I am trying to get a Reservation object which contains a pointer to Restaurant.
In Parse Cloud code, i am able to get the restaurants objects associated with Reservations via query.include('Restaurant') in log just before response.success. However, the Restaurants reverted back to pointer when i receive the response on client app.
I tried reverted JSSDK version to 1.4.2 & 1.6.7 as suggested in some answers, but it doesn't work for me.
Parse.Cloud.define('getreservationsforuser', function(request, response) {
var user = request.user
console.log(user)
var query = new Parse.Query('Reservations')
query.equalTo('User', user)
query.include('Restaurant')
query.find({
success : function(results) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(results))
response.success(results)
},
error : function (error) {
response.error(error)
}
})
})
response :
..."restaurant":{"__type":"Pointer",
"className":"Restaurants",
"objectId":"kIIYe7Z0tD"},...
You can't directly send the pointer objects back from cloud code even though you have included it. You need to manually copy the content of that pointer object to a javascript object. Like below:
var restaurant = {}
restaurant["id"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.id;
restaurant["createdAt"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.createdAt;
restaurant["custom_field"] = YOUR_POINTER_OBJECT.get("custom_field");
ps: in your code you seem do nothing else other than directly send the response back. I think parse REST api might be a better choice in that case.
It turned out that my code implementation was correct.
Related
I have a question regarding a small issue that I'm having. I've created a widget that will live on the Service Portal to allow an admin to Accept or Reject requests.
The data for the widget is pulling from the Approvals (approval_approver) table. Under my GlideRecord, I have a query that checks for the state as requested. (Ex. addQuery('state', 'requested'))
To narrow down the search, I tried entering addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id). When I use this query, my script breaks and I get an error on the Service Portal end.
Here's a sample of the GlideRecord script I've written to Accept.
[//Accept Request
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var inRec1 = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
inRec1.addQuery('state', 'requested');
//inRec1.get('sys_id', current.sys_id);
inRec1.query();
if(inRec1.next()) {
inRec1.setValue('state', 'Approved');
inRec1.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
inRec1.update();
}
}][1]
I've research the web, tried using $sp.getParameter() as a work-around and no change.
I would really appreciate any help or insight on what I can do different to get script to work and filter the right records.
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking how to get the sysId of the sysapproval_approver record from the client-side in a widget.
Unless you have defined current elsewhere in your server script, current is undefined. Secondly, $sp.getParameter() is used to retrieve URL parameters. So unless you've included the sysId as a URL parameter, that will not get you what you are looking for.
One pattern that I've used is to pass an object to the client after the initial query that gets the list of requests.
When you're ready to send input to the server from the client, you can add relevant information to the input object. See the simplified example below. For the sake of brevity, the code below does not include error handling.
// Client-side function
approveRequest = function(sysId) {
$scope.server.get({
action: "requestApproval",
sysId: sysId
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log("Request approved");
});
};
// Server-side
var requestGr = new GlideRecord();
requestGr.addQuery("SOME_QUERY");
requestGr.query(); // Retrieve initial list of requests to display in the template
data.requests = []; // Add array of requests to data object to be passed to the client via the controller
while(requestsGr.next()) {
data.requests.push({
"number": requestsGr.getValue("number");
"state" : requestsGr.getValue("state");
"sysId" : requestsGr.getValue("sys_id");
});
}
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var sysapprovalGr = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
if(sysapprovalGr.get(input.sysId)) {
sysapprovalGr.setValue('state', 'Approved');
sysapprovalGr.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
sysapprovalGr.update();
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
}
...
I am working on New web application which is Using Web API as Business Layer and Knock out Js as client side frame work to binding. I have a requirement like Pass the certain search criteria to Web API Controller and get the Data from DB and Create and Send the Excel/MS-Word file on the fly as a downloadable content.
I am new to both the Web API and Knock out, I am searching on the Net and get partial solution and I am looking here to get more optimal solution for this use case.
Below is my code:
Client:
function GetExcelFile() {
var $downloadForm = $("<form method='POST'>")
.attr("action", baseUrl + "api/FileHandler/GetExcelFileTest")
.attr("target", "_blank")
$("body").append($downloadForm);
$downloadForm.submit();
$downloadForm.remove();
}
On Button Click having this code snippet to create a form on the fly and Get response from Web API.
Web API Code:
[HttpPost]
public HttpResponseMessage GetExcelFileTest()
{
var response = new HttpResponseMessage();
//Create the file in Web App Physical Folder
string fileName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString() + ".xls";
string filePath = HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath(String.Format("~/FileDownload/{0}", fileName));
StringBuilder fileContent = new StringBuilder();
//Get Data here
DataTable dt = GetData();
if (dt != null)
{
string str = string.Empty;
foreach (DataColumn dtcol in dt.Columns)
{
fileContent.Append(str + dtcol.ColumnName);
str = "\t";
}
fileContent.Append("\n");
foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows)
{
str = "";
for (int j = 0; j < dt.Columns.Count; j++)
{
fileContent.Append(str + Convert.ToString(dr[j]));
str = "\t";
}
fileContent.Append("\n");
}
}
// write the data into Excel file
using (StreamWriter sw = new StreamWriter(fileName.ToString(), false))
{
sw.Write(fileContent.ToString());
}
IFileProvider FileProvider = new FileProvider();
//Get the File Stream
FileStream fileStream = FileProvider.Open(filePath);
//Set response
response.Content = new StreamContent(fileStream);
response.Content.Headers.ContentDisposition = new ContentDispositionHeaderValue("attachment");
response.Content.Headers.ContentDisposition.FileName = fileName;
response.Content.Headers.ContentType = new MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/ms-excel");
response.Content.Headers.ContentLength = fileStream.Length;
//Delete the file
//if(File.Exists(filePath))
//{
// File.Delete(filePath);
//}
return response;
}
Using this code I am able to download an Excel File. Still I have some more open questions to make this code optimal.
Q1) I need to Pass view model(Search Criteria) to API Controller Using the dynamically create form ? (OR) Any better ways to get Excel file from Web API.
Q2) I am sure it's not a good way to create Excel file in Physical folder and Get FileStream and send as a respone. How to do on the fly ? OR any other optimal ways.
Please suggest me to do better ways.. Thanks
Q1) You can quite easily pass the view-model, but it's also similarly easy to pull that information from the posted form.
Passing the view-model
If you want to pass the view-model to a WebAPI method then remember that said method must take as a parameter an object with the same properties. So if the object that you wish to post back always has the same properties then it's trivial to build a server-side class with the same properties and receive an instance of that class.
To post back this client-side object you can do something like this (uses jQuery, which I see you're already using):
$.ajax({
contentType: "application/json",
data: my-view-model.toJSON(),
type: "POST",
url: baseUrl + "api/FileHandler/GetExcelFileTest" });
I haven't attached any success or error handlers here because the JavaScript isn't concerned with the return, but you might wish to add some handlers in case an exception is thrown in your WebAPI method. I recommend doing that by adding the following to the above $.ajax() call:
statusCode: {
500: function(jqXhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
},
[other HTTP error codes]
}
[Read the documentation for the $.ajax() call here.]
One additional tip here: when you call my-view-model.toJSON() (or self.toJSON(), if called from within your view-model) Knockout will first of all determine if your view-model contains a toJSON() method. If so, it will use this method; if not then it will call the browser's implementation of this function. However, the browser's implementation of this function will serialise everything, which can be particularly length if you have, for example, long select lists in your view-model. Therefore, if you wish only to send back a subset of the view-model's properties then define your own toJSON function on your view-model like so:
var toJSON = function() {
return {
Property1: ...,
Property2: ...
};
}
[Read more about converting a view-model to JSON here.]
Posting the form as-is
If you don't wish to expend the effort to do the view-model wiring then you can just post the form exactly like you have in your question. You can then retrieve the values from the form by using
Request.Form["my-field"];
Q2)
You're probably right in pointing out that it's not wise to create the Excel file in the physical folder. However, as far as I'm aware (interested if someone says otherwise) you'll have to use a 3rd-party library for this. Microsoft do offer an Office automation library but I have a suspicion that you also need Office to be installed at the same location.
Creating Excel spreadsheets dynamically is something I've done several times but for the actual creation I use Aspose.Cells, which requires a license. Although I do create a physical version and then delete it, I believe Aspose.Cells may allow you to create it as a stream. But take a look around, there are certainly other libraries which offer Excel automation.
Returning the File from the Server
Calling $.ajax({...}) alone won't allow you to present the user with a "Save as..." dialog. What I do in this situation - and this won't work if you wish to store the generated file only in memory (FileStream, for example) and not on the file system - is to respond to the $.ajax({...}) call with a filename for the generated file.
The next step is to direct the user towards that filename.
So I have something like this in my JavaScript:
$.ajax({
dataType: "json",
type: "GET", // you'll probably want POST in your case
url: ...,
success: function(response) {
if (response && response.Uri && response.Uri.length) {
window.location.href = [root URL] + response.Uri;
}
}
});
But don't be alarmed by this redirect. That window.location.href points directly to a folder on the server, no controller needed. Because the browser then receives a file it presents the "Save as..." dialog while remaining on the same webpage.
Using the JavaScript SDK, what kind of object would be returned on the following query:
var groupQuery = new Parse.Query('some_valid_class');
var group = groupQuery.get('some_valid_object_id');
console.log(group);
I only see [object Object] in the log.
thanks!
On Cloud Code - You can't print objects directly as we usually does in console of browser.
You have to use console.log(JSON.stringify(yourObject))
Although the documentation doesn't say so, I believe the get method returns a Promise. Here is an example for getting the actual object taken from the documentation:
var query = new Parse.Query(MyClass);
query.get(myId, {
success: function(object) {
// object is an instance of Parse.Object.
},
error: function(object, error) {
// error is an instance of Parse.Error.
}
});
In the success-function a Parse.Object is provided.
You can find all the info at the Parse JavaScript SDK & Cloud Code Reference
Specific Parse.Query.get() documentation here: https://parse.com/docs/js/symbols/Parse.Query.html#get
In my app, I have users and posts, and I am trying to instantiate my Activity class which has pointers to user and post objects. Here is my code:
var Activity = Parse.Object.extend("Activity");
var User = Parse.Object.extend("_User");
var Post = Parse.Object.extend("Posts");
var activityHandler = function(request, response){
//toUser is the objectId of the User not the object itself.
var toUserId = request.toUser;
var fromUserId = request.fromUser;
var postId = request.post;
var arg = request.argument;
var toUser = new User();
toUser.set("objectId",toUserId);
var fromUser = new User();
fromUser.set("objectId",fromUserId);
var post = new Post();
post.set("objectId",postId);
var activity = new Activity();
activity.set("activityFrom", fromUser);
activity.set("activityTo", toUser);
activity.set("argument", arg);
activity.set("post", post);
activity.save(null, {
useMasterKey: true,
success: function(o){
console.log("activity logged successfully");
response.success();
},
error: function(err){
console.log(err);
},
}
);
};
Parse.Cloud.define("createActivity", activityHandler);
The code is self-explanatory, but just to summarize, the client sends the appropriate user and post IDs, and the cloud function should instantiate a new Activity object, with pointers to the users and post. However, when I try to save, I'm getting:
{"code":141,"error":"Uncaught Tried to save an object with a pointer to a new, unsaved object."}
The problem is that, the object IDs sent to the function are completely valid, already-existing objects in the database. ACL is also not an issue as I'm on the master key.
What am I doing wrong?
It was my bad.
There were multiple problems with my code.
I was using object.set("objectId", id); syntax, which actually should be object.id = id. I'm not sure if it is necessary, maybe it would work without that change too, but I've read everywhere that it's a bad practice.
I wasn't getting the request parameters correctly. I was using request.param1 instead of request.params.param1, and the parameter variable was undefined. I haven't checked if it was undefined or not for a long time, as the error message wasn't really helpful about parameter being undefined, from my perspective back then. (now it makes sense, no ID, and it automatically tries to create a new object)
I've corrected them and it does save correctly now.
This also happens when you forget to call the method:
response.success(object);
I have a servicestack service which when called via the browser (restful) Url ex:http://localhost:1616/myproducts, it works fine.
The service method has RedisCaching enabled. So first time it hits the data repository and caches it for subsequent use.
My problem is when I try calling it from a c# client via Soap12ServiceClient. It returns the below error:
Error in line 1 position 183. Expecting element '<target response>'
from namespace 'http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/<target namespace>'..
Encountered 'Element' with name 'base64Binary',
namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/'.
Below is my Client code:
var endpointURI = "http://mydevelopmentapi.serverhostingservices.com:1616/";
using (IServiceClient client = new Soap12ServiceClient(endpointURI))
{
var request = new ProductRequest { Param1 = "xy23432"};
client.Send<ProductResponse>(request);
}
It seems that the soapwsdl used is giving the problem, but I appear to have used the defaults as generated by servicestack..
Any help will be much appreciated.
Update
I was able over come this error by changing the cache code at the service end:
Code that returned error at client end:
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Code that works now:
var result = this.CacheClient.Get<ProductResponse>(cacheKey);
if (result == null)
{
this.CacheClient.Set<ProductResponse>(cacheKey, productResult);
result = productResult;
}
return result;
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
From what I can tell, the ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is trying to pull a specific format (xml, html, json, etc) out of the cache based on the RequestContext's ResponseContentType (see code here and here). When using the Soap12ServiceClient the ResponseContentType is text/html (not sure if this is correct/intentional within ServiceStack). So what ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is pulling out of the cache is a string of html. The html string is being returned to the Soap12ServiceClient and causing an exception.
By pulling directly out of the cache you are bypassing ToOptimizedResultUsingCache's 'format check' and returning something the Soap12ServiceClient can handle.
** If you are using Redis and creating your key with UrnId.Create method you should see a key like urn:ProductResponse:{yourkey}.html
Thanks for your response paaschpa.
I revisited the code and I was able to fix it. Since your response gave me the direction, I have accepted your answer. Below is my fix.
I moved the return statement from RequestContext to the response DTO.
Code which throws error when used via c# client (code was returning entire requestcontext):
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Fixed Code (return moved to response DTO):
RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() => {
return new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
}
});