Net MVC application there I want to update the telerik control as per the security team.
I am looking at the nuget packages and it giving me multiple options. The MVC projects that I have it is running on .net 4.7.2 so I am not sure which package to install. Also I used to think MVC4 is .net 4x.x but seem like it is not true so here is the
Here are the multiple options for MVC:
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC3
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC4
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC5
Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet.Core
I thought Telerik.Ui.For.ASPNet>MVC4 would work on 4.7.2 but it is not working as expected when I installed the several different packages.
Another confusion created to me by Telerik documentation. If it is referring to 3, 4 or 5 what does it really means?
" Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Core—Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc5—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 5 Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc4—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 4 Commercial.
Telerik.UI.for.AspNet.Mvc3—Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC 3 Commercial.
I am thinking about how can i achieve hot deployement in asp .net core mvc project. I would appreciate if you could answer my question.
I am mostly interested in the unified Web API in MVC 6 for building restful services. However I am a bit confused at the moment on how these components fit together. When building a new app with the latest Visual Studio 2015, MVC 6 is available as an ASP.NET 5 template. My understanding is that ASP.NET 5 is now ASP.NET Core 1.0. What does this mean for MVC 6 and how will it be supported in the future? Will it be part of the ASP.NET Core 1.0, ASP.NET 4.6 or both?
Could someone please explain how these components fit together? Thanks!
ASP.NET Core is the unification of MVC and WebApi.
It can run on the .NET Core framework or on the .NET full desktop framework.
The MVC design pattern is still there but there is less reason to call it "MVC" when talking about it. In the old days we talked about "MVC" to distinguish it from other things like WebForms or WebPages, but ASP.NET Core doesn't have those other things so calling it "MVC" is not really necessary. It was earlier called "MVC 6" but that was before everything got renamed to ASP.NET Core.
You can find a good explanation here: ASP.NET 5 is dead - Introducing ASP.NET Core 1.0 and .NET Core 1.0
In few words:
ASP.NET 4.6 is the newest version of the ASP.NET we have known so far. This version is available right now.
ASP.NET 5 was going to be the name of something that wasn't a newer version of the ASP.NET we've used so far. SO Microsoft decided to rename it as ASP.NET Core
MVC 6 was the name of the MVC included in ASP.NET 5, so this name no longer make sense
One of the characteristics of ASP.NET Core is that, as you're asking, the MVC and Web API controllers are unified (which aren't on ASP.NET 4.6). But another very interesting thing is that ASP.NET Core runs on OSX, Linux and Windows, and there are available tools to develop thiskind of projects on these 3 platforms.
ASP.NET Core runs on .NET Core (previously named .NET 5), which is a "reduced" version of the .NET CLR that runs on OSX, Linux and Windows.
ASP.NET Core is already incomplete: it doesn't include SignalR or Web Pages so far, but it expected in the future.
What is practical difference between ASP.net MVC3 & Spring.Net. What would you suggest to use for a new application. Does Spring.net is actively developed and supported?
And whether both are compatible with each other and can be used together?
Any idea would be highly appreciated.
Thank you
Spring.NET is a Dependency Injection framework for .NET.
ASP.NET is a framework for developing web applications on top of ASP.NET using the MVC pattern.
So it's like asking What is practical difference between an apple and an orange.
How do I upgrade ASP.NET MVC2 to MVC3 with minimal possible implications to NHibernate?
There's there should be no impact in terms of NHibernate if you properly separated concerns in your application by using abstractions. As far as upgrading an ASP.NET MVC 2 application to ASP.NET MVC 3 application is concerned you could follow the upgrading steps mentioned in the release notes or even try the Upgrade Tool.