I'm working on Employee directory module in Odoo 11 and I want to create a compute field that check for each employee if it's related user is equivalent to the current user (logged user).
I create the compute function but it allways return false.
Python code :
user_id = fields.Many2one('res.users', 'User', related='resource_id.user_id')
current_user = fields.Boolean('is current user ?', compute='_get_current_user')
#api.depends('user_id')
def _get_current_user(self):
for e in self:
e.current_user = (self.env.user.id == e.user_id)
Any help please ?
Try out this code.
user_id = fields.Many2one('res.users', 'User', related='resource_id.user_id')
current_user = fields.Boolean('is current user ?', compute='_get_current_user')
#api.depends('user_id')
def _get_current_user(self):
for e in self:
e.current_user = (True if e.env.user.id == e.user_id.id else False)
Related
How do I check if an id exists in the database?
def get_user!(id), do: Repo.get!(User, id)
get_user!(id) can be used to get the user, is there a way to check if id exists?
I want something like below which would return true.
MyApp.Accounts.get_user!(user_id) == %MyApp.Accounts.User{id: user_id}
Ecto v3 supports this with Ecto.Repo.exists?/2
import Ecto.Query, only: [from: 2]
Repo.exists?(from u in User, where: u.id == ^user_id)
Repo.get! throws an error if no record is found.
You might want to use Repo.get instead like
Repo.get(User, user_id) != nil
You can also define a function to check if a give user id exists
def user_exist_by_id(user_id)do
#select just id to reduce payload
query = (from u in User, where: u.id == ^user_id, select: %{id: u.id})
found = Repo.one(query)
#if not result, found will be nil
found != nil
end
I have the following OpenERP 7 method:
# Function to get the vat number (CIF/NIF) and then show it on invoice form view
def _get_vat_num(self, cr, uid, ids, field_name, args=None, context=None):
partner_pool = self.pool.get('res.partner')
invoice_pool = self.pool.get('account.invoice')
res = {}
for inv in self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context):
invoice = invoice_pool.browse(cr,uid, inv.id, context=None)
partner = partner_pool.browse(cr, uid, invoice.partner_id.id, context=None)
res[inv.id] = partner.vat
return res
inv_vat = fields.Char(compute='_get_vat_num', string="CIF/NIF")
I need to rewrite it to Odoo v8 syntax. I have tried but it doesn't work:
def _get_vat_num(self):
partner_pool = self.env['res.partner']
invoice_pool = self.env['account.invoice']
res = {}
for inv in self.browse(self.id):
invoice = invoice_pool.browse(inv.id)
partner = partner_pool.browse(invoice.partner_id.id)
res[inv.id] = partner.vat
return res
What should be the correct code?
It looks like you're setting a functional field. You should instead be able to define the field as a related field like so:
inv_vat = fields.Char(string="VAT", related="partner_id.vat")
If you really want it as a functional field, this is how you would do it
inv_vat = fields.Char(string="VAT", compute="_get_vat_num")
def _get_vat_num(self):
# self is a recordset of account.invoice records
for invoice in self:
# to set a functional field, you just assign it
invoice.inv_vat = invoice.partner_id.vat
Check out the recordset documentation: https://www.odoo.com/documentation/8.0/reference/orm.html#recordsets
And the computed fields documentation:
https://www.odoo.com/documentation/8.0/reference/orm.html#computed-fields
I'm trying to create a field “complete_name” that displays a hierarchy name similar to whats done on the product categories grid but I can't seem to get it to work. It just puts Odoo in an endless loading screen when I access the relevant view using the new field "complete_name".
I have tried to copy the code used in addons/product/product.py and migrate to work with Odoo 9 API by using compute instead of .function type but it did not work.
Can someone help me understand whats wrong? Below is my model class which works fine without the complete_name field in my view.
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
complete_name = newFields.Char( compute = '_name_get_fnc', string = 'Name' )
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
res = self.name_get( self )
return dict( res )
Your compute function is supposed to define the value of an attribute of your class, not return a value. Ensure the value you are assigning complete_name is a string.
Also name_get() returns a tuple. I am not sure if you really want a string representation of this tuple or just the actual name value.
Try this
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = self.name_get()[1]
If you really want what is returned by name_get() then try this.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = str(self.name_get())
If you are still having issues I would incorporate some logging to get a better idea of what you are setting the value of complete_name to.
import logging
_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
_logger.info("COMPUTING COMPLETE NAME")
_logger.info("COMPLETE NAME: " + str(self.name_get()))
self.complete_name = self.name_get()
If this does not make it apparent what the issue is you could always try statically assigning it a value in the off chance that there is a problem with your view.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = "TEST COMPLETE NAME"
After further review I think I have the answer to my own question. It turns out as with a lot of things its very simple.
Simply use "_inherit" and inherit the product.category
model. This gives access to all the functions and fields
of product.category including the complete_name field
and computes the name from my custom model data. I was
able to remove my _name_get_func and just use the inherited
function.
The final model definition is below. Once this
update was complete I was able to add a "complete_name" field
to my view and the results were as desired!
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_inherit = 'product.category'
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
I'm trying to create a webapp in django 1.9 for task tracking and ordering. The different tasks are divided into spaces (like different projects). Now, I want to be able to choose what the task is assigned to in the CreateView.
The problem is, that I have a large number of users in my system, so I do not want to show a dropdown. Instead, I want to use a TextInput widget, to have the form check for the available options (this way I can also use typeahead on the client side).
This is the best I could come up with for the TaskCreate view:
class TaskCreate(LoginRequiredMixin, CreateView):
"""
a view for creating new tasks
"""
model = Task
fields = ['space', 'name', 'description', 'assigned_to', 'due_date']
template_name = "task_tracker/task_form.html"
success_url = reverse_lazy('tracker:my_open_task_list')
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
context = super(TaskCreate, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
context['header_caption'] = 'Create'
context['submit_caption'] = 'Create'
context['all_usernames'] = [x.username for x in User.objects.all()]
return context
def get_form(self, form_class=None):
form = super(TaskCreate, self).get_form(form_class)
form.fields['assigned_to'].choices = [(x.username, x.id) for x in User.objects.all()]
form.fields['assigned_to'].initial = self.request.user.username,
form.fields['assigned_to'].widget = widgets.TextInput()
try:
form.fields['space'].initial = Space.objects.get(name=self.request.GET['space'])
finally:
return form
def form_valid(self, form):
form.instance.created_by = self.request.user
form.instance.assigned_to = User.objects.get(username=form.cleaned_data['assigned_to'])
return super(TaskCreate, self).form_valid(form)
But the thing is that this is not working - the form still considers my choice to be illegal, even when I type in a valid username.
I tried to switch places the x.username and x.id in the choice field but it didn't help me.
I'm stuck on this for a week now. Can anybody help me please?
I need some help with a treeview. When I specify the model as
class TreeModel(QtGui.QStandardItemModel):
def __init__(self,parent=None):
QtGui.QStandardItemModel.__init__(self,parent)
self.rootItem = QtGui.QStandardItem('root')
I'm able to add items to the tree from the window with
def on_actionAddItem_triggered(self,checked=None):
if checked is None:
return
parent = self.model.invisibleRootItem()
parent.appendRow(QtGui.QStandardItem("test"))
But when I try to overload the model, the treeview doesn't update. The code fails to update the treeview. Can someone explain please?
class TreeModel(QtGui.QStandardItemModel):
def __init__(self,parent=None):
QtGui.QStandardItemModel.__init__(self,parent)
self.rootItem = QtGui.QStandardItem('root')
def data(self,index,role):
if role == QtCore.Qt.DisplayRole:
row = index.row()
text = self.rootItem.child(row)
return text.text()
def columnCount(self,parent=None):
return 1
def rowCount(self,parent=QtCore.QModelIndex()):
return self.rootItem.rowCount()
def headerData(self, column, orientation, role):
if role == QtCore.Qt.DisplayRole:
if orientation == QtCore.Qt.Horizontal:
if column == 0:
return 'zero'
I discovered that, invisibleRootItem() does not automatically point to the root item. Simply specifying parent = self.model.rootItem resolved the issue.