I have a shell script (script.sh) on a local linux machine that I want to run on a few remote servers. The script should take a local txt file (output.txt) as an argument and write to it from the remote server.
script.sh:
#!/bin/sh
file="$1"
echo "hello from remote server" >> $file
I have tried the following with no success:
ssh user#host "bash -s" < script.sh /path/to/output.txt
So if I'm reading this correctly...
script.sh is stored on the local machine, but you'd like to execute it on remote machines,
output.txt should get the output of the remotely executed script, but should live on the local machine.
As you've written things in your question, you're providing the name of the local output file to a script that won't be run locally. While $1 may be populated with a value, that file it references is nowhere to be seen from the perspective of where it's running.
In order to get a script to run on a remote machine, you have to get it to the remote machine. The standard way to do this would be to copy the script there:
$ scp script.sh user#remotehost:.
$ ssh user#remotehost sh ./script.sh > output.txt
Though, depending on the complexity of the script, you might be able to get away with embedding it:
$ ssh user#remotehost sh -c "$(cat script.sh)" > output.txt
The advantage of this is of course that it doesn't require disk space to be used on the remote machine. But it may be trickier to debug, and the script may function a little differently if it's run in-line like this rather than from a file. (For example, positional options will be different.)
If you REALLY want to provide the local output file as an option to the script you're running remotely, then you need to include a remote path to get to that script. For example:
script.sh:
#!/bin/sh
outputhost="${1%:*}" # trim off path, leaving host
outputpath="${1#*:}" # trim off host, leaving path
echo "Hello from $(hostname)." | ssh "$outputhost" "cat >> '$outputpath'"
Then after copying the script over, call the script with:
$ ssh user#remotehost sh ./script.sh localhostname:/path/to/output.txt
That way, script.sh running on the remote host will send its output independently, rather than through your existing SSH connection. Of course, you'll want to set up SSH keys and such to facilitate this extra connection.
You can achieve it like below:-
For saving output locally on UNIX/Linux:
ssh remote_host "bash -s script.sh" > /tmp/output.txt
The first line of your script file should be #!/bin/bash and you don't need to use bash -s in your command line. Lets try like below:-
Better always put full path for your bash file like
ssh remote_host "/tmp/scriptlocation/script.sh" > /tmp/output.txt
For testing execute any unix command first:-
ssh remote_host "/usr/bin/ls -l" > /tmp/output.txt
For saving output locally on Windows:,
ssh remote_host "script.sh" > .\output.txt
Better use plink.exe . Example
plink remote_host "script.sh" > log.txt
Related
I have a local bash script with some useful functions I use frequently.
Is there any way to source this file on a remote host on login?
Let's say, the name of the local file with functions helper.sh, it has test() function that just outputs "test msg"
localhost$ ls
helper.sh
localhost$. ./helper.sh
localhost$test
test msg
I log in to a remote host and want my test() function from the helper.sh working on the remote host without copying helper.sh onto the remote host in advance:
localhost$ ssh user#remotehost # or something else to make my script work on remote host
remotehost$ test
test msg
I have a special function for this:
function ssh_with_rcfile
{
if (( $# == 1 )); then
local remote_hostname=$(echo ${1:?Need remote hostname} | sed 's/^[^#]*#//') # always rsync as default user
rsync --quiet \
$LINUX_CONFIG_DIR/.sshrc \
$LINUX_CONFIG_DIR/some_other_file.sh \
$remote_hostname:/tmp/${USER}/
/usr/bin/ssh -t $1 "bash --rcfile /tmp/${USER}/.sshrc -i"
else
# TODO: This is not very useful, probably better to just append any remaining arguments to the ssh command above
/usr/bin/ssh "$#"
fi
}
ssh -t combined with the remote bash --rcfile command allows you to effectively source a remote file upon login. So I just rsync my .sshrc file up to the remote before logging in.
One caveat is that you can only have a single rcfile, so if you want to source multiple files (e.g. some_other_file.sh above), you have to handle them all from inside of .sshrc.
ssh user#server './test/file.sh'
The command logs you in with a command to be run, in this example which is to run the file.sh
The backticks are used to run the command on the remote machine, and then pass the output to your local machine, as if you entered the command on the local machine.
I am creating a Jenkins job in which am running a ssh command to execute a script for comparing two folders using diff command on a remote server. Script is running fine, output file is getting created. But after this command Jenkins execute shell block is failed.
Command:
ssh -T user#dtest.com "bash /tmp/sample.sh" >> result.txt
Log:
ssh -T user#dtest.com "bash /tmp/sample.sh" >> result.txt
stdin: is not a tty
"Execute shell" is marked as failure
I am not sure what sample.sh is supposed to do, but I understand that you are trying to capture what is logged by this script.
I would try several solutions:
ssh -T user#dtest.com "bash /tmp/sample.sh >> result.txt"
This should save your output in your remote server. Then you could copy this file from remote to local using:
scp user#dtest.com:/remote/dir/result.txt /local/dir/
More context: Copying files from server to local computer using ssh
If you are choosing this solution, you could also consider to write your result.txt directly from your script, and keep the console output for important logging purpose.
Another Solution I could think of would be to use
ssh user#dtest.com "bash /tmp/sample.sh" > result.txt
With this solution you will redirect your output directly to your local machine.
But you will need to delete the ssh "-T" option. And you will run into other problems with Jenkins. So this might not fit you.
ssh -T Disables pseudo-tty allocation, what sounds like your problem's root cause. (https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E36784_01/html/E36870/ssh-1.html)
I want to modify an existing variable on a remote machine. On a local machine I use 'sed' for that. But how can I achieve this on a remote machine?
comlink.sh:
The remote file containing the variable that should be changed.
#!/bin/bash
test=1
new=2
ready=0
How I change that variable locally:
sed 's/ready=.*/ready=1/' /home/pi/comlink.sh > tmp
mv tmp /home/pi/comlink.sh
My approach of what I want to achieve remotely:
sed 's/ready=.*/ready=1/' ssh pi#[myIP] /home/pi/comlink.sh > tmp
mv ssh pi#[myIP] tmp /home/pi/comlink.sh
But this is not the right way or syntax. I think I might need some help here. Thanks!
Do this: it's really just a quoting challenge -- execute the sed command remotely
ssh pi#ip "sed -i 's/ready=.*/ready=1/' /home/pi/comlink.sh"
The first word in a Bash expression is a command (a program, alias, function, builtin, etc.). ssh is a program to connect to remote machines, so you can't just drop the string "ssh" into other commands and have them do the work of ssh. The confusion is understandable because the opposite is somewhat true - you can pass arbitrary commands to ssh in order to execute them on the remote machine.
So while sed PATTERN ssh pi#[myIP] ... is meaningless (you're applying PATTERN to files in your current directory called ssh and pi#[myIP], which presumably don't exist), you can say something like:
ssh pi#[myIP] "cat /home/pi/comlink.sh"
To output the contents of a file on your remote machine named /home/pi/comlink.sh.
You can also do more complex operations, like output redirection (>), over ssh, but you need to ensure the full command you want to run is being passed to ssh by quoting it - otherwise the output redirection will occur locally. Compare:
ssh pi#[myIP] echo foo > /tmp/foo
vs.
ssh pi#[myIP] 'echo foo > /tmp/foo'
The former will invoke echo foo on your remote machine and write the output to /tmp/foo on your local machine. The latter will invoke echo foo > /tmp/foo on the remote machine.
Take a look also at the -i flag for sed - it will apply the pattern in-place to the given file(s), so you don't need to write to a temporary file and then move it.
I often have to login to one of several servers and go to one of several directories on those machines. Currently I do something of this sort:
localhost ~]$ ssh somehost
Welcome to somehost!
somehost ~]$ cd /some/directory/somewhere/named/Foo
somehost Foo]$
I have scripts that can determine which host and which directory I need to get into but I cannot figure out a way to do this:
localhost ~]$ go_to_dir Foo
Welcome to somehost!
somehost Foo]$
Is there an easy, clever or any way to do this?
You can do the following:
ssh -t xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx "cd /directory_wanted ; bash --login"
This way, you will get a login shell right on the directory_wanted.
Explanation
-t Force pseudo-terminal allocation. This can be used to execute arbitrary screen-based programs on a remote machine, which can be very useful, e.g. when implementing menu services.
Multiple -t options force tty allocation, even if ssh has no local tty.
If you don't use -t then no prompt will appear.
If you don't add ; bash then the connection will get closed and return control to your local machine
If you don't add bash --login then it will not use your configs because its not a login shell
You could add
cd /some/directory/somewhere/named/Foo
to your .bashrc file (or .profile or whatever you call it) at the other host. That way, no matter what you do or where you ssh from, whenever you log onto that server, it will cd to the proper directory for you, and all you have to do is use ssh like normal.
Of curse, rogeriopvl's solution works too, but it's a tad bit more verbose, and you have to remember to do it every time (unless you make an alias) so it seems a bit less "fun".
My preferred approach is using the SSH config file (described below), but there are a few possible solutions depending on your usages.
Command Line Arguments
I think the best answer for this approach is christianbundy's reply to the accepted answer:
ssh -t example.com "cd /foo/bar; exec \$SHELL -l"
Using double quotes will allow you to use variables from your local machine, unless they are escaped (as $SHELL is here). Alternatively, you can use single quotes, and all of the variables you use will be the ones from the target machine:
ssh -t example.com 'cd /foo/bar; exec $SHELL -l'
Bash Function
You can simplify the command by wrapping it in a bash function. Let's say you just want to type this:
sshcd example.com /foo/bar
You can make this work by adding this to your ~/.bashrc:
sshcd () { ssh -t "$1" "cd \"$2\"; exec \$SHELL -l"; }
If you are using a variable that exists on the remote machine for the directory, be sure to escape it or put it in single quotes. For example, this will cd to the directory that is stored in the JBOSS_HOME variable on the remote machine:
sshcd example.com \$JBOSS_HOME
SSH Config File
If you'd like to see this behavior all the time for specific (or any) hosts with the normal ssh command without having to use extra command line arguments, you can set the RequestTTY and RemoteCommand options in your ssh config file.
For example, I'd like to type only this command:
ssh qaapps18
but want it to always behave like this command:
ssh -t qaapps18 'cd $JBOSS_HOME; exec $SHELL'
So I added this to my ~/.ssh/config file:
Host *apps*
RequestTTY yes
RemoteCommand cd $JBOSS_HOME; exec $SHELL
Now this rule applies to any host with "apps" in its hostname.
For more information, see http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/ssh_config.5.html
I've created a tool to SSH and CD into a server consecutively – aptly named sshcd. For the example you've given, you'd simply use:
sshcd somehost:/some/directory/somewhere/named/Foo
Let me know if you have any questions or problems!
Based on additions to #rogeriopvl's answer, I suggest the following:
ssh -t xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx "cd /directory_wanted && bash"
Chaining commands by && will make the next command run only when the previous one was successful (as opposed to using ;, which executes commands sequentially). This is particularly useful when needing to cd to a directory performing the command.
Imagine doing the following:
/home/me$ cd /usr/share/teminal; rm -R *
The directory teminal doesn't exist, which causes you to stay in the home directory and remove all the files in there with the following command.
If you use &&:
/home/me$ cd /usr/share/teminal && rm -R *
The command will fail after not finding the directory.
In my very specific case, I just wanted to execute a command in a remote host, inside a specific directory from a Jenkins slave machine:
ssh myuser#mydomain
cd /home/myuser/somedir
./commandThatMustBeRunInside_somedir
exit
But my machine couldn't perform the ssh (it couldn't allocate a pseudo-tty I suppose) and kept me giving the following error:
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal
I could get around this issue passing "cd to dir + my command" as a parameter of the ssh command (to not have to allocate a Pseudo-terminal) and by passing the option -T to explicitly tell to the ssh command that I didn't need pseudo-terminal allocation.
ssh -T myuser#mydomain "cd /home/myuser/somedir; ./commandThatMustBeRunInside_somedir"
I use the environment variable CDPATH
going one step further with the -t idea. I keep a set of scripts calling the one below to go to specific places in my frequently visited hosts. I keep them all in ~/bin and keep that directory in my path.
#!/bin/bash
# does ssh session switching to particular directory
# $1, hostname from config file
# $2, directory to move to after login
# can save this as say 'con' then
# make another script calling this one, e.g.
# con myhost repos/i2c
ssh -t $1 "cd $2; exec \$SHELL --login"
My answer may differ from what you really want, but I write here as may be useful for some people. In my solution you have to enter into the directory once and then every new ssh session goes to the same dir (after the first logout).
How to ssh to the same directory you have been in your last login.
(I assume you use bash on the remote node.)
Add this line to your ~/.bash_logout on the remote node(!):
echo $PWD > ~/.bash_lastpwd
and these lines to the ~/.bashrc file (still on the remote node!)
if [ -f ~/.bash_lastpwd ]; then
cd $(cat ~/.bash_lastpwd)
fi
This way you save your current path on every logout and .bashrc put you into that directory after login.
ps: You can tweak it further like using the SSH_CLIENT variable to decide to go into that directory or not, so you can differentiate between local logins and ssh or even between different ssh clients.
Another way of going to directly after logging in is create "Alias". When you login into your system just type that alias and you will be in that directory.
Example : Alias = myfolder '/var/www/Folder'
After you log in to your system type that alias (this works from any part of the system)
this command if not in bashrc will work for current session. So you can also add this alias to bashrc to use that in future
$ myfolder => takes you to that folder
I know this has been answered ages ago but I found the question while trying to incorporate an ssh login in a bash script and once logged in run a few commands and log back out and continue with the bash script. The simplest way I found which hasnt been mentioned elsewhere because it is so trivial is to do this.
#!/bin/bash
sshpass -p "password" ssh user#server 'cd /path/to/dir;somecommand;someothercommand;exit;'
Connect With User
In case if you don't know this, you can use this to connect by specifying both user and host
ssh -t <user>#<Host domain / IP> "cd /path/to/directory; bash --login"
Example: ssh -t admin#test.com "cd public_html; bash --login"
You can also append the commands to be executed on every login by appending it in the double quotes with a ; before each command
Unfortunately, the suggested solution (of #rogeriopvl) doesn't work when you use multiple hops, so I found another one.
On remote machine add into ~/.bashrc the following:
[ "x$CDTO" != "x" ] && cd $CDTO
This allows you to specify the desired target directory on command line in this way:
ssh -t host1 ssh -t host2 "CDTO=/desired_directory exec bash --login"
Sure, this way can be used for a single hop too.
This solution can be combined with the usefull tip of #redseven for greater flexibilty (if no $CDTO, go to saved directory, if exists).
SSH itself provides a means of communication, it does not know anything about directories. Since you can specify which remote command to execute (this is - by default - your shell), I'd start there.
simply modify your home with the command:
usermod -d /newhome username
I have to run a local shell script (windows/Linux) on a remote machine.
I have SSH configured on both machine A and B. My script is on machine A which will run some of my code on a remote machine, machine B.
The local and remote computers can be either Windows or Unix based system.
Is there a way to run do this using plink/ssh?
If Machine A is a Windows box, you can use Plink (part of PuTTY) with the -m parameter, and it will execute the local script on the remote server.
plink root#MachineB -m local_script.sh
If Machine A is a Unix-based system, you can use:
ssh root#MachineB 'bash -s' < local_script.sh
You shouldn't have to copy the script to the remote server to run it.
This is an old question, and Jason's answer works fine, but I would like to add this:
ssh user#host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ENDSSH
This can also be used with su and commands which require user input. (note the ' escaped heredoc)
Since this answer keeps getting bits of traffic, I would add even more info to this wonderful use of heredoc:
You can nest commands with this syntax, and that's the only way nesting seems to work (in a sane way)
ssh user#host <<'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user#host2 <<'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
You can actually have a conversation with some services like telnet, ftp, etc. But remember that heredoc just sends the stdin as text, it doesn't wait for response between lines
I just found out that you can indent the insides with tabs if you use <<-END!
ssh user#host <<-'ENDSSH'
#commands to run on remote host
ssh user#host2 <<-'END2'
# Another bunch of commands on another host
wall <<-'ENDWALL'
Error: Out of cheese
ENDWALL
ftp ftp.example.com <<-'ENDFTP'
test
test
ls
ENDFTP
END2
ENDSSH
(I think this should work)
Also see
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/here-docs.html
Also, don't forget to escape variables if you want to pick them up from the destination host.
This has caught me out in the past.
For example:
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo \$HOME"
prints out /home/user2
while
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo $HOME"
prints out /home/user
Another example:
user#host> ssh user2#host2 "echo hello world | awk '{print \$1}'"
prints out "hello" correctly.
This is an extension to YarekT's answer to combine inline remote commands with passing ENV variables from the local machine to the remote host so you can parameterize your scripts on the remote side:
ssh user#host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'
# commands to run on remote host
echo $ARG1 $ARG2
ENDSSH
I found this exceptionally helpful by keeping it all in one script so it's very readable and maintainable.
Why this works. ssh supports the following syntax:
ssh user#host remote_command
In bash we can specify environment variables to define prior to running a command on a single line like so:
ENV_VAR_1='value1' ENV_VAR_2='value2' bash -c 'echo $ENV_VAR_1 $ENV_VAR_2'
That makes it easy to define variables prior to running a command. In this case echo is our command we're running. Everything before echo defines environment variables.
So we combine those two features and YarekT's answer to get:
ssh user#host ARG1=$ARG1 ARG2=$ARG2 'bash -s' <<'ENDSSH'...
In this case we are setting ARG1 and ARG2 to local values. Sending everything after user#host as the remote_command. When the remote machine executes the command ARG1 and ARG2 are set the local values, thanks to local command line evaluation, which defines environment variables on the remote server, then executes the bash -s command using those variables. Voila.
<hostA_shell_prompt>$ ssh user#hostB "ls -la"
That will prompt you for password, unless you have copied your hostA user's public key to the authorized_keys file on the home of user .ssh's directory. That will allow for passwordless authentication (if accepted as an auth method on the ssh server's configuration)
I've started using Fabric for more sophisticated operations. Fabric requires Python and a couple of other dependencies, but only on the client machine. The server need only be a ssh server. I find this tool to be much more powerful than shell scripts handed off to SSH, and well worth the trouble of getting set up (particularly if you enjoy programming in Python). Fabric handles running scripts on multiple hosts (or hosts of certain roles), helps facilitate idempotent operations (such as adding a line to a config script, but not if it's already there), and allows construction of more complex logic (such as the Python language can provide).
cat ./script.sh | ssh <user>#<host>
chmod +x script.sh
ssh -i key-file root#111.222.3.444 < ./script.sh
Try running ssh user#remote sh ./script.unx.
Assuming you mean you want to do this automatically from a "local" machine, without manually logging into the "remote" machine, you should look into a TCL extension known as Expect, it is designed precisely for this sort of situation. I've also provided a link to a script for logging-in/interacting via SSH.
https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/expect
http://bash.cyberciti.biz/security/expect-ssh-login-script/
ssh user#hostname ". ~/.bashrc;/cd path-to-file/;. filename.sh"
highly recommended to source the environment file(.bashrc/.bashprofile/.profile). before running something in remote host because target and source hosts environment variables may be deffer.
I use this one to run a shell script on a remote machine (tested on /bin/bash):
ssh deploy#host . /home/deploy/path/to/script.sh
if you wanna execute command like this
temp=`ls -a`
echo $temp
command in `` will cause errors.
below command will solve this problem
ssh user#host '''
temp=`ls -a`
echo $temp
'''
If the script is short and is meant to be embedded inside your script and you are running under bash shell and also bash shell is available on the remote side, you may use declare to transfer local context to remote. Define variables and functions containing the state that will be transferred to the remote. Define a function that will be executed on the remote side. Then inside a here document read by bash -s you can use declare -p to transfer the variable values and use declare -f to transfer function definitions to the remote.
Because declare takes care of the quoting and will be parsed by the remote bash, the variables are properly quoted and functions are properly transferred. You may just write the script locally, usually I do one long function with the work I need to do on the remote side. The context has to be hand-picked, but the following method is "good enough" for any short scripts and is safe - should properly handle all corner cases.
somevar="spaces or other special characters"
somevar2="!##$%^"
another_func() {
mkdir -p "$1"
}
work() {
another_func "$somevar"
touch "$somevar"/"$somevar2"
}
ssh user#server 'bash -s' <<EOT
$(declare -p somevar somevar2) # transfer variables values
$(declare -f work another_func) # transfer function definitions
work # call the function
EOT
The answer here (https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883) works great if
you're trying to run a script on a remote linux machine using plink or ssh.
It will work if the script has multiple lines on linux.
**However, if you are trying to run a batch script located on a local
linux/windows machine and your remote machine is Windows, and it consists
of multiple lines using **
plink root#MachineB -m local_script.bat
wont work.
Only the first line of the script will be executed. This is probably a
limitation of plink.
Solution 1:
To run a multiline batch script (especially if it's relatively simple,
consisting of a few lines):
If your original batch script is as follows
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop
python filename.py
you can combine the lines together using the "&&" separator as follows in your
local_script.bat file:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8055390/4752883:
cd C:\Users\ipython_user\Desktop && python filename.py
After this change, you can then run the script as pointed out here by
#JasonR.Coombs: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2732991/4752883 with:
`plink root#MachineB -m local_script.bat`
Solution 2:
If your batch script is relatively complicated, it may be better to use a batch
script which encapsulates the plink command as well as follows as pointed out
here by #Martin https://stackoverflow.com/a/32196999/4752883:
rem Open tunnel in the background
start plink.exe -ssh [username]#[hostname] -L 3307:127.0.0.1:3306 -i "[SSH
key]" -N
rem Wait a second to let Plink establish the tunnel
timeout /t 1
rem Run the task using the tunnel
"C:\Program Files\R\R-3.2.1\bin\x64\R.exe" CMD BATCH qidash.R
rem Kill the tunnel
taskkill /im plink.exe
This bash script does ssh into a target remote machine, and run some command in the remote machine, do not forget to install expect before running it (on mac brew install expect )
#!/usr/bin/expect
set username "enterusenamehere"
set password "enterpasswordhere"
set hosts "enteripaddressofhosthere"
spawn ssh $username#$hosts
expect "$username#$hosts's password:"
send -- "$password\n"
expect "$"
send -- "somecommand on target remote machine here\n"
sleep 5
expect "$"
send -- "exit\n"
You can use runoverssh:
sudo apt install runoverssh
runoverssh -s localscript.sh user host1 host2 host3...
-s runs a local script remotely
Useful flags:
-g use a global password for all hosts (single password prompt)
-n use SSH instead of sshpass, useful for public-key authentication
If it's one script it's fine with the above solution.
I would set up Ansible to do the Job. It works in the same way (Ansible uses ssh to execute the scripts on the remote machine for both Unix or Windows).
It will be more structured and maintainable.
It is unclear if the local script uses locally set variables, functions, or aliases.
If it does this should work:
myscript.sh:
#!/bin/bash
myalias $myvar
myfunction $myvar
It uses $myvar, myfunction, and myalias. Let us assume they is set locally and not on the remote machine.
Make a bash function that contains the script:
eval "myfun() { `cat myscript.sh`; }"
Set variable, function, and alias:
myvar=works
alias myalias='echo This alias'
myfunction() { echo This function "$#"; }
And "export" myfun, myfunction, myvar, and myalias to server using env_parallel from GNU Parallel:
env_parallel -S server -N0 --nonall myfun ::: dummy
Extending answer from #cglotr. In order to write inline command use printf, it useful for simple command and it support multiline using char escaping '\n'
example :
printf "cd /to/path/your/remote/machine/log \n tail -n 100 Server.log" | ssh <user>#<host> 'bash -s'
See don't forget to add bash -s
I created a solution that works better for me by combining the use of a heredoc from Yarek T's answer with the piped cat method from cglotr's answer along with some other tricks for non-interactive login (using sshpass), using variables from the local and remote host in the script, and enabling sudo commands. The code is longer just because it includes some additional tricks that are likely desired, but the original questioner didn't ask for them.
The problem I have with Yarek's answer is that all the warnings and commands in the heredoc print to the screen. The problem I have with cglotr's answer is that is requires a script file and a complex command with additional interaction to execute the script. With my solution, I write a script that does everything by simply calling the script with the remote host IP address as the first argument like this:
./MYSCRIPT REMOTE_IP_ADDRESS
The script to be run on the remote host is saved to a variable within the script on the local host using a heredoc so that you don't need to do any quote escaping. Then, the variable containing the script is echo piped to sshpass. Be sure to indent the commands with tabs and not spaces (you'll get spaces instead of tabs when you copy the code). Here is an example of the remote script within the local script.
!/bin/bash
# Input argument 1 should be the target host IP address (required)
RX_IP="/(\b25[0-5]|\b2[0-4][0-9]|\b[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)(\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)){3}/"
IS_IP=$(echo $1 | sed -nr "${RX_IP}p" | wc -l)
if (( $IS_IP )); then
USERNAME=remoteuser
HOSTNAME=$1
# Export the SSH password to environment variable for sshpass and sudo.
# The space before the command prevents saving the command to history.
export SSHPASS=mypassword;
while read -r -d '' SCRIPT <<-EOS
# Enable sudo commands with the following command.
# The space before echo prevents saving the command to history.
echo $SSHPASS | sudo -Sv
# Do stuff here. Escape variables to be be accessed on the remote host.
# For example, escape print variable in an awk command:
# This command lists all USB block device partitions.
ls -l /dev /dev/mapper | awk '/^b/ && /sd[a-z][1-9]/ {print \$10}'
exit
EOS
echo "$SCRIPT" | sshpass -e ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null ${USERNAME}#${HOSTNAME} &>/dev/null
echo 'DONE'
else
echo "Missing IP address of target host."
echo "Usage: ./SCRIPT_NAME IP_ADDRESS
fi
You need to install sshpass on the local host like this (for Debian based distros).
sudo apt install sshpass
There is another approach ,you can copy your script in your host with scp command then execute it easily .
First, copy the script over to Machine B using scp
[user#machineA]$ scp /path/to/script user#machineB:/home/user/path
Then, just run the script
[user#machineA]$ ssh user#machineB "/home/user/path/script"
This will work if you have given executable permission to the script.