For following bash statement:
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while [ 1 ]; do echo "pre"; exit; echo "past"; done
I got "pre", but didn't quit to the bash prompt, then if I input something into /tmp/report, I could quit from this script and get into bash prompt.
I think that's reasonable. the 'exit' make the 'while' statement quit, but the 'tail' still alive. If something input into /tmp/report, the 'tail' will output to pipe, then 'tail' will detect the pipe is close, then 'tail' quits.
Am I right? If not, would anyone provide a correct interpretation?
Is it possible to add anything into 'while' statement to quit from the whole pipe statement immediately? I know I could save the pid of tail into a temporary file, then read this file in the 'while', then kill the tail. Is there a simpler way?
Let me enlarge my question. If use this tail|while in a script file, is it possible to fulfill following items simultaneously?
a. If Ctrl-C is inputed or signal the main shell process, the main shell and various subshells and background processes spawned by the main shell will quit
b. I could quit from tail|while only at a trigger case, and preserve other subprocesses keep running
c. It's better not use temporary file or pipe file.
You're correct. The while loop is executing in a subshell because its input is redirected, and exit just exits from that subshell.
If you're running bash 4.x, you may be able to achieve what you want with a coprocess.
coproc TAIL { tail -Fn0 /tmp/report.txt ;}
while [ 1 ]
do
echo "pre"
break
echo "past"
done <&${TAIL[0]}
kill $TAIL_PID
http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Coprocesses.html
With older versions, you can use a background process writing to a named pipe:
pipe=/tmp/tail.$$
mkfifo $pipe
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report.txt >$pipe &
TAIL_PID=$!
while [ 1 ]
do
echo "pre"
break
echo "past"
done <$pipe
kill $TAIL_PID
rm $pipe
You can (unreliably) get away with killing the process group:
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while :
do
echo "pre"
sh -c 'PGID=$( ps -o pgid= $$ | tr -d \ ); kill -TERM -$PGID'
echo "past"
done
This may send the signal to more processes than you want. If you run the above command in an interactive terminal you should be okay, but in a script it is entirely possible (indeed likely) the the process group will include the script running the command. To avoid sending the signal, it would be wise to enable monitoring and run the pipeline in the background to ensure that a new process group is formed for the pipeline:
#!/bin/sh
# In Posix shells that support the User Portability Utilities option
# this includes bash & ksh), executing "set -m" turns on job control.
# Background processes run in a separate process group. If the shell
# is interactive, a line containing their exit status is printed to
# stderr upon their completion.
set -m
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while :
do
echo "pre"
sh -c 'PGID=$( ps -o pgid= $$ | tr -d \ ); kill -TERM -$PGID'
echo "past"
done &
wait
Note that I've replaced the while [ 1 ] with while : because while [ 1 ] is poor style. (It behaves exactly the same as while [ 0 ]).
Related
I want to kill a bash command when I found some string in the output.
To clarify, I want the solution to be similar to a timeout command:
timeout 10s looping_program.sh
Which will execute the script: looping_program.sh and kill the script after 10 seconds of execute.
Instead I want something like:
regexout "^Success$" looping_program.sh
Which will execute the script until it matches a line that just says Success in the stdout of the program.
Note that I'm assuming that this looping_program.sh does not exit at the same time it outputs Success for whatever reason, so simply waiting for the program to exit would waste time if I don't care about what happens after that.
So something like:
bash -e looping_program.sh > /tmp/output &
PID="$(ps aux | grep looping_program.sh | head -1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -f 2 -d ' ')"
echo $PID
while :; do
echo "$(tail -1 /tmp/output)"
if [[ "$(tail -1 /tmp/output)" == "Success" ]]; then
kill $PID
exit 0
fi
sleep 1
done
Where looping_program.sh is something like:
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
echo "Success"
sleep 1;
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
echo "Fail"
sleep 1;
But that is not very robust (uses a single tmp file... might kill other programs...) and I want it to just be one command. Does something like this exist? I may just write a c program to do it if not.
P.S.: I provided my code as an example of what I wanted the program to do. It does not use good programming practices. Notes from other commenters:
#KamilCuk Do not use temporary file. Use a fifo.
#pjh Note that any approach that involves using kill with a PID in shell code runs the risk of killing the wrong process. Use kill in shell programs only when it is absolutely necessary.
There are more suggestions below from other users, I just wanted to make sure no one came across this and thought it would be good to model their code after.
looping_program() {
for i in 1 2 3; do echo $i; sleep 1; done
echo Success
yes
}
coproc looping_program
while IFS= read -r line; do
if [[ "$line" =~ Success ]]; then
break
fi
done <&${COPROC[0]}
exec {COPROC[0]}>&- {COPROC[1]}>&-
kill ${COPROC_PID}
wait ${COPROC_PID}
Notes:
Do not use temporary file. Use a fifo.
Do not use tail -n1 to read last line. Read from the stream in a loop.
Do not repeat tail -1 twice. Cache the result.
Wait for pid after killing to synchronize.
When you're using a coprocess, use COPROC_PID to get the PID
When you're not using a coprocess, use $! to get the PID of a background process started from the current shell.
When you can't use $! (because the process you're trying to get a PID of was not spawned in the background as a direct child of the current shell), do not use ps aux | grep to get the pid. Use pgrep.
Do not use echo $(stuff). Just run the stuff, no echo.
With expect
#!/usr/bin/env -S expect -f
set timeout -1
spawn ./looping_program.sh
expect "Success"
send -- "\x03"
expect eof
Call it looping_killer:
$ ./looping_killer
spawn ./looping_program.sh
Fail
Fail
Fail
Success
^C
To pass the program and pattern:
./looping_killer some_program "some pattern"
You'd change the expect script to
#!/usr/bin/env -S expect -f
set timeout -1
spawn [lindex $argv 0]
expect -- [lindex $argv 1]
send -- "\x03"
expect eof
Assuming that your looping program exists when it tries to write to a broken pipe, this will print all output up to and including the 'Success' line and then exit:
./looping_program | sed '/^Success$/q'
You may need to disable buffering of the looping program output. See Force line-buffering of stdout in a pipeline and How to make output of any shell command unbuffered? for ways to do it.
See Should I save my scripts with the .sh extension? and Erlkonig: Commandname Extensions Considered Harmful for reasons why I dropped the '.sh' suffix.
Note that any approach that involves using kill with a PID in shell code runs the risk of killing the wrong process. Use kill in shell programs only when it is absolutely necessary.
Would someone please tell me why below bash statement cannot be terminated by Ctrl+c properly?
$( { ( tail -fn0 /tmp/a.txt & )| while read line; do echo $line; done } 3>&1 )
I run this statement, then two bash processes and one tail process are launched(got from ps auxf), then input Ctrl+c, and it won't quit to the bash prompt, at this moment, I see the two bash processes stopped, while the tail is still running, then I input something into /tmp/a.txt, then we could get into bash prompt.
What I want is, input Ctrl+c, then just quit into bash prompt without any relevant process left.
It will be more appreciative that someone explains the exact process of this statement, like a pipe causes the bash fork, something redirect to somewhere, etc.
Updated at Oct 9 2014:
Here provide some update in case it's useful to you.
My adopt solution is alike with 2 factors:
use a tmp pid file
( tail -Fn0 ${monitor_file} & echo "$!" >${tail_pid} ) | \
while IFS= read -r line; do
xxxx
done
use trap like: trap "rm ${tail_pid} 2>/dev/null; kill 0 2>/dev/null; exit;" INT TERM to kill relevant processes and remove remain files.
Please note, this kill 0 2 is bash specific, and 0 means all processes in the current process group.
This solution used a tmp pid file, while I still expect other solution without tmp pid file.
It works to trap the INT signal (sent by Ctrl-C) to kill the tail process.
$( r=$RANDOM; trap '{ kill $(cat /tmp/pid$r.pid);rm /tmp/pid$r.pid;exit; }' SIGINT EXIT; { ( tail -fn0 /tmp/a.txt & echo $! > /tmp/pid$r.pid )| while read line; do echo $line; done } 3>&1 )
(I use a random value on the PID file name to at least mostly allow multiple instances to run)
I am attempting to run a couple commands in a bash script however it will hang up on my command waiting for it to complete (which it wont). this script is simply making sure its running.
#!/bin/bash
ps cax | grep python > /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Process is running."
else
echo "Process is not running... Starting..."
python likebot.py
echo $(ps aux | grep python | grep -v color | awk {'print $2'})
fi
Once it gets to the python command it hangs up while the command is being executed. its not till i cntrl c before it gives the pid. is there anyway i can have it run this bash script and exit the bash script once the commands were run (without waiting for them to complete).
In general, if you want to execute a command and not wait for it, you can simply use & as the delimiter rather than ; or a newline. When doing so, the pid of that process is available to the shell in the special variable !. If you want to wait for that process to complete, you can use wait. If you do not wish to wait for it, then simply omit the wait. In your case:
python likebot.py & # Start command asynchronously
echo $! # echo the pid of the most recent asynchronous process
Since it looks like likebot should be always running you might want to consider 'nohup' as well, with a bare & the job is still a child of your login process and will die if that dies.
Suppose I have test.sh as below. The intent is to run some background task(s) by this script, that continuously updates some file. If the background task is terminated for some reason, it should be started again.
#!/bin/sh
if [ -f pidfile ] && kill -0 $(cat pidfile); then
cat somewhere
exit
fi
while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done &
echo $! > pidfile
and want to call it like ./test.sh | otherprogram, e. g. ./test.sh | cat.
The pipe is not being closed as the background process still exists and might produce some output. How can I tell the pipe to close at the end of test.sh? Is there a better way than checking for existence of pidfile before calling the pipe command?
As a variant I tried using #!/bin/bash and disown at the end of test.sh, but it is still waiting for the pipe to be closed.
What I actually try to achieve: I have a "status" script which collects the output of various scripts (uptime, free, date, get-xy-from-dbus, etc.), similar to this test.sh here. The output of the script is passed to my window manager, which displays it. It's also used in my GNU screen bottom line.
Since some of the scripts that are used might take some time to create output, I want to detach them from output collection. So I put them in a while true; do script; sleep 1; done loop, which is started if it is not running yet.
The problem here is now that I don't know how to tell the calling script to "really" detach the daemon process.
See if this serves your purpose:
(I am assuming that you are not interested in any stderr of commands in while loop. You would adjust the code, if you are. :-) )
#!/bin/bash
if [ -f pidfile ] && kill -0 $(cat pidfile); then
cat somewhere
exit
fi
while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done >/dev/null 2>&1 &
echo $! > pidfile
If you want to explicitly close a file descriptor, like for example 1 which is standard output, you can do it with:
exec 1<&-
This is valid for POSIX shells, see: here
When you put the while loop in an explicit subshell and run the subshell in the background it will give the desired behaviour.
(while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done)&
How can you suppress the Terminated message that comes up after you kill a
process in a bash script?
I tried set +bm, but that doesn't work.
I know another solution involves calling exec 2> /dev/null, but is that
reliable? How do I reset it back so that I can continue to see stderr?
In order to silence the message, you must be redirecting stderr at the time the message is generated. Because the kill command sends a signal and doesn't wait for the target process to respond, redirecting stderr of the kill command does you no good. The bash builtin wait was made specifically for this purpose.
Here is very simple example that kills the most recent background command. (Learn more about $! here.)
kill $!
wait $! 2>/dev/null
Because both kill and wait accept multiple pids, you can also do batch kills. Here is an example that kills all background processes (of the current process/script of course).
kill $(jobs -rp)
wait $(jobs -rp) 2>/dev/null
I was led here from bash: silently kill background function process.
The short answer is that you can't. Bash always prints the status of foreground jobs. The monitoring flag only applies for background jobs, and only for interactive shells, not scripts.
see notify_of_job_status() in jobs.c.
As you say, you can redirect so standard error is pointing to /dev/null but then you miss any other error messages. You can make it temporary by doing the redirection in a subshell which runs the script. This leaves the original environment alone.
(script 2> /dev/null)
which will lose all error messages, but just from that script, not from anything else run in that shell.
You can save and restore standard error, by redirecting a new filedescriptor to point there:
exec 3>&2 # 3 is now a copy of 2
exec 2> /dev/null # 2 now points to /dev/null
script # run script with redirected stderr
exec 2>&3 # restore stderr to saved
exec 3>&- # close saved version
But I wouldn't recommend this -- the only upside from the first one is that it saves a sub-shell invocation, while being more complicated and, possibly even altering the behavior of the script, if the script alters file descriptors.
EDIT:
For more appropriate answer check answer given by Mark Edgar
Solution: use SIGINT (works only in non-interactive shells)
Demo:
cat > silent.sh <<"EOF"
sleep 100 &
kill -INT $!
sleep 1
EOF
sh silent.sh
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/15798
Maybe detach the process from the current shell process by calling disown?
The Terminated is logged by the default signal handler of bash 3.x and 4.x. Just trap the TERM signal at the very first of child process:
#!/bin/sh
## assume script name is test.sh
foo() {
trap 'exit 0' TERM ## here is the key
while true; do sleep 1; done
}
echo before child
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
foo &
pid=$!
sleep 1 # wait trap is done
echo before kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
kill $pid ## no need to redirect stdin/stderr
sleep 1 # wait kill is done
echo after kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
Is this what we are all looking for?
Not wanted:
$ sleep 3 &
[1] 234
<pressing enter a few times....>
$
$
[1]+ Done sleep 3
$
Wanted:
$ (set +m; sleep 3 &)
<again, pressing enter several times....>
$
$
$
$
$
As you can see, no job end message. Works for me in bash scripts as well, also for killed background processes.
'set +m' disables job control (see 'help set') for the current shell. So if you enter your command in a subshell (as done here in brackets) you will not influence the job control settings of the current shell. Only disadvantage is that you need to get the pid of your background process back to the current shell if you want to check whether it has terminated, or evaluate the return code.
This also works for killall (for those who prefer it):
killall -s SIGINT (yourprogram)
suppresses the message... I was running mpg123 in background mode.
It could only silently be killed by sending a ctrl-c (SIGINT) instead of a SIGTERM (default).
disown did exactly the right thing for me -- the exec 3>&2 is risky for a lot of reasons -- set +bm didn't seem to work inside a script, only at the command prompt
Had success with adding 'jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null' to the script, not certain if it will help anyone else's script, but here is a sample.
while true; do echo $RANDOM; done | while read line
do
echo Random is $line the last jobid is $(jobs -lp)
jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null
sleep 3
done
Another way to disable job notifications is to place your command to be backgrounded in a sh -c 'cmd &' construct.
#!/bin/bash
# ...
pid="`sh -c 'sleep 30 & echo ${!}' | head -1`"
kill "$pid"
# ...
# or put several cmds in sh -c '...' construct
sh -c '
sleep 30 &
pid="${!}"
sleep 5
kill "${pid}"
'
I found that putting the kill command in a function and then backgrounding the function suppresses the termination output
function killCmd() {
kill $1
}
killCmd $somePID &
Simple:
{ kill $! } 2>/dev/null
Advantage? can use any signal
ex:
{ kill -9 $PID } 2>/dev/null