I'm writing a makefile that, as part of its operation, downloads and extracts a zipfile containing an ESRI shapefile. Shapefile is a misnomer, because a shapefile is actually a directory containing files named like shape.[shp,dbf,prj,shp.html,shp.xml,sbn,sbx]
Is there a way of defining a list of extensions to append to a common file prefix in a make target? Something like:
shape.[mylistofexts] : shape.zip
unzip stuff...
I found this question which appears to be the inverse, in that they have a single target with multiple sources that each require processing. My neophyte's intuition is that this should be a simpler case.
The feature you want here is multiple patterns in a single target.
From the Pattern Rule Examples section of the GNU make makefile:
This pattern rule has two targets:
%.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
bison -d $<
This tells make that the recipe ‘bison -d x.y’ will make both x.tab.c and x.tab.h. If the file foo depends on the files parse.tab.o and scan.o and the file scan.o depends on the file parse.tab.h, when parse.y is changed, the recipe ‘bison -d parse.y’ will be executed only once, and the prerequisites of both parse.tab.o and scan.o will be satisfied. (Presumably the file parse.tab.o will be recompiled from parse.tab.c and the file scan.o from scan.c, while foo is linked from parse.tab.o, scan.o, and its other prerequisites, and it will execute happily ever after.)
So you want to write:
%.shp, %.dbf %.prj %.shp.html %.shp.xml %.sbn %.sbx: %.zip
#unzip ...
Which can be shortened (technically) to:
$(addprefix %.,dbf prj shp.html shp.xml sbn sbx): %.zip
#unzip ...
Related
In my project, I have a set of sub-directories that contain package.yaml files, for e.g.:
A/package.yaml
B/package.yaml
C/package.yaml
If I run hpack A/package.yaml, the file A/A.cabal is (re-)generated. The list of such directories can change over time, so I want to use GNU make to find all immediate sub-directories containing package.yaml files and generate the corresponding .cabal files using hpack.
I tried this based on another question, but it didn't work:
HPACK_FILES := $(wildcard */package.yaml)
PKG_DIRS := $(subst /,,$(dir $(HPACK_FILES)))
CABAL_FILES := $(addsuffix .cabal,$(join $(dir $(HPACK_FILES)),$(PKG_DIRS)))
test:
#echo $(CABAL_FILES)
update-cabal: $(CABAL_FILES)
%.cabal: package.yaml
hpack $<
However, make update-cabal says there's nothing to be done. make test however does output the right cabal files. How can I fix this?
Cheers!
The problem is this:
%.cabal: package.yaml
There is no file package.yaml. The files are named things like A/package.yaml. That is not the same thing.
Because the prerequisite doesn't exist, make decides that this pattern rule cannot match and so it goes looking for another rule that might be able to build the target. It doesn't find any rule that can build the target, so make says there's nothing to do because all the output files already exist.
Unfortunately what you want to do is not at all easy with make, because make is most comfortable with input and output files that are tied together by the filename with extensions, or similar. And in particular, it has a really hard time with relationships where the variable part is repeated more than once (as in, A/A.cabal where the A is repeated). There's no easy way to do that in make.
You'll have to use an advanced feature such as eval to do this. Something like:
# How to build a cabal file
%.cabal:
hpack $<
# Declare the prerequisites
$(foreach D,$(dir $(HPACK_FILES)),$(eval $D/$D.cabal: $D/package.yml))
I'm trying to make a make file for a static page generator, and I'm using jinja and pandoc so far, and the idea is to have a file structure as such
.
|-content
|-public
|-templates
|-Makefile
VPATH=public
TARGETS=$(find content -regex ".*(htm|md)" | sed -e "s/md$/htm/g;s/^content/public/g")
all: $(TARGETS)
#echo fullbuild
public/%: content/%
content/%.md:
# Pandoc script
pandoc -i $# -o ${${#:.md=.htm}:content=public}
content/%.htm:
# Jinja Script
The problem I'm having (At least I think that's it) is that according to me the syntax is
# For a final result
target: dependency
commands
# A rule for dependency
dependency:
commands
My dependencies are in the content dir and my targets are in the public dir that may or may not exist yet, and almost all the files I generate will be htm files, and in that case if the target is public/some/route/to/file.htm the dependency will be any of this two content/some/route/to/file.(htm|md).
I can easily generate by walking the content dir, and changing extensions.
How should I write the rules properly, so
- Make knows where to "watch" for changes every time I do a make, because right now it points that every file is up to date
- How do I indicate properly the dependency of a file to it's content file.
This rule:
public/%: content/%
does nothing because pattern rules without recipes delete existing pattern rules, they don't define new pattern rules.
It's very simple, you should write two rules like this:
public/%.htm: content/%.md:
# Pandoc script
pandoc -i $< -o $#
public/%.htm: content/%.htm
# Jinja Script
Here's a hint: whenever you're writing a makefile recipe and you discover that you need to create a target which is different than exactly $#, unmodified, immediately stop what you're doing and back up: you've taken a wrong turn.
I read this: Makefile: Copying files with a rule but couldn't do it.
To make it simple, suppose I have two directories dir1 and dir2. Under dir1 I have three files: rabbit.c, tiger.c and bus.c .
I made Makefile like this:
dir2/rabbit.c:dir1/rabbit.c
dir2/tiger.c:dir1/tiger.c
dir2/bike.c:dir1/bike.c
dir2/%:
cp -f $< $#
I specified the prerequisites in three separate lines and specified the unified recipe for the three targets. I expected when I touch any file under dir1, make will copy that file to dir2. But this happend only for rabbit.c. What is wrong?
ADD(after selecting an answer) :
After realizing what's wrong by Takkat's answer, I fixed it and later modified it further and I think this is the correct simplest Makefile for this case.
.PHONY:all
LIST:=rabbit.c tiger.c bike.c
DSTFILES:=$(addprefix dir2/, $(LIST))
all: $(DSTFILES)
dir2/%:dir1/%
cp -f $< $#
Make chooses a default target in your makefile and, unless you specify differently on the command line, it builds just that target (and all prerequisites required to build that target).
The default target in a makefile is, by default, the first explicit target listed.
So in your makefile the first rule is:
dir2/rabbit.c:dir1/rabbit.c
so the first explicit target is dir2/rabbit.c, so that's all make builds.
If you want to build multiple targets by default, you need a first target that lists all the "real" targets as prerequisites; put this line first in your makefile:
all: dir2/rabbit.c dir2/tiger.c dir2/bike.c
and it will work. It's often considered good practice to declare targets like this, which don't relate to real files on the disk, as phony:
.PHONY: all
I'm using Automake.
I have a few source files listed in dist_man1_MANS like this:
dist_man1_MANS = some-file.1 some-other-file.1
Now, Automake + configure eventually generate this in Makefile:
dist_man1_MANS = some-file.1 some-other-file.1
# ...
install-man1: $(dist_man1_MANS)
# generated recipe here
Since I'm not prefixing the .1 files with $(srcdir), I assume that, since I run make from the build directory (its current working directory), it should find them in the build directory.
So, I'm doing an out-of-tree build, for example, in /tmp/build:
/path/to/src/configure --prefix=$(pwd)/install
make
make install
and the build succeeds, that is, make finds the man pages and installs them. They are not in the build directory, however. I add this to the generated Makefile:
install-man1: $(dist_man1_MANS)
#echo ">>> $(^)"
#echo "::: $(dist_man1_MANS)"
# generated recipe here
Now, I would assume that both echos print the same thing, because $^ means the names of all the prerequisites, with spaces between them. To my surprise, the output is:
>>> /path/to/src/some-file.1 /path/to/src/some-other-file.1
::: some-file.1 some-other-file.1
So:
How did make find the /path/to/src/ prefix exactly? Where does it come from in this very context?
Why do $^ and $(dist_man1_MANS) differ?
I found the answer.
Automake sets the VPATH variable in its generated Makefile, a special variable for make, to something like:
VPATH = /path/to/src
From the previous links:
4.5.1 VPATH: Search Path for All Prerequisites
The value of the make variable VPATH specifies a list of directories that make should search. Most often, the directories are expected to contain prerequisite files that are not in the current directory; however, make uses VPATH as a search list for both prerequisites and targets of rules.
So make searches for the some-file.1 and some-other-file.1 prerequisites in the current working directory first, then for /path/to/src/some-file.1 and /path/to/src/some-other-file.1 if it cannot find the first ones. In this case I understand why $^ is different from $(dist_man1_MANS): $^ is the list of effective (resolved) prerequisites.
This question is based on another question of mine here: Getting basename and notdir to work in prerequisite (dependency) list.
I'm using a Makefile to generate some figures automatically and
efficiently.
My figures are generated in ../thesis/figures using Octave .m
files that are in the current directory where the Makefile also is.
Each .m file, e.g. figure1.m, may generate several figures, e.g.
figure1.p1.tex and figure1.p2.tex (and their dependecies, which
are also generated by figure1.m). These .tex files are then to be compiled using LaTeX (a single run of pdflatex figure1.p1.tex suffices in this case; so, there is no need for latexmk or other alternatives).
The Makefile I have so far is
OCTAVE = octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet
PDFLATEX = pdflatex
FIGDIR = ../thesis/figures
TEXTARGETS = $(wildcard $(FIGDIR)/*.tex)
.PHONY: figures
figures: $(TEXTARGETS)
.SECONDEXPANSION:
$(TEXTARGETS): %.tex : $$(basename $$(notdir %)).m
$(OCTAVE) $<
$(PDFLATEX) $#
A dry run with make -n shows me
octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet figure1.m
pdflatex ../thesis/figures/figure1.p1.tex
octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet figure1.m
pdflatex ../thesis/figures/figure1.p2.tex
make: *** No rule to make target `figure2.m', needed by `../thesis/figures/figure2.tex'. Stop.
There are two issues here:
1) Both figure1.p1.tex and figure.p2.tex are generated by the first run of figure1.m by octave. Is there a way to treat all targets with the same basename (or other pattern) as a prerequisite as one, so that there is no more than one invocation of octave per .m file?
2) figure2.tex was made using some other means than an .m file. How can I tell make to ignore a rule if its prerequisite does not exist. I know how to do that for an explicit prerequisite:
target: prereq
recipe
prereq:
But what to do in this case with the prerequisite being derived from the target's name?
GNU make can be taught that multiple targets are created by one command invocation by using a pattern rule for those targets.
From Pattern Rule Examples:
This pattern rule has two targets:
%.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
bison -d $<
This tells make that the recipe ‘bison -d x.y’ will make both x.tab.c and x.tab.h. If the file foo depends on the files parse.tab.o and scan.o and the file scan.o depends on the file parse.tab.h, when parse.y is changed, the recipe ‘bison -d parse.y’ will be executed only once, and the prerequisites of both parse.tab.o and scan.o will be satisfied. (Presumably the file parse.tab.o will be recompiled from parse.tab.c and the file scan.o from scan.c, while foo is linked from parse.tab.o, scan.o, and its other prerequisites, and it will execute happily ever after.)
So you could use something like
figure1.%1.tex figure1.%2.tex: figure1.m
$(OCTAVE) $<
but to do that for N output files where N is variable would require generating an included makefile that pulled that information out of the .m file (or similar).
If a file exists that matches a target but no matching prerequisite file is found make will just use the file it found and ignore the rule (the rule doesn't apply). You shouldn't have to do anything for that.
If, however, the file would otherwise match the rule (but you don't want make to follow the rule for that file) then you can cancel just that application by giving that file an explicit target. Like this.
figure2.tex: ;