I am using apiResource and other routes. I grouped them like below:
Route::group(['prefix' => 'posts'], function () {
Route::group(['prefix' => '/{post}'], function () {
Route::put('lablabla', [PostController::class, 'lablabla']);
});
Route::apiResource('/', PostController::class, [
'names' => [
'store' => 'create_post',
'update' => 'edit_post',
]
]);
});
all apiResource routes except index and store do not work! How should I group routes?
Your syntax for routing is wrong,
Notes
You will provide a uri for the apiResource (plural)
eg. Route::apiResource('posts', PostController::class);
Your name of resource route is wrong
Get this out https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/controllers#restful-naming-resource-routes
it should be
Route::apiResource('posts', PostController::class)->names([
'store' => 'create_post',
'update' => 'edit_post',
]);
No need of repeating Route::group, you can just write your routes like this
Route::prefix('posts')->group(function () {
Route::put('lablabla', [PostController::class, 'lablabla']);
});
Route::apiResource('posts', PostController::class)->names([
'store' => 'create_post',
'update' => 'edit_post',
]);
Your syntax is incorrect, there is a names method. See the documentation here https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/controllers#restful-naming-resource-routes.
Related
In the example from the tutorial, it shows up.
Route::group([
'prefix' => 'admin',
'as' => 'admin.'
], function () {}
Can someone tells me what 'as' does? Also, is the dot next to the 'admin' neccessary?
Thank you.
Let's say, for example, that you have this route:
Route::get('admin', [
'as' => 'admin', 'uses' => 'AdminController#index'
]);
By using as you assign custom name to your route. So now, Laravel will allow you to reference said route by using:
$route = route('admin');
So you don't have to build the URL manually over and over again in your code. You don't really need . notation if you only want to call your route admin. If you want a more detailed name of your route, lets say for ex. admin product route, then you use the . notation, like this:
Route::get('admin/product', [
'as' => 'admin.product', 'uses' => 'AdminController#showProduct'
]);
So now, you will be able to call this route by the assigned name:
$route = route('admin.product');
Update:
The previous answer I provided is valid for a single routes. For the route groups, the procedure is very similar. In the route groups you need the . notation when you add a custom name, since you will be referencing another route after that . notation. This will allow you to set a common route name prefix for all routes within the group. So by your example, lets say you have a dashboard route inside your admin route group:
Route::group(['as' => 'admin.'], function () {
Route::get('dashboard', ['as' => 'dashboard', function () {
//Some logic
}]);
});
Now, you will be able to call the dashboard route like this:
$route = route(admin.dashboard);
You can read more about this in Laravel official documentation.
you may specify an as keyword in the route group attribute array, allowing you to set a common route name prefix for all routes within the group.
For Example
Route::group(['as' => 'admin::'], function () {
// Route named "admin::"
});
UseRoute Name like {{route(admin::)}} or route('admin::')
you can use an 'as' as a named route. if you do not prefix your route name in group route than you may add custom route name like this.
Route::group(['prefix' => 'admin', 'middleware' => ['auth', 'roles'], 'roles' => ['2']], function () {
Route::post('/changeProfile', ['uses' => 'UserController#changeProfile',
'as' => 'changeProfile']);
});
i have in my controller
public function details($id)
{
$claim = Claim::findOrFail($id);
$details = $claim->details;
return response()->json([], 200);
}
and I have in my routes
Route::resource('claims', 'Admin\\ClaimsController',['names'=> ['details'=>'admin.claims.details'], 'only' => ['index','store','update','destroy','details']]);
when I run php artisan route:list i do not see the admin.claims.details( admin/claims/1/details) in the list
the documentation is pretty vague here so I'm asking how to properly set a custom route? How do I specify if its "POST" or "GET"?
To override the default resource controller actions' route names, you can pass a names array with your options.
For example:
Route::resource('claims', 'ControllerClassName', [
'names' => [
'index' => 'admin.claims.details',
'create' => 'admin.claims.create',
// etc...
],
'only' => [
'index','store','update','destroy','details'
]
]);
REF: https://laravel.com/docs/5.2/controllers#restful-naming-resource-routes
Here are examples of setting custom named get/post routes.
GET Route
Route::get('claims', ['as' => 'admin.claims.details', uses => 'ControllerClassName']);
POST Route
Route::post('claims', ['as' => 'admin.claims.details', uses => 'ControllerClassName']);
REF: https://laravel.com/docs/5.2/routing#named-routes
I have config route like this:
Route::get(
'index/{type?}',
[
'as' => 'AAA.index',
'uses' => 'AAA#index',
]
);
Route::any(
'create/{type}',
[
'as' => 'AAA.create',
'uses' => 'AAA#create',
]
);
If I have a string AAA.index, I want to get index/{type?}
If I have a string AAA.create, I want to get create/{type?}
What is the method can do that?
Use route method:
route('AAA.index', $parameter);
See in: https://laravel.com/docs/5.2/helpers#method-route
I'm experiencing routing confusion in laravel 4.
Route::group(['prefix' => 'myProfile', 'before' => 'auth|inGroup:Model|isMe'], function()
{
Route::get('/{username}', function(){
echo 'hello';
});
});
Route::get('/{username}', [
'as' => 'show-profile',
'uses' => 'ProfileController#index'
]);
When i write to address bar domain.app/myProfile it runs second route and runs ProfileController#index...
Thanks.
Looks like correct behaviour. To access first route you would have to type something like domain.app/myProfile/FooUser. You didn't specify / route in myProfile route group, so it cannot match it and uses second one.
Breaking down your routes:
1)
Route::get('/{username}', [
'as' => 'show-profile',
'uses' => 'ProfileController#index'
]);
Use /example URI to access the above route.
2)
Route::group(['prefix' => 'myProfile', 'before' =>'auth|inGroup:Model|isMe'], function()
{
Route::get('/{username}', function(){
echo 'hello';
});
});
Use /myProfile/example URI to access the above route.
Your application is working as expected.
I'm trying to figure out whether there is a way of adding url parameters to the Route::controller call.
What I have at the moment for my control panel is:
Route::group(
[
'prefix' => 'admin',
'namespace' => 'Admin'
],
function() {
Route::group(
[
'prefix' => '',
'before' => 'auth.admin'
],
function() {
Route::controller('page', 'PageController');
Route::controller('article', 'ArticleController');
}
);
Route::controller('/', 'LoginController');
}
);
Now - each of the controllers will have the post / getEdit actions, which will require the url id parameter to be passed over in the simple format of /admin/page/edit/{id}.
My question is - is there a way to perhaps add some parameters to the Route::controller method or do I have to do them all using Route::get / Route::post approach?
I know I can do it by adding two extra cases with get and post above the given controller call:
Route::group(
[
'prefix' => 'admin',
'namespace' => 'Admin'
],
function() {
Route::group(
[
'prefix' => '',
'before' => 'auth.admin'
],
function() {
Route::get('page/edit/{id}', 'PageController#getEdit');
Route::post('page/edit/{id}', 'PageController#postEdit');
Route::controller('page', 'PageController');
Route::controller('article', 'ArticleController');
}
);
Route::controller('/', 'LoginController');
}
);
but perhaps there's a better approach?
You can use Route::resource:
Route::resource('resource', 'ResourceController');
This will register the following routes:
GET /resource index resource.index
GET /resource/create create resource.create
POST /resource store resource.store
GET /resource/{resource} show resource.show
GET /resource/{resource}/edit edit resource.edit
PUT/PATCH /resource/{resource} update resource.update
DELETE /resource/{resource} destroy resource.destroy
You can use it together with only or except to choose what routes to be included (or excluded):
Route::resource('resource', 'ResourceController', ['only' => ['index', 'show', 'update', 'destroy']]);
Read more about restful resource controllers in the Laravel documentation.
This post might also be interesting: Laravel 4 - Route::resource vs Route::controller. Which to use?