I have a Locations controller and Location model
I want to use the the Location model in another controller but calling
geddy.models.Locations.all(...);
does not work. It says Locations is undefined.
How do I make it load the model manually? Or should I create a function in the Locations controller to grab the data using a request on the client or a call directly to the controller on the sever?
Looks like you're pluralizing Locations when it should be singular: Location - hope this helps.
Related
Basically what i want to do is that 1 Controller handels two store functions called like this:
public function singleupload(){
..some code
}
and
public function multiupload(){
..some code too
}
as i continued to define the routes (get/post)
Route::get('/MultiUpload', 'controller#MultiUpload');
Route::get('/SingleUpload', 'controller#SingleUpload');
Route::post('/MultiUpload', 'controller#storeMulti');
Route::post('/SingleUpload', 'controller#storeSingle');
and as i tried to post some data to my database it tells me that there is no 'store' function. So i opened the docs and found this:
POST /photos store photos.store
So my question is can i create two store functions in one controller or do i have to create a different one so every route has its own controller with its own store function?
You are doing some things wrong.
First of all follow Repository Pattern.
You should always write all common functions in Repository which can be accessible in entire Project.
You should use controller only to fetch the request from the Route and pass all the logic to the Repository.
These Process will help you reduce all you coding lines.
Hope this helps !!!
cheers!!
NO you don't need to create new Controller. You can add new action for this.
But it also, depends on the how is your application functionality.
Normally, i personally recommended to create generic function or traits or add the functionality in base controller.
you can handle multiple store functions in one controller there is no need to create 2 different controllers.
I have one module Foo in my codeigniter HMVC. Also I have an api controller inside my application/controllers. I want to load a model inside application/module/foo/models from application/controllers/testapi
I have tested it by autoload as
$autoload['model'] = array('foo/Foo_model');
and called from testapi
$this->load->model('Foo_model');
But its not working
Try
$this->load->model('foo/foo_model');
from your controller.
then call model's function like this
$this->foo_model->function_name();
save model in application/modules/foo/models/Foo_model.php
CodeIgniter loads all possible models from application/models, I would suggest you modify the path of your models to something like application/models/modules with this you can load your model using
$this->load->model('modules/foo/Foo_model')
If you do want to retain your folder structure, I suggest you look at the constant paths of CodeIgniter and start modifying them to your will (although this is not really recommended).
I am new to MVC. Someone please tell me that is it necessary to have a controller for every model, or we can use a single controller for more than one models. Your answers will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
You don't need to have a controller for each model, the controller interacts with views and data, so each controller can have more than one model depending of what you want to do and how you want to do it.
The answer is "YES", we can use a single controller for more than one models. Besides, I want to make you clear that a controller doesnt't have any model. A controller use(not have) one or more models. They(controller and models) are not bind with one another. A model can be used in different controllers at the same time a controller can use as much model as it needs to use.
You can load any number of model in one controller or a model can be loaded in multiple controller. codeigniter is not following any convention and hence you can use it as you want.
If i use the MVC pattern to create my Spring project, is it wrong to call the Controller from the View?
Is this schema right?:
View calls the Controller
Controller performs operations and put data result into the Model
View reads data from the Model
Edit:
In my index jsp there is a menu with several categories of articles. I want to pass the name of the category to the controller. The controller calls the method of a beans which executes a query and returns the list of articles presents into the database.The Controller puts this list into the model and the View read this list from the Model.
Thanks
What you say (in your comments) is not specially wrong, but it does not make sense.
Either the categories are known when you build the view, and then it is the controller role to collate all information and put it into the model before calling the view with the model.
Or the category is chosen through a user interaction. But at this moment, the JSP is over for a long time : the response has been committed and transmitted to the browser. The only possibility is to prepare a new request (with a form or with ajax), send this new request to the server, where it will be handled by a controller, which will collate data into a (new) model and pass it all to a view
Depends what you mean by calling. But yes, View doesn't know anything about the controllers. It sends HttpRequests, and than the mechanism doing what you describe kicks in. There's the famous schema from spring docs, basically your bullets described via diagram. The point with respect to your question is that the view doesn't call the controller rather sends the request
I think you will find your answers in article mentioned below :
http://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/2.5.3/reference/mvc.html
I need to call a controller say 'faq_view' inside admin controller as the URL structure admin/faq_view like this how I can do this?
e.g:
site.com/maincontroller/function
site.com/maincontroller/othercontroller/function
Then, just redirect the page. Else if you want to just call the function, call it via AJAX.
It depends what you exactly want to do. If you want to just invoke the function, its not the right way. Controller as it defines itself controls the flow of the pages that comes on sequence. Controller is responsible to send commands to its associated view to change the view's presentation of the model.
So, if you are saying you want to call controller within another controller, that should mean you are about to redirect to another page.
Updated answer:
Just assume you have new_function on maincontroller that calls the function from othercontroller. The function does not need to be defined on othercontroller.
Add the following line on routes.php.
$routes['maincontroller/new_function'] = 'othercontroller/new_function';
Now, you can call the function of othercontroller as maincontroller/new_function.
You can always call a controller inside another controller, but this only works for calling one controller as far as I have tried. Let's say you are trying to load a controller inside a controller. You can try this:
$this->load->library('../controllers/myothercontroller');
Then do this:
$this->myothercontroller->function_name();
That's it! You can now access any function inside myothercontroller (controller) in your current controller. I hope this helps too.
Your controllers are part of the presentation layer and should not contain application logic. That means you should never need to call a controller from another controller, instead refactor your application and move the domain logic to the model layer.
Now if you have a method that you need in multiple controllers, say for example you need a template method that automatically adds your header and footer views.
If that is the case, create a base class that your controllers extend.
If you are talking about just a routing issue, then just use the routes file for that. I don't like the CI automatic routing and it should be avoided as it will result in duplicate URLs for the same resource.