Net MVC application there I want to update the telerik control as per the security team.
I am looking at the nuget packages and it giving me multiple options. The MVC projects that I have it is running on .net 4.7.2 so I am not sure which package to install. Also I used to think MVC4 is .net 4x.x but seem like it is not true so here is the
Here are the multiple options for MVC:
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC3
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC4
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC5
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet.Core
I thought Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC4 would work on 4.7.2 but it is not working as expected when I installed the several different packages.
Another confusion created to me by Telerik documentation. If it is referring to 3, 4 or 5 what does it really means?
" Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Core—Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc5—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 5 Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc4—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 4 Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc3—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 3 Commercial.
Related
I used DevExtreme v22.3 but it doesn't support for ASP.NET Core 6 MVC. I used it good but it not working in some case (DataGrid, Popup, ...).
Can I have some advice for it?
I am mostly interested in the unified Web API in MVC 6 for building restful services. However I am a bit confused at the moment on how these components fit together. When building a new app with the latest Visual Studio 2015, MVC 6 is available as an ASP.NET 5 template. My understanding is that ASP.NET 5 is now ASP.NET Core 1.0. What does this mean for MVC 6 and how will it be supported in the future? Will it be part of the ASP.NET Core 1.0, ASP.NET 4.6 or both?
Could someone please explain how these components fit together? Thanks!
ASP.NET Core is the unification of MVC and WebApi.
It can run on the .NET Core framework or on the .NET full desktop framework.
The MVC design pattern is still there but there is less reason to call it "MVC" when talking about it. In the old days we talked about "MVC" to distinguish it from other things like WebForms or WebPages, but ASP.NET Core doesn't have those other things so calling it "MVC" is not really necessary. It was earlier called "MVC 6" but that was before everything got renamed to ASP.NET Core.
You can find a good explanation here: ASP.NET 5 is dead - Introducing ASP.NET Core 1.0 and .NET Core 1.0
In few words:
ASP.NET 4.6 is the newest version of the ASP.NET we have known so far. This version is available right now.
ASP.NET 5 was going to be the name of something that wasn't a newer version of the ASP.NET we've used so far. SO Microsoft decided to rename it as ASP.NET Core
MVC 6 was the name of the MVC included in ASP.NET 5, so this name no longer make sense
One of the characteristics of ASP.NET Core is that, as you're asking, the MVC and Web API controllers are unified (which aren't on ASP.NET 4.6). But another very interesting thing is that ASP.NET Core runs on OSX, Linux and Windows, and there are available tools to develop thiskind of projects on these 3 platforms.
ASP.NET Core runs on .NET Core (previously named .NET 5), which is a "reduced" version of the .NET CLR that runs on OSX, Linux and Windows.
ASP.NET Core is already incomplete: it doesn't include SignalR or Web Pages so far, but it expected in the future.
Does ASP.Net Core 1.0 support .Net WebForm projects? Or it is an MVC only environment? Also can I create classic web services(asmx) there?
Short answer: No, ASP.NET Core does not contain Web Forms or Web Services.
Long answer:
Depends on your meaning of "support". If you aim to run ASP.NET Core project on top of CoreCLR and CoreFX, then the answer is no: ASP.NET Core will contain support only for MVC ja Web API -projects (which are the same thing in ASP.NET Core).
If you can run on full .NET Framework, then ASP.NET Web Forms can co-exist with ASP.NET Core. The Web Forms will be the same Web Forms they are today on System.Web. In this scenario you would host your web forms in a different project (normal ASP.NET 4.x application) on IIS and ASP.NET Core would live in it's own application on Kestrel.
A need to use .NET technologies not available for .NET Core
Some .NET Framework technologies are not available in .NET Core. Some of them will be available in later .NET Core releases, but others don’t apply to the new application patterns targeted by .NET Core and may never be available. The following list shows the most common technologies not found in .NET Core 1.0:
ASP.NET Web Forms applications: ASP.NET Web Forms is only available on the .NET Framework, so you cannot use ASP.NET Core / .NET Core for this scenario. Currently there are no plans to bring ASP.NET Web Forms to .NET Core.
ASP.NET Web Pages applications: ASP.NET Web Pages are not included in ASP.NET Core 1.0, although it is planned to be included in a future release as explained in the .NET Core roadmap.
ASP.NET SignalR server/client implementation. At .NET Core 1.0 release timeframe (June 2016), ASP.NET SignalR is not available for ASP.NET Core (neither client or server), although it is planned to be included in a future release as explained in the .NET Core roadmap. Preview state is available at the Server-side and Client Library GitHub repositories.
WCF services implementation. Even when there’s a WCF-Client library to consume WCF services from .NET Core, as of June 2016, WCF server implementation is only available on the .NET Framework. This scenario is not part of the current plan for .NET Core but it’s being considered for the future.
Workflow related services: Windows Workflow Foundation (WF), Workflow Services (WCF + WF in a single service) and WCF Data Services (formerly known as “ADO.NET Data Services”) are only available on the .NET Framework and there are no plans to bring them to .NET Core.
Language support: Visual Basic and F# don’t currently have tooling support .NET Core, but both will be supported in Visual Studio 2017 and later versions of Visual Studio.
source Choosing between .net Core and .net Framework
How do I upgrade ASP.NET MVC2 to MVC3 with minimal possible implications to NHibernate?
There's there should be no impact in terms of NHibernate if you properly separated concerns in your application by using abstractions. As far as upgrading an ASP.NET MVC 2 application to ASP.NET MVC 3 application is concerned you could follow the upgrading steps mentioned in the release notes or even try the Upgrade Tool.
Can't install MVC 3 Tools update. The installer finishes ok, but MVC 3 Tools Update never gets installed (when viewed in Control Panel's Programs and Features section). The MVC project templates remain old and can't compile projects created with a pc that actually has the MVC 3 Tools Update installed. For example, VS2010 complains about ViewBag as non-existent.
Anyone else having the same issue that MVC 3 Tools Update doesn't install?
ViewBag is built-in ASP.NET MVC 3, nothing to do with the Tools Update. If VS cannot recognize ViewBag you probably are not working on an ASP.NET MVC 3 project or even don't have this installed.