I'm trying to create a webapp in django 1.9 for task tracking and ordering. The different tasks are divided into spaces (like different projects). Now, I want to be able to choose what the task is assigned to in the CreateView.
The problem is, that I have a large number of users in my system, so I do not want to show a dropdown. Instead, I want to use a TextInput widget, to have the form check for the available options (this way I can also use typeahead on the client side).
This is the best I could come up with for the TaskCreate view:
class TaskCreate(LoginRequiredMixin, CreateView):
"""
a view for creating new tasks
"""
model = Task
fields = ['space', 'name', 'description', 'assigned_to', 'due_date']
template_name = "task_tracker/task_form.html"
success_url = reverse_lazy('tracker:my_open_task_list')
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
context = super(TaskCreate, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
context['header_caption'] = 'Create'
context['submit_caption'] = 'Create'
context['all_usernames'] = [x.username for x in User.objects.all()]
return context
def get_form(self, form_class=None):
form = super(TaskCreate, self).get_form(form_class)
form.fields['assigned_to'].choices = [(x.username, x.id) for x in User.objects.all()]
form.fields['assigned_to'].initial = self.request.user.username,
form.fields['assigned_to'].widget = widgets.TextInput()
try:
form.fields['space'].initial = Space.objects.get(name=self.request.GET['space'])
finally:
return form
def form_valid(self, form):
form.instance.created_by = self.request.user
form.instance.assigned_to = User.objects.get(username=form.cleaned_data['assigned_to'])
return super(TaskCreate, self).form_valid(form)
But the thing is that this is not working - the form still considers my choice to be illegal, even when I type in a valid username.
I tried to switch places the x.username and x.id in the choice field but it didn't help me.
I'm stuck on this for a week now. Can anybody help me please?
Related
I'm trying to webscrape a page with about 20 articles, but for some reason the spider is only finding the information needed for the very first article. How do I make it scrape every article on the page?
I've tried changing the xpaths multiple times, but I think that I'm too new to this to be sure what the issue is. When I take all the paths out of the for loop it scraps everything well, but its not in a format that allows me to transfer the data to a csv file.
import scrapy
class AfgSpider(scrapy.Spider):
name = 'afg'
allowed_domains = ['www.pajhwok.com/en']
start_urls = ['https://www.pajhwok.com/en/security-crime']
def parse(self, response):
container = response.xpath("//div[#id='taxonomy-page-block']")
for x in container:
title = x.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/text()").get()
author = x.xpath(".//div[#class='field-item even']/a/text()").get()
rel_url = x.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/#href").get()
yield{
'title' : title,
'author' : author,
'rel_url' : rel_url
}
You can use this code to collect required information:
import scrapy
class AfgSpider(scrapy.Spider):
name = 'test'
allowed_domains = ['www.pajhwok.com/en']
start_urls = ['https://www.pajhwok.com/en/security-crime']
def parse(self, response):
container = response.css("div#taxonomy-page-block div.node-article")
for x in container:
title = x.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/text()").get()
author = x.xpath(".//div[#class='field-item even']/a/text()").get()
rel_url = x.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/#href").get()
yield{
'title': title,
'author': author,
'rel_url': rel_url
}
The problem was that you code container = response.xpath("//div[#id='taxonomy-page-block']")
returns only one row, it's because id should be unique within the whole page, class can be the same for a few tags
Nice answer provided by #Roman. Another options to fix your script :
.Declaring the right XPath for your loop step :
container = response.xpath("//div[#class='node-inner clearfix']")
. Or, remove your loop step and use .getall() method to fetch the data :
title = response.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/text()").getall()
author = response.xpath(".//div[#class='field-item even']/a/text()").getall()
rel_url = response.xpath(".//h2[#class='node-title']/a/#href").getall()
I want to change an old image to a new image by using graphene-django.
In my database, there is one picture that has and id of 1.
I want to change the picture, that means I want to make a new picture that has an id of 1.
This is my mutation:
class ImageAndSelfMutation(graphene.Mutation):
class Arguments:
image = Upload()
Output = types.EditProfileResponse
def mutate(self, info, image, **kwargs):
user = info.context.user
ok = True
error = None
if user.is_authenticated is not None:
try:
first_image = models.Photo.objects.get(owner=user, order="first")
create_image = models.Photo.objects.create(image=image[0], owner=user)
serializer = serializers.ImageSerializer(first_image, data=create_image)
if serializer.is_valid():
serializer.save(owner=user)
return types.EditProfileResponse(ok=ok, error=error)
else:
error = '로그인이 필요합니다.'
return types.EditProfileResponse(ok=not ok, error=error)
This code makes some new data that has an id of 2, but I don't want to make new data. I want to change the id of 1's picture.
Could anyone help me?
Changing id of instance is bad idea. New id values should be generated by sequence in database. Instead of changing id you can duplicate previous instance with new image and then delete previous one:
previous_id = first_image.id
first_image.id = None
first_image.image = image[0]
first_image.save()
models.Photo.objects.filter(id=previous_id).delete()
This post should be a little more complex than usual.
We have created a new field for an account.invoice.line : pack_operation. With this field, we can print serial/lot number for each line on the PDF invoice (this part works well).
Many hours passed trying to write the domain to select the EXACT and ONLY stock pack operation for each invoice line.
In the code below, we used the domain [('id','=', 31)] to make our tests printing the PDF.
Ho to write this domain to be sure at 100 % that we will get the right stock pack operation for each invoice line?
I really need your help here... Too complex for my brain.
Our code :
class AccountInvoiceLine(models.Model):
_inherit = "account.invoice.line"
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')
def compute_stock_pack_operation_id(self):
stock_operation_obj = self.env['stock.pack.operation']
stock_operation = stock_operation_obj.search( [('id','=', 31)] )
self.pack_operation = stock_operation[0]
EDIT#1
I know that you won't like my code. But, this one seems to work. I take any comments and improvements with pleasure.
class AccountInvoiceLine(models.Model):
_inherit = "account.invoice.line"
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')#api.one
def compute_stock_pack_operation_id(self):
procurement_order_obj = self.env['procurement.order']
stock_operation_obj = self.env['stock.pack.operation']
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line = []
for saleorderline in self.sale_line_ids:
for procurement in saleorderline.procurement_ids:
for stockmove in procurement.move_ids:
if stockmove.picking_id.id not in all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line.append(stockmove.picking_id.id)
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line))
stock_operation = stock_operation_obj.search(
[ '&',
('picking_id','in',all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line),
('product_id','=',self.product_id.id)
]
)
self.pack_operation = stock_operation[0]
The pack_operation field is a computed field, that be default means that the field will not be saved on the database unless you set store=True when you define your field.
So, what you can do here is change:
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')
to:
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id', store=True)
And try running your query again.
I'm trying to create a field “complete_name” that displays a hierarchy name similar to whats done on the product categories grid but I can't seem to get it to work. It just puts Odoo in an endless loading screen when I access the relevant view using the new field "complete_name".
I have tried to copy the code used in addons/product/product.py and migrate to work with Odoo 9 API by using compute instead of .function type but it did not work.
Can someone help me understand whats wrong? Below is my model class which works fine without the complete_name field in my view.
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
complete_name = newFields.Char( compute = '_name_get_fnc', string = 'Name' )
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
res = self.name_get( self )
return dict( res )
Your compute function is supposed to define the value of an attribute of your class, not return a value. Ensure the value you are assigning complete_name is a string.
Also name_get() returns a tuple. I am not sure if you really want a string representation of this tuple or just the actual name value.
Try this
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = self.name_get()[1]
If you really want what is returned by name_get() then try this.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = str(self.name_get())
If you are still having issues I would incorporate some logging to get a better idea of what you are setting the value of complete_name to.
import logging
_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
_logger.info("COMPUTING COMPLETE NAME")
_logger.info("COMPLETE NAME: " + str(self.name_get()))
self.complete_name = self.name_get()
If this does not make it apparent what the issue is you could always try statically assigning it a value in the off chance that there is a problem with your view.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = "TEST COMPLETE NAME"
After further review I think I have the answer to my own question. It turns out as with a lot of things its very simple.
Simply use "_inherit" and inherit the product.category
model. This gives access to all the functions and fields
of product.category including the complete_name field
and computes the name from my custom model data. I was
able to remove my _name_get_func and just use the inherited
function.
The final model definition is below. Once this
update was complete I was able to add a "complete_name" field
to my view and the results were as desired!
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_inherit = 'product.category'
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
I am creating a set of things (each thing has FK to the set) directly with forms. The problem I am having is with the view(s).
I want to create the set for the things and then update all the things over and over using AJAX (Kind of like autosave). In my case the set is a SurveySet and the thing is a Survey.
def screen_many(request):
if not request.is_ajax():
# get an ordered QuerySet of students
students = ids_to_students(request.GET.items())
e_students = ids_to_students(request.GET.items(), 'e')
i_students = ids_to_students(request.GET.items(), 'i')
survey_count = len(students)
# Build a dataset of students with there associated behavior types.
data = [{'student':s.pk, 'behavior_type': 'E'} for s in e_students]
data += [{'student':s.pk, 'behavior_type': 'I'} for s in i_students]
# Use that dataset as initial data for a formset
SurveyFormset = formset_factory(SurveyForm, extra=0)
survey_formset = SurveyFormset(initial=data)
# ... not shown: customizing the crispy form helper
# Make a new survey set...
ss = SurveySet()
ss.user=request.user
ss.save()
if request.is_ajax():
surveyset = get_object_or_404(SurveySet, pk=ss.pk)
surveys = surveyset.survey_set.all()
survey_formset = SurveyFormset(request.POST, instance=surveyset)
if survey_formset.is_valid():
# Create surveys for this surveyset
for form in survey_formset.forms:
saved = form.save(commit=False)
saved.surveyset = ss
saved.save()
HttpResponse('saved.')
formsetWithStudents = zip(survey_formset.forms, students)
c = {
'formsetWithStudents' : formsetWithStudents,
'students' : students,
'survey_count' : survey_count,
'e_students': e_students,
'i_students': i_students,
'survey_formset': survey_formset,
}
c.update(csrf(request))
return render_to_response("reports/screen_many.html", c)
If my URL looks like this: http://127.0.0.1:8000/screen_many/?e_1=13&e_2=12&i_1=14 The view makes 3 survey sets all the while complaining that there is an
UnboundLocalError at /screen_many/
local variable 'ss' referenced before assignment
I feel like I need to make a separate view just for the ajax and I want the SurveySet object to only be created once.
So, in other words. I am filling in forms of a formset which update after clicking "view next form" This is in my template.
$('.next').click(function(){
$(this).parent().hide()
$(this).parent().next().show()
var posting = $.post('/screen_many/', $('form').serializeArray() );
posting.done(function(response){
console.log(response)
});
Or I could send the POST data here:
def save_as_you_go(request):
if request.is_ajax():
# Get the surveyset from POST
ss = request.POST['form-0-surveyset']
surveyset = get_object_or_404(SurveySet, pk=ss)
surveys = surveyset.survey_set.all()
SurveyFormSet = inlineformset_factory(SurveySet, Survey, form=SurveyForm, can_delete=False, extra=0)
survey_formset = SurveyFormSet(request.POST, instance=surveyset)
if survey_formset.is_valid():
for form in survey_formset.forms:
student = form.save(commit=False)
student.surveyset = surveyset
student.save()
return HttpResponse('saved.')
else:
return HttpResponseRedirect('/')
But then I get
[u'ManagementForm data is missing or has been tampered with']
Forgive me if my answer seems naive--I am new to Python and Django, but it looks like you are setting the ss variable in the non-ajax request and then referencing it in the ajax request. Perhaps you can set ss prior to the if statements?
#set ss variable before if statements
ss = SurveySet()
ss.user=request.user
ss.save()
if not request.is_ajax():
###do your non-ajax request stuff
if request.is_ajax():
###do your ajax request stuff