a .testsettings file which enables deployment and my connection string looks like this:
<add name="MyDb" connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS2005;Database=MyDbTest;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|MyDbTest.mdf;User Instance=true;Integrated Security=SSPI;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
The test runs OK the first time, but after that it fails with errors like this:
Test method ... threw exception: System.Data.DataException: An exception occurred while initializing the database. See the InnerException for details. ---> System.Data.EntityException: The underlying provider failed on Open.
---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Database '...\bin\Debug\MyDbTest.mdf' already exists. Choose a different database name. Cannot attach the file '...\Out\MyDbTest.mdf' as database 'MyDbTest'.
The accepted answer in this MSDN thead says to remove the "Database=" connection string parameter. However, if I do that it fails with this error:
Test method ... threw exception:
System.InvalidOperationException: Unable to complete operation. The supplied SqlConnection does not specify an initial catalog.
How do I get this to work?
So far I've come up with a hack to change the DB name at runtime, at test assembly initialization time. This requires a further hack - using Reflection to enable modifying the configuration at runtime (thanks to David Gardiner).
[TestClass]
public static class TestHelper
{
[AssemblyInitialize]
public static void AssemblyInit(TestContext context)
{
RandomizeDbName();
}
private static void RandomizeDbName()
{
// Get the DB connection string setting
var connStringSetting = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["TheDbSetting"];
// Hack it using Reflection to make it writeable
var readOnlyField = typeof(ConfigurationElement).GetField("_bReadOnly",
BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
readOnlyField.SetValue(connStringSetting, false);
// Randomize the DB name, so that SQL Express doesn't complain that it's already in use
connStringSetting.ConnectionString = connStringSetting.ConnectionString.Replace(
"Database=MyTestDb", "Database=MyTestDb_" + new Random().Next());
}
}
Edit: It's actually even a bit worse than this: I'm having to call TestHelper.RandomizeDbName() at the start of every test that requires a fresh DB, otherwise it gets data left over from previous tests.
Related
I'm trying to scaffold a new razor view using Visual Studio. I select a template, my model and my DbContext, then I get the error message shown below.
Things to note. My models, my DbContext and my website are all in different projects. From the message below I am using AddDbContext and I have a constructor that accepts a DbContextOptions<TContext> parameter.
I read a comment on a blog post that the issue is because my context is in another project. The comment referenced something about the need to inject the Configuration into the DbContext to get the connection string and manually add it in the OnConfiguring override.
I can't find any examples if this is correct or how to set it up. Any help would be appreciated.
EDIT:
Testing out the theory from the blog comment I mentioned above, I added this section into my DbContext. ConnectionString is a hardcoded string constant with my connection information. This does work and allow me to scaffold, so the question still remains. How can I inject this connection string into my DbContext to allow the scaffolding to work?
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
if (!optionsBuilder.IsConfigured)
{
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer(ConnectionString);
}
else
{
base.OnConfiguring(optionsBuilder);
}
}
EDIT: So after making this change, I checked in the code and had another developer pick it up. It appears this section above just needs to be there to allow scaffolding to work. He never changed the connection string to point to his environment. He no longer got the error above it just worked.
I am not sure about what is the actual problem but it seems like we were having problems creating DbContext at design time. I manually added the code below and it's working now. It's just a temporary solution tho.
public AppDbContext CreateDbContext(string[] args)
{
var optionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<AppDbContext>();
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer("Data Source=.;Initial Catalog=JwtTemplate;Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30;Encrypt=False;TrustServerCertificate=False;ApplicationIntent=ReadWrite;MultiSubnetFailover=False");
return new AppDbContext(optionsBuilder.Options);
}
Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70559350
I'm having a lot of trouble getting a basic proof-of-concept working, in which I am accessing an Oracle DB (11g) through Azure Functions via Entity Framework (6.2).
Prerequisites:
ODT For Visual Studio 2017 is installed, as well as Azure Functions CLI/Core Tools. Everything mentioned below is done entirely via Visual Studio 2017, not through Azure portal.
Take 1:
Created a new project with the Azure Functions template.
Installed NuGet packages EntityFramework (6.2.0), Oracle.ManagedDataAccess (12.2.1100) and Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework (12.2.1100). Note: When installing NuGet packages in projects using the Azure Functions template, the packages are added under Dependencies -> NuGet, rather than under References.
Added ADO.NET Entity Data Model to project.
Problem: After setting my connection string, choosing Entity Framework 6.x is unavailable, with the following error message:
An Entity Framework database provider compatible with the latest
version of Entity Framework could not be found for your data
connection. If you have already installed a compatible provider,
ensure you have rebuilt your project before performing this action.
Otherwise, exit this wizard, install a comaptible provider, and
rebuild your project befre performing this action.
As the simplest of workarounds, I have tried to just go ahead with EF5, but it throws an exception while creating the DB model (after selecting the objects to include in model, including some stored procedures).
Take 2:
Created project and installed NuGet packages as above.
Created class library project to facilitate the Oracle interactions.
Installed the same NuGet packages as above in the class library project.
Added ADO.NET Entity Data Model to class library project and added some database objects to the database model. Also added custom constructor to the model for specific connection string, because managing connection strings in Azure Functions was a seperate set of headaches that I'll deal with later.
Added a simple wrapper method to the class library project that calls a stored procedure from the database model:
public static string NameByEmpNo(int empNo)
{
string result;
MyEntities entities = new MyEntities("metadata=res://*/MyEntities.csdl|res://*/MyEntities.ssdl|res://*/MyEntities.msl;provider=Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client;provider connection string='DATA SOURCE=127.0.0.1:1521/ORCL;PASSWORD=tiger;USER ID=SCOTT'");
ObjectParameter name = new ObjectParameter("o_empname", typeof(string));
entities.GET_EMP_NAME_PROC(empNo, name);
result = (string)name.Value;
return result;
}
Added reference to the class library in the Azure Functions project.
Added function that calls NameByEmpNo:
[FunctionName("GetNameByEmpNo")]
public static async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetNameByEmpNo([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Function, "get", Route = null)]HttpRequestMessage req, TraceWriter log)
{
int empNo = Int32.Parse(req.GetQueryNameValuePairs()
.FirstOrDefault(q => string.Compare(q.Key, "empno", true) == 0)
.Value);
string empName = ScottAccess.NameByEmpNo(empNo);
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, "Employee name: " + empName);
}
Problem: At runtime, calling the function fails with this error
message:
Exception while executing function: GetNameByEmpNo -> The ADO.NET
provider with invariant name 'Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client' is
either not registered in the machine or application config file, or
could not be loaded. See the inner exception for details. -> Unable to
find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be
installed.
Bonus info: My class library works perfectly when called through a console application. Also, my Azure Functions app works perfectly when calling functions that do not use my class library...
I am stumped. Has anyone got experience with getting this combination of techs working together and can offer some insight into where I'm going wrong / provide steps to get a basic connection working?
Entity Framework within Azure Functions defaults the providers to System.Data.SqlClient so SQL connections will work without any configuration changes, but that means you have to do something special for Oracle connections. The problem seems to come from the config values that the Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client library assumes are available within the App.Config or Web.Config file in the project, which are inserted whenever you install the Oracle.ManagedDataAcess.EntityFramework Nuget package. Azure Functions don't have config files, and I wasn't able to find any way to specify the Oracle provider in the settings json files.
I found a solution in this post
It suggests bypassing this mechanism and creating a DbConfiguration for Oracle, then using DbConfigurationType to tell the DbContext which configuration you're using.
public class OracleDbConfiguration : DbConfiguration
{
public OracleDbConfiguration()
{
SetDefaultConnectionFactory(new OracleConnectionFactory());
SetProviderServices("Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client", EFOracleProviderServices.Instance);
SetProviderFactory("Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client", new OracleClientFactory());
}
}
[DbConfigurationType(typeof(OracleDbConfiguration))]
public partial class MyEntities : IGISContext
{
//Expose Connection String Constructor
public MyEntities(string connectionString, int commandTimeoutInSeconds = 30) : base(connectionString)
{
this.Database.CommandTimeout = commandTimeoutInSeconds;
}
}
Note: I used EF 6 Database First to generate my EDMX; MyEntities here is a partial class for providing a constructor that takes in a connection string.
The oracle connection wil use the specified DbConfiguration class, and any SQL database connections will continue to work using the defaults.
My solution is using the Nuget Packages:
EntityFramework 6.2.0
Oracle.ManagedDataAccess 12.2.1100
Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework 12.2.1100
In my gwt web-app i'm using Mondrian. I have a method:
private Result executeMdxQuery(String queryString, Schema schema) throws InterruptedException {
CatalogLocatorImpl locator = new CatalogLocatorImpl();
Connection mdxConnection = DriverManager.getConnection(createConnectString(schema), locator);
return executeMdxQuery(queryString, mdxConnection);
}
result of createConnectString(schema) is
Provider=mondrian;Jdbc=jdbc:mysql://localhost/dds?user=root&password=qwerty;Catalog=/home/vskovalenko/schemas/air_new_zealand_monthly_traffic.xml;JdbcDrivers=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver;
all data within it is seems to be correct (at least db credentials and path to the file), this method throws no exception, it just silently dies and doesn't tell anything. Where should i loock to?
You should use the olap4j API to get a connection. This will allow you to let the application server manage and pool the connections to Mondrian.
If you require more control on the Mondrian server instance, you should take a look at the class MondrianServer.
add the following snippet to your code and try again:
Class.forName("mondrian.olap4j.MondrianOlap4jDriver");
My scenario is this:
I have a custom RavenDB membership provider that is implemented in a class library (DLL). This provider needs to access a database to store and retrieve User and Role information. I'd like to use the same app database to store membership information to avoid having one more database.
I don't know how to get a reference to the already initialized database (app database) inside the class library code. I think I'm going the wrong way here... :)
Some code:
bool embeddedStore = Convert.ToBoolean(config["enableEmbeddableDocumentStore"]);
if (embeddedStore)
{
_documentStore = new EmbeddableDocumentStore()
{
// Here I'm using the same connection string used by the app.
// This gives me an error when I try to open a session in the DocumentStore.
ConnectionStringName =
config["connectionStringName"]
};
}
else
{
_documentStore = new DocumentStore()
{
ConnectionStringName =
config["connectionStringName"]
};
}
This is the connection string present in Web.config:
<add name="RavenDB" connectionString="DataDir = ~\App_Data\Database" />
How can I reuse the same database within the custom membership provider? Any ideas?
I thought about moving the class library code files to the Web project. This way I could get a reference to the DocumentStore easily, but the code wouldn't be as organized as I'd like.
I also tried to use 2 RavenDB databases: 1 for the app and 1 for the membership provider, but as I'm running RavenDB in its embeddable fashion I couldn't get it working.
These are the errors I got during my attempts so far:
RavenDB Could not open transactional storage.
Temp path already used by another database instance.
You need to pass the instance of the opened document store to your dll.
You can do that using a container or by providing an API call to do that.
You can't have two instance using the same db.
I am wondering if anyone else has had an issue with running the DB initializer from the global asax?
I have this in the ApplicationStart:
Database.SetInitializer(new MyInitializer());
That runs fine, after that once my application has started I try a login Method i created in my services. It fails when it tries to open the context.
My test application is setup almost the same way and doesn't have an issue.
Any thoughts?
Update:
I tried adding the MultipleActiveResultSets=True and now I am getting this error:
The underlying provider failed on Open.
Update 2:
Well, it turns out that my application loads while the initializer is still finishing. That is why I was getting those errors. So, what I figured out is that part of the app loads and then it must request something from the DB (at which point it created the DB and seeds it). At that point part of the application has loaded, but you don't know that the initializer is still running.
Like I sad in my updates, the DB wasn't getting created until after most of the application had run already. It was still running even though, as a user, you wouldn't know it. So I created an initialization project and added this class:
public static class InitializeAndSeed
{
public static void Initialize()
{
Database.SetInitializer(new MyContextInitializer());
using (var db = new MyContext())
{
db.Database.Initialize(false);
}
}
}
In my Applicaiton_Start() I call the InitializeAndSeed.Initialize(). Worked perfectly.
This article helped me figure that out.