This question is based on another question of mine here: Getting basename and notdir to work in prerequisite (dependency) list.
I'm using a Makefile to generate some figures automatically and
efficiently.
My figures are generated in ../thesis/figures using Octave .m
files that are in the current directory where the Makefile also is.
Each .m file, e.g. figure1.m, may generate several figures, e.g.
figure1.p1.tex and figure1.p2.tex (and their dependecies, which
are also generated by figure1.m). These .tex files are then to be compiled using LaTeX (a single run of pdflatex figure1.p1.tex suffices in this case; so, there is no need for latexmk or other alternatives).
The Makefile I have so far is
OCTAVE = octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet
PDFLATEX = pdflatex
FIGDIR = ../thesis/figures
TEXTARGETS = $(wildcard $(FIGDIR)/*.tex)
.PHONY: figures
figures: $(TEXTARGETS)
.SECONDEXPANSION:
$(TEXTARGETS): %.tex : $$(basename $$(notdir %)).m
$(OCTAVE) $<
$(PDFLATEX) $#
A dry run with make -n shows me
octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet figure1.m
pdflatex ../thesis/figures/figure1.p1.tex
octave --jit-compiler --no-gui --quiet figure1.m
pdflatex ../thesis/figures/figure1.p2.tex
make: *** No rule to make target `figure2.m', needed by `../thesis/figures/figure2.tex'. Stop.
There are two issues here:
1) Both figure1.p1.tex and figure.p2.tex are generated by the first run of figure1.m by octave. Is there a way to treat all targets with the same basename (or other pattern) as a prerequisite as one, so that there is no more than one invocation of octave per .m file?
2) figure2.tex was made using some other means than an .m file. How can I tell make to ignore a rule if its prerequisite does not exist. I know how to do that for an explicit prerequisite:
target: prereq
recipe
prereq:
But what to do in this case with the prerequisite being derived from the target's name?
GNU make can be taught that multiple targets are created by one command invocation by using a pattern rule for those targets.
From Pattern Rule Examples:
This pattern rule has two targets:
%.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
bison -d $<
This tells make that the recipe ‘bison -d x.y’ will make both x.tab.c and x.tab.h. If the file foo depends on the files parse.tab.o and scan.o and the file scan.o depends on the file parse.tab.h, when parse.y is changed, the recipe ‘bison -d parse.y’ will be executed only once, and the prerequisites of both parse.tab.o and scan.o will be satisfied. (Presumably the file parse.tab.o will be recompiled from parse.tab.c and the file scan.o from scan.c, while foo is linked from parse.tab.o, scan.o, and its other prerequisites, and it will execute happily ever after.)
So you could use something like
figure1.%1.tex figure1.%2.tex: figure1.m
$(OCTAVE) $<
but to do that for N output files where N is variable would require generating an included makefile that pulled that information out of the .m file (or similar).
If a file exists that matches a target but no matching prerequisite file is found make will just use the file it found and ignore the rule (the rule doesn't apply). You shouldn't have to do anything for that.
If, however, the file would otherwise match the rule (but you don't want make to follow the rule for that file) then you can cancel just that application by giving that file an explicit target. Like this.
figure2.tex: ;
Related
I am very much new to make files , I am facing very basic problem , My Makefile doesn't detect changes I made to source files . The problem is , when I first time generate consoleapp binary from my source file i get expected output . But When I change source file again and when I run make again it says
make: 'consoleapp' is up to date , So what changes I have to give to make file so that it detects my changes
Below is my Makefile :
consoleapp:
g++ consoleapp.cpp -o consoleapp
clean:
rm -rf *.o consoleapp
This is my Source File :
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
cout<<"I am ok \n"; // I am changing this line again after giving make
return 0;
}
make relies on the makefile author to tell it what each target's prerequisites are -- that is, which other targets or files affect the construction of the target in question, so that if they are newer or themselves out of date then the target is out of date and should be rebuilt. As your other answer already indicates, you do not designate any prerequisites for your targets, so make considers them out of date if and only if they don't exist at all.
That's actually problematic for both targets, albeit in different ways. For target consoleapp, which represents an actual file that you want to build, the failure to specify any prerequisites yields the problem you ask about: make does not recognize that changes to the source file necessitate a rebuild. The easiest way to fix that would be to just add the source file name to the recipe's header line, after the colon:
consoleapp: consoleapp.cpp
g++ consoleapp.cpp -o consoleapp
Generally speaking, however, it is wise to minimize duplication in your makefile code, and to that end you can use some of make's automatic variables to avoid repeating target and prerequisite names in your rule's recipe. In particular, I recommend always using $# to designate the rule's target inside its recipe:
consoleapp: consoleapp.cpp
g++ consoleapp.cpp -o $#
It's a bit more situational for prerequisites. In this case, all the prerequisites are source files to be compiled, and furthermore there is only one. If you are willing to rely on GNU extensions then in the recipe you might represent the sources via either $< (which represents the first prerequisite), or as $^ (which represents the whole prerequisite list, with any duplicates removed). For example,
consoleapp: consoleapp.cpp
g++ $^ -o $#
If you are not using GNU make, however, or if you want to support other people who don't, then you are stuck with some repetition here. You can still save yourself some effort, especially in the event of a change to the source list, by creating a make variable for the sources and duplicating that instead of duplicating the source list itself:
consoleapp_SRCS = consoleapp.cpp
consoleapp: $(consoleapp_SRCS)
g++ $(consoleapp_SRCS) -o $#
I mentioned earlier that there are problems with both of your rules. But what could be wrong with the clean rule, you may ask? It does not create a file named "clean", so its recipe will be run every time you execute make clean, just as you want, right? Not necessarily. Although that rule does not create a file named "clean", if such a file is created by some other means then suddenly your clean rule will stop working, as that file will be found already up to date with respect to its (empty) list of prerequisites.
POSIX standard make has no solution for that, but GNU make provides for it with the special target .PHONY. With GNU make, any targets designated as prerequisites of .PHONY are always considered out of date, and the filesystem is not even checked for them. This is exactly to support targets such as clean, which are used to designate actions to perform that do not produce persistent artifacts on the file system. Although that's a GNU extension, it is portable in the sense that it uses standard make syntax and the target's form is reserved for extensions, so a make that does not support .PHONY in the GNU sense is likely either to just ignore it or to treat it as an ordinary rule:
.PHONY: clean
clean:
rm -rf *.o consoleapp
because your target has no dependence. Please use this codes that rely to all cpp file in current dir to update binary.
SRCS=consoleapp.cpp
consoleapp: $(SRCS)
g++ $< -o $#
I'm using Automake.
I have a few source files listed in dist_man1_MANS like this:
dist_man1_MANS = some-file.1 some-other-file.1
Now, Automake + configure eventually generate this in Makefile:
dist_man1_MANS = some-file.1 some-other-file.1
# ...
install-man1: $(dist_man1_MANS)
# generated recipe here
Since I'm not prefixing the .1 files with $(srcdir), I assume that, since I run make from the build directory (its current working directory), it should find them in the build directory.
So, I'm doing an out-of-tree build, for example, in /tmp/build:
/path/to/src/configure --prefix=$(pwd)/install
make
make install
and the build succeeds, that is, make finds the man pages and installs them. They are not in the build directory, however. I add this to the generated Makefile:
install-man1: $(dist_man1_MANS)
#echo ">>> $(^)"
#echo "::: $(dist_man1_MANS)"
# generated recipe here
Now, I would assume that both echos print the same thing, because $^ means the names of all the prerequisites, with spaces between them. To my surprise, the output is:
>>> /path/to/src/some-file.1 /path/to/src/some-other-file.1
::: some-file.1 some-other-file.1
So:
How did make find the /path/to/src/ prefix exactly? Where does it come from in this very context?
Why do $^ and $(dist_man1_MANS) differ?
I found the answer.
Automake sets the VPATH variable in its generated Makefile, a special variable for make, to something like:
VPATH = /path/to/src
From the previous links:
4.5.1 VPATH: Search Path for All Prerequisites
The value of the make variable VPATH specifies a list of directories that make should search. Most often, the directories are expected to contain prerequisite files that are not in the current directory; however, make uses VPATH as a search list for both prerequisites and targets of rules.
So make searches for the some-file.1 and some-other-file.1 prerequisites in the current working directory first, then for /path/to/src/some-file.1 and /path/to/src/some-other-file.1 if it cannot find the first ones. In this case I understand why $^ is different from $(dist_man1_MANS): $^ is the list of effective (resolved) prerequisites.
I have a very bizzare problem with GNU make. I have the following files:
a/x.html
b/Makefile
b/c/Makefile
The contents of a/x.html are irrelevant. The contents of b/Makefile are as follows:
SRC=../a
all: x.html
%.html: ${SRC}/%.html
rsync $< $#
The contents of b/c/Makefile are the same, except for the definition of SRC:
SRC=../../a
If I run make in b/c/ the result is as expected:
rsync ../../a/x.html x.html
and x.html gets copied from a/ to b/c/.
However, if I run make in b/ the output I get is several lines of:
make: stat: ../a/../a/.. (repeated many times) ../a/x.html: File name too long
It seems that make is applying the rule for %.html recursively, but why? Is there something obvious I am missing?
To build a target that matches the pattern %.html (i.e. any target name that ends in .html), make applies the rule if it can build the dependency (target built from the original target with ../a/ prepended).
You ask to build x.html. This matches the pattern %.html, so the rule applies: make sees if it can build ../a/x.html.
../a/x.html matches the pattern %.html, so the rule applies: make sees if it can build ../a/../a/x.html.
../../a/x.html matches the pattern %.html, so the rule applies, etc.
The stem character can match any part of a path, including directory separators.
You can see what make is trying by running make -r -d (-d to show debugging output, -r to turn off built-in rules which would cause a huge amount of noise).
When you're in b/c, this stops at step 2 because ../../a/x.html exists but ../../../../a/x.html doesn't.
One way to fix this is to list the files on which you want to act. You can build that list from the list of files that already exist in ../a:
$(notdir $(wildcard ${SRC}/*.html)): %.html: ${SRC}/%.html
rsync $< $#
This has the downside that if the HTML files in ../a are themselves built by a rule in b/Makefile, then running make in b won't built them in a pristine source directory. This shouldn't be a problem though: it would be unusual to have a makefile in b build things outside b.
Another approach which doesn't have this defect is to use an absolute path.
%.html: $(abspath ${SRC})/%.html
rsync $< $#
I have another make-like tool that produces an XML as an artifact after parsing my makefile which I'll then further process with Python.
It'd simplify things for me - a lot - if I could have make consider every single prerequisite to be an actual target because then this other tool
will classify each and every file as a "job".
This is a fragment of my makefile:
.obj/eventlookupmodel.o: C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/src/AL2HMIBridge/LookupModels/eventlookupmodel.cpp C:\Users\User1\Desktop\A\PROJ\src\AL2HMIBridge\LookupModels\eventlookupmodel.h \
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/qt5binaries/include/QtCore/qabstractitemmodel.h \
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/qt5binaries/include/QtCore/qvariant.h \
...
I'd want for make to think I have a dummy rule for each prerequisite such as below:
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/qt5binaries/include/QtCore/qvariant.h:
#echo target pre= $#
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/qt5binaries/include/QtCore/qabstractitemmodel.h:
#echo target pre=$#
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/PROJ/src/AL2HMIBridge/LookupModels/eventlookupmodel.cpp :
#echo target pre=$#
C:\Users\User1\Desktop\A\PROJ\src\AL2HMIBridge\LookupModels\eventlookupmodel.h:
#echo target pre=$#
I don't care about the exact form of the rule just that each file is considered an actual target.
My method of passing in this rule would be by setting the MAKEFILES variable like so
make all MAKEFILES=Dummy.mk
with Dummy.mk containing this rule so that I do not modify the makefiles.
I've tried the following so far.
Dummy.mk:
%.h:
#echo header xyz = $#
%:
#echo other xyz= $#
This partially works.
I run make all --trace --print-data-base MAKEFILES=Dummy.mk and I can see that
make does "bind" the %.h: rule to the header files. In the --print-data-base section, I see that rule being assigned to the header files.
C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/QNX_SDK/target/qnx6/usr/include/stddef.h:
# Implicit rule search has been done.
# Implicit/static pattern stem: 'C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/QNX_SDK/target/qnx6/usr/include/stddef'
# Last modified 2016-05-27 12:39:16
# File has been updated.
# Successfully updated.
# recipe to execute (from '#$(QMAKE) top_builddir=C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/HMI_FORGF/src/../lib/armle-v7/release/ top_srcdir=C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/HMI_FORGF/ -Wall CONFIG+=release CONFIG+=qnx_build_release_with_symbols CONFIG+=rtc_build -o Makefile C:/Users/User1/Desktop/A/HMI_FORGF/src/HmiLogging/HmiLogging.pro
', line 2):
#echo header xyz = $#
However, I do NOT see the "echo header xyz $#"-rule being executed.
Regarding the %: rule, it is neither executed for the .cpp files nor "bound" to them in the --print-data-base section.
However, it is bound and executed for existing targets which have no suffix i.e.
all: library binary
binary: | library
ifs: | library
For the %: rule, the reason for this behavior is because of 10.5.5 Match-Anything Pattern Rules: If you do not mark the match-anything rule as terminal, then it is non-terminal. A non-terminal match-anything rule cannot apply to a file name that indicates a specific type of data. A file name indicates a specific type of data if some non-match-anything implicit rule target matches it.
If I make it non-terminal - no double colon - then the rule doesn't apply to built-in types like .cppunless I un-define the built-in rules that negate my intended %: rule.
If I make it terminal, "it does not apply unless its prerequisites actually exist". But a .h or .cpp doesn't technically have prerequisites; can I just create a dummy file and have that as its prerequisite?
NOTE: This has NOTHING to do with gcc -M generation. Yes the -M option would help in the specific case of header and source files but this question is for more generic targets and prerequisites that already exist in the makefile when make is launched.
This may take a few iterations. Try:
%.h: null
#echo header xyz = $#
%: null
#echo other xyz= $#
null:
#:
Try generating static pattern rules for the header files. See one of the answers to Make ignoring Prerequisite that doesn't exist.
Static pattern rules only apply to an explicit list of target files like this:
$(OBJECTS): %.o: %.c
*recipe here*
where the variable OBJECTS is defined earlier in the makefile to be a list of target files (separated by spaces), for example:
OBJECTS := src/fileA.c src/fileB.c src/fileC.c
Note that you can use the various make utility functions to build that list of target files. For example, $(wildcard pattern), $(addsuffix), etc.
You should also ensure that the recipe "touches" the header file to change the timestamp.
I've found that using static pattern rules instead of pattern rules fixes problems where make doesn’t build prerequisites that don’t exist, or deletes files that you want.
Here is an example of using wildcard to copy files from one directory to another.
# Copy images to build/images
img_files := $(wildcard src/images/*.png src/images/*.gif src/images/*.jpg \
src/images/*.mp3)
build_images := $(subst src/,$(BUILD_DIR)/,$(img_files))
$(build_images): $(BUILD_DIR)/images/% : src/images/%
mkdir -p $(dir $#)
cp -v -a $< $#
There are other make functions like addprefix that could be used to generate a more complex file specification.
I'm writing a makefile that, as part of its operation, downloads and extracts a zipfile containing an ESRI shapefile. Shapefile is a misnomer, because a shapefile is actually a directory containing files named like shape.[shp,dbf,prj,shp.html,shp.xml,sbn,sbx]
Is there a way of defining a list of extensions to append to a common file prefix in a make target? Something like:
shape.[mylistofexts] : shape.zip
unzip stuff...
I found this question which appears to be the inverse, in that they have a single target with multiple sources that each require processing. My neophyte's intuition is that this should be a simpler case.
The feature you want here is multiple patterns in a single target.
From the Pattern Rule Examples section of the GNU make makefile:
This pattern rule has two targets:
%.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
bison -d $<
This tells make that the recipe ‘bison -d x.y’ will make both x.tab.c and x.tab.h. If the file foo depends on the files parse.tab.o and scan.o and the file scan.o depends on the file parse.tab.h, when parse.y is changed, the recipe ‘bison -d parse.y’ will be executed only once, and the prerequisites of both parse.tab.o and scan.o will be satisfied. (Presumably the file parse.tab.o will be recompiled from parse.tab.c and the file scan.o from scan.c, while foo is linked from parse.tab.o, scan.o, and its other prerequisites, and it will execute happily ever after.)
So you want to write:
%.shp, %.dbf %.prj %.shp.html %.shp.xml %.sbn %.sbx: %.zip
#unzip ...
Which can be shortened (technically) to:
$(addprefix %.,dbf prj shp.html shp.xml sbn sbx): %.zip
#unzip ...