I am need a reusable, global dialog/modal component in my vue application. I need to be able to call it from any component and update its header text, body text and callback function once the dismiss button is pressed on the modal. I have tried importing a custom made dialog component into each component where I plan to use it and I have tried creating a global dialog where the values would be set using a mutable values in a modals vuex modal. This latter did not work because vuex will not store functions as values. I am new to vue and am not too sure how to go about this and absolutely any advice on a good way to go about it would help tremendously.
I did something like that before. The main ingredient is the handling of events through the $root because you can't relay in this scenario on the normal component communication.
// In your Global Modal
<script>
export default {
name: 'GlobalModal',
mounted () {
this.$root.$on('callGlobalModal', () => {
this.dialog = true
})
},
data: () => ({
dialog: false,
}),
}
</script>
Then call it frome anywhere using this.$root.$emit('callGlobalModal')
Related
I am opening a modal component from a Nativescript-Vue function which opens fine
this.$showModal(SuccessModal).then(() => { console.log('Modal Closed') });
I can call $modal.close from a button within the modal but getting $modal is undefined if I try to call this from, say, the mounted() hook.
I want the modal to close on its own after a three second timeout rather than the user having to click outside of the modal.
How would I go about this?
When using the traditional syntax for function you loose the current context (this), use arrow functions to avoid that.
setTimeout(() => {
this.$modal.close();
}, 3000);
Or you will have to keep reference to context in a variable
var me = this;
setTimeout(function() {
me.$modal.close();
}, 3000);
Here's a twist on #Manoj's response.
Instead of using an external variable to bind the global this, you could use a .bind() in your native (non-arrow) function if you're inclined to do so, like this:
setTimeout(function() {
this.$modal.close();
}.bind($this), 3000);
Im using bootstrap vue:
<b-form-checkbox #change="onoff('concurency_filter')" v-model="concurency_filter.onoff" switch size="lg"></b-form-checkbox>
And I need call ajax with state of this checkbox:
onoff: function (filter) {
axios.put('/api/user/accounts/'+this.account_id+'/togglefilter',
{
filter: filter,
status: this[filter].onoff //here still old value in this.concurency_filter.onoff
}).then(response => {
..........
});
},
But v-model still not changed when ajax is called. When checkbox clicked v-model must toggle true/false, but ajax called before v-model toggle it. How to deal with it?
I know that I can use WATCH in vue, but when first time ajax loading data it's triggering this WATCH event. I want trigger it only on click
Success:
onoff('concurency_filter', $event)
$event will contain exact value of checkbox right after click
How should one access state (just state, not the React State) of child components in React?
I've built a small React UI. In it, at one point, I have a Component displaying a list of selected options and a button to allow them to be edited. Clicking the button opens a Modal with a bunch of checkboxes in, one for each option. The Modal is it's own React component. The top level component showing the selected options and the button to edit them owns the state, the Modal renders with props instead. Once the Modal is dismissed I want to get the state of the checkboxes to update the state of the parent object. I am doing this by using refs to call a function on the child object 'getSelectedOptions' which returns some JSON for me identifying those options selected. So when the Modal is selected it calls a callback function passed in from the parent which then asks the Modal for the new set of options selected.
Here's a simplified version of my code
OptionsChooser = React.createClass({
//function passed to Modal, called when user "OK's" their new selection
optionsSelected: function() {
var optsSelected = this.refs.modal.getOptionsSelected();
//setState locally and save to server...
},
render: function() {
return (
<UneditableOptions />
<button onClick={this.showModal}>Select options</button>
<div>
<Modal
ref="modal"
options={this.state.options}
optionsSelected={this.optionsSelected}
/>
</div>
);
}
});
Modal = React.createClass({
getOptionsSelected: function() {
return $(React.findDOMNode(this.refs.optionsselector))
.find('input[type="checkbox"]:checked').map(function(i, input){
return {
normalisedName: input.value
};
}
);
},
render: function() {
return (
//Modal with list of checkboxes, dismissing calls optionsSelected function passed in
);
}
});
This keeps the implementation details of the UI of the Modal hidden from the parent, which seems to me to be a good coding practice. I have however been advised that using refs in this manner may be incorrect and I should be passing state around somehow else, or indeed having the parent component access the checkboxes itself. I'm still relatively new to React so was wondering if there is a better approach in this situation?
Yeah, you don't want to use refs like this really. Instead, one way would be to pass a callback to the Modal:
OptionsChooser = React.createClass({
onOptionSelect: function(data) {
},
render: function() {
return <Modal onClose={this.onOptionSelect} />
}
});
Modal = React.createClass({
onClose: function() {
var selectedOptions = this.state.selectedOptions;
this.props.onClose(selectedOptions);
},
render: function() {
return ();
}
});
I.e., the child calls a function that is passed in via props. Also the way you're getting the selected options looks over-fussy. Instead you could have a function that runs when the checkboxes are ticked and store the selections in the Modal state.
Another solution to this problem could be to use the Flux pattern, where your child component fires off an action with data and relays it to a store, which your top-level component would listen to. It's a bit out of scope of this question though.
I'm trying to experiment here. I want to build a component that auto populates some data from an ajax request after mounting. Something like this:
var AjaxComponent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {
data: {}
};
},
render: function() {
return (
<div>
{this.state.data.text}
</div>
);
},
componentDidMount: function() {
makeAjaxResquest(this.props.url).then(function(response){
this.setState({
data: response.body // or something
});
}.bind(this));
}
});
With that example component, I'd use <AjaxComponent url="/url/to/fetch" /> to display the content.
Now, what if I'd like to access different bits of data from children elements? Can I do something like this?
<AjaxComponent url="/url/to/fetch">
<div>
<header>{RESPONSE.title}</header>
<div>
{RESPONSE.text}
</div>
</div>
</AjaxComponent>
No problem if it doesn't render anything before the ajax request ends. The thing is how could I pass the data for children to render, not as props. Is it possible?
I had a similar scenario where I had similar Components that would query data from different APIs. Assuming you know the expected response from a given API, you could do it the same way perhaps.
Essentially make a generic Component where it props functions as an "API" of sorts, then define different types of sub components and their associated render function.
For example:
In widget, you then do something like this, where widgets is just a plain javascript file with a bunch of functions:
componentDidMount: widgets[type].componentDidMount(),
render: widgets[type].render().
In widgets, it would be like this:
var widgets = {
widget1: {
componentDidMount: function () {
//Ajax call..
},
render: function() {
//How should I draw?
}
},
widget2: //Same format, different functions
Then in some parent component you simply go
< Widget type="widget1" \>
or whatever.
There are a couple weird things about this that probably don't sit right with React. First off, you should take state all the way up to the top-level component, so I wouldn't do my ajax calls in componentDidMount...I'd more likely get the data I want for the widgets I want to render at a higher level, then pass that in as a prop too if it won't change until I make another API call (thinking Flux style flow here). Then, just pass in the data as a prop as well and just specify the render functions:
< Widget data={this.state.data[0]} type=widget1 />
The "gotcha" here is that you are making an assumption that whatever is in this data prop will match what you need in the widget type. I would pass in an object, and then validate it all in the render function etc.
That's one way. Not sure if it's valid, I'm sure someone who knows more could pick it apart but it suited my use case and I now have a library of similar components that I can selectively render by passing in data and a type, then looking up the appropriate render function and checking to make sure the data object contains everything I need to render.
I am using backbone.js and trying to stay strict to the model-view-controller structure as I learn it. I have an onclick function for a link in one of my views that I am not sure where to put. Is the best place to keep this in the render function of the view?
Thanks
More specifically, the onclick performs a facebook login and then adds the user to my database if they are not currently in it. Don't know if this changes anything.
Here is what I think I will go with:
var NewUserView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: $('#window'),
render: function(){
// Render
this.listeners();
},
listeners: function(){
// onclick and other listeners
}
});
From the Backbone documentation:
In Backbone, the View class can also be thought of as a kind of
controller, dispatching events that originate from the UI, with the
HTML template serving as the true view. We call it a View because it
represents a logical chunk of UI, responsible for the contents of a
single DOM element.
Here's the general way to handle events in Backbone:
var NewUserView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: $('#window'),
render: function() {
// Render
},
events: {
"click #facebookButton": "loginViaFacebook"
},
loginViaFacebook: {
// Perform facebook login and add user to database
}
});
Where do you want the link to appear? On View page right? So , you should keep it in the same view on which you want the link to appear.
But , if you are building an architecture rather than just a web application, then you should put the onclick function in some different file where you will keep all these function and then import them in the view as required or keeping them in separate files and bundling them for import on view page.
Please make a file and write all the functions in that file and include that file in the your view file and use the onClick in the anchor tag. Please let me know if this make sense.