I am looking for an event or notification that enables me to react in my Eclipse-Plugin when methods of a (java)classes are changed (renamed or removed/added).
I am particularly interested in the IJavaElement representation of the method that is changed.
Does some kind of event exists that provides me with this kind of information?
this is my plugin.xml
<extension
point="org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.renameParticipants">
<renameParticipant
class="bookmark.renameparticipant.JavaElementRenameParticipant"
id="bookmark-pp.bookmark.renameParticipant1"
name="name">
<enablement>
<with
variable="element">
<or>
<instanceof
value="org.eclipse.jdt.core.ICompilationUnit">
</instanceof>
<instanceof
value="org.eclipse.jdt.core.IType">
</instanceof>
<instanceof
value="org.eclipse.jdt.core.IMethod">
</instanceof>
<instanceof
value="org.eclipse.jdt.core.IField">
</instanceof></or>
</with>
</enablement>
</renameParticipant>
and my source of my rename participant:
I set a breakpoint in the init-method of the participant, but if I use CTRL+2+R in Eclipse not even the init is called:
#Override
protected boolean initialize(Object element) {
if (!(element instanceof IJavaElement)) {
return false;
}
oldHandleId = ((IJavaElement) element).getHandleIdentifier();
detectElementType((IJavaElement) element);
newHandleId = generateNewHandleId(oldHandleId);
if (!initSuccessful()) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
I think you are looking for rename participants. See the extension point org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.renameParticipant.
You get a chance to hook into a refactoring and you get a callback when the refactoring starts through the checkConditions method as well as when it ends through the createChange method.
Related
I am attempting to add primefaces to an existing Spring/JSF (myfaces) project. I have the actual timeline component working (or at least loading with the correct data), but the event listeners don't seem to work correctly. I have tried a number of configurations but can't seem to resolve this issue.
<p:timeline id="timeline1"
value="#{timelineView.getModel(searchFacade.dataModel)}"
editable="true" eventMargin="10" eventMarginAxis="0"
start="#{timelineView.start}"
end="#{timelineView.end}"
showNavigation="true" showButtonNew="true"
axisOnTop="true" stackEvents="false"
oncomplete="styleEvents();">
<p:ajax event="changed" listener="#{timelineView.onEdit()}" oncomplete="restyleTimeline()" />
</p:timeline>
In the above code the changed event is triggered and there is an AJAX call made. In the network pane of the browser I can see that the AJAX call is always to the URL of the current page (so like /mypage.jsf?conversationCode=a - I'm also using Apache Orchestra obviously)
The actual form data being sent for the changed event looks like this:
javax.faces.partial.ajax:true
javax.faces.source:timeline1
javax.faces.partial.execute:timeline1
javax.faces.behavior.event:changed
javax.faces.partial.event:changed
timeline1_eventIdx:0
timeline1_startDate:1498881600000
timeline1_endDate:1510894800000
timeline1_group:<div class='timeline-group'><div class='timeline-row timeline-row-group'>Group One/div><div class='timeline-row timeline-row-sub'>Group One subtitle</div><div class='timeline-row timeline-row-details'>Group One details</div></div>
mainForm:j_id_mt_SUBMIT:1
javax.faces.ViewState: Big hash as usual
The bizarrely long group name is because I am formatting the output group names into a more detailed title for the row btw.
The bean in the back (imports and package omitted):
public class TimelineView<T> implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
TimelineView<T> timelineView;
public TimelineModel getModel() {
return timelineView.getModel();
}
public TimelineModel getModel(ListDataModel<? extends Row<T>> results) {
return timelineView.getModel(results);
}
public void setTimelineView(TimelineView<T> timelineView) {
this.timelineView = timelineView;
}
public Date getStart() {
return timelineView.getStart();
}
public Date getEnd() {
return timelineView.getEnd();
}
public void onEdit(TimelineModificationEvent e) {
timelineView.onEdit(e);
}
public void onSelect(TimelineSelectEvent e) {
timelineView.onSelect(e);
}
}
The functionality and code inside these methods doesn't matter because when I set a breakpoint I can see that the onEdit method is never called and neither was the onSelect method when I had a select event in the timeline.
Since I have Spring handling all beans, my configuration was just this, located in the ApplicationContext.xml file:
<bean id="timelineView" class="com.mycompany.projectone.view.timeline.TimelineView" />
I have tried adding a form around the timeline, which made no difference, and have also tried adding process=":form_id", which caused the error "Cannot find component for expression ":form_id"".
As an alternative that would also suit my needs, does anyone know how to send primefaces events to a javascript function to be handled? For example, if the user moves the start and end points of the item in the timeline I would like to update the displayed start and end dates.
I would also like to change or intercept the delete behavior and modify what occurs when the delete link is clicked.
Any help would be hugely appreciated. Thanks.
EDIT
The suggested potential duplicate does not address the symptoms nor the actual solution - see answer below.
Okay, so the answer turns out to be that the Primfaces timeline component must have a widgetVar set in order for the p:ajax and pe:javascript calls to work. Incredibly simple solution but so infuriatingly difficult to find.
I know there are several topics already on stackoverflow, but nothing that actually solves the problem. Here it is:
Because of some inherent problems with Ribbon Designer I decided to build my next Excel AddIn using XML Ribbon.
However, occasionally I need to make changes to the controls in the ribbon based on user selections. For example I need to change the text of a label, and also make some of the controls disabled in some cases. And here's where I hit a brick wall. It looks like there's no way to do it. I tried to put the logic in the onAction callback as follows:
public void LabelAction(IRibbonControl control)
{
LabelControl label = (LabelControl)control;
label.Label = "changed text";
}
But this cast doesn't work because apparently IRibbonControl interface has nothing to do with the RibbonControl class that LabelConrol inherits from.
I was also not able to find any other way to access any of the XML ribbon controls. Is there even a solution to this? Or should I stick to Ribbon Designer?
You need to do this in a routine that sets the item label.
The xml would look like this:
<button id="SkLabelTest1" getLabel="GetLabelTest" onAction="SkLabelTest1"/>
<button id="SkLabelTest2" getLabel="GetLabelTest" onAction="SkLabelTest2"/>
The routine you are interested in is getLabel
I've done a noddy routine to demonstrate this.
First I added a property to ThisAddin.cs for it to read:
public string _labelTest = string.Empty;
public string LabelTest { get { return _labelTest; } set { _labelTest = value; } }
Then in my ribbon handling code I added the getLabel routine:
public string GetLabelTest(Office.IRibbonControl control)
{
switch (control.Id.ToLower())
{
case "sklabeltest2":
if (Globals.ThisAddIn.LabelTest != string.Empty)
return Globals.ThisAddIn.LabelTest;
else
return "Label Test 2";
default:
return "Label Test 1";
}
}
This works by the SkLabelTest1 button changing the text of SkLabelTest2 and then invalidating the control to force the ribbon to reload it:
public void SkLabelTest1(Office.IRibbonControl control)
{
Globals.ThisAddIn._labelTest = "Changed text";
Globals.ThisAddIn._ribbon.InvalidateControl("SkLabelTest2");
}
I've tested just in case and it changes the text OK. Hope this helps
I couldn't make a comment because of my reputation. As a comment to Charlie's post, it is a perfect solution but on my side, I had to change one part.
I changed public void SklabelTest1 function to this one below:
public void SkLabelTest1(Office.IRibbonControl control)
{
Globals.ThisAddIn._labelTest = "Changed text";
this.ribbon.InvalidateControl("SkLabelTest2");
}
And also added this in the beginning of my ribbon class.
private Office.IRibbonUI ribbon;
I hope it helps.
I have a list of items that goes to another page, That page is hooked up to a view model. In the constructor of this view model I have code that grabs data from the server for that particular item.
What I found is that when I hit the back button and choose another item fromt hat list and it goes to the other page the constructor does not get hit.
I think it is because the VM is now created and thinks it does not need a new one. I am wondering how do I force a cleanup so that a fresh one is always grabbed when I select from my list?
I faced the same issue, that's how i solved it.
Have a BaseView class, override OnNavigatedTo
protected override void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
base.OnNavigatedTo(e);
if (NavigatedToCommand != null && NavigatedToCommand.CanExecute(null))
NavigatedToCommand.Execute(null);
}
add DependencyProperty.
public static readonly DependencyProperty NavigatedToCommandProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("NavigatedToCommand", typeof(ICommand), typeof(BaseView), null);
public ICommand NavigatedToCommand
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(NavigatedToCommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(NavigatedToCommandProperty, value); }
}
On the necessary pages, add to xaml (and, of course, inherit BaseView )
NavigatedToCommand="{Binding OnNavigatedToCommand}"
In the ViewModel, make command itself
public RelayCommand OnNavigatedToCommand
{ get { return new RelayCommand(OnNavigatedTo); } }
and implement method you want to call to update list
public async void OnNavigatedTo()
{
var result = await myDataService.UpdateMyList();
if (result.Status == OK)
MyList = result.List;
}
So, now, every time you navigate to page with list, inside of overriden OnNavigatedTo(), a NavigatedToCommand would be executed, which would execute OnNavigatedToCommand (which you set in xaml), which would call OnNavigatedTo, which would update your list.
A bit messy, but MVVM :)
EDIT: What about cleanings, they can be done in OnNavigatedFrom(), which works the same. Or OnNavigatingFrom(), which also can be useful in some cases.
i have a little problem with javafx. i added a change listener like this:
private final ChangeListener<String> pageItemSelected = new ChangeListener<String>()
{
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends String> observable, String oldValue, String newValue){
pageGotSelected(newValue);
}
};
now to the problem: if i change an page item like this:
guiPageList.setValue(model.getCurrentTargetPage());
the event gets also(as it get by selecting something with the mouse or key) fired. is there a way to disable the event firing or another way?
i need the event only, if the element got selected by the user and not if i change it with the setValue() function...
perhaps consuming the event, but i don´t know what kind of event this would be.
thanks in advance!!!
You can temporarily remove the listener and add it again:
guiPageList.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().removeListener(pageItemSelected);
guiPageList.setValue(model.getCurrentTargetPage());
guiPageList.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(pageItemSelected);
Alternatively you could decorate the listener with another listener implementation, the code would be something like:
class InvalidationListenerEventBlocker implements InvalidationListener {
InvalidationListener decoratedListener;
boolean block;
public void invalidated(Observable observable) {
if(!block) {
decoratedListener.invalidated(observable);
}
}
}
Add a setter for the block boolean and send the listener in through the constructor. Set block to true to stop events.
This is very old question, but I came to some solution I personally use, that's reusable and does not require storing a reference to the listener (but it needs a reference to the exposing/muffling property thou).
So first the concept: we're going to create lambda (InvalidationListener), that is going to be called only if above mentioned exposing/muffling property is set to true/false. For that we are going to define another functional interface that provides described behavior:
#FunctionalInterface
private interface ManageableInvalidationListener
extends InvalidationListener {
public static InvalidationListener exposing(
BooleanProperty expose,
ManageableInvalidationListener listener) {
return ob -> {
if (expose.get()) {
listener.invalidate(ob);
}
};
}
public static InvalidationListener muffling(
BooleanProperty muffle,
ManageableInvalidationListener listener) {
return ob -> {
if (!muffle.get()) {
listener.invalidated(ob);
}
}
}
public abstract void invalidated(Observable ob);
}
This interface defines two static methods we're going to use in our code. We pass a steering property as first argument (it will tell if listener should be called) and actual implementation to be performed, when it will be called. Please note, that there is no need to extend InvalidationListener, but I'd like to keep ManageableInvalidationListener in sync with InvalidationListener.
So we would call exposing if we need to create a (manageabale) listener that would notify the (invalidation) listener if expose property has value of true. In other case we would create the listener with muffling, if true of the steering property would mean, well, to muffle the notification.
How to use it?
//- Let's make life easier and import expose method statically
import static ManageableInvalidationListener.exposing;
// ...
//- This is the steering property.
BooleanProperty notify = new SimpleBooleanProperty(true);
//- This is our main property with the listener.
ObjectProperty<Foobar> foobar = new SimpleObjectProperty<>();
//- Let's say we are going to notify the listener, if the
// notify property is set to true.
foobar.addListener(exposing(notify, ob -> {
//- Here comes the InvalidListener code.
}));
And then somewhere in the code:
//- Listener will be notified as usual.
foobar.set(new Foobar());
//- Now temporarily disable notifications.
notify.set(false);
//- The listener will not get the notification this time.
foobar.set(new Foobar());
//- Re-enable notifications.
notify.set(true);
Hope this somehow helps. You're free to use the code in this post as pleases you.
I get this error when opening one specific form. The rest is working fine and I have no clue why this one isn't.
Error: An attempt has been made to Attach or Add an entity that is not new, perhaps having been loaded from another DataContext. This is not supported.
I get the error at _oDBConnection when I try to save. When I watch _oDBConnection while running through the code, it does not exist. Even when I open the main-window it does not exist. So this form is where the DataContext is built for the very first time.
Every class inherits from clsBase where the DataContext is built.
My collegue is the professional one who built it all. I am just expanding and using it (learned it by doing it). But now I'm stuck and he is on holiday. So keep it simple :-)
What can it be?
clsPermanency
namespace Reservation
{
class clsPermanency : clsBase
{
private tblPermanency _oPermanency;
public tblPermanency PermanencyData
{
get { return _oPermanency; }
set { _oPermanency = value; }
}
public clsPermanency()
: base()
{
_oPermanency = new tblPermanency();
}
public clsPermanency(int iID)
: this()
{
_oPermanency = (from oPermanencyData in _oDBConnection.tblPermanencies
where oPermanencyData.ID == iID
select oPermanencyData).First();
if (_oPermanency == null)
throw new Exception("Permanentie niet gevonden");
}
public void save()
{
if (_oPermanency.ID == 0)
{
_oDBConnection.tblPermanencies.InsertOnSubmit(_oPermanency);
}
_oDBConnection.SubmitChanges();
}
}
}
clsBase
public class clsBase
{
protected DBReservationDataContext _oDBConnection;
protected int _iID;
public int ID
{
get { return _iID; }
}
public DBReservationDataContext DBConnection
{
get { return _oDBConnection; }
}
public clsBase()
{
_oDBConnection = new DBReservationDataContext();
}
}
Not a direct answer, but this is really bad design, sorry.
Issues:
One context instance per class instance. Pretty incredible. How are you going to manage units of work and transactions? And what about memory consumption and performance?
Indirection: every entity instance (prefixed o) is wrapped in a cls class. What a hassle to make classes cooperate, if necessary, or to access their properties.
DRY: far from it. Does each clsBase derivative have the same methods as clsPermanency?
Constructors: you always have to call the base constructor. The constructor with int iID always causes a redundant new object to be created, which will certainly be a noticeable performance hit when dealing with larger numbers. A minor change in constructor logic may cause the sequence of constructor invocations to change. (Nested and inherited constructors are always tricky).
Exception handling: you need a try-catch everywhere where classes are created. (BTW: First() will throw its own exception if the record is not there).
Finally, not a real issue, but class and variable name prefixes are sooo 19xx.
What to do?
I don't think you can change your colleague's design in his absence. But I'd really talk to him about it in due time. Just study some linq-to-sql examples out there to pick up some regular patterns.
The exception indicates that somewhere between fetching the _oPermanency instance (in the Id-d constructor) and saving it a new _oDBConnection is created. The code as shown does not reveal how this could happen, but I assume there is more code than this. When you debug and check GetHashCode() of _oDBConnection instances you should be able to find where it happens.