I am new with Bash, and trying to rename files in my folder keeping the first 9 characters intact and get rid of anything that comes after.
abc123456olda.jpg > abc123456.jpg
I wrote this;
for file in *
do
echo mv "$file" `echo "$file" | sed -e 's/(.{9}).*(\.jpg)$/$1$2/' *.jpg
done
Did not get it to work. Can someone guide what am I doing wrong?
You're not far off, try this:
for file in *.jpg; do
echo mv "$file" "$(echo "$file" | sed -E -e 's/(.{9}).*(\.jpg)$/\1\2/')"
done
There are some corrections. A important one is that $1$2 should be \1\2, and you need the -E flag to sed so that it understands the grouping with parenthesis.
Once you see the command is alright, remove the echo from the second line so mv actually gets executed.
Use bash's built-in parameter expansion operator rather than sed.
Also, you should put *.jpg in the for statement, not the sed argument; what you're doing is processing the contents of the files, not the filenames.
for file in *.jpg
do
mv "$file" "${file:0:9}.jpg"
done
${file:0:9} means the substring of $file starting from index 0 and having 9 characters.
I am trying to select the nth file in a folder of which the filename matches a certain pattern:
Ive tried using this with sed: e.g.,
sed -n 3p /path/to/files/pattern.txt
but it appears to return the 3rd line of the first matching file.
Ive also tried
sed -n 3p ls /path/to/files/*pattern*.txt
which doesnt work either.
Thanks!
Why sed, when bash is so much better at it?
Assuming some name n indicates the index you want:
Bash
files=(path/to/files/*pattern*.txt)
echo "${files[n]}"
Posix sh
i=0
for file in path/to/files/*pattern*.txt; do
if [ $i = $n ]; then
break
fi
i=$((i++))
done
echo "$file"
What's wrong with sed is that you would have to jump through many hoops to make it safe for the entire set of possible characters that can occur in a filename, and even if that doesn't matter to you you end up with a double-layer of subshells to get the answer.
file=$(printf '%s\n' path/to/files/*pattern*.txt | sed -n "$n"p)
Please, never parse ls.
ls -1 /path/to/files/*pattern*.txt | sed -n '3p'
or, if patterne is a regex pattern
ls -1 /path/to/files/ | egrep 'pattern' | sed -n '3p'
lot of other possibilities, it depend on performance or simplicity you look at
I have a file named test-domain, the contents of which contain the line 100.am.
When I do this, the line with 100.am is deleted from the test-domain file, as expected:
for x in $(echo 100.am); do sed -i "/$x/d" test-domain; done
However, if instead of echo 100.am, I read each line from a file named unwanted-lines, it does NOT work.
for x in $(cat unwanted-lines); do sed -i "/$x/d" test-domain; done
This is even if the only contents of unwanted-lines is one line, with the exact contents 100.am.
Does anyone know why sed delete line works if you use echo in your variable, but not if you use cat?
fgrep -v -f unwanted-lines test-domain > /tmp/Buffer
mv /tmp/Buffer test-domain
sed is not interesting in this case due to multiple call in shell (poor efficiency and lot of ressources used). The way to still use sed is to preload line to delete, and make a search base on this preloaded info but very heavy compare to fgrep in this case
Does anyone know why sed delete line works if you use echo in your
variable, but not if you use cat?
I believe that your file containing unwanted lines contains CR+LF line endings due to which it doesn't work when you use the file. You could strip the CR in your loop:
for x in $(cat unwanted-lines); do x="${x//$'\r'}"; sed -i "/$x/d" test-domain; done
One better strategy than yours would be to use a genuine editor, e.g., ed, as so:
ed -s test-domain < <(
shopt -s extglob
while IFS= read -r l; do
[[ $l = *([[:space:]]) ]] && continue
l=${l//./\\.}
echo "g/$l/d"
done < unwanted-lines
echo "wq"
)
Caveat. You must make sure that the file unwanted-lines doesn't contain any character that could clash with ed's regexps and commands. I have already included a match for a period (i.e., replace . with \.).
This method is quite efficient, as you're not forking so many times on sed, writing temp files, renaming them, etc.
Another possibility would be to use grep, but then you won't have the editing option ed offers.
Remark. ed is the standard editor.
why not just applying the sed command on your file?
sed -i '/.*100\.am/d' your_file
I am writing some BASH shell script that will continuously check a file to see if the file already contains "Completed!" before proceeding. (Of course, assume the file is being updated and will eventually contain the phrase "Completed!")
I am not sure how to do this. Thank you for your help.
You can do something like:
while ! grep -q -e 'Completed!' file ; do
sleep 1 # Or some other number of seconds
done
# Here the file contains completed
Amongst the standard utilities, tail has an option to keep reading from a file: tail -f. So filter the output of tail -f.
<some_file tail -f -n +1 | grep 'Completed!' | head -n 1 >/dev/null
There may be a delay due to buffering. You can at least reduce the delay by using fewer tools in the pipeline. In fact, some implementations of tail never buffer when you do tail -f, so the following snippet will return as soon as Completed! is written to the file.
<some_file tail -f -n +1 | sed -e '/Completed!/ q'
This assumes that the file is being appended to by some other tool. If the file is overwritten by the data-producing program after you start tail, this solution won't work. You can search the file periodically. On some systems you can call a notification mechanism to know whenever the file changes, e.g. with inotifywait under Linux.
I've done this in Kornshell:
tail -f somefile | while read line
do
echo $line
[[ $line == *Completed!* ]] && break
done
Note no quotes around the *Completed!* string. This allows the double square brackets to do glob pattern matching instead of string matching.
This seems to work in BASH too. However, the line with the Completed must end in a NL. Otherwise, it'll take an extra line before it breaks the loop.
You can use grep too:
tail -f somefile | while read line
do
echo $line
grep -iq "Completed!" && break
done
The -q parameter means quiet. If your grep doesn't take the -q parameter, you might have to pipe it to /dev/null. The -i is ignore case. Whether you want to do that is up to you.
The advantage is that you aren't doing any processing unless there's a line to read. Using sleep may mean you miss the line, or that you're processing when no line has been added to the file.
Using grep in a pipe you may turn on line buffering mode by adding the --line-buffered option!
I need to repeatedly remove the first line from a huge text file using a bash script.
Right now I am using sed -i -e "1d" $FILE - but it takes around a minute to do the deletion.
Is there a more efficient way to accomplish this?
Try tail:
tail -n +2 "$FILE"
-n x: Just print the last x lines. tail -n 5 would give you the last 5 lines of the input. The + sign kind of inverts the argument and make tail print anything but the first x-1 lines. tail -n +1 would print the whole file, tail -n +2 everything but the first line, etc.
GNU tail is much faster than sed. tail is also available on BSD and the -n +2 flag is consistent across both tools. Check the FreeBSD or OS X man pages for more.
The BSD version can be much slower than sed, though. I wonder how they managed that; tail should just read a file line by line while sed does pretty complex operations involving interpreting a script, applying regular expressions and the like.
Note: You may be tempted to use
# THIS WILL GIVE YOU AN EMPTY FILE!
tail -n +2 "$FILE" > "$FILE"
but this will give you an empty file. The reason is that the redirection (>) happens before tail is invoked by the shell:
Shell truncates file $FILE
Shell creates a new process for tail
Shell redirects stdout of the tail process to $FILE
tail reads from the now empty $FILE
If you want to remove the first line inside the file, you should use:
tail -n +2 "$FILE" > "$FILE.tmp" && mv "$FILE.tmp" "$FILE"
The && will make sure that the file doesn't get overwritten when there is a problem.
You can use -i to update the file without using '>' operator. The following command will delete the first line from the file and save it to the file (uses a temp file behind the scenes).
sed -i '1d' filename
For those who are on SunOS which is non-GNU, the following code will help:
sed '1d' test.dat > tmp.dat
You can easily do this with:
cat filename | sed 1d > filename_without_first_line
on the command line; or to remove the first line of a file permanently, use the in-place mode of sed with the -i flag:
sed -i 1d <filename>
No, that's about as efficient as you're going to get. You could write a C program which could do the job a little faster (less startup time and processing arguments) but it will probably tend towards the same speed as sed as files get large (and I assume they're large if it's taking a minute).
But your question suffers from the same problem as so many others in that it pre-supposes the solution. If you were to tell us in detail what you're trying to do rather then how, we may be able to suggest a better option.
For example, if this is a file A that some other program B processes, one solution would be to not strip off the first line, but modify program B to process it differently.
Let's say all your programs append to this file A and program B currently reads and processes the first line before deleting it.
You could re-engineer program B so that it didn't try to delete the first line but maintains a persistent (probably file-based) offset into the file A so that, next time it runs, it could seek to that offset, process the line there, and update the offset.
Then, at a quiet time (midnight?), it could do special processing of file A to delete all lines currently processed and set the offset back to 0.
It will certainly be faster for a program to open and seek a file rather than open and rewrite. This discussion assumes you have control over program B, of course. I don't know if that's the case but there may be other possible solutions if you provide further information.
The sponge util avoids the need for juggling a temp file:
tail -n +2 "$FILE" | sponge "$FILE"
If you want to modify the file in place, you could always use the original ed instead of its streaming successor sed:
ed "$FILE" <<<$'1d\nwq\n'
The ed command was the original UNIX text editor, before there were even full-screen terminals, much less graphical workstations. The ex editor, best known as what you're using when typing at the colon prompt in vi, is an extended version of ed, so many of the same commands work. While ed is meant to be used interactively, it can also be used in batch mode by sending a string of commands to it, which is what this solution does.
The sequence <<<$'1d\nwq\n' takes advantage of modern shells' support for here-strings (<<<) and ANSI quotes ($'...') to feed input to the ed command consisting of two lines: 1d, which deletes line 1, and then wq, which writes the file back out to disk and then quits the editing session.
As Pax said, you probably aren't going to get any faster than this. The reason is that there are almost no filesystems that support truncating from the beginning of the file so this is going to be an O(n) operation where n is the size of the file. What you can do much faster though is overwrite the first line with the same number of bytes (maybe with spaces or a comment) which might work for you depending on exactly what you are trying to do (what is that by the way?).
You can edit the files in place: Just use perl's -i flag, like this:
perl -ni -e 'print unless $. == 1' filename.txt
This makes the first line disappear, as you ask. Perl will need to read and copy the entire file, but it arranges for the output to be saved under the name of the original file.
should show the lines except the first line :
cat textfile.txt | tail -n +2
Could use vim to do this:
vim -u NONE +'1d' +'wq!' /tmp/test.txt
This should be faster, since vim won't read whole file when process.
How about using csplit?
man csplit
csplit -k file 1 '{1}'
This one liner will do:
echo "$(tail -n +2 "$FILE")" > "$FILE"
It works, since tail is executed prior to echo and then the file is unlocked, hence no need for a temp file.
Since it sounds like I can't speed up the deletion, I think a good approach might be to process the file in batches like this:
While file1 not empty
file2 = head -n1000 file1
process file2
sed -i -e "1000d" file1
end
The drawback of this is that if the program gets killed in the middle (or if there's some bad sql in there - causing the "process" part to die or lock-up), there will be lines that are either skipped, or processed twice.
(file1 contains lines of sql code)
tail +2 path/to/your/file
works for me, no need to specify the -n flag. For reasons, see Aaron's answer.
You can use the sed command to delete arbitrary lines by line number
# create multi line txt file
echo """1. first
2. second
3. third""" > file.txt
deleting lines and printing to stdout
$ sed '1d' file.txt
2. second
3. third
$ sed '2d' file.txt
1. first
3. third
$ sed '3d' file.txt
1. first
2. second
# delete multi lines
$ sed '1,2d' file.txt
3. third
# delete the last line
sed '$d' file.txt
1. first
2. second
use the -i option to edit the file in-place
$ cat file.txt
1. first
2. second
3. third
$ sed -i '1d' file.txt
$cat file.txt
2. second
3. third
If what you are looking to do is recover after failure, you could just build up a file that has what you've done so far.
if [[ -f $tmpf ]] ; then
rm -f $tmpf
fi
cat $srcf |
while read line ; do
# process line
echo "$line" >> $tmpf
done
Based on 3 other answers, I came up with this syntax that works perfectly in my Mac OSx bash shell:
line=$(head -n1 list.txt && echo "$(tail -n +2 list.txt)" > list.txt)
Test case:
~> printf "Line #%2d\n" {1..3} > list.txt
~> cat list.txt
Line # 1
Line # 2
Line # 3
~> line=$(head -n1 list.txt && echo "$(tail -n +2 list.txt)" > list.txt)
~> echo $line
Line # 1
~> cat list.txt
Line # 2
Line # 3
Would using tail on N-1 lines and directing that into a file, followed by removing the old file, and renaming the new file to the old name do the job?
If i were doing this programatically, i would read through the file, and remember the file offset, after reading each line, so i could seek back to that position to read the file with one less line in it.