I'll start off by stating that I don't know if this is possible at all, but I'm reading over the Kendo UI documentation and trying to figure out how to at least try it, but I'm running into a lot of difficulties with making a custom binding. This is a followup to another question I am still working on, which is posted here. If this is not an appropriate question, please kindly let me know, and I will close it or rephrase it. I'm just really lost and confused at this point.
As I understand it, based on what I've been told and tried, Kendo cannot bind to an Associative Array not because the data isn't good, but because it is an array of objects, each as a separate individual entity - under normal circumstances, an array would be a bit different and contain a length property, as well as some other functions in the array prototype that make iteration through it possible.
So I was trying to conjecture how to get around this. I succeeded in getting what I think was a workaround to function. I preface that with "think" because I'm still too inexperienced with Javascript to truly know the ramifications of doing it this way (performance, stability, etc)
Here is what I did;
kendo template
<script type="text/x-kendo-template" id="display-items-many">
# for(var key in data) { #
# if (data.hasOwnProperty(key) && data[key].hasOwnProperty("Id")) { #
<tr>
<td>
<strong>#= data[key].Id #</strong>
</td>
<td class="text-right">
<code>#= data[key].Total #</code>
</td>
</tr>
# } #
# } #
</script>
html
<table class="table borderless table-hover table-condensed" data-bind="source: Associative data-template="display-items-many">
</table>
Now to me, immediately off hand, this gave me the illusion of functioning. So I got to thinking a bit more on how to fix this ...
I want to create a new binding called repeat. The goal of this binding is as follows;
repeat the template for each instance of an object within the given root object that meets a given criteria
In my head, this would function like this;
<div data-template="repeater-sample" data-bind="repeat: Associative"></div>
<script type="text/x-kendo-template" id="repeater-sample">
<div> ${ data.Id }</div>
</script>
And the criteria would be a property simply called _associationKey. So the following would, in theory, work.
$.ajax({
// get data from server and such.
}).done(function(results){
// simple reference to the 'associative array' for easier to read code
var associative = results.AssociativeArray;
// this is a trait that everything in the 'associative array' should have to match
// this is purely, purely an example. Obviously you would use a more robust property
var match = "Id";
// go through the results and wire up the associative array objects
for(var key in associative ) {
if(associative.hasOwnProperty(key) && associative[key].hasOwnProperty(match)) {
associative[key]._associationKey = 10; // obviously an example value
}
}
// a watered down example implementation, obviously a real use would be more verbose
viewModel = kendo.observable({
// property = results.property
// property = results.property
associativeArray = associative
});
kendo.bind('body', viewModel);
});
So far this actually seems to work pretty well, but I have to hard code the logic in the template using inline scripting. That's kind of what I want to avoid.
Problem
The big issue is that I'm vastly confused on telerik's documentation for custom bindings (available here). I do have their examples to draw from, yes - but it's a bit confusing to me how it interacts with the object. I'll try to explain, but I'm so lost that it may be difficult.
This is what telerik gives for an example custom binding, and I've pruned it a bit for space concerns;
<script>
kendo.data.binders.repeater = kendo.data.Binder.extend({
init: function(element, bindings, options) {
//call the base constructor
kendo.data.Binder.fn.init.call(this, element, bindings, options);
var that = this;
// how do we interact with the data that was bound?
}
});
</script>
So essentially that's where I am lost. I'm having a big disconnect figuring out how to interact with the actual "associative array" that is bound using data-bind="repeat: associativeArray"
So ..
I need to interact with the bound data (the entire 'associative array')
I need to be able to tell it to render the target template for each instance that matches
Further Updates
I have been digging through the kendo source code, and this is what I have so far - by taking the source binding as an example... but I'm still not getting the right results. Unfortunately this poses a few problems;
some of the functions are internal to kendo, I'm not sure how to get access to them without re-writing them. While I have the source and can do that, I'd prefer to make version agnostic code so that it can "plug in" to newer releases
I'm totally lost about what a lot of this does. I basically made a copy of the source binding and replaced it with my own syntax where possible, since the concept is fundamentally the same. I cannot figure out where to do the test for qualification to be rendered, if that makes sense.
I'm having a big logic disconnect here - there should ideally be some place where I can basically say ... If the current item that kendo is attempting to render in a template matches a criteria, render it. If not, pass it over and then another place where I tell it to iterate over every object in the 'associative array' so as to get to the point where I test it.
I feel just forcing a for loop in here will actually make this fire too many times, and I am getting pretty lost. Any help is greatly appreciated.
kendo.data.binders.repeat = kendo.data.Binder.extend({
init: function(element, bindings, options) {
kendo.data.Binder.fn.init.call(this, element, bindings, options);
var source = this.bindings.repeat.get();
if (source instanceof kendo.data.DataSource && options.autoBind !== false) {
source.fetch();
}
},
refresh: function(e) {
var that = this,
source = that.bindings.repeat.get();
if (source instanceof kendo.data.ObservableArray|| source instanceof kendo.data.DataSource) {
e = e || {};
if (e.action == "add") {
that.add(e.index, e.items);
} else if (e.action == "remove") {
that.remove(e.index, e.items);
} else if (e.action != "itemchange") {
that.render();
}
} else {
that.render();
}
},
container: function() {
var element = this.element;
if (element.nodeName.toLowerCase() == "table") {
if (!element.tBodies[0]) {
element.appendChild(document.createElement("tbody"));
}
element = element.tBodies[0];
}
return element;
},
template: function() {
var options = this.options,
template = options.template,
nodeName = this.container().nodeName.toLowerCase();
if (!template) {
if (nodeName == "select") {
if (options.valueField || options.textField) {
template = kendo.format('<option value="#:{0}#">#:{1}#</option>',
options.valueField || options.textField, options.textField || options.valueField);
} else {
template = "<option>#:data#</option>";
}
} else if (nodeName == "tbody") {
template = "<tr><td>#:data#</td></tr>";
} else if (nodeName == "ul" || nodeName == "ol") {
template = "<li>#:data#</li>";
} else {
template = "#:data#";
}
template = kendo.template(template);
}
return template;
},
add: function(index, items) {
var element = this.container(),
parents,
idx,
length,
child,
clone = element.cloneNode(false),
reference = element.children[index];
$(clone).html(kendo.render(this.template(), items));
if (clone.children.length) {
parents = this.bindings.repeat._parents();
for (idx = 0, length = items.length; idx < length; idx++) {
child = clone.children[0];
element.insertBefore(child, reference || null);
bindElement(child, items[idx], this.options.roles, [items[idx]].concat(parents));
}
}
},
remove: function(index, items) {
var idx, element = this.container();
for (idx = 0; idx < items.length; idx++) {
var child = element.children[index];
unbindElementTree(child);
element.removeChild(child);
}
},
render: function() {
var source = this.bindings.repeat.get(),
parents,
idx,
length,
element = this.container(),
template = this.template();
if (source instanceof kendo.data.DataSource) {
source = source.view();
}
if (!(source instanceof kendo.data.ObservableArray) && toString.call(source) !== "[object Array]") {
source = [source];
}
if (this.bindings.template) {
unbindElementChildren(element);
$(element).html(this.bindings.template.render(source));
if (element.children.length) {
parents = this.bindings.repeat._parents();
for (idx = 0, length = source.length; idx < length; idx++) {
bindElement(element.children[idx], source[idx], this.options.roles, [source[idx]].concat(parents));
}
}
}
else {
$(element).html(kendo.render(template, source));
}
}
});
I would propose as a simpler solution transform transmitted associative array in an array. This is pretty simple and (for most cases) can solve your problem.
Lets say that you get the following associative array received from the server:
{
"One" : { Name: "One", Id: "id/one" },
"Two" : { Name: "Two", Id: "id/two" },
"Three" : { Name: "Three", Id: "id/three" }
}
That is store in a variable called input. Transform it from associative to no associative is as easy as:
var output = [];
$.each(input, function(idx, elem) {
elem.index = idx;
output.push(elem);
});
Now, you have in output an equivalent array where I saved the index field into a field called index for each element of the associative array.
Now you can use out-of-the-box code for displaying the data received from the server.
See it in action here : http://jsfiddle.net/OnaBai/AGfWc/
You can even use KendoUI DataSource for retrieving and transforming the data by using DataSource.schema.parse method as:
var dataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
transport: {
read: ...
},
schema : {
parse: function (response) {
var output = [];
$.each(response, function(idx, elem) {
elem.index = idx;
output.push(elem);
});
return output;
}
}
});
and your model would be:
var viewModel = new kendo.data.ObservableObject({
Id: "test/id",
Associative: dataSource
});
You can see it in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/OnaBai/AGfWc/1/
Related
I have a parent table with rows.
When they select a row, an AJAX call fires that returns the child details.
I have multiple text boxes showing child properties
<div class="row">
#Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.Child.Property)
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.Child.Property)
</div>
but I can't see how to update the text boxes with the child I get back in AJAX results.
The best I've been able to do is manually updating each field from the 'complete' method. But I've got about 30 more fields to add and it feels like the wrong approach.
How do I bind the edit boxes to the returned model without using partials and without refreshing the entire page?
I added Child as a property in the #model, and the TextFor appears to bind properly. But of course
#Model.Child = child
does not. So they never show any data.
This question was based on a misunderstanding on my part. At first I deleted the question when I realized my mistake. I'm reinstating it because I think it is an easy mistake for a noobie to fall into and once you do, the answer is hard to sort out.
The problem is that #model no longer exists once the page is rendered. There is no data binding going on behind the scenes as I thought there was.
Your options are
populating the elements manually. (this will need editing to fit your particular elements)
function DisplayMergeSection(data) {
for (var key of Object.keys(data)) {
DisplayElement(data, key, "#Clients_");
}
}
function DisplayElement(data, key, prefix) {
return;
var val = data[key];
var valString = data[key + "String"];
var element = $(prefix + key)[0];
if (element && element.type === 'text') {
if ((val || '').toString().indexOf("Date(") > -1) {
var dtStart = new Date(parseInt(val.substr(6)));
element.value = moment(dtStart).format('MM/DD/YYYY');
} else {
element.value = val;
}
} else if (element && element.type === 'checkbox') {
element.checked = val;
} else if (element && element.type === 'select-one') {
element.value = valString;
} else if (element && element.nodeName === 'DIV') {
if ((val || '').toString().indexOf("Date(") > -1) {
var dtStart = new Date(parseInt(val.substr(6)));
element.innerText = moment(dtStart).format('MM/DD/YYYY');
} else {
element.innerText = val;
}
}
}
create a bunch of observables with knockout and then set up data binding. This is a lot cleaner.
https://knockoutjs.com/documentation/json-data.html
set up a mapping with the knockout plugin.
https://knockoutjs.com/documentation/plugins-mapping.html
I'm trying to add a simple drop down control above a list such that I can sort it by "created" or "title".
The list template is called posts_list.html. In it's helper .js file I have:
posts: function () {
var sortCriteria = Session.get("sortCriteria") || {};
return Posts.find({},{sort: {sortCriteria: 1}});
}
Then, I have abstracted the list into another template. From here I have the following click event tracker in the helper.js
"click": function () {
// console.log(document.activeElement.id);
Session.set("sortCriteria", document.activeElement.id);
// Router.go('history');
Router.render('profile');
}
Here I can confirm that the right Sort criteria is written to the session. However, I can't make the page refresh. The collection on the visible page never re-sorts.
Frustrating. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
You can't use variables as keys in an object literal. Give this a try:
posts: function() {
var sortCriteria = Session.get('sortCriteria');
var options = {};
if (sortCriteria) {
options.sort = {};
options.sort[sortCriteria] = 1;
}
return Posts.find({}, options);
}
Also see the "Variables as keys" section of common mistakes.
thanks so much for that. Note I've left commented out code below to show what I pulled out. If I required a truly dynamic option, versus the simply binary below, I would have stuck w/ the "var options" approach. What I ended up going with was:
Template.postList.helpers({
posts: function () {
//var options = {};
if (Session.get("post-list-sort")) {
/*options.sort = {};
if (Session.get("post-list-sort") == "Asc") {
options.sort['created'] = 1;
} else {
options.sort['created'] = -1;
}*/
//return hunts.find({}, options);}
console.log(Session.get("hunt-list-sort"));
if (Session.get("hunt-list-sort") == "Asc") {
return Hunts.find({}, {sort: {title: 1}});
}
else {
return Hunts.find({}, {sort: {title: -1}});
};
}
}
});
In my angularJS application I have a collection (array) of rather large objects. I need to bind to this collection in various places (e.g. to display the property: name of the contained objects) - binding is essential, as these names might change.
As the normal ngRepeat would observe the whole collection by strict equality comparison I am concerned about application speed (we are talking about objects with thousends of properties or more) - I actually just need to observe general changes in the collection (like length, changes of the single references in case two elements are flipped and some specific properties like the mentioned .name property)
I am thinking about using the following approach (basically creating a custom copy of the collection and manually bind to the original collection.
My question:
Is the described approach better than watching the original collection (by equality - as it is my understanding the ngRepeater does) or is there some better approach (e.g. defining some kind of compare callback in a watch statement to check only for changes in certain properties,...)
<script>
function QuickTestController($scope) {
// simulate data from a service
var serviceCollection = [], counter = 0,
generateElement = function() {
var element = { name:'name' + ++counter };
//var element = { name:'name' };
for (var j = 0 ; j < 5 ; j++) element['property' + j] = j;
return element;
};
for (var i = 0 ; i < 5 ; i++) {
serviceCollection.push( generateElement() );
}
// in the view controller we could either bind to the service collection directly (which should internally use a watchCollection and watch every single element for equality)
$scope.viewCollection = serviceCollection;
// watching equality of collection
/*
$scope.$watch('_viewCollectionObserve', function(newValue, oldValue) {
console.log('watch: ', newValue, oldValue);
}, true);
*/
// or we could create our own watchCollection / watch structure and watch only those properties we are interested in
$scope._viewCollectionObserve = serviceCollection;
var viewCollectionManual = [],
rebuildViewCollection = function() {
viewCollectionManual = [];
for (var i = 0, length = serviceCollection.length ; i < length ; i++) {
viewCollectionManual.push( {name:serviceCollection[i].name } );
}
console.log('- rebuildViewCollection - ');
$scope.viewCollection2 = viewCollectionManual;
},
watchCollectionProperties = [],
unregisterWatchCollection = function() {},
rebuildWatchCollectionProperties = function() {
watchCollectionProperties = [];
for (var i = 0, length = serviceCollection.length ; i < length ; i++) {
watchCollectionProperties.push('_viewCollectionObserve[' + i + ']'); // watch for ref changes
watchCollectionProperties.push('_viewCollectionObserve[' + i + '].name'); // watch for changes in specific properties
}
unregisterWatchCollection();
var watchString = '[' + watchCollectionProperties.join(',') + ']';
unregisterWatchCollection = $scope.$watchCollection(watchString, function(newValues, oldValues) {
console.log('watchCollection: ', newValues, oldValues);
rebuildViewCollection();
});
};
$scope.$watch('_viewCollectionObserve.length', function(newValue, oldValue) { // watch add / remove elements to / from collection
console.log('watch / length: ', newValue, oldValue);
rebuildWatchCollectionProperties();
});
// rebuildViewCollection();
rebuildWatchCollectionProperties();
// click handler ---
$scope.changName = function() { serviceCollection[0].name += '1'; };
$scope.changeSomeProperty = function() { serviceCollection[0].property0 += 1; };
$scope.removeElement = function() { serviceCollection.splice(0, 1); };
$scope.addElement = function() { serviceCollection.push( generateElement() ); };
$scope.switchElement = function() {
var temp = serviceCollection[0];
serviceCollection[0] = serviceCollection[1];
serviceCollection[1] = temp;
};
// will of course not react to this (this is desired behaviour!)
$scope.removeCollection = function() { serviceCollection = []; };
}
</script>
<div data-ng-controller="QuickTestController">
<ul>
<li data-ng-repeat="element in viewCollection">{{element.name}} {{element}}</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<ul>
<li data-ng-repeat="element in viewCollection2">{{element.name}} {{element}}</li>
</ul>
<button data-ng-click="changName()">changName</button>
<button data-ng-click="changeSomeProperty()">changeSomeProperty</button>
<button data-ng-click="removeElement()">removeElement</button>
<button data-ng-click="addElement()">addElement</button>
<button data-ng-click="switchElement()">switchElement</button>
<hr>
<button data-ng-click="removeCollection()">removeCollection (see comment)</button>
</div>
Any help / opinions would be greatly appreciated - please note that I tried to create a fiddle to demonstrate my approach but failed :-(
(I know that benchmarking might be a possible solution to test my approach, but I´d rather know the opinion of the angularjs pros in here)
thanks,
matthias
I think what you're looking for is bindonce, which is a high performance binding directive that lets you bind a property or expression once in AngularJS, just as what its name suggests.
One thing you can also try is a 'track by' expression. If you have a property that is unique for each object in the collection, you can pass that to your repeat expression.
<div ng-repeat="item in items track by item.id"></div>
I think Angular will then just watch that property on each of your items. So this should improve performance, but I don't know how much.
I have written a multiselect jQuery plugin that can be applied to a normal HTML select element.
However, this plugin will parse the select element and its options and then remove the select element from the DOM and insert a combination of divs and checkboxes instead.
I have created a custom binding handler in Knockout as follows:
ko.bindingHandlers.dropdownlist = {
init: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor, viewModel, bindingContext) {
// This will be called when the binding is first applied to an element
// Set up any initial state, event handlers, etc. here
// Retrieve the value accessor
var value = valueAccessor();
// Get the true value of the property
var unwrappedValue = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(value);
// Check if we have specified the value type of the DropDownList items. Defaults to "int"
var ddlValueType = allBindingsAccessor().dropDownListValueType ? allBindingsAccessor().dropDownListValueType : 'int';
// Check if we have specified the INIMultiSelect options otherwise we will use our defaults.
var elementOptions = allBindingsAccessor().iniMultiSelectOptions ? allBindingsAccessor().iniMultiSelectOptions :
{
multiple: false,
onItemSelectedChanged: function (control, item) {
var val = item.value;
if (ddlValueType === "int") {
value(parseInt(val));
}
else if (ddlValueType == "float") {
value(parseFloat(val));
} else {
value(val);
}
}
};
// Retrieve the attr: {} binding
var attribs = allBindingsAccessor().attr;
// Check if we specified the attr binding
if (attribs != null && attribs != undefined) {
// Check if we specified the attr ID binding
if (attribs.hasOwnProperty('id')) {
var id = attribs.id;
$(element).attr('id', id);
}
if (bindingContext.hasOwnProperty('$index')) {
var idx = bindingContext.$index();
$(element).attr('name', 'ddl' + idx);
}
}
if ($(element).attr('id') == undefined || $(element).attr('id') == '') {
var id = "ko_ddl_id_" + (ko.bindingHandlers['dropdownlist'].currentIndex);
$(element).attr('id', id);
}
if ($(element).attr('name') == undefined || $(element).attr('name') == '') {
var name = "ko_ddl_name_" + (ko.bindingHandlers['dropdownlist'].currentIndex);
$(element).attr('name', name);
}
var options = $('option', element);
$.each(options, function (index) {
if ($(this).val() == unwrappedValue) {
$(this).attr('selected', 'selected');
}
});
if (!$(element).hasClass('INIMultiSelect')) {
$(element).addClass('INIMultiSelect');
}
$(element).iniMultiSelect(elementOptions);
ko.bindingHandlers['dropdownlist'].currentIndex++;
},
update: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor, viewModel, bindingContext) {
var unwrappedValue = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(valueAccessor());
var id = $(element).attr('id').replace(/\[/gm, '\\[').replace(/\]/gm, '\\]');
var iniMultiSelect = $('#' + id);
if (iniMultiSelect != null) {
iniMultiSelect.SetValue(unwrappedValue, true);
}
}};
ko.bindingHandlers.dropdownlist.currentIndex = 0;
This will transform the original HTML select element into my custom multiselect.
However, when the update function is called the first time, after the init, the "element" variable will still be the original select element, and not my wrapper div that holds my custom html together.
And after the page has been completely loaded and I change the value of the observable that I am binding to, the update function is not triggered at all!
Somehow I have a feeling that knockout no longer "knows" what to do because the original DOM element that I'm binding to is gone...
Any ideas what might be the issue here?
There is clean up code in Knockout that will dispose of the computed observables that are used to trigger bindings when it determines that the element is no longer part of the document.
You could potentially find a way to just hide the original element, or place the binding on a container of the original select (probably would be a good option), or reapply a binding to one of the new elements.
I ran into a similar problem today, and here's how I solved it. In my update handler, I added the following line:
$(element).attr("dummy-attribute", ko.unwrap(valueAccessor()));
This suffices to prevent the handler from being disposed-of by Knockout's garbage collector.
JSFiddle (broken): http://jsfiddle.net/padfv0u9/
JSFiddle (fixed): http://jsfiddle.net/padfv0u9/2/
I've searched everywhere to find out how to add a class to a particular row in slickgrid. It looks like there used to be a rowCssClasses property but it's gone now. Any help on this would be extremely appreciated.
Update: I figured it out using the getItemMetadata...so before you render, you have to do something like this:
dataView.getItemMetadata = function (row) {
if (this.getItem(row).compareThis > 1) {
return {
'cssClasses': 'row-class'
};
}
};
That will inject that 'row-class' into the row that matches the if statement. It seems that this getItemMetadata function doesn't exist until you put it there and slickGrid checks to see if there's anything in there. It makes it kind of difficult to figure out it's options but if you search for getItemMetadata in the slick.grid.js file you should find some hidden treasures! I hope this helps someone!
If there's a better way of doing this, please let me know.
In newer versions of SlickGrid, DataView brings its own getItemMetadata to provide formatting for group headers and totals. It is easy to chain that with your own implementation though. For example,
function row_metadata(old_metadata_provider) {
return function(row) {
var item = this.getItem(row),
ret = old_metadata_provider(row);
if (item && item._dirty) {
ret = ret || {};
ret.cssClasses = (ret.cssClasses || '') + ' dirty';
}
return ret;
};
}
dataView.getItemMetadata = row_metadata(dataView.getItemMetadata);
myDataView.getItemMetadata = function(index)
{
var item = myDataView.getItem(index);
if(item.isParent === true) {
return { cssClasses: 'parentRow' };
}
else {
return { cssClasses: 'childRow' };
}
};
//In my CSS
.parentRow {
background-color: #eeeeee;
}
.childRow {
background-color: #ffffff;
}
You could use the setCellCssStyles function:
https://github.com/mleibman/SlickGrid/wiki/Slick.Grid#wiki-setCellCssStyles
grid.setCellCssStyles(key, hash)
key - A string key. Will overwrite any data already associated with
this key.
hash - A hash of additional cell CSS classes keyed by row number and
then by column id. Multiple CSS classes can be specified and separated
by space.
Example:
{
0: {
"number_column": "cell-bold",
"title_column": "cell-title cell-highlighted"
},
4: {
"percent_column": "cell-highlighted"
} }
I used that to highlight edited fields in my grid. I didn't like the getItemMetadata method.