I packaged the winapi CreateWindowEx into a simple class. Since every window sharing a same wndProc(hwnd,msg,wparam,lparam), I put every window created by CreateWindowEx into a map to distribute msg, like this:
wndProc(hwnd, msg, wparam, lparam){
if(map[hwnd]!=nil){
switch(msg){
map[hwnd].wndProc(...)
}
}
}
And each time a window or its parent window being destroyed, remove it from the map:
case WM_DESTROY: delete(map, hwnd)
But things like buttons do not receive WM_DESTROY. I printed all msg in WM_NOTIFY and WM_COMMAND but i got noting.
So how can I remove those child windows form the map at the right time? Or a way distribute the msg without creating a hwnd map?
They certainly do get that message. But their window procedure is inside Windows, not inside your program. So you never see it. Something you can read in the MSDN documentation, note how WM_DESTROY doesn't get any special treatment. Nor generate a notification that your parent window can see.
Short from automatically removing all the child windows when you see the parent window destroyed, subclassing controls is a pretty standard requirement for C++ class library wrappers. Best to not invent your own btw, this has been done many times already.
So how can I remove those child windows form the map at the right time?
You have to subclass every window you create, either with SetWindowLongPtr(GWL_WNDPROC) or SetWindowSubClass(), then you will receive all of the WM_DESTROY messages.
Or a way distribute the msg without creating a hwnd map?
Frameworks like ATL and VCL handle that by dynamically allocating a thunk for each window and putting the object pointer right in the thunk, then use the thunk as the window procedure. That way, whenever the thunk is called, it passes the message directly to its associated object.
Related
I am working on Windows GUI Application.There are 20 Push Buttons on my Window. Against each button click, I want to open up a new window for displaying some information. It can be anything which can display some information but since I am new to all this and I didn’t want to try anything complicated, I decided to go with the idea of creating a pop up window against each button click.
Now the problem that I am facing is that since there are 20 different windows, do I need to create 20 different window callback functions? Though there is only one control in the pop up window i.e. a Close sign, but even for that I need to have a CALLBACK function.
I had been trying with this but now this idea looks senseless. Is there any other option in which I can achieve the desired functionality?
Waiting for help.
If all of the windows should behave the same way, then you can create a single window procedure (what you're calling the CALLBACK function) that is shared by all of the pop-up windows.
Window procedures do not have to be unique to individual windows, but if multiple windows share the same window procedure, they will react identically to all messages that they receive.
For example:
// Message procedure for all pop-up windows.
LRESULT CALLBACK MyPopupWndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (msg)
{
// handle any messages you want here in order to
// customize the behavior of your pop-up window
}
return DefWindowProc(hwnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
You specify a pointer to the MyPopupWndProc function when you register the window class for your pop-up windows (using the RegisterClassEx function), and then you pass the name of the registered window class when you call CreateWindowEx to create/display a pop-up window whenever one of the buttons on your main window is clicked.
Of course, if you're just wanting something simple for testing purposes, remember that you can always call the MessageBox function! No window procedures or class registration required.
When a standard window control (e.g. an "EDIT" control) is created, its WNDPROC is defined as part of the window class (i.e. "EDIT" has a specific WNDPROC that is designed to make the window display & behave as an edit-control).
MFC allows you to interact with such controls via their wrapper classes, such as a CEdit wrappers the specialized messages for an "EDIT" window control.
MFC further allows you to bind an instance of an "EDIT" window to a C++ subclass of CEdit, say a CMyEdit, where you can override inherited virtual functions of CEdit and CWnd, and you can define a message table to gain access / override messages sent to the window instance itself.
There is CWnd::Default(), which calls this->DefWndProc with the current message arguments. This appears to lookup the WNDPROC for the HWND it is associated with. So is this the correct answer: call DefWndProc() (or equally, Default()), which will hand it off to the WNDPROC of the windows control?
Obviously, this is different than other message table handlers which can return FALSE to indicate that they didn't handle the message, and MFC will automatically route the message up the class inheritance hierarchy to the next message handler for this message, or, I assume, to Default() to be handled by the native WNDPROC?
If I define an arbitrary message handler, say for WM_SETTEXT, what is the correct way to pass this message on to the "EDIT" WNDPROC?
I'd also love to know if there is a way to pass the message up to a superclass (C++ class hierarchy) for handling? Many OnXXX style handlers do have a way to do so, but is there a mechanism that works for ON_MESSAGE handlers?
class CDynamicMenuControlEdit : public CEdit
{
...
LRESULT OnSetText(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
...
}
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CDynamicMenuControlEdit, CEdit)
...
ON_MESSAGE(WM_SETTEXT, OnSetText)
...
END_MESSAGE_MAP()
LRESULT CDynamicMenuControlEdit::OnSetText(
WPARAM wParam, // not used; must be zero
LPARAM lParam // window-text string (LPCTSTR)
)
{
if (m_bHasFocus)
{
// do normal thing
// !!! THIS IS MY QUESTION: IS THIS CALLING EDIT's WNDPROC, or ::DefWinProc()? !!!
return DefWindowProc(WM_SETTEXT, wParam, lParam);
}
...
}
Clarification
You can have multiple MFC subclasses at the C++ level -
so C inherits B inherits A, where A is an MFC class (e.g. CEdit).
Each of those can have an MFC message table - i.e. BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP ... END_MESSAGE_MAP which can each have a handler for any arbitrary windows message, such as WM_MESSAGE(WM_SETTEXT, OnSetText) - and that OnSetText member is not necessarily virtual - just a static member (each MFC subclass can route that message in any arbitrary way).
My question is - since a WM_MESSAGE dispatch entry doesn't have a return value, how do I allow MFC to walk up the MFC dispatch tables from C to B to A before handing back to the real windows 'EDIT' class's wndproc?
Or are all such entries intended at the MFC design-level NOT to be walked? i.e. the most subclassed layer's dispatcher is intended to be the only one called? And if it wants to leverage an inherited member it has to manually make that call - MFC simply doesn't have any specific generic structure for this?
Calling Default() will cause the "normal" processing that would have happened in response to a message to occur. I'm not entirely clear on what you are trying to achieve, but it seems to me that calling Default() is what you want to do.
If you look at a lot of the handlers from Windows messages in the CWnd handlers (and handlers from classes derived from CWnd such as CEdit) you will see that they call Default().
Word to the wise, that Default() will actually use whatever parameters the original message had - you cannot change them.
You're doing it right. CWnd::DefWindowProc() uses the WINDOWPROC you subclassed from and will call the EDIT window's window procedure.
I'm trying to track focus changes between several TrackBars (aka sliders, all within the same window) using WTL.
So far I've tried a
MESSAGE_HANDLER(WM_SETFOCUS, func)
as well as one
COMMAND_HANDLER(IDC_SLIDERn, WM_SETFOCUS, func)
for each slider without success.
The about trackbar controls page on msdn says: "WM_SETFOCUS Repaints the trackbar window." ..
edit:
I now have derived the sliders from my own class where I handle WM_SETFOCUS with MESSAGE_HANDLER and notify the parent window by posting the message to it with m_hWnd as lParam so I can check in the parent which slider gained focus.
This works, but is there a more elegant way to do this?
WM_SETFOCUS is sent to the specific window that gets focus, not to the parent, as you've discovered.
However, there's an alternate tecnique that you can use to avoid subclassing; most controls (specifically the 'common controls', which includes sliders) will send a WM_NOTIFY to their parent when certain events happen, allowing the parent to handle these events for a collection of children.
In your case, try listening for WM_NOTIFY message at the parent window, specifically checking for the case where the notification ID is NM_SETFOCUS - from MSDN:
Notifies a control's parent window that the control has received the input focus. This notification code is sent in the form of a WM_NOTIFY message.
...which sounds like what you are looking for. Apparently ATL supports these in the message map using NOTIFY_HANDLER, something like:
NOTIFY_HANDLER(IDC_SLIDERn, NM_SETFOCUS, func)
Note that this works because the Win32 Common Controls support this sort of notification forwarding; if you were to use some other custom control instead, you may not get these notifications and would have to resort to subclassing. But for the common controls, this is the simplest way of doing it.
You don't need to derive your class, subclassing with CContainedWindowT is just fine.
BEGIN_MSG_MAP_EX(CDialog)
// ...
ALT_MSG_MAP(IDC_TRACKBAR)
MSG_WM_SETFOCUS(OnControlSetFocus)
MSG_WM_KILLFOCUS(OnControlKillFocus)
END_MSG_MAP()
// ...
CContainedWindowT<CTrackBarCtrl> m_TrackBar;
// ...
CDialog() :
m_TitleListView(this, IDC_TRACKBAR)
// ...
LRESULT OnInitDialog(HWND, LPARAM)
{
// ...
ATLVERIFY(m_TrackBar.SubclassWindow(GetDlgItem(IDC_TRACKBAR)));
// ...
// ...
LRESULT OnControlSetFocus(...) { }
LRESULT OnControlKillFocus(...) { }
I'm going through some code for an open source project and this is my first time dealing with a Win32 app (mostly did console stuff). I see that several functions within the code are windows procedures because they return LRESULT CALLBACK.
Is there something the programmer has to do to make sure DispatchMessage invokes the right WndProc or is DispatchMessage coded in a way that it can determine the right WndProc all on its own?
EDIT:
I'm guessing that the way DispatchMessage(const MSG*) chooses between different WndProc's in an application is based on the window handle member (HWND) of the MSG object passed to it.[Hope previous sentence wasn't too confusing.] If the message was for the edit window for an application, for example, (and not for its main window,) then DispatchMessage will choose the WndProc member function for the particular class for which the edit window is an object of. If the message was for the main window, then it would choose the WndProc member function for the class that the main window is an object of (for me, this class would be the Notepad_plus_Window class). This is only a thought, though. I haven't found much to back it up so I'd be glad if anyone could confirm this.
Yes you are right, it uses MSG.hwnd to send the message to the correct window. One thing to be noted, it will use the WndProc associated with the window, not the window class. A window is an instance of a window class.
This article of Microsoft's "Under The Hood" illustrates this with rather detailed pseudo-code of DispatchMessage() that might be worth taking a look as well )
I'd like to prevent my window from being updated until I finish receiving data from the server and render it. Can I hook on the WM_PAINT event, or better still call some Win32API method to prevent the window from being updated and unfreeze it later?
More info:
In the context of an MMC snapin written in C#, our application suffers from annoying flickering and double sorting behaviour:
We use MMC's listViews, but since we subscribe to the sort event.
MMC does it's own magic and sorts the page being displayed (and we can't override that), and when we receive a reply from our server we change the listView again.
each row change is done sequentially, there's no beginUpdate etc. (AFAIK).
Normally hooking into WM_PAINT is the way to go, but make sure you also ignore all WM_ERASEBKGND notifcations, otherwise you'll still get flicker, because Windows erases the Windows area for you. (Return non-zero to prevent Windows from doing that)
One other possibility is to use the LockWindowUpdate function, but it has some drawbacks:
Only one window can be locked
Upon unlock the whole desktop and all sub-windows (i.e. everything) is repainted, resulting in short flash of the whole desktop. (It's worse on XP than on Vista)
Some controls have BeginUpdate and EndUpdate APIs for this purpose.
If you do something (e.g. hook and ignore paint events) do disable painting, then a way to force a repaint later is to call the Invalidate method.
OK, after all searching and checking I've found that LockUpdateWindow is bad idea - see for example articles of Raimond Chen OldNewThing. But even to implement the idea of SetRedrawWindow wasn't so simple - because what I had was only received from IConsole2* pConsole->GetMainWindow() HWND handler of main window. By setting it to SetRedraw = FALSE it was disappeared in very strange manner. Though to make the procedure run only for the TreeView and not for the whole application (ours left panel) I ran
EnumChildWindows(hWnd, SetChildRedraw, FALSE); //stopping redraw
//... here you do your operations
EnumChildWindows(hWnd, SetChildRedraw, TRUE); //restarting redraw
where SetChildRedraw callback was defined in next way:
#define DECLARE_STRING(str) TCHAR str[MAX_PATH]; ZeroMemory(str, sizeof(str));
BOOL CALLBACK SetChildRedraw(HWND hwndChild, LPARAM lParam)
{
RECT rcChildRect; ZeroMemory(&rcChildRect, sizeof(rcChildRect));
DECLARE_STRING(sText)
GetClassName(hwndChild, sText, MAX_PATH);
if (wcsstr(sText, L"SysTreeView32") != NULL)
{
SetWindowRedraw(hwndChild, lParam);
if (lParam == TRUE)
{
GetWindowRect(hwndChild, &rcChildRect);
InvalidateRect(hwndChild, &rcChildRect, TRUE);
}
}
return TRUE;
}