I am new to this IDQ tool. can anyone give me a step by step instructions with some screenshots to know how to use the labeler transformation using reference tables.
Any video links related to labeler transforamtion using reference tables are also appreciated
Thanks in advance!!!
Related
I am very new to working with SAS, have not worked with it before. My current workplace is asking me to migrate reports over from SAS and rework them using SSIS/SSRS. I'm not sure how would be the best way to go about this or where even to start. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
You will need to look at the data sources and the report outputs and figure out what is required to manually recreate the reports from scratch in SQL and SSRS. There is no conversion tool available.
I have downloaded the sample app of the Doddle Report and understand it is to report a collection of IEnumerable data. I am able to get data reported nicely for a simple report.
However, the sample app did not have grouping. I would think to accomplish this I need to extend the functionality from the source code to show group format and wonder if anyone tried and succeed. If so, how should I approach it? Thanks in advance.
As far as I know, Doddle Report doesn't have grouping capability built into the system.
According to some of the discussion on the codeplex,
DoddleReport.Codeplex.com
it appears that the creator is also looking for someone to include that functionality.
One work-around I used for different groups was to create an excel report and then use AppendReport() to get multiple pages in the same report. Unfortunately, the iTextSharp report writer doesn't implement AppendReport() so I had to use the OpenXml writer for this.
Im' working on a project where I have to use Pentaho. There are lots of tools included (or that can be include) in this solution.
I don't really see the difference between the reporting part (here PRD pentaho report designer) and the analysis part (pentaho analyzer or saiku).
For me, with both tools we can see what's in my DW and do more or less complicate reports about those data. Am i right or did I understand nothing?
thks for your help
Pentaho Reporting (PR) and Analysis tool are two different things. PR is static report, you can create it using sql. Analysis Tool report(AT) such as saiku, jpivot, or stpivot is dynamic . You must create it using MDX. By using AT, we can create analysis report dynamically according to the dimension we want.
I have to work on building a website in Oracle Apex that should be displayed in multiple languages. Let me decompose this further.
I am assuming that there are two parts to an Apex application
UI & elements of the UI i.e. regions, buttons, tables, page headings
Data
At the moment I need to find answers on how to enable multiple language support for only the UI part of my application. Not the data.
As I can understand, there are two broad based approaches to achieve this.
Use the Apex inbuilt support for changing the UI elements.
Create a solution from scratch that is based on a database driven approach.
IS my understanding correct?
Two more questions
1. Can anyone give me a short brief on in the type of support that Oracle Apex provides for creating multiple versions of webpages / websites for my application? Alternatively just point me in the right direction by providing relevant links etc.
Which one of the above two approaches would you recommend? And Why?
Thanks a ton
Romi
Okay, this one I seemed to have solved on my own. The process consists of the following steps
Create a shadow applications for each language other than the language of the primary application.
Export the UI elements from the primary language application into an XML file (XLIFF) for the target language application (the shadow application as mentioned in 1 above).
Edit the XML file and enter the text descriptions for the target language application in the XML file.
Upload the edited XML file to the target application.
For a detailed explanation look at this link . Click here to create a sample multi language application in Apex.
At the time of writing this I don't see any reason for creating this feature from scratch. Why reinvent the wheel?
Any comments?
We are using an oracle database in a project. Most of the tables represents classes or objects in the application. The application currently doesn't have a substantial amount of documentation. I am using StarUML to make up some class diagrams and such for other developers on the project to increase their understanding of the overall project. Using the database tables as a starting guide, and then making modifications to the diagrams as needed would be the absolute easiest and quickest way to get these set up. Is there any free applications that could assist me in pulling the schema out of the Oracle database and create class diagrams from them? Currently, there are 98 "objects" or classes closely modeled in the database and to create these all in a modeling application from scratch would be very time consuming.
You don't say what your target language is.
You can use Hibernate to generate schemas from an object model and mapping.
Middlegen is a tool that can create Java classes from schemas. Maybe those will help.
A 1:1 object-to-table mapping isn't always the best way to do things. It's hardly object-oriented. I'd view it as a starting point only.
I looked (briefly) through the StarUML documentation and don't see any way to import a database definition, so I'm not sure how you do this, sorry.
If you can find a way to get the data into StarURL, you could use Oracle's free SQL Developer tool to get the table definitions out as DDL or XML.
I know that Microsoft's Visio tool (Pro & Enterprise editions) can read selected tables from your Oracle database and generate models from that, but it ain't cheap. I really like Allround Automation's PL/SQL Developer as a reasonably-priced IDE targeted at programmers (vs DBAs) and I know that will generate diagrams locally. But I'm not sure it can save the metadata in a form you could use in StarUML.
Good luck,
-- Stew
It's a shame you didn't bother to respond to replies to your own question. Or am I misunderstanding the standard practice here that people just give points and move on?