I am using hapi-fhir sdk in Android. I got ResourceVersionConflictException for Patient update. From api doc
Represents an HTTP 409 Conflict response. This exception should be
thrown in methods which accept a version (e.g. Update, Delete) when
the operation fails because of a version conflict as specified in the
FHIR specification.
how is version conflict happening here. I am just updating Given name and calling client.update()
Here is my sample code;
Patient read:
val patient = client.read()
.resource(Patient::class.java)
.withId(id)
.encodedJson()
.execute()
Update:
val newName = .....
val humanName = if (patient.name == null){
patient.addName()
}else{
if (patient.name.isEmpty()){ patient.addName() } else patient.name[0]
}
// updating given name
if (humanName.given.isEmpty()){
humanName.addGiven(newName)
}else{
humanName.given[0].value = newName
}
// update api call
client.update()
.resource(patient)
.encodedJson()
.execute()
I am getting ResourceVersionConflictException for this update call. I am missing something. How can i update patient?
Thanks in advance.
Related
I'm using Xamarin and LinqToTwitter plugin. What I want is just to fetch messages with some tag. But even simplest query fails because of error "Method 'HttpClientHandler.set_AutomaticDecompression' not found".
try
{
var context = GetTwitterContext();
var searchResponses = ( from search in context.Search
where search.Type == SearchType.Search && search.Query == "Xamarin"
select search.Statuses).SingleOrDefault();
var tweets = from tweet in searchResponses
select new Message
{
Value = tweet.Text,
Id = tweet.TweetIDs,
ImageUri = tweet.User.ProfileImageUrl,
UserName = tweet.User.ScreenNameResponse,
Name = tweet.User.Name,
CreatedAt = tweet.CreatedAt,
ReTweets = tweet.RetweetCount,
Favorite = tweet.FavoriteCount.Value
};
return tweets.ToList();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
ex.Message.ToString();
}
When I look at the exception, there's a source: "mscorlib".
So I'm wondering what can be wrong, because it seems like plugin Microsoft.Bcl.Compression is OK.
Also I changed my packages.config "LinkToTwitter" to lowercase "linqtotwitter" but it barely helps.
Will be grateful for any help.
For all who stuck with this problem - add Http Clients lib to your platform projects, not only to shared project.
LINQ to Twitter has a dependency on HttpClient. You should install that from NuGet Microsoft HTTP Client Libraries.
I am trying to get a Reservation object which contains a pointer to Restaurant.
In Parse Cloud code, i am able to get the restaurants objects associated with Reservations via query.include('Restaurant') in log just before response.success. However, the Restaurants reverted back to pointer when i receive the response on client app.
I tried reverted JSSDK version to 1.4.2 & 1.6.7 as suggested in some answers, but it doesn't work for me.
Parse.Cloud.define('getreservationsforuser', function(request, response) {
var user = request.user
console.log(user)
var query = new Parse.Query('Reservations')
query.equalTo('User', user)
query.include('Restaurant')
query.find({
success : function(results) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(results))
response.success(results)
},
error : function (error) {
response.error(error)
}
})
})
response :
..."restaurant":{"__type":"Pointer",
"className":"Restaurants",
"objectId":"kIIYe7Z0tD"},...
You can't directly send the pointer objects back from cloud code even though you have included it. You need to manually copy the content of that pointer object to a javascript object. Like below:
var restaurant = {}
restaurant["id"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.id;
restaurant["createdAt"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.createdAt;
restaurant["custom_field"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.get("custom_field");
ps: in your code you seem do nothing else other than directly send the response back. I think parse REST api might be a better choice in that case.
It turned out that my code implementation was correct.
Parse.Cloud.afterSave(function(request) {
var type = request.object.get("type");
switch (type) {
case 'inspiration':
var query = new Parse.Query("Inspiration");
break;
case 'event':
var query = new Parse.Query("Event");
break;
case 'idea':
var query = new Parse.Query("Idea");
break;
case 'comment':
break;
default:
return;
}
if (query) {
query.equalTo("shares", request.object.id);
query.first({
success: function(result) {
result.increment("sharesCount");
result.save();
},
error: function(error) {
throw "Could not save share count: " + error.message;
}
});
}
});
For some reason request.object.id is not returning the object id from the newly created record. I've tested this code out throughly and have isolated it down to the request.object.id variable. I've even successfully ran it with using a pre-existing object ID and it worked fine. Am I using the wrong variable for the object ID?
Thanks in advanced for any help!
Had this exact problem a few weeks ago.
It turned out to be a bug in Parse's newest Javascript SDK. Please have a look at your CloudCode folder - it should contain a global.json file where you can specify the JavaScript SDK version. By default, it states "latest", change it to "1.4.2" and upload your CloudCode folder again.
In case the global.json file is missing in your cloud code folder, please have a look at this thread, where I described how to create it manually.
Thanks for the reply. I found out another work around for this for version 1.6.5. I should probably also mention that my use case for this code is to increment a count column (comments count) when a new relation has been added to a particular record (post).
Instead of implementing an afterSave method on my relation class (comment), I instead implemented a beforeSave method on my class (Post) and used request.object.dirtyKeys() to get my modified columns. From there I check to see if my dirty key was comments and if it is I increment my count column. It works pretty well actually.
I have a servicestack service which when called via the browser (restful) Url ex:http://localhost:1616/myproducts, it works fine.
The service method has RedisCaching enabled. So first time it hits the data repository and caches it for subsequent use.
My problem is when I try calling it from a c# client via Soap12ServiceClient. It returns the below error:
Error in line 1 position 183. Expecting element '<target response>'
from namespace 'http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/<target namespace>'..
Encountered 'Element' with name 'base64Binary',
namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/'.
Below is my Client code:
var endpointURI = "http://mydevelopmentapi.serverhostingservices.com:1616/";
using (IServiceClient client = new Soap12ServiceClient(endpointURI))
{
var request = new ProductRequest { Param1 = "xy23432"};
client.Send<ProductResponse>(request);
}
It seems that the soapwsdl used is giving the problem, but I appear to have used the defaults as generated by servicestack..
Any help will be much appreciated.
Update
I was able over come this error by changing the cache code at the service end:
Code that returned error at client end:
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Code that works now:
var result = this.CacheClient.Get<ProductResponse>(cacheKey);
if (result == null)
{
this.CacheClient.Set<ProductResponse>(cacheKey, productResult);
result = productResult;
}
return result;
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
From what I can tell, the ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is trying to pull a specific format (xml, html, json, etc) out of the cache based on the RequestContext's ResponseContentType (see code here and here). When using the Soap12ServiceClient the ResponseContentType is text/html (not sure if this is correct/intentional within ServiceStack). So what ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is pulling out of the cache is a string of html. The html string is being returned to the Soap12ServiceClient and causing an exception.
By pulling directly out of the cache you are bypassing ToOptimizedResultUsingCache's 'format check' and returning something the Soap12ServiceClient can handle.
** If you are using Redis and creating your key with UrnId.Create method you should see a key like urn:ProductResponse:{yourkey}.html
Thanks for your response paaschpa.
I revisited the code and I was able to fix it. Since your response gave me the direction, I have accepted your answer. Below is my fix.
I moved the return statement from RequestContext to the response DTO.
Code which throws error when used via c# client (code was returning entire requestcontext):
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Fixed Code (return moved to response DTO):
RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() => {
return new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
}
});
I am trying to write an activity in Google+ using the dotnet-client. The issue is that I can't seem to get the configuration of my client app correctly. According to the Google+ Sign-In configuration and this SO question we need to add the requestvisibleactions parameter. I did that but it did not work. I am using the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login and I even added the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write but the insert still did not work.
This is what my request url looks like:
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lso&passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope%3Dhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login%2Bhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp://localhost/%26state%3D%26requestvisibleactions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26client_id%3D000.apps.googleusercontent.com%26request_visible_actions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26hl%3Den%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-1fbe06f1c6120f4d<mpl=popup&shdf=Cm4LEhF0aGlyZFBhcnR5TG9nb1VybBoADAsSFXRoaXJkUGFydHlEaXNwbGF5TmFtZRoHQ2hpa3V0bwwLEgZkb21haW4aB0NoaWt1dG8MCxIVdGhpcmRQYXJ0eURpc3BsYXlUeXBlGgdERUZBVUxUDBIDbHNvIhTeWybcoJ9pXSeN2t-k8A4SUbfhsygBMhQivAmfNSs_LkjXXZ7bPxilXgjMsQ&scc=1
As you can see from there that there is a request_visible_actions and I even added one that has no underscore in case I got the parameter wrong (requestvisibleactions).
Let me say that my app is being authenticated successfully by the API. I can get the user's profile after being authenticated and it is on the "insert moment" part that my app fails. My insert code:
var body = new Moment();
var target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = referenceId;
target.Image = image;
target.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
target.Description = description;
target.Name = caption;
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
var insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
// this is a valid service instance as I am using this to query the user's profile
_plusService,
body,
id,
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment result = null;
try
{
result = insert.Fetch();
}
catch (ThreadAbortException)
{
// User was not yet authenticated and is being forwarded to the authorization page.
throw;
}
catch (Google.GoogleApiRequestException requestEx)
{
// here I get a 401 Unauthorized error
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
} `
For the OAuth flow, there are two issues with your request:
request_visible_actions is what is passed to the OAuth v2 server (don't pass requestvisibleactions)
plus.moments.write is a deprecated scope, you only need to pass in plus.login
Make sure your project references the latest version of the Google+ .NET client library from here:
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/download/stable/plus/v1/csharp
I have created a project on GitHub showing a full server-side flow here:
https://github.com/gguuss/gplus_csharp_ssflow
As Brettj said, you should be using the Google+ Sign-in Button as demonstrated in the latest Google+ samples from here:
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-quickstart-csharp
First, ensure you are requesting all of the activity types you're writing. You will know this is working because the authorization dialog will show "Make your app activity available via Google, visible to you and: [...]" below the text that starts with "This app would like to". I know you checked this but I'm 90% sure this is why you are getting the 401 error code. The following markup shows how to render the Google+ Sign-In button requesting access to Add activities.
<div id="gConnect">
<button class="g-signin"
data-scope="https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login"
data-requestvisibleactions="http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity"
data-clientId="YOUR_CLIENT_ID"
data-accesstype="offline"
data-callback="onSignInCallback"
data-theme="dark"
data-cookiepolicy="single_host_origin">
</button>
Assuming you have a PlusService object with the correct activity type set in data-requestvisibleactions, the following code, which you should be able to copy/paste to see it work, concisely demonstrates writing moments using the .NET client and has been tested to work:
Moment body = new Moment();
ItemScope target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = "replacewithuniqueforaddtarget";
target.Image = "http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/GoogleyEyes.png";
target.Type = "";
target.Description = "The description for the activity";
target.Name = "An example of add activity";
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
MomentsResource.InsertRequest insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
_plusService,
body,
"me",
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment wrote = insert.Fetch();
Note, I'm including Google.Apis.Plus.v1.Data for convenience.
Ah it's that simple! Maybe not? I am answering my own question and consequently accept it as the answer (after a few days of course) so others having the same issue may be guided. But I will definitely up-vote Gus' answer for it led me to the fix for my code.
So according to #class answer written above and as explained on his blog the key to successfully creating a moment is adding the request_visible_actions parameter. I did that but my request still failed and it is because I was missing an important thing. You need to add one more parameter and that is the access_type and it should be set to offline. The OAuth request, at a minimum, should look like: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http://localhost/&request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity&access_type=offline.
For the complete and correct client code you can get Gus' example here or download the entire dotnet client library including the source and sample and add what I added below. The most important thing that you should remember is modifying your AuthorizationServerDescription for the Google API. Here's my version of the authenticator:
public static OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient> CreateAuthenticator(
string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientId))
throw new ArgumentException("clientId cannot be empty");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientSecret))
throw new ArgumentException("clientSecret cannot be empty");
var description = GoogleAuthenticationServer.Description;
var uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
// This is the one that has been documented on Gus' blog site
// and over at Google's (https://developers.google.com/+/web/signin/)
// This is not in the dotnetclient sample by the way
// and you need to understand how OAuth and DNOA works.
// I had this already, see my original post,
// I thought it will make my day.
if (uri.IndexOf("request_visible_actions") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri(
uri + param +
"request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
}
// This is what I have been missing!
// They forgot to tell us about this or did I just miss this somewhere?
uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
if (uri.IndexOf("offline") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint =
new Uri(uri + param + "access_type=offline");
}
// Register the authenticator.
var provider = new WebServerClient(description)
{
ClientIdentifier = clientId,
ClientSecret = clientSecret,
};
var authenticator =
new OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient>(provider, GetAuthorization)
{ NoCaching = true };
return authenticator;
}
Without the access_type=offline my code never worked and it will never work. Now I wonder why? It would be good to have some explanation.