How to create additional jar file with contents of all modules during maven build? - maven

I have a multi-module maven project (say project-xxx). Lets say it consists of 5 modules:
project-xxx (war)
--> module-1 (jar)
--> module-2 (jar)
--> module-3 (jar)
--> module-4 (jar)
--> module-5 (jar)
When the maven project is built, the war file is generated and it includes the jar files of the 5 modules as well.
Now, for a different purpose (i.e., deploy to a distributed cache, so we can run queries from command-line), I want to generate a single `jar' file as well which includes the java classes from all modules. I'm aware that it is against maven's philosophy to generate more than one artifact and I read this blog post and a few other questions on SO.
But creating this single jar file would greatly simplify a few other things in my project. What would be the best approach to go about generating this single jar file?

I am very much in favor of the one artifact per Maven project convention. That being said, if you need a single artifact that contains all of the classes for all of the modules, then make a dedicated single project to do so:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>your-group-id</groupId>
<artifactId>one-jar-to-rule-them-all</artifactId>
<version>your-version</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>your-group-id</groupId>
<artifactId>module-1</artifactId>
<version>your-version</version>
</dependency>
.
.
.
<dependency>
<groupId>your-group-id</groupId>
<artifactId>module-5</artifactId>
<version>your-version</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4.2</version>
<configuration>
<!--
This restricts the jar to classes from your group;
you may or may not want to do this.
-->
<artifactSet>
<includes>
<include>your-group-id</include>
</includes>
</artifactSet>
<createDependencyReducedPom>true</createDependencyReducedPom>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
This example project depends on each module and then uses the maven-shade-plugin to combine all of those modules together into a single jar artifact. You could also make this a child module of your parent project-xxx so it gets built by the reactor. This way, you can have both a war and an uber jar, but still keep the modularity of a standard Maven build.

I think you should consider introducing first separate profiles, so that profile1 would contain the configuration to result a proper war packaging. Profile2 could contain configuration using the maven-shade-plugin, in order to create an UBER jar out of your existing modules. Profiles are a very clean and maven-ish way to split different concerns.
For maven profiles see here. For the maven-shade-plugin see here.
Hope that helps.

Related

Exclude Java package from dependency jar

I want to use jar from third party vendor. But in this jar I have old version of Java package org.osgi.framework I need to find some way to exclude the package from the main project. Something like this:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.ibm</groupId>
<artifactId>com.ibm.ws.admin.client</artifactId>
<version>8.5.0</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>org.osgi.framework</exclusion>
</exclusions>
<type>jar</type>
</dependency>
Can you recommend some solution?
Although a better solution would be to re-pack the dependency (without the unwanted package) with a classifier (as described in this answer) and publish it on your enterprise Maven repository (or install it into your local Maven cache, if it's a personal project), below is a different solution which should also suit your needs.
You could have a multi-module Maven project, having a module with just this dependency and in it you could use the Maven Shade Plugin and its filters property as explained in its official example.
As per documentation, the filters element:
Archive Filters to be used. Allows you to specify an artifact in the form of a composite identifier as used by artifactSet and a set of include/exclude file patterns for filtering which contents of the archive are added to the shaded jar
In your case, the following configuration should apply the filter:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<filters>
<filter>
<artifact>com.ibm:com.ibm.ws.admin.client</artifact>
<excludes>
<exclude>org/osgi/framework/**</exclude>
</excludes>
</filter>
</filters>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
The generated jar from the package phase should not contain that package any longer. As part of the Maven output you should see:
[INFO] --- maven-shade-plugin:2.4.3:shade (default) # test-checksum ---
[INFO] Including com.ibm:com.ibm.ws.admin.client:jar:8.5.0 in the shaded jar.
[INFO] Replacing original artifact with shaded artifact.
You can verify the content of the generated jar, the filtered package should not be there.
Then, the output of this module will have the "new"/filtered jar you were looking for. Then the consumer module would just need to have a dependency on this module and as such have the filter applied.
An example of such a multimodule project would be:
+ aggregator/parent project
- filtered-dependency-module (applying the shade filter)
- consumer-module (having dependency on the filtered module)
Update
Further note: in the module which applies the filter, you should declare the dependency as optional so that the consumer module doesn't bring it in transitively again.
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.ibm</groupId>
<artifactId>com.ibm.ws.admin.client</artifactId>
<version>8.5.0</version>
<optional>true</optional>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Optional doesn't affect the module itself, only the consumer one. And the Shade plugin will keep on working (I re-tested it, just in case).

Why would a maven-war-plugin generate a JAR instead of a WAR?

I am following this Contract first using CXF tutorial and while the resulting pom.xml generates sources and even completes build successfully, it fails to create a WAR file.
Instead, it creates a JAR file.
My understanding is that the part in the pom.xml that's responsible for creating the WAR is:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1.1</version>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>D:/path/to/profile/autodeploy</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</plugin>
I don't see any <goal> or <execution> element there (unlike in the build-helper-maven-plugin one), but I also understand that with this plugin this is implied as even the official usage page demonstrates:
<project>
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<configuration>
<webappDirectory>/sample/servlet/container/deploy/directory</webappDirectory>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
...
</project>
So... what am I missing?
What could possibly explain a maven-war-plugin that behaves in unexpected way like this and produces a JAR instead of a WAR by default?
Is there a way to force it to produce a WAR?
packaging should be as below.
<packaging>war</packaging>
if it won't help then try binding your plug-in configuration with a lifecycle phase.
in your project definition , please check if packaging is missing or not , it should be some thing like this .
<groupId>some.groupid</groupId>
<artifactId>My Web Application</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1</version>
<packaging>war</packaging>
<description>My First Web Application</description>
By default maven war plugin binds to package phase of the lifecycle ,so its important that we should mention the type of packaging we want once the build is done.
I would like to suggest to have a look at the Maven specs for war plugin.

Can I have maven artifact run maven plugin when it is installed?

I have created a Maven plugin (called unpackTemplates) that unpacks a dependency jar file and copies resource files (in this case, templates) from it into a specific location in a project.
Right now, I put the following into the pom file of every project that has a dependency with templates. It looks like:
<project>
<groupId>DuriansAreDope</groupId>
<artifactId>DuriansAreDope</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<build>
<plugin>
<groupId>mycorp</groupId>
<artifactId>unpackTemplates</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<configuration>
<groupId>com.mycorp.lib</groupId>
<version>1.0</version>
<artifactId>Lib-With-Templates</artifactId>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>unpackTemplates</goal>
</goals>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<pluginManagement>....</pluginManagement>
</build>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.mycorp.lib</groupId>
<artifactId>Lib-With-Templates</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
The above project pom works for us. It calls the plugin and the plugin does it's job. However, we'd like to avoid adding the plugin section to the pom of every project.
It would make more sense to put that plugin section in the dependencies pom. This way the project pom does not need to be modified beyond adding the <dependency> tags as usual. And the dependency has it's plugin run wherever it is installed.
I've seen that the pom file for Gson contains a <build><plugins>...</plugins></build> section in it. When I give my dependencies the following pom files, however, the plugin is not run (although the dependency is found, downloaded, installed, etc correctly).
<project>
<groupId>com.mycorp.lib</groupId>
<artifactId>Lib-With-Templates</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<build>
<plugin>
<groupId>mycorp</groupId>
<artifactId>unpackTemplates</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<configuration>
<groupId>com.mycorp.lib</groupId>
<version>1.0</version>
<artifactId>Lib-With-Templates</artifactId>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>unpackTemplates</goal>
</goals>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<pluginManagement>....</pluginManagement>
</build>
</project>
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong, or if the Gson pom is simply doing something else entirely?
(NB: The groupId/version/artifactIds in <configuration> are necessary because they are (string) parameters to the plugin; presumably if I got the run-straight-from-dependency approach working I could refactor them away, but again, it's not even running the kludgy version with parameters.)
two points:
First I agree with khmarbaise in that you don't need a plugin of your own for those tasks. To unpack to a specific location you can use dependency:unpack-dependencies and outputDirectory parameter.
If you need more configuration you can use the assembly plugin to structure your artifact (which you want to unpack).
For the second point it seems to me that you want to use the contents of your lib-with-templates in many projects. Why don't you add the plugin and dependency to a parent pom which you include in every pom where you need it? Then you don't need to declare it in "every pom". If you don't really need it in every pom you can put it in a profile and choose a proper activation for it.
HTH!

How to include resources from war to another maven project

I have a maven project , which needs to copy webapp/WEB-INF/ resources from another maven project which is packaged as a war .
How do I do it ?
PLease suggest
As Bittrance said, you should use the maven dependency plugin.
The better way is to create project that include all your shared resources, probably a type zip, which is build up with the assembly plugin. This is the good "maven way". It's a better solution than unpacking a war.
Then, refer it
<dependency>
<groupId>com.mygroup/groupId>
<artifactId>my-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<type>zip</type>
</dependency>
Next, you use the maven dependency plugin to unpack your resources, in the directory of your choice (probably WEB-INF/ ?)
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unpack-cfg-test-resources</id>
<goals>
<goal>unpack-dependencies</goal>
</goals>
<phase>resources</phase>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/WEB-INF/</outputDirectory>
<includeArtifacIds>my-resources</includeArtifacIds>
<excludeTypes>pom</excludeTypes>
<excludeTransitive>true</excludeTransitive>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I'm not realy sure of this code snippet (written for another purpose), but this is an example.
For more information, please follow this link : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/
If you can't shared a common-project including your files, you can unpack war including only ftl (or whatever you want), but it's not a realy clean solution ;)
There is a lot of posts that deal with this subject :
Unzip dependency in maven
...
Just try with the keywords maven-dependency-plugin, unpack :)
Hope that will help you.
I can see some alternatives:
Use external references in your version control system to point all repos to the same files.
The Maven Dependency module can copy and unpack project dependencies. From there, you can use the Maven Assembly plugin (or Ant targets) to include parts of that dependency in your own installation.
At least for the FTL files, perhaps you could package them in a separate Jar file and then load them as resources through the class loader.
If the resources are filtered, you may get into problem with solution 1 if you want the filtered version and 2, 3 if you want the source version.
Hope this helps.
(This assumes your dependent project is java (jar) and not another web app, if it is a webapp I think the solution is similar).
I suggest a (slightly) different approach:
Instead of reading resources from war, add this to your war pom, to generate a jar in the artifact as well as a war:
<!-- maven war plugin config -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<configuration>
...
<attachClasses>true</attachClasses>
<classesClassifier>some-string</classesClassifier>
</configuration>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0</version>
</plugin>
...
<resources>
<!-- This is for inclusion in the jar, so dependent module can load it -->
<resource>
<targetPath>some-path</targetPath>
<directory>src/main/webapp/path...</directory>
<includes>
<include>your-resource</include>
</includes>
</resource>
</resources>
And this to your consuming pom, so the generated jar will be loaded:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.company</groupId>
<artifactId>...</artifactId>
<classifier>some-string</classifier>
</dependency>
Then you will be able to load the resources the usual way (getResourceAsStream("some-path/your-resource"))

Maven WAR dependency

I am writing a project for acceptance testing and for various reasons this is dependent on another project which is packaged as a WAR. I have managed to unpack the WAR using the maven-dependency-plugin, but I cannot get my project to include the unpacked WEB-INF/lib/*.jar and WEB-INF/classes/* to be included on the classpath so the build fails. Is there a way to include these files into the classpath, or is there a better way of depending on a WAR?
Many thanks.
There's another option since maven-war-plugin 2.1-alpha-2. In your WAR project:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1.1</version>
<configuration>
<attachClasses>true</attachClasses>
</configuration>
</plugin>
This creates a classes artifact which you can use in the acceptance tests project with:
<dependency>
<groupId>your-group-id</groupId>
<artifactId>your-artifact-id</artifactId>
<version>your-version</version>
<classifier>classes</classifier>
</dependency>
Indeed, by design, Maven doesn't resolve transitive dependencies of a war declared as dependency of a project. There is actually an issue about that, MNG-1991, but it won't be solved in Maven 2.x and I'm not sure that I don't know if overlays allow to workaround this issue. My understanding of the suggested solution is to duplicate the dependencies, for example in a project of type pom.
(EDIT: After some more digging, I found something interesting in this thread that I'm quoting below:
I have been helping out with the development of the AppFuse project over
the last month where we make heavy use of the war overlay feature in the
Maven war plugin. It is a really nifty feature!
To get max power with war overlays I have developed the Warpath plugin
that allows projects to use war artifacts as fully fledged dependencies.
In brief:
1) The contents of the /WEB-INF/classes directory in the war dependency
artifacts can be included in the project's classpath for normal compile,
etc tasks.
2) Transitive dependencies from the war dependency artifacts become
available for use by other plugins, e.g. compile and ear - so no more
having to include all the dependencies when creating skinny wars!
The plugin has now been actively used in the AppFuse project for the
last few months, and I feel it is at a point where it is both usable and
stable.
Would the war plugin team be interested in including the warpath
functionality inside the war plugin? It would seem to be the most
natural place to host it.
So, I don't have any experience with it, but the maven warpath plugin actually looks nice and simple and is available in the central repo. To use it,include the following plugin configuration element in your pom.xml file:
[...]
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.appfuse</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-warpath-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>add-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
[...]
And add the war dependencies you want included in the classpath as warpath type dependencies:
[...]
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.appfuse</groupId>
<artifactId>appfuse-web</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
<type>war</type>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.appfuse</groupId>
<artifactId>appfuse-web</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
<type>warpath</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
[...]
Both the war and warpath dependency types are needed: the war type is used by the Maven war plugin to do the war overlay, the warpath type is used by the Warpath plugin to determine the correct list of artifacts for inclusion in the project classpath.
I'd give it a try.)
Use overlays. First, your test project need to have also packaging war.
Declare dependency of war project you want to test:
<dependency>
<groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>your-project-arftifactId</artifactId>
<version>${project.version}</version>
<type>war</type>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
then configure maven-war-plugin overlay:
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<webResources>
<resource>
<directory>${basedir}/src/main/webresources</directory>
<filtering>true</filtering>
</resource>
</webResources>
<overlays>
<overlay/>
<overlay>
<groupId>your.group</groupId>
<artifactId>your-project-artifactId</artifactId>
</overlay>
</overlays>
</configuration>
</plugin>
In the above example in test project I overwrite webresources configuration files (like conxtext etc.).
EDIT: This solution wasn't tested with Maven 3.
Good point, Justin. That got me actually solving my problem, namely: including a war into an assembly AND including all its transitive dependencies.
I could not duplicate the war-dependency as 'jar' as you suggested since the assembly plugin would not find a jar referenced by that groupId/artefactId, but
duplicating the war-dependency as type pom
works!
The war and its transitive dependencies are not included in the assembly.
To exclude the (now also appearing) pom file I had to add an exclude element like this:
<excludes>
<exclude>*:pom</exclude>
</excludes>
into my assembly.xml file.
I think this could also be a workaround for the original question of this thread.
If you list the dependency on the war project as a jar dependency it seems to pickup the required jars/resources. I'm using Maven 2.2 + m2eclipse.

Resources