I have a list of Items and every item have some list, Now I wants to select Distinct items of child. I have tried like below but it's not working.
var items = await _context.Items.
Include(i => i.Tags.Distinct()).
Include(i => i.Comments).
OrderBy(i => i.Title).ToListAsync();
//Tag items
TagId - tag
------------------
1 --- A
2 --- B
3 --- B
4 --- C
5 --- D
6 --- D
7 --- F
//Expected Result
Item.Tags -> [A,B,C,D,F]
how can I do this in EF Core? Thanks.
You can use the MoreLinq library to get DistinctBy or write your own using this post.
Then use this:
var items = await _context.Items.
Include(i => i.Tags).
Include(i => i.Comments).
OrderBy(i => i.Title).
DistinctBy(d => d.Tags.tag).
ToListAsync();
You want to get distinct records based on one column; so that should do it.
Apparently you have a table of Items, where every Item has zero or more Tags. Furthermore the Items have a property Comments, of which we do not know whether it is one string, or a collection of zero or more strings. Furthermore every Item has a Title.
Now you want all properties of Items, each with its Comments, and a list of unique Tags of the items. Ordered by Title
One of the slower parts of database queries is the transport of the selected data from the database management system to your local process. Hence it is wise to limit the amount of data to the minimum you are really using.
It seems that the Tags of the Items are in a separate table. Every Item has zero or more Tags, every Tag belongs to exactly one item. A simple one-to-many relation with a foreign key Tag.ItemId.
If Item with Id 300 has 1000 Tags, then you know that every one of these 1000 Tags has a foreign key ItemId of which you know that it has a value of 300. What a waste if you would transport all these foreign keys to your local process.
Whenever you query data to inspect it, Select only the properties
you really plan to use. Only use Include if you plan to update the
included item.
So your query will be:
var query = myDbContext.Items
.Where(item => ...) // only if you do not want all items
.OrderBy(item => item.Title) // if you Sort here and do not need the Title
// you don't have to Select it
.Select(item => new
{ // select only the properties you plan to use
Id = item.Id,
Title = item.Title,
Comments = item.Comments, // use this if there is only one item, otherwise
Comments = item.Comments // use this version if Item has zero or more Comments
.Where(comment => ...) // only if you do not want all comments
.Select(comment => new
{ // again, select only the Comments you plan to use
Id = comment.Id,
Text = comment.Text,
// no need for the foreign key, you already know the value:
// ItemId = comment.ItemId,
})
.ToList();
Tags = item.Tags.Select(tag => new
{ // Select only the properties you need
Id = tag.Id,
Type = tag.Type,
Text = tag.Text,
// No need for the foreign key, you already know the value
// ItemId = tag.ItemId,
})
.Distinct()
.ToList(),
});
var fetchedData = await query.ToListAsync();
I haven't tried it, but I'd say you put .Distinct() in the wrong place.
var items = await _context.Items
.Include(i => i.Tags)
.Include(i => i.Comments).
.OrderBy(i => i.Title)
.Select(i => { i.Tags = i.Tags.GroupBy(x => x.Tag).Select(x => x.First()); return i; })
.ToListAsync();
Related
I am trying to learn how to use LINQ to perform a query that yields the same result as this:
SELECT (
SELECT SUM(point)
FROM communitymemberpointfeature
WHERE communitymemberpointfeature.communitymemberid = communitymember.id
) AS points, communitymember.*
FROM communitymember
After browsing around the Internet, I constructed the following statement:
var list = (from pointFeature in communityMemberPointFeatureList
join member in communityMemberList on pointFeature.CommunityMemberId equals member.Id
group pointFeature by new { pointFeature.CommunityMemberId }
into grouping
select new
{
grouping,
points = grouping.Sum(row => row.Point)
}).ToList();
But this yielded a result like
[
{
points:7200,
grouping:[
{Id:1,Point:5000,FeatureId:1,CommunityMemberId:1},
{Id:2,Point:2200,FeatureId:1,CommunityMemberId:1},
],
}
...
]
What I really want is a result set like:
[
{points:7200,CommunityMemberId:1,firstname:'john',lastname:'blah' ....},
...
]
Can someone tell me what I did wrong?
Edit after comment added to the end
I can imagine you have problems translating your SQL into LINQ. When trying to write LINQ statements it is usually a lot easier to start from your requirements, instead of starting from a SQL statement.
It seems to me that you have a table with CommunityMembers. Every CommunityMember has a primary key in property Id.
Furthermore, every CommunityMember has zero or more CommunityMemberPointFeatures, namely those CommunityMemberPointFeatures with a foreign key CommunityMemberId that equals the primary key of the CommunityMember that it belongs to.
For example: CommunityMember [14] has all CommunityMemberPointFeatures that have a value CommunityMemberId equal to 14.
Requirement
If I look at your SQL, it seems to me that you want to query all CommunityMembers, each with the sum of property Point of all CommunityMemberPointFeatures of this CommunityMember.
Whenever you want to query "items with their zero or more subitems", like "Schools with their Students", "Customers with their Orders", "CommunityMembers with their PointFeatures", consider using GroupJoin.
A GroupJoin is in fact a Left Outer Join, followed by a GroupBy to make Groups of the Left item with all its Right items.
var result = dbContext.CommunityMembers // GroupJoin CommunityMembers
.GroupJoin(CommunityMemberPointFeatures, // With CommunityMemberPointFeatures
communityMember => communityMember.Id, // from every CommunityMember take the Id
pointFeature => pointFeature.CommunityMemberId, // from every CommunityMemberPointFeature
// take the CommunityMemberId
// Parameter ResultSelector: take every CommunityMember, with all its matching
// CommunityMemberPointFeatures to make one new object:
(communityMember, pointFeaturesOfThisCommunityMember) => new
{
// Select the communityMember properties that you plan to use:
Id = communityMember.Id,
Name = communityMember.Name,
...
// From the point features of this CommunityMember you only want the sum
// or property Point:
Points = pointFeaturesOfThisCommunityMember
.Select(pointFeature => pointFeature.Point)
.Sum(),
// However, if you want more fields, you can use:
PointFeatures = pointFeaturesOfThisCommunityMember.Select(pointFeature => new
{
Id = pointFeature.Id,
Name = pointFeature.Name,
...
// not needed, you know the value:
// CommunityMemberId = pointFeature.CommunityMemberId,
})
.ToList(),
});
Edit after comment
If you want, you can omit Selecting the values that you plan to use.
// Parameter ResultSelector:
(communityMember, pointFeaturesOfThisCommunityMember) => new
{
CommunityMember = communityMember,
PointFeatures = pointFeaturesOfThisCommunityMember.ToList(),
),
However, I would strongly advise against this. If CommunityMember [14] has a thousand PointFeatures, then every PointFeature will have a foreign key with a value 14. So you are transporting this value 14 1001 times. What a waste of processing power, not to mention all the other fields you plan not to use.
Besides: if you do this you violate against information hiding: whenever your tables changes internally, the result of this function changes. Is that what you want?
I have an MVC ViewModel that I'd like to pass through to a Razor view. In the controller, I've created a database context and joined tables together using Linq. Once summed and grouped, I'm getting an error:
Error CS1061 'decimal' does not contain a definition for 'GroupBy' and no accessible extension method 'GroupBy' accepting a first argument of type 'decimal' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?
I've gone through almost every example on stack overflow and google and couldn't find an example that matched the structure of my query. Also, the MS examples are very trivial and are not of much use.
Here is the action in the controller:
public IHttpActionResult GetEmployeeReleasedAllocatedBonus(int eid)
{
var employeeReleasedAllocatedBonus =
(from br in _context.BonusReleases
join emp in _context.Employees
on new
{
br.EmployeeID,
empID = br.EmployeeID
} equals new
{
emp.EmployeeID,
empID = eid
}
join job in _context.Jobs on br.JobID equals job.JobID
join bonus in _context.Bonus
on new
{
br.JobID,
empID = br.EmployeeID
}
equals new
{
bonus.JobID,
empID = bonus.EmployeeID
}
select new EmployeeAllocatedReleasedBonusViewModel()
{
AllocatedToEmployee = br.Amount, AllocatedPercentage = bonus.Amount * 100
,
JobNumber = job.JobNumber, JobDescription = job.JobDescription
})
.ToList()
.Sum(s => s.AllocatedToEmployee)
.GroupBy(g => new {g.JobNumber, g.JobDescription, g.AllocatedPercentage});
return Ok(employeeReleasedAllocatedBonus);
}
It's worth mentioning that the AllocatedPercentage datatype is a decimal. However, I've tried changing it to string but the error message stays.
Also tried using the group functionality right before .ToList() but that didn't work either.
After ToList() you have a List<EmployeeAllocatedReleasedBonusViewModel>.
In Sum(s => s.AllocatedToEmployee), every s is one EmployeeAllocatedReleasedBonusViewModel. Apparently a EmployeeAllocatedReleasedBonusViewModel has a property AllocatedToEmployee which is probably of type decimal. This can be summed into one decimal.
The result of the Sum (a decimal) is the input of your GroupBy. Does type decimal have a method GroupBy? Of course it doesn't!
Alas you forgot to tell us your requirements. It is difficult to extract them from code that doesn't do what you want.
It seems to me that you have two one-to-many relations:
Employees have zero or more BonusReleases. Every BonusRelease belongs to exactly one Employee using foreign key
Jobs have zero or more BonusReleases. Every BonusRelease belongs to exactly one Job.
Now what do you want: do you want all JobNumbers and JobDescriptions of all Jobs with the total of their AllocatedPercentage? I'm not sure what the Employees do within this query.
Whenever you want items with their sub-items, like Schools with their Students, Customers with their Orders, Orders with their OrderLines, use GroupJoin. If you want it the other way round: Student with the School that he attends, Order with the Customer who placed the Order, use Join.
var result = dbContext.Jobs.GroupJoin(dbContext.BonusReleases,
job => job.Id, // from every Job take the primary key
bonusRelease => bonusReleas.JobId, // from every BonusRelease take the foreign key
// parameter ResultSelector: take every Job with all its BonusReleases to make a new:
(job, bonusReleasesOfThisJob) => new
{
JobNumber = job.JobNumber,
JobDescription = job.JobDescription
// do you want the total of all allocated percentages?
TotalAllocatedPercentages = bonusReleasesOfThisJob
.Select(bonus => bonus.Amount)
.Sum(),
// do something to make it a percentage
// or do you want a sequence of allocated percentages?
TotalAllocatedPercentages = bonusReleasesOfThisJob
.Select(bonus => bonus.Amount)
.ToList(),
});
Or do you want the JobNumber / JobDescription / Total allocated bonus per Employee?
var result = dbContext.Employees.GroupJoin(dbContext.BonusReleases,
employee => employee.Id, // from every Employee take the primary key
bonus => bonus.EmployeeId, // from every BonusRelease take the foreign key
(employee, bonusesOfThisEmployee) => new
{
// Employee properties:
EmployeeId = employee.Id,
EmpoyeeName = employee.Name,
// for the jobs: Join the bonusesOfThisEmployee with the Jobs:
Jobs = dbContext.Jobs.GroupJoin(bonusOfThisEmployee,
job => job.Id,
bonusOfThisEmployee => bonusOfThisEmployee.JobId,
(job, bonusesOfThisJob) => new
{
Number = job.Id,
Description = job.Description,
TotalBonus = bonusOfThisJob.Select(bonus => bonus.Amount).Sum(),
}),
});
Harald's comment was key - after ToList(), I had a list of . Therefore I took a step back and said what if I put the results into an anonymous object first. Then do the group by and then the sum, putting the final result into the view model. It worked. Here is the answer.
var employeeReleasedAllocatedBonus =
(from br in _context.BonusReleases
join emp in _context.Employees
on new
{
br.EmployeeID,
empID = br.EmployeeID
} equals new
{
emp.EmployeeID,
empID = eid
}
join job in _context.Jobs on br.JobID equals job.JobID
join bonus in _context.Bonus
on new
{
br.JobID,
empID = br.EmployeeID
}
equals new
{
bonus.JobID,
empID = bonus.EmployeeID
}
select new
{
AllocatedToEmployee = br.Amount
,AllocatedPercentage = bonus.Amount * 100
,JobNumber = job.JobNumber
,JobDescription = job.JobDescription
})
.GroupBy(g => new {g.JobNumber, g.JobDescription, g.AllocatedPercentage})
.Select(t => new EmployeeAllocatedReleasedBonusViewModel
{
JobNumber = t.Key.JobNumber,
JobDescription = t.Key.JobDescription,
AllocatedPercentage = t.Key.AllocatedPercentage,
AllocatedToEmployee = t.Sum(ae => ae.AllocatedToEmployee)
});
I have a list of record that I picked up through the code:
var list= NhSession.QueryOver<Data.Models.MembModel>()
.Where(w => w.Comp.Id == idcomp)
.JoinQueryOver(jq => jq.Ver)
.Select(s => s.Ver)
.List<Dados.Models.VerModel>();
With this code I get a list of VerModel that I have relation in a MembModel. The problem is that I what get the list of VerModel that don't be in relation in a MembModal, I think to describe this, I want to select one list that is "notin" a first list. How can I do this?
Tks
What we need, as you said, is a NOT IN (subquery) statement. And NHibernate does have a clear way how to achieve that. First the subquery, which will return MembModel collection (filtered or not - as needed), represented by the VerModel.ID
var subquery = QueryOver.Of<Data.Models.MembModel>()
// we can still filter this sub-select ... or not
// .Where(w => w.Comp.Id == idcomp)
// what we need to be returned is the reference id, the VerModel.ID
.Select(m => m.Ver.ID);
And now we will query the VerModel itself, with the NOT IN (subquery) clause:
var list = session.QueryOver<Dados.Models.VerModel>()
.WithSubquery
.WhereProperty(v => v.ID) // the ID to match the prev selected one
.NotIn(subquery) // should NOT be IN
.List<Dados.Models.VerModel>();
Check:
16.8. Subqueries
I am trying to create table headers that sort during a back end call in nhibernate. When clicking the header it sends a string indicating what to sort by (ie "Name", "NameDesc") and sending it to the db call.
The db can get quite large so I also have back end filters and pagination built into reduce the size of the retrieved data and therefore the orderby needs to happen before or at the same time as the filters and skip and take to avoid ordering the smaller data. Here is an example of the QueryOver call:
IList<Event> s =
session.QueryOver<Event>(() => #eventAlias)
.Fetch(#event => #event.FiscalYear).Eager
.JoinQueryOver(() => #eventAlias.FiscalYear, () => fyAlias, JoinType.InnerJoin, Restrictions.On(() => fyAlias.Id).IsIn(_years))
.Where(() => !#eventAlias.IsDeleted);
.OrderBy(() => fyAlias.RefCode).Asc
.ThenBy(() => #eventAlias.Name).Asc
.Skip(numberOfRecordsToSkip)
.Take(numberOfRecordsInPage)
.List();
How can I accomplish this?
One way how to achieve this (one of many, because you can also use some fully-typed filter object etc or some query builder) could be like this draft:
Part one and two:
// I. a reference to our query
var query = session.QueryOver<Event>(() => #eventAlias);
// II. join, filter... whatever needed
query
.Fetch(#event => #event.FiscalYear).Eager
var joinQuery = query
.JoinQueryOver(...)
.Where(() => !#eventAlias.IsDeleted)
...
Part three:
// III. Order BY
// Assume we have a list of strings (passed from a UI client)
// here represented by these two values
var sortBy = new List<string> {"Name", "CodeDesc"};
// first, have a reference for the OrderBuilder
IQueryOverOrderBuilder<Event, Event> order = null;
// iterate the list
foreach (var sortProperty in sortBy)
{
// use Desc or Asc?
var useDesc = sortProperty.EndsWith("Desc");
// Clean the property name
var name = useDesc
? sortProperty.Remove(sortProperty.Length - 4, 4)
: sortProperty;
// Build the ORDER
order = order == null
? query.OrderBy(Projections.Property(name))
: query.ThenBy(Projections.Property(name))
;
// use DESC or ASC
query = useDesc ? order.Desc : order.Asc;
}
Finally the results:
// IV. back to query... call the DB and get the result
IList<Event> s = query
.List<Event>();
This draft is ready to do sorting on top of the root query. You can also extend that to be able to add some order statements to joinQuery (e.g. if the string is "FiscalYear.MonthDesc"). The logic would be similar, but built around the joinQuery (see at the part one)
var customer= from cust in customerData
select new Customer
{
CustomerID = cust["id"],
Name = cust["Name"],
LastVisit = cust["visit"],
PurchashedAmount = cust["amount"],
Tagged = cust["tagged"]
Code = cust["code"]
}
The rows looks like this
Name LastVisit PurchasedAmount Tagged Code CustomerID
------ --------- -------------- ------ ----- -----
Joshua 07-Jan-09 Yes chiJan01 A001
Joshua 10000
The 2nd row belongs to first row just that the other columns are empty.How can i merge the PurchasedAmount into the first row using LinQ?
This is probably a more general solution than you need - it will work even if the other values are scattered across rows. The main condition is that the Name column should identify rows that belong together.
customer = from c in customer
group c by c.Name
into g
select new Customer
{
Name = g.Key,
LastVisit = g.Select(te => te.LastVisit).
Where(lv => lv.HasValue).FirstOrDefault(),
PurchaseAmount = g.Select(te => te.PurchaseAmount).
Where(pa => pa.HasValue).FirstOrDefault(),
Tagged = g.Select(te => te.Tagged).
Where(ta => ta.HasValue).FirstOrDefault(),
Code = g.Select(te => te.Code).
Where(co => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(co)).FirstOrDefault(),
CustomerID = g.Select(te => te.CustomerID).
Where(cid => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(cid)).FirstOrDefault()
};
This will return a new IEnumerable with the items grouped by Name and the non-null values selected (same effect as moving PurchasedAmount to the first row and deleting the second in your case).
Note that the code is based on the assumption that LastVisit, PurchaseAmount and Tagged are nullable types (DateTime?, int? and bool?). Thus the usage of HasValue. If, however, they are strings in your case, you have to use !string.IsNullOrEmpty() instead (as for Code and CustomerID).