Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I have to WAN connected to mikrotik routerboard, named ppoe-WAN1 and ppoe-WAN2
I want to add simple load balancing to using tow internet connection for all lan users
the simplest way is that add new route with 2 gateway like image below,
Note that if before add this route you must delete all route with distance 1 that does not contains routing marks
and disable Add default Route from pope connections
Having two gateways for the same destination will just put the other in redundancy. It is better that you decide on one of the following:
1. Policy based routing (PBR)
2. Per connection classifier (PCC)
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a scenario where I have multiple mobile phones using a single home wifi router (read not special or expensive) When I get the phones to send almost identical requests to the same location the router appears to be dropping one phone and keeping the other (generally the faster of the two).
After testing for a while now, I'm closing in on the hypothesis that NAT translation is blocking one of the phones or dropping its returned info from the web.
The goal is to get both phones to communicate with a web application online through a generic home wifi without (key aspect here) modifying the router.
My communication is an AJAX request from within a PhoneGap application. Is there something that I can do programatically to help NAT work it's magic and support multiple phones?
This turned out to be an unknown issue with the Web Host provider. Despite more than a dozen detailed requests for what on their side was blocking things I was always referred to how my own equipment or own code was at fault.
Set myself up a VPS and presto change-o I have a working system with no modifications to the code or the equipment.
TIL I don't like people who cover up their incompetency by blaming others.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a very basic question.Please help me in understanding this.
What is actually JMS? How we need to configure it ?
Recently I heard from one of my colleague that in JMS,the XML tags will not be represented as "<" and ">" rather it would be as "ampersand+lt;" and "ampersand+gt;". Is that true?
I have tried to understand JMS concepts.But could not get a clear picture.
Could someone explain in simple way.
Well you have got the concept wrong, which is already pointed out in the comments... Anyway, you can put XML in a JMS message body and send that JMS message to a messaging engine. XML could be put in the JMS text message as is and no changes are required, like the one you have mentioned.
One of the reasons your colleague could have told you this is because the receiver of the JMS message might want the XML is some format.
JMS is a messaging API and XML is a markup language.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Improve this question
I want to point my custom domain to heroku.
My provider uses cPanel.
I have followed the instructions here.
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/custom-domains
And added this to my DNS Zone Editor
www.my-site.com. 14400 IN CNAME my-app.herokuapp.com
however it's been a day and my app still doesn't point to heroku.
It might be because there are several other records in the DNS
currently these are the records in my DNS.
I'm wondering what's wrong with my setup.
Do I have to remove the A record pointing to the IP address of the old server?
note: XX.XX.XX.XX = Old IP address
NAME----------------------------TTL-----------CLASS------TYPE--------RECORD
my-site.com.---------------------14400-----------IN------------A----------XX.XX.XX.XX
localhost.my-site.com.---------14400-----------IN------------A------------127.0.0.1
mail.my-site.com.---------------14400-----------IN-----------CNAME-----my-site.com
www.my-site.com.--------------14400 ------ ----IN---------- CNAME-----my-app.herokuapp.com
ftp.my-site.com.---------------- 14400------------IN----------CNAME-----my-site.com
webdisk.my-site.com.----------14400----------- IN----------A-------------XX.XX.XX.XX
autodiscover.my-site.com.--- 14400------------IN----------A-------------XX.XX.XX.XX
autoconfig.my-site.com.------14400------------ IN----------A-------------XX.XX.XX.XX
FIX: I fixed the problem by removing the A record pointing to the old server. Then it now points to my herokuapp. I tried to put the old A record back on and it still works now (don't know why) maybe it's a conflict on the provider's side
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
There is Windows Server 2003 machine which has many users to access. Each of them want to configure their own hosts file to redirect a hostname to certain IP address. (They are virtual machines with same hostname and different IP addresses owned by each user.)
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
Also, we cannot simply ask users to use IP address to connect because the hostname is configured and need to be used in an application. Can we have this user specific hosts file configured or any workaround?
technically this is not possible...a simple programmatic work around could be to write a script and at user logon replace the file with whatever values you want.
since most of the changes in the hosts file are read at runtime, you should be able to achieve the result you are expecting
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am a freelance programmer and often I will register a domain name for a client under a domain name reseller (and of course under my account).
I wanted to know if there is any standard procedure for selling the domain name to the client or just let them transfer it.
Does anyone know a normal procedure for this type of scenario?
If the domain name was purchased on behalf of the client, then it belong to the client and I would not charge them if they want to move the domain to a different registrar. It would not be ethical. I normally insert my name as technical contact only and leave the client as administrative contact, thereby indicating they are the owners.