In Visual Studio, is it possible to edit assembly language code while stepping through each statement (so that statements in the program can be modified while the program is running?) It would be useful to modify statements in a program while the program is running (for debugging purposes), but I'm not sure if this is possible yet.
You can modify the source code, but it doesn't get reassembled to produce a new binary during your debugging session. The debugger will tell you the "source no longer matches the code" but you can still step. Your display may be confusing because, well, the source code no longer matches the object code :-} I often add comments to instructions or in blank lines, which gets me the complaint, but you can still single-step and see the right source lines in this special case.
I think you can manually modify the memory containing the instruction you want to patch. I've not ever bothered to do this; its easier to set a breakpoint where I'm at, re-assemble, and then run till the breakpoint.
You can modify all the registers and data memory pretty easily (actually you have to use this to modify the code memory, I think!).
A really useful thing to do is "Set Next Statement" to set the PC back to a somewhat earlier place in the code; you can often then step forward to point of failure, if the registers and memory aren't changed. (put cursor in your source or disassembly window, click on a line, then right-click "Set Next Statement")
Related
Most debuggers with GUI have a useful function run to cursor. Is there any similar way of doing this in gdb?
I'm talking about assembly mode debugging (without source code).
For example, it currently break at: 0x400000, I'd like to run to 0x400100, there're lots of instructions between them. To do this, I have to:
set breakpoint at 0x400100 with b *0x400100,
continue with c
delete breakpoint with d ...
It is lots of typing, and I need to do this frequently. Any simpler way of doing this?
You are looking for either "until" or "advance" command.
Details in GDB manual chapter Continuing and Stepping.
If stopping on frame exit is problematic, you can still use tbreak, which sets temporary breakpoint, which is automatically deleted once it is hit.
I rarely used the netbeans debugger but I have this bug in my program which I'm trying to get to the bottom of. Basically my program searches a binary file (4.5gb) for a seqeunce of bytes and writes it to file. However, the programm always stalls at this specific point in the file when reading near halfway of the file (~2gb). They way I using the debugger if putting a breakpoint and keep "continuing" the debugger until it reaches that point in the file but it's going to take forever to reach the 2gb mark. I'm guessing there's a better way to use the debugger which I'm not aware of. Any suggestions?
Netbeans supports conditional breakpoints. If you add a breakpoint via the menu "Debug / New Breakpoint" (or just hit Ctrl+Shift+F8) you can specify a condition (either how often the breakpoint has to be hit until it execution is halted on this breakpoint or an expression).
You could keep a count of how much data you have processed, and add an if() block which checks whether you are up to the 2GB mark. Put a dummy command inside the if() block, and add a breakpoint on the dummy command; this will only be reached when you have processed sufficient data.
i have found myself several times in the need of knowing the last values set to a range of variables that were in a certain portion of code, or method; maybe dispersed around the program.
does anyone know a way to select variables and know the last value set to them after the program ends running - in a windows maybe ?
There isn't anything I know of that will record every value ever assigned to every variable in your program in case you want to look at it later. It is possible with VS2010's historical debugging abilities to look at "values from the past" although I haven't used this yet, so I don't know if that ability extends "beyond death" of the process.
You may also be able to use tracepoints (VS2008 and later). These are like breakpoints, but instead of stopping execution they simply print information to the debug output. So you could add a tracepoint for a variable so that each time it is changed its value is reported (basically the same as printing the values out in your code, but you don't have to change your code to enable them, and can add them while your code is executing).
Two simple approaches that will work for pretty much any dev environment are:
Write the values to an application log each time they change, then read the last reported entries. If you realise you need 5 values from all around the program, simply printing them to the debug output will only take a few seconds to add to your program. (If you can't do this easily, then you're not encapsulating your data very well).
Put a breakpoint on the destructor of the class you're interested in, or at the start of the shutdown process just before you destroy the objects, or the last line of code in your program (for statics) (etc) and just use the debugger to drill down into the data.
Is it possible for the debugger (or the CLR exception handler) to show the line where the exception happened in Release mode using the pdb?
The code, in release mode, is optimized and do not always follow the order and logic of the "original" code.
It's also surprising that the debugger can navigate through my code step by step, even in Release mode. The optimization should make the navigation very inconfortable.
Could you please clarify those two points for me?
I'm not as familiar with how this is done with CLR, but it's probably very similar to how it's done with native code. When the compiler generates machine instructions, it adds entries to the pdb that basically say "the instruction at the current address, X, came from line 25 in foo.cpp".
The debugger knows what program address is currently executing. So it looks up some address, X, in the pdb and sees that it came from line 25 in foo.cpp. Using this, it's able to "step" through your source code.
This process is the same regardless of Debug or Release mode (provided that a pdb is generated at all in Release mode). You are right, however, that often in release mode due to optimizations the debugger won't step "linearly" through the code. It might jump around to different lines unexpectedly. This is due to the optimizer changing the order of instructions, but it doesn't change the address-to-source-line mapping, so the debugger is still able to follow it.
[#Not Sure] has it almost right. The compiler makes a best effort at identifying an appropriate line number that closely matches the current machine code instruction.
The PDB and the debugger don't know anything about optimizations; the PDB file essentially maps address locations in the machine code to source code line numbers. In optimized code, it's not always possible to match exactly an assembly instruction to a specific line of source code, so the compiler will write to the PDB the closest thing it has at hand. This might be "the source code line before", or "the source code line of the enclosing context (loop, etc)" or something else.
Regardless, the debugger essentially finds the entry in the PDB map closest (as in "before or equal") to the current IP (Instruction Pointer) and highlights that line.
Sometimes the match is not very good, and that's when you see the highlighted area jumping all over the place.
The debugger makes a best-effort guess at where the problem occurred. It is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate, and with fully optimized code, it often will be inaccurate - I've found the inaccuracies ranging anywhere from a few lines off to having an entirely wrong call stack.
How accurate the debugger is with optimized code really depends on the code itself and which optimizations you're making.
Reference the following SO question:
Display lines number in stack trace for .NET assembly in release mode
I'm trying to watch the execution of a VB6 app and I'm running into an issue because once I enter the debugger and then hit Continue, it no longer lets me step through the code until I hit another break point. I want to be able to execute a program without stepping through something until I hit a point where I want to watch it execute. Ideally this would be something to the effect of holding a key down while I pressed a button to 'step into' that function.
Thanks in advance!
[EDIT]: I'm aware that I can use break points to stop the execution. To be more clear, the problem is that I don't know where the execution is going to, so I can't set the break point there (because I don't know where there is). That's why I essentially want to be able to say, 'after this next thing that I do, break, no matter what'. It sounds like this functionality does not exist, but I'm still keeping my fingers crossed.
While the code is running, press ctrl+break (or the 'VCR pause' button in the IDE) then press F8 (or choose 'Step Into'from the Debug menu in the IDE) to continue running the app. The next action will cause execution to break.
Note that the which causes the break will not always be the one you hoped it would be. Particularly annoying is the _MouseOver event which prevents you from doing a mouse down or a timer firing quckier than you can perform your action. Some breaks may even be fatal as regards running your app e.g. where Windows messages have been hooked (subclassing). Also consider there may not be an event handler in code (yet) for your action where it can break. But usually this technique identifies where you should be setting your breakpoint.
There is a Stop statement available for use in VB6 that will drop to the debugger when the statement is executed from code running through the IDE. (Just be sure to remove the all of the Stop statements from the code when compiling a release build.)
There are several techniques you can use.
These two have been mentioned
Using F8 and Shift-F8 to step through the program
Adding Stops (and later removing)
Others
Use a global variable to create a collection. Use it as a stack and have the subroutines you are interested in push and and pop strings. Conversely don't pop anything and you will get a trace.
Use Watches to monitor and break at selection conditions. You can setup just about any condition to break.
Make a Global String and have your procedures set when you enter them. Monitor it through a Watch.
Use Debug.Print in your code. Also Unlike Stop you can leave these in without effecting the production code.
Use the File System Object to create a text file to act as a log.
Sometimes problem only occurs in the Complied version then you need to use MsgBox or log to a text file. MsgBox can alter the behavior of complex user interactions with forms.
These are all techniques I used in debugging an application. If I had to monitor an application I would use Debug.Print. If that doesn't do the trick compile then log to a text file.
If you have something really complex going on then I recommend moving all your code out of the events into classes implementing a Command Pattern. Your commands classes should interact with the form through and interface.
In the Execute method of the command classes you will something like
<save the current state>
<Do your original code>
<save the modified state>
<push the command onto a stack>
What will happen is that you wind up with a list of all the commands you have executed (even things like mouseover) with the state they encountered and the modified state. You can then examine each object in turn to see what is happening. This is nearly the equivalent of creating Undo/Redo
Note however things like MouseOver can push a lot of classes on the command stack so you will have to structure your tests carefully or be overloaded with information. Remember you can always skip pushing the command onto the stack.
The downside of using commands is that you gone beyond debugging into redesigning. You will to decide whether the problem is worth doing this.
You can press the F8 key to step through the code line by line. Alternatively, you can press SHIFT-F8 to step through line by line.
F8 will step you in to a function, where SHIFT-F8 will step you over the function. If you click on the DEBUG menu in the VB IDE, you will see other options too.
EDIT:
You can also put a permanent break point in your code by using:
Debug.Assert False
By doing it this way, the 'breakpoint' is saved in your code. When you compile the app, debug code is ignored.