when I used this I got error:
=SUM(iif(Fields!InitialAPUUsageHrRead.Value="true", "0.0",Fields!Hours_Read_Leg_Data.Value-Previous(Fields!Hours_Read_Leg_Data.Value)))
SSRS won't let you do this. It really doesn't like you breaking out of groups and datasets...
You can try referencing the exact textbox you want to get the value from:
ReportItems!TextBox1.Value
It will grab the box in your current grouping.
If that doesn't work, check out the LOOKUP and LOOKUPSET functions, they might help you accomplish what you're trying to do.
Related
Struggling to find rank values from highest to lowest, please see attached example of what I'm trying to achieve.
My current custom expression is:
Sum([ViolationAmt])
I have tried this:
Sum([ViolationAmt]) over Rank([ViolationAmt])
I've played around with the rank expressions however unable to implement...would be very grateful for some help.
Spotfire Rank Example
I need to make a lot of assumptions here because I don't know anything about your data set or really what your end goal is, so please comment back and/or provide more info in your question if I am off base.
the first assumption is that each row in your dataset represents one, for simplicity, [AccountID] with a [ViolationAmt]. I'm also guessing you want to show the top N accounts with the highest violations in a table, since that's what you've shown here.
so it sounds like you are going to need two calculated columns: one for getting the total [ViolationAmt] per account, and then another to rank them.
for the first, create a column called [TotalViolationAmt] or somesuch and use:
Sum([ViolationAmt]) OVER ([AccountID])
for the second:
Rank([TotalViolationAmt])
it will be useful to read the documentation on ranking functions if you haven't already.
you could probably combine these two into a single column with something like:
Rank(Sum([ViolationAmt]) OVER ([AccountID]))
but I haven't tested this at all. again, if you put in a bit more detail about what you're trying to accomplish it will help you get a better, more detailed answer :)
i'm working on a rdlc file, for a report. I need the value of a field to be on ProperCase, however the syntax seems to be wrong.
Using the formula StrConv...
Using the formula ProperCase, it's not even recognized...
This is the correct syntax, for anyone that has the same problem
Please let know how to do correlation from below given code for FaxNumer whose value is "ctl02". This value "ctl02" will change depending on number of details added. The script is performing task of adding first an fax number to an account and then update it. So whenever we have to update a fax details it will be dependent on "test12345" from first line. "test12345" will be parametrized and its value will change everytime.
I have tried various option but not able to correlate it properly.
Kindly let me know in case more information is required.
Look at CSS/JQuery Extractor or XPath Extractor, both can work with parent/child associations and siblings.
If you aren't very familiar with CSS or XPath locators and need assistance in developing appropriate expression update your question with some more lines of HTML code around.
I have the following problem:
I want to avoid that one field of the copied row gets copied into the new row. (ME51n)
I thought that I could search somewhere in the debugger for this field name.
Example:
first row has the MATNR: 100-1-15
now i want to search in the debugger for the field MATNR. Is this possible?
(I know this example does not make sense, but my field is not used that often because it's an self-created field)
Or is there an user-exit especially for that?
Use watchpoints for that particular aim that you stated. In official documentation you can learn how to do it. The problem of finding suitable user-exit is not related to original question.
I Have two objects in same page but with different locations(tabs), I want to verify those objects each a part ...
i cant uniquely any of objects because the have same properties.
These objects clearly are unique to a point because they have completely different text, this means that you will be able to create an object to match only one of them. My suggestion would be to look for the object by using its text property, one of them will always have "Top Ranking" the other you wil need to turn into a regular expression for the text and will be something "Participants (\d+)".
I am assuming that this next answer is unlikely to be possible so saved it for after the answer you are likely to use but the best solution would of course be to get someone with access to give these elements ids for you to search for. This will in the long term be much easier for you to maintain and not using text will allow this test to run in any language.
Manaysah, do these objects have different indexes? Use the object spy and determine which index they have, the ordinal identifier index may be a solution to your problem. You could also try adding an innertext object property if possible, using a wildcard for the number inside the () as it appears dynamic.
try using xpath for the objects...xpath will definitely be different