Place to share cool CSS3 tricks [closed] - animation

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I just wrote a pure CSS3 DIV slider, It uses #keyframe and other CSS tricks to slide divs. On the hover, the slide pauses. You can embed youtube videos, link images, embed text etc.
It isn't ver user friendly but I will probably work on that. Where can I share it?
http://jsfiddle.net/sQb7U/1/
Have a look at the CSS in there, any ways to improve it? The whole trick is not use any JavaScript. I know there is no fallback for non-CSS3 browsers but I don't really mind. Any suggestions.

Where can I share it?
Right here! The suggested way of providing useful answers to common problems is to ask a question describing the problem you've solved, and answer it yourself. This provides an opportunity for others who have encountered a similar problem to comment and provide alternative solutions while still leaving the information available for anyone that is looking for an answer to the question to find it here on SO.

Related

What was this live filtered table implemented with? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I was just browsing http://plugins.netbeans.org/PluginPortal/
I like the way that the table at the bottom of the page works, with its various live filtering & sort options. Particularly its speed, fluidity & function.
Does anyone know how this would have been implemented (I'm talking specifically, I have a good understanding of the generalized process, and am interested in the specific technology if it already exists as a particular type of control in/on a particular platform)?
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
looking at the page source it looks like the DataTables plug in for jquery see here

Save for web feature in Photoshop for image size reduction [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Save for web feature in Photoshop for image size reduction, would this be the simplest way for a beginner (like myself) to try and save on (some) loading time.
I am using images for my menu buttons, background, header, post page, etc etc
I have only just found this save for web feature and I was wondering does it really help in image size or does it not make that much difference.
Is there any other option?
(website for reference: www.kizzieskorner.com)
PS: if you mark my question down please could you give an explanation why so I know what not to do next time - as I am new to these question forums too!
Any reductions in size will help of course. I would actually recommend looking at other image optimising tools.
If you are on a mac there is ImageOptim which is part of my regular workflow now. There is also an optimiser within CodeKit.
This site has a whole host of others listed too and might give you a bit more information on the subject.
http://devstand.com/apps/compress-images-apps/
Hope this helps

Building and animating fractals [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Can anyone recommend any software/books required to learn and build fractal patterns? I want to also be able to animate the fractal patterns too. Like something off of winamp.
For book on animated fractal Fractals: An Animated Discussion with Edward Lorenz and Benoît Mandelbrot could be what you want.
You might like: The Computational Beauty of Nature
http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/flaoh/cbnhtml/
I am working on a project in java for creating fractals (flame fractals).
The user provides a script file in javascript, that takes care of the interpolation between fractals. Also, as input, one can provide a file that affects an animation in some way,
so this is the way to make an animation change to some music,
see for example
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imDPqR9cDL8
I can send you the source code if you provide me with an address.
There's lots of fractal programs out there.
I know that Ultrafractal is pretty popular, but not free.
As far as free ones go, there are programs such a ChaosPro and others. A quick google search will find them for you.

CSI style zoom in and enhance now possible? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
I have always thought the way they zoom in and enhance on TV and movies was strictly impossible. Essentially because you cannot create more information that there is to begin with.
There were ways to get better looking or clearer images like with re-sampling, but never to the extent seen on film.
Now, it seems that is not true.
I was reading this article, and it seems they have a way to do that now?
Or, is this just a better version of what was already possible? You still need to have a fairly clear image to start with? Otherwise, what are the limits of this technique?
There is something called Super-resolution. Some companies claim to use fractal theory to enhance images when they are upscaled. But, what you see in most movies is just fiction.
Image enhancement always involves pixel interpolation (aka. prediction) - in one way or the other. Interpolation can be good, bad or whatever, but it will never out-perform real pixel which was recorded by imaging device at greater resolution.

How to measure the size of a Ruby object? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm having Memcache problems and I was wondering what is the best way to know how big the objects I create are.
The only solution I have is to put them into Memcache which display their size in bytes (by the way, can I customize Memcache's output? I want readable kilobytes…).
Thank you,
Kevin
The excellent Eigenclass blog had an interesting article on that once:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120126022146/http://eigenclass.org/R2/writings/object-size-ruby-ocaml
There also was a good discussion on ruby-talk, which led to some code by Robert Klemme (Ruby Best Practices):
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/156648
http://www.pastie.org/217131
Plugging the values from the first article into the script might get you started and is probably quite educational.
You could also check out memprof, though it's more about object references and finding memory leaks than actual sizes:
http://github.com/ice799/memprof

Resources