I am trying to edit an ascx file from our server to modify some aspects of our website. However, when I import the ascx into Visual Studio, instead of code I get weird lines of text that look like memory addresses. See below:
00000000 AA 2A 81 C2 98 3E 6D E6 4C DB 0A 81 9B 6D 3B 37 .*...>m.l....m;7
00000010 20 E1 66 7F D1 B5 C3 A5 8D 57 7J 7F FF 33 23 83 .f......Wv..3#.
... And this goes on for quite some time. I suspect there is a fundemental point I am missing here about ascx files and Visual Studio. I am obviously new to modifying ascx files, can somebody lead me in the right direction so I can edit the code?
As the comments helped me with, the solution to this problem is that the .ascx files are binary even though they have the .ascx extension. Editable files should always be able to be viewed in Notepad, and especially in Visual Studio.
Related
When I set the PDF paper size to A4, is there a way to make the PDF display area only A5 size while keeping the PDF paper size to A4?
Parts of text or images larger than A5 will not be displayed.
I have try the option 'CropBox',but it's make A4 size to A5 size.
please help me !!
you could clip the content by first creating a clipping path. This could look like:
p.being_page_ext(595, 842, "");
p.save();
p.rect(0, 0, 421, 595);
p.clip();
... (place content which will only visible within the A5 area)
p.restore()
... further content which will be visible on the whole page.
p.end_page_ext("");
I added the save()/restore(), so you can encapsulate the clipping and can add additional content afterwards. Please adjust also the reference point for the clipping rectangle if necessary.
Please see PDFlib 9.3 Tutorial, chapter 3.2.3 "Direct Paths and Path Objects" for details.
I'm working on a cross platform application for Linux, Windows and macOS and there is part where I need to scale something based on the screen scaling. So far I have been using QApplication::desktop()->devicePixelRatioF() under Linux and Windows to get the scale factor and that works fine but now one of my users run into an issue with macOS where there is obviously screen scaling going on but the devicePixelRatio is always set to 1.
This is how scaling variables look like on his machine:
devicePixelRatio: 1
devicePixelRatioF: 1
logicalDpiX: 72
logicalDpiY: 72
physicalDpiX: 114
physicalDpiy: 114
I have also tried reading out the values from QApplication::primaryScreen()but they look the same.
QScreen devicePixelRatio: 1
QScreen logicalDotsPerInch: 72
QScreen logicalDotsPerInchX: 72
QScreen logicalDotsPerInchY: 72
QScreen physicalDotsPerInch: 113.5
QScreen physicalDotsPerInchX: 113.5
QScreen physicalDotsPerInchY: 113.5
According to my user he should have 227 dpi:
"13-inch MacBook Pro models introduced in late 2012 or later. Native resolution: 2560 x 1600 at 227 pixels per inch. Support for millions of colors."
Any idea whats going on here or how we could detect the scale factor?
ANSI X3.64[1] and ECMA-48[2] video terminal escape codes define a set of parameters for Select Graphic Rendition that have to do with ideograms. Specifically:
60 ideogram underline or right side line
61 ideogram double underline or double line on the right side
62 ideogram overline or left side line
63 ideogram double overline or double line on the left side
64 ideogram stress marking
65 cancels the effect of the rendition aspects established by parameter values 60 to 64
Wikipedia lists these codes as "rarely supported" but doesn't go into any detail, and from what I can tell, ECMA-48 is very sparse about the intention behind escape codes.
I'm trying to figure out what these escape codes were intended for, what an implementation for them would look like, and if any video terminals ever actually implemented this.
Any clues would be greatly appreciated!
I've actually only been able to find copies of ECMA-48, so please correct me if I'm making a wrong assumption about X3.64.
https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-048.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#SGR_(Select_Graphic_Rendition)_parameters (permalink)
I have Dymo labelwriter printer:
Which is used to print labels in sticker model 11356 (40mm, 80mm)
In Ghostscript which settings can be adjusted to tell it's not A4 nor A5, B5, EnvC5, but it has to be 40mm, 80mm? I tried following parameters, but it's not printing to 1 sticker, instead it keeps pushing out 20 stickers and printing in wrong label locations.
MediaSize A4
MediaSize A5
MediaSize B5
MediaSize EnvC5
MediaSize EnvDL
MediaSize EnvISOB5
MediaSize Postcard
MediaSize DoublePostcard
Therefore, I also have the PDF file itself made into 40mm by 80mm. But it keeps failing to print on 1 label/sticker.
How do I tell Ghostscript just to print the PDF with its exact default size. Without Ghostscript when I print the PDF it works perfectly but the moment I use Ghostscript it's doing abnormal paper settings and printing abnormally.
You have not said how you are using Ghostscript. Which device are you using CUPS, mswinpr2, something else ?
All the Ghostscript devices will honour the media request from PostScript or PDF, and this will override any command line switch, unless you also set -dFIXEDMEDIA.
You haven't quoted an exact command line; but the MediaSize switch is deprecated and should not be used.
I'm going to guess that you are using mswinpr2, in which case Ghostscript will be using the default Media Size configured in the printer. I that's not correct, you need to alter it.
I have added a project to the render queue, but after 15 minutes, nothing had rendered. I have no problems when rendering normally. This is Cinema 4D R15. How come it isn't rendering? Thanks.
Check the render setting and option in it and make sure that you have chosen the destination folder. After setting this all, click the render button and wait for your video to process.
Save the file close Cinema 4D and try rendering when you re-open it.
Make sure that you give it some time too if the project is big enough