I have list of values(selected from DB) that start from 1 but the end range is unknown,and i want to group this values in crystal report in such a way that
values between 1 to 50 then 51 to 100 then 101 to 150 etc up to the maximum value.
how should i group??
eg: The selected values of the column rate are
1,1.6,2,56,71.1,61.9,109,118 etc.
i want to group like
rate range(1-50)
1
1.6
2
-------------------------------
rate range(51-100)
56
71.1
61.9
--------------------
rate range(101-150)
109
118
etc.
but i don't know the exact max value of the list
Create a formula similar to this logic, and group the report on that formula:
NumberVar YourValue := 300 ;
NumberVar FromValue := 50*Floor(YourValue/50) ;
NumberVar ToValue := FromValue + 50 ;
ToText(FromValue,0,"") & "-" & ToText(ToValue,0,"");
Create following formula and group the report on that formula.
Floor(({yourTable.Value}-1)/50)+1
It returns the group number. Examples:
for the value 23 it returns 1
for the value 150.99 it returns 3
for the value 543 it returns 11.
Use following formula as group title:
"rate range(" & CStr({#GroupNumber}*50-49, "#") & "-" & CStr({#GroupNumber}*50, "#") & ")"
Related
I'm trying to run a for loop to make a balance table in Stata (comparing the demographics of my dataset with national-level statistics)
For this, I'm prepping my dataset and attempting to calculate the percentages/averages for some key demographics.
preserve
rename unearnedinc_wins95 unearninc_wins95
foreach var of varlist fem age nonwhite hhsize parent employed savings_wins95 debt_wins95 earnedinc_wins95 unearninc_wins95 underfpl2019 { //continuous or binary; to put categorical vars use kwallis test
dis "for variable `var':"
tabstat `var'
summ `var'
local `var'_samplemean=r(mean)
}
clear
set obs 11
gen var=""
gen sample=.
gen F=.
gen pvalue=.
replace var="% Female" if _n==1
replace var="Age" if _n==2
replace var="% Non-white" if _n==3
replace var="HH size" if _n==4
replace var="% Parent" if _n==5
replace var="% Employed" if _n==6
replace var="Savings stock ($)" if _n==7
replace var="Debt stock ($)" if _n==8
replace var="Earned income last mo. ($)" if _n==9
replace var="Unearned income last mo. ($)" if _n==10
replace var="% Under FPL 2019" if _n==11
foreach col of varlist sample {
replace `col'=100*round(`fem_`col'mean', 0.01) if _n==1
replace `col'=round(`age_`col'mean') if _n==2
replace `col'=100*round(`nonwhite_`col'mean', 0.01) if _n==3
replace `col'=round(`hhsize_`col'mean', 0.1) if _n==4
replace `col'=100*round(`parent_`col'mean', 0.01) if _n==5
replace `col'=100*round(`employed_`col'mean', 0.01) if _n==6
replace `col'=round(`savings_wins95_`col'mean') if _n==7
replace `col'=round(`debt_wins95_`col'mean') if _n==8
replace `col'=round(`earnedinc_wins95_`col'mean') if _n==9
replace `col'=round(`unearninc_wins95_`col'mean') if _n==10
replace `col'=100*round(`underfpl2019_`col'mean', 0.01) if _n==11
}
I'm trying to run the following loop, but in the second half of the loop, I keep getting an 'invalid syntax' error. For context, in the first half of the loop (before clearing the dataset), the code stores the average values of the variables as a macro (`var'_samplemean). Can someone help me out and mend this loop?
My sample data:
clear
input byte fem float(age nonwhite) byte(hhsize parent) float employed double(savings_wins95 debt_wins95 earnedinc_wins95 unearninc_wins95) float underfpl2019
1 35 1 6 1 1 0 2500 0 0 0
0 40 0 4 1 1 0 10000 1043 0 0
0 40 0 4 1 1 0 20000 2400 0 0
0 40 0 4 1 1 .24 20000 2000 0 0
0 40 0 4 1 1 10 . 2600 0 0
Thanks!
Thanks for sharing the snippet of data. Apart from the fact the variable unearninc_wins95 has already been renamed in your sample data, the code runs fine for me without returning an error.
That being said, the columns for your F-statistics and p-values are empty once the loop at the bottom of your code completes. As far as I can see there is no local/varlist called sample which you're attempting to call with the line foreach col of varlist sample{. This could be because you haven't included it in your code, in which case please do, or it could be because you haven't created the local/varlist sample, in which case this could well be the source of your error message.
Taking a step back, there are more efficient ways of achieving what I think you're after. For example, you can get (part of) what you want using the package stat2data (if you don't have it installed already, run ssc install stat2data from the command prompt). You can then run the following code:
stat2data fem age nonwhite hhsize parent employed savings_wins95 debt_wins95 earnedinc_wins95 unearninc_wins95 underfpl2019, saving("~/yourstats.dta") stat(count mean)
*which returns:
preserve
use "~/yourstats.dta", clear
. list, sep(11)
+----------------------------+
| _name sN smean |
|----------------------------|
1. | fem 5 .2 |
2. | age 5 39 |
3. | nonwhite 5 .2 |
4. | hhsize 5 4.4 |
5. | parent 5 1 |
6. | employed 5 1 |
7. | savings_wins 5 2.048 |
8. | debt_wins95 4 13125 |
9. | earnedinc_wi 5 1608.6 |
10. | unearninc_wi 5 0 |
11. | underfpl2019 5 0 |
+----------------------------+
restore
This is missing the empty F-statistic and p-value variables you created in your code above, but you can always add them in the same way you have with gen F=. and gen pvalue=.. The presence of these variables though indicates you want to run some tests at some point and then fill the cells with values from them. I'd offer advice on how to do this but it's not obvious to me from your code what you want to test. If you can clarify this I will try and edit this answer to include that.
This doesn't answer your question directly; as others gently point out the question is hard to answer without a reproducible example. But I have several small comments on your code which are better presented in this form.
Assuming that all the variables needed are indeed present in the dataset, I would recommend something more like this:
local myvarlist fem age nonwhite hhsize parent employed savings_wins95 debt_wins95 earnedinc_wins95 unearninc_wins95 underfpl2019
local desc `" "% Female" "Age" "% Non-white" "HH size" "% Parent" "% Employed" "Savings stock ($)" "Debt stock ($)" "Earned income last mo. ($)" "Unearned income last mo. ($)" "% Under FPL 2019" "'
local i = 1
gen variable = ""
gen mean = ""
local i = 1
foreach var of local myvars {
summ `var', meanonly
local this : word `i' of `desc'
replace variable = "`this'" in `i'
if inlist(`i', 1, 3, 5, 6, 11) {
replace mean = strofreal(100 * r(mean), "%2.0f") in `i'
}
else if `i' == 4 {
replace mean = strofreal(r(mean), "%2.1f") in `i'
}
else replace mean = strofreal(r(mean), "%2.0f") in `i'
local ++i
}
This has not been tested.
Points arising include:
Using in is preferable for what you want over testing the observation number with if.
round() is treacherous for rounding to so many decimal places. Most of the time you will get what you want, but occasionally you will get bizarre results arising from the fact that Stata works in binary, like any equivalent program. It is safer to treat rounding as a problem in string manipulation and use display formats as offering precisely what you want.
If the text you want to show is just the variable label for each variable, this code could be simplified further.
The code hints at intent to show other stuff, which is easily done compatibly with this design.
I want to take the max of the progress column that is ordered with a distinct column name.
For example;
progress - journey_id
0 - 90
12 - 90
89 - 90
7 - 90
the code I tried to make but I couldn't do more
$impressions = DB::table('journey_content_impression')
->where('user_id', 11)
->where('journey_id',12)
->select('journey_item_id','progress')->distinct()->get();
Finally, It should give us one row with the max number.
Also, other columns of row should be available like this,
$impressions->first()->user_id; //
Try this:
$impressions = DB::table('journey_content_impression')
->where('user_id',{id})
->where('journey_id',{j_id})
->groupBy('journey_item_id')
->get(['journey_item_id', DB::raw('MAX(progress) as progress')]);
Maybe it helps you try this
$impressions = DB::table('journey_content_impression')
->where([['user_id', 11],['journey_id',12]])
->select('journey_item_id','progress')->distinct()->get();
I am trying to plot Num/Den type percentages using OVER. But my thoughts does not appear to translate into spotfire custom expression syntax.
Sample Input:
RecordID CustomerID DOS Age Gender Marker
9621854 854693 09/22/15 37 M D
9732721 676557 09/18/15 65 M D
9732700 676557 11/18/15 65 M N
9777003 5514882 11/25/15 53 M D
9853242 1753256 09/30/15 62 F D
9826842 1260021 09/30/15 61 M D
9897642 3375185 09/10/15 74 M N
9949185 9076035 10/02/15 52 M D
10088610 3512390 09/16/15 33 M D
10120650 41598 10/11/15 67 F N
9949185 9076035 10/02/15 52 M D
10088610 3512390 09/16/15 33 M D
10120650 41598 09/11/15 67 F N
Expected Out:
Row Labels D Cumulative_D N Cumulative_N Percentage
Sep 6 6 2 2 33.33%
Oct 2 8 1 3 37.50%
Nov 1 9 1 4 44.44%
My counts are working.
I want to take the same Cumulative_N & Cumulative_D count and plot Percentage over [Axis.X] as a line chart.
Here's what I am using:
UniqueCount(If([Marker]="N",[CustomerID])) / UniqueCount(If([Marker]="D",[CustomerID])) THEN SUM([Value]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X])) as [CumulativePercent]
I understand SUM([Value]) is not the way to go. But I don't know what to use instead.
Also tried the one below as well, but did not:
UniqueCount(If([Marker]="N",[CustomerID])) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X])) / UniqueCount(If([Marker]="D",[CustomerID])) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X])) as [CumulativePercent]
Can you have a look ?
I found a way to make it work, but it may not fit your overall solution. I should mention i used Count() versus UniqueCount() so that the results would mirror your desired output.
Add a transformation to your current data table
Insert a calculated column Month([DOS]) as [TheMonth]
Set Row Identifers = [TheMonth]
Set value columns and aggregation methods to Count([CustomerID])
Set column titles to [Marker]
Leave the column name pattern as %M(%V) for %C
That will give you a new data table. Then, you can do your cumulative functions. I did them in a cross table to replicate your expected results. Insert a new cross table and set the values to:
Sum([D]), Sum([N]), Sum([D]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.Rows])) as [Cumulative_D],
Sum([N]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.Rows])) as [Cumulative_N],
Sum([N]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.Rows])) / Sum([D]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.Rows])) as [Percentage]
That should do it.
I don't know if Spotfire released a fix or based on everyone's inputs I could get the syntax right. But here is the solution that worked for me.
For Columns D & N,
COUNT([CustomerID])
For columns Cumulative_D & Cumulative_N,
Count([CustomerID]) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X])) where [Axis.X] is DOS(Month), Marker
For column Percentage,
Count(If([Marker]="N",[CustomerID])) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X])) / Count(If([Marker]="D",[CustomerID])) OVER (AllPrevious([Axis.X]))
where [Axis.X] is DOS(Month)
I have a report (which is in crystal report 9) . I send a query from VB 6 to crystal report like.
qur = "SELECT copmanyid, product_name, trans_date1, bno, mrp, exp_date, Sum(quantity) As qty , Sum(bonus) As bon From q_saledetail Where trans_date1=# " & dt1.Value & " # and (invno between " & Val(Text1.Text) & " and " & Val(Text2.Text) & ") and tid='SV' Group By copmanyid, product_name, bno, mrp, exp_date, trans_date1 ORDER By copmanyid "
this is query is selected from q_saledetail which have invno, trans_date1 and tid and filed below:
But when its open in crystal report then result is look like this: (which is Not sorted by companyid
Companyid product_name Packing mrp bno exp_date qty bon
201016 CARBAPIN 20TAB 165 40 30-Dec-17 100 0
201011 CITOFAST 10TAb 260 61 30-Oct-17 30 0
201011 COGIN SYP 10TAB 270 I003 30-Jun-18 50 0
201011 MELONEX 2MG. 460 TD51 30-Mar-17 20 0
201011 NEULIN TAB 10TAB 680 TD53 30-Mar-17 4 0
201016 OLONCO 3 25TAB 93 0002 30-Oct-17 50 0
201016 OLONCO 6 25TAB 156 0002 30-Oct-17 50 0
201011 TOPAMID 50M. 200 762 30-May-17 30 0
What i Do???
You'll have to create a Group in Crystal Reports based on the Companyid. This will sort it, and allow headers and footers for each Companyid if you want them.
I created a toy example of my code below.
In this toy example I would like to create a measure of all higher prices minus lower prices within a self-created reference group. So within each reference group, I would like to take each individual and subtract its price value from all higher price values from other individuals in the same group. I do not want to have negative differences. Then I would like to sum all these differences. In creating this code I found some help here:
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data-management/try-all-values-with-foreach/
However, the code didn't work perfectly for me, because my dataset is quite large (several 100K obs) and the examples on the website and my code only work until the numlist maximum of 1600 in Stata. (I am using version 12). The toy example with the auto dataset works, due to small size of the dataset.
I would like to ask if someone has an idea how to code this more efficiently, so that I can get around the numlist restriction. I thought about summing the differences directly without saving them in intermediate variables, but that also blow up the numlist restriction.
clear all
sysuse auto
ren headroom refgroup
bysort refgroup : egen pricerank = rank(price)
qui: su pricerank, meanonly
gen test = `r(max)'
su test
foreach i of num 1/`r(max)' {
qui: bys refgroup: gen intermediate`i' = price[_n+`i'] -price if price[_n+`i'] > price
}
egen price_diff = rowmax(intermediate*)
drop intermediate*
If I understand this correctly, this isn't even a problem that requires explicit loops. The sum of all higher prices is just the difference between two cumulative sums. You might need to think through what you want to do if prices are tied.
. clear
. set obs 10
obs was 0, now 10
. gen group = _n > 5
. set seed 2803
. gen price = ceil(1000 * runiform())
. bysort group (price) : gen sumhigherprices = sum(price)
. by group : replace sumhigherprices = sumhigherprices[_N] - sumhigherprices
(10 real changes made)
. list
+--------------------------+
| group price sumhig~s |
|--------------------------|
1. | 0 218 1448 |
2. | 0 264 1184 |
3. | 0 301 883 |
4. | 0 335 548 |
5. | 0 548 0 |
|--------------------------|
6. | 1 125 3027 |
7. | 1 213 2814 |
8. | 1 828 1986 |
9. | 1 988 998 |
10. | 1 998 0 |
+--------------------------+
Edit: For what the OP needs, there is an extra line
. by group : replace sumhigherprices = sumhigherprices - (_N - _n) * price
If I understand the wording of the problem correctly, maybe this can help. It uses joinby (new observations are created and depending on the size of the original database, you may or not hit the Stata hard-limit on number of observations). The code reproduces the results that would follow from the code of the original post. This is a second attempt. The code before this final edit did not provide the sought-after results. The wording of the problem was somewhat difficult for me to understand.
clear all
set more off
* Load data
sysuse auto
* Delete unnecessary vars
ren headroom refgroup
keep refgroup price
* Generate id´s based on rankings (sort)
bysort refgroup (price): gen id = _n
* Pretty list
order refgroup id
sort refgroup id price
list, sepby(refgroup)
* joinby procedure
tempfile main
save "`main'"
rename (price id) =0
joinby refgroup using "`main'"
list, sepby(refgroup)
* Do not compare with itself and drop duplicates
drop if id0 >= id
* Compute differences and max
gen dif = abs(price0 - price)
collapse (max) dif, by(refgroup id0)
list, sepby(refgroup)