How can you suppress the Terminated message that comes up after you kill a
process in a bash script?
I tried set +bm, but that doesn't work.
I know another solution involves calling exec 2> /dev/null, but is that
reliable? How do I reset it back so that I can continue to see stderr?
In order to silence the message, you must be redirecting stderr at the time the message is generated. Because the kill command sends a signal and doesn't wait for the target process to respond, redirecting stderr of the kill command does you no good. The bash builtin wait was made specifically for this purpose.
Here is very simple example that kills the most recent background command. (Learn more about $! here.)
kill $!
wait $! 2>/dev/null
Because both kill and wait accept multiple pids, you can also do batch kills. Here is an example that kills all background processes (of the current process/script of course).
kill $(jobs -rp)
wait $(jobs -rp) 2>/dev/null
I was led here from bash: silently kill background function process.
The short answer is that you can't. Bash always prints the status of foreground jobs. The monitoring flag only applies for background jobs, and only for interactive shells, not scripts.
see notify_of_job_status() in jobs.c.
As you say, you can redirect so standard error is pointing to /dev/null but then you miss any other error messages. You can make it temporary by doing the redirection in a subshell which runs the script. This leaves the original environment alone.
(script 2> /dev/null)
which will lose all error messages, but just from that script, not from anything else run in that shell.
You can save and restore standard error, by redirecting a new filedescriptor to point there:
exec 3>&2 # 3 is now a copy of 2
exec 2> /dev/null # 2 now points to /dev/null
script # run script with redirected stderr
exec 2>&3 # restore stderr to saved
exec 3>&- # close saved version
But I wouldn't recommend this -- the only upside from the first one is that it saves a sub-shell invocation, while being more complicated and, possibly even altering the behavior of the script, if the script alters file descriptors.
EDIT:
For more appropriate answer check answer given by Mark Edgar
Solution: use SIGINT (works only in non-interactive shells)
Demo:
cat > silent.sh <<"EOF"
sleep 100 &
kill -INT $!
sleep 1
EOF
sh silent.sh
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/15798
Maybe detach the process from the current shell process by calling disown?
The Terminated is logged by the default signal handler of bash 3.x and 4.x. Just trap the TERM signal at the very first of child process:
#!/bin/sh
## assume script name is test.sh
foo() {
trap 'exit 0' TERM ## here is the key
while true; do sleep 1; done
}
echo before child
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
foo &
pid=$!
sleep 1 # wait trap is done
echo before kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
kill $pid ## no need to redirect stdin/stderr
sleep 1 # wait kill is done
echo after kill
ps aux | grep 'test\.s[h]\|slee[p]'
Is this what we are all looking for?
Not wanted:
$ sleep 3 &
[1] 234
<pressing enter a few times....>
$
$
[1]+ Done sleep 3
$
Wanted:
$ (set +m; sleep 3 &)
<again, pressing enter several times....>
$
$
$
$
$
As you can see, no job end message. Works for me in bash scripts as well, also for killed background processes.
'set +m' disables job control (see 'help set') for the current shell. So if you enter your command in a subshell (as done here in brackets) you will not influence the job control settings of the current shell. Only disadvantage is that you need to get the pid of your background process back to the current shell if you want to check whether it has terminated, or evaluate the return code.
This also works for killall (for those who prefer it):
killall -s SIGINT (yourprogram)
suppresses the message... I was running mpg123 in background mode.
It could only silently be killed by sending a ctrl-c (SIGINT) instead of a SIGTERM (default).
disown did exactly the right thing for me -- the exec 3>&2 is risky for a lot of reasons -- set +bm didn't seem to work inside a script, only at the command prompt
Had success with adding 'jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null' to the script, not certain if it will help anyone else's script, but here is a sample.
while true; do echo $RANDOM; done | while read line
do
echo Random is $line the last jobid is $(jobs -lp)
jobs 2>&1 >/dev/null
sleep 3
done
Another way to disable job notifications is to place your command to be backgrounded in a sh -c 'cmd &' construct.
#!/bin/bash
# ...
pid="`sh -c 'sleep 30 & echo ${!}' | head -1`"
kill "$pid"
# ...
# or put several cmds in sh -c '...' construct
sh -c '
sleep 30 &
pid="${!}"
sleep 5
kill "${pid}"
'
I found that putting the kill command in a function and then backgrounding the function suppresses the termination output
function killCmd() {
kill $1
}
killCmd $somePID &
Simple:
{ kill $! } 2>/dev/null
Advantage? can use any signal
ex:
{ kill -9 $PID } 2>/dev/null
Related
I'm running a shell test program that I can view a progress bar but when I run it I keep getting a unary error . Is kill -0 a way to kill a subprocess in shell ?
Or is there another method to test if my process has died?
heres my code to run a progress bar until my command ends:
#!/bin/sh
# test my progress bar
spin[0]="-"
spin[1]="\\"
spin[2]="|"
spin[3]="/"
sleep 10 2>/dev/null & # run as background process
pid=$! # grab process id
echo -n "[sleeping] ${spin[0]}"
while [ kill -0 $pid ] # wait for process to end
do
for i in "${spin[#]}"
do
echo -ne "\b$i"
sleep 0.1
done
done
enter code here
1. Is kill -0 a way to kill a subprocess in shell ?
On Linux OS, kill -0 is just a way to try to kill a process and see what happens, '0' is not a POSIX signal, it does nothing at all.
If the process is running, kill will return 0, if not, it will return 1.
ps $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 could do the same job.
To kill a process, one generally use the SIGQUIT/3 (quit program) or SIGKILL/9 (terminate program) ; the process could trap the signal and make a clean exit, or it could ignore the signal so the OS has to terminate it 'quick and dirty'.
2. test and '['
The square bracket '[' is an utility ( /bin/[ ), and expect something you didn't provide correctly.
The syntax of while is while list; do list; done where list will return an exit code, so you don't have to use something else.
3. how do I watch for a process to have died in shell script?
Like you did, the code below will do the job:
#!/bin/bash
spin[0]="-"
spin[1]="\\"
spin[2]="|"
spin[3]="/"
sleep 10 2>/dev/null & # run as background process
pid=$! # grab process id
echo -n "[sleeping] ${spin[0]}"
#while ps -p $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 # using ps
while kill -0 $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 # using kill
do
for i in "${spin[#]}"
do
echo -ne "\b$i"
sleep 0.5
done
done
CAVEATS
I use /bin/bash as interpreter, as some of the Bourne Shell (sh) could not support the use of an array (ie spin[n]).
It's probably cleaner to run the spinner in the background and kill it when the process (running in the foreground) terminates. Or, you could open another file descriptor and write something into it after the background process terminates, and have the main process block on a read. eg:
#!/bin/bash
# test my progress bar
spin[0]='-'
spin[1]='\'
spin[2]='|'
spin[3]='/'
{ { { sleep 10 2>/dev/null; echo >&5; } & # run as background process
} 5>&1 1>&3 | { # wait for process to end
while ! read -t 1; do
printf "\r[sleeping] ${spin[ $(( i = ++i % 4 )) ]}"
done
}
} 3>&1
By referencing bash: silently kill background function process and Timeout a command in bash without unnecessary delay, I wrote my own script to set a timeout for a command, as well as silencing the kill message.
But I still am getting a "Terminated" message when my process gets killed. What's wrong with my code?
#!/bin/bash
silent_kill() {
kill $1 2>/dev/null
wait $1 2>/dev/null
}
timeout() {
limit=$1 #timeout limit
shift
command=$* #command to run
interval=1 #default interval between checks if the process is still alive
delay=1 #default delay between SIGTERM and SIGKILL
(
((t = limit))
while ((t > 0)); do
sleep $interval;
#kill -0 $$ || exit 0
((t -= interval))
done
silent_kill $$
#kill -s SIGTERM $$ && kill -0 $$ || exit 0
sleep $delay
#kill -s SIGKILL $$
) &> /dev/null &
exec $*
}
timeout 1 sleep 10
There's nothing wrong with your code, that "Terminated" message doesn't come from your script but from the invoking shell (the one you launch your script
from).
You can deactivate if by disabling job control:
$ set +m
$ bash <your timeout script>
Perhaps bash has moved on in 4 years. I do know you can avoid
getting Terminated by disowning a child process. You can no longer job control it though. Eg:
$ sleep 100 &
[1] 15436
$ disown -r
$ kill -9 15436
help disown:
disown [-h] [-ar] [jobspec ...]
Remove jobs from current shell.
Removes each JOBSPEC argument from the table of active jobs. Without
any JOBSPECs, the shell uses its notion of the current job.
-a remove all jobs if JOBSPEC is not supplied
-h mark each JOBSPEC so that SIGHUP is not sent to the job if the shell receives a SIGHUP
-r remove only running jobs
Internally the shell maintains a list of children it forked and wait()s for any of them to exit or be killed. When a child's exit status was collected, the shell prints a message. This is called monitoring in shell parlance.
It seems you want to turn off monitoring. Monitoring is managed with the m option; to turn it on, use set -m (the default at startup). To turn it off, set +m.
Note that monitoring off also disables messages for asynchronous jobs, e.g. no more messages like
$ sleep 5 &
[1] 59468
$
[1] + done sleep 5
$
For following bash statement:
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while [ 1 ]; do echo "pre"; exit; echo "past"; done
I got "pre", but didn't quit to the bash prompt, then if I input something into /tmp/report, I could quit from this script and get into bash prompt.
I think that's reasonable. the 'exit' make the 'while' statement quit, but the 'tail' still alive. If something input into /tmp/report, the 'tail' will output to pipe, then 'tail' will detect the pipe is close, then 'tail' quits.
Am I right? If not, would anyone provide a correct interpretation?
Is it possible to add anything into 'while' statement to quit from the whole pipe statement immediately? I know I could save the pid of tail into a temporary file, then read this file in the 'while', then kill the tail. Is there a simpler way?
Let me enlarge my question. If use this tail|while in a script file, is it possible to fulfill following items simultaneously?
a. If Ctrl-C is inputed or signal the main shell process, the main shell and various subshells and background processes spawned by the main shell will quit
b. I could quit from tail|while only at a trigger case, and preserve other subprocesses keep running
c. It's better not use temporary file or pipe file.
You're correct. The while loop is executing in a subshell because its input is redirected, and exit just exits from that subshell.
If you're running bash 4.x, you may be able to achieve what you want with a coprocess.
coproc TAIL { tail -Fn0 /tmp/report.txt ;}
while [ 1 ]
do
echo "pre"
break
echo "past"
done <&${TAIL[0]}
kill $TAIL_PID
http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Coprocesses.html
With older versions, you can use a background process writing to a named pipe:
pipe=/tmp/tail.$$
mkfifo $pipe
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report.txt >$pipe &
TAIL_PID=$!
while [ 1 ]
do
echo "pre"
break
echo "past"
done <$pipe
kill $TAIL_PID
rm $pipe
You can (unreliably) get away with killing the process group:
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while :
do
echo "pre"
sh -c 'PGID=$( ps -o pgid= $$ | tr -d \ ); kill -TERM -$PGID'
echo "past"
done
This may send the signal to more processes than you want. If you run the above command in an interactive terminal you should be okay, but in a script it is entirely possible (indeed likely) the the process group will include the script running the command. To avoid sending the signal, it would be wise to enable monitoring and run the pipeline in the background to ensure that a new process group is formed for the pipeline:
#!/bin/sh
# In Posix shells that support the User Portability Utilities option
# this includes bash & ksh), executing "set -m" turns on job control.
# Background processes run in a separate process group. If the shell
# is interactive, a line containing their exit status is printed to
# stderr upon their completion.
set -m
tail -Fn0 /tmp/report | while :
do
echo "pre"
sh -c 'PGID=$( ps -o pgid= $$ | tr -d \ ); kill -TERM -$PGID'
echo "past"
done &
wait
Note that I've replaced the while [ 1 ] with while : because while [ 1 ] is poor style. (It behaves exactly the same as while [ 0 ]).
Suppose I have test.sh as below. The intent is to run some background task(s) by this script, that continuously updates some file. If the background task is terminated for some reason, it should be started again.
#!/bin/sh
if [ -f pidfile ] && kill -0 $(cat pidfile); then
cat somewhere
exit
fi
while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done &
echo $! > pidfile
and want to call it like ./test.sh | otherprogram, e. g. ./test.sh | cat.
The pipe is not being closed as the background process still exists and might produce some output. How can I tell the pipe to close at the end of test.sh? Is there a better way than checking for existence of pidfile before calling the pipe command?
As a variant I tried using #!/bin/bash and disown at the end of test.sh, but it is still waiting for the pipe to be closed.
What I actually try to achieve: I have a "status" script which collects the output of various scripts (uptime, free, date, get-xy-from-dbus, etc.), similar to this test.sh here. The output of the script is passed to my window manager, which displays it. It's also used in my GNU screen bottom line.
Since some of the scripts that are used might take some time to create output, I want to detach them from output collection. So I put them in a while true; do script; sleep 1; done loop, which is started if it is not running yet.
The problem here is now that I don't know how to tell the calling script to "really" detach the daemon process.
See if this serves your purpose:
(I am assuming that you are not interested in any stderr of commands in while loop. You would adjust the code, if you are. :-) )
#!/bin/bash
if [ -f pidfile ] && kill -0 $(cat pidfile); then
cat somewhere
exit
fi
while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done >/dev/null 2>&1 &
echo $! > pidfile
If you want to explicitly close a file descriptor, like for example 1 which is standard output, you can do it with:
exec 1<&-
This is valid for POSIX shells, see: here
When you put the while loop in an explicit subshell and run the subshell in the background it will give the desired behaviour.
(while true; do
echo "something" >> somewhere
sleep 1
done)&
I need to set a trap for a bash process I'm starting in the background. The background process may run very long and has its PID saved in a specific file.
Now I need to set a trap for that process, so if it terminates, the PID file will be deleted.
Is there a way I can do that?
EDIT #1
It looks like I was not precise enough with my description of the problem. I have full control over all the code, but the long running background process I have is this:
cat /dev/random >> myfile&
When I now add the trap at the beginning of the script this statement is in, $$ will be the PID of that bigger script not of this small background process I am starting here.
So how can I set traps for that background process specifically?
(./jobsworthy& echo $! > $pidfile; wait; rm -f $pidfile)&
disown
Add this to the beginning of your Bash script.
#!/bin/bash
trap 'rm "$pidfile"; exit' EXIT SIGQUIT SIGINT SIGSTOP SIGTERM ERR
pidfile=$(tempfile -p foo -s $$)
echo $$ > "$pidfile"
# from here, do your long running process
You can run your long running background process in an explicit subshell, as already shown by Petesh's answer, and set a trap inside this specific subshell to handle the exiting of your long running background process. The parent shell remains unaffected by this subshell trap.
(
trap '
trap - EXIT ERR
kill -0 ${!} 1>/dev/null 2>&1 && kill ${!}
rm -f pidfile.pid
exit
' EXIT QUIT INT STOP TERM ERR
# simulate background process
sleep 15 &
echo ${!} > pidfile.pid
wait
) &
disown
# remove background process by hand
# kill -TERM ${!}
You do not need trap to just run some command after a background process terminates, you can instead run through a shell command line and add the command following after the background process, separated with semicolon (and let this shell run in the background instead of the background process).
If you still would like to have some notification in your shell script send and trap SIGUSR2 for instance:
#!/bin/sh
BACKGROUND_PROCESS=xterm # for my testing, replace with what you have
sh -c "$BACKGROUND_PROCESS; rm -f the_pid_file; kill -USR2 $$" &
trap "echo $BACKGROUND_PROCESS ended" USR2
while sleep 1
do
echo -n .
done