I'm trying to write a custom ReactiveHttpOutputMessage implementation. Should I release the DataBuffers I receive in writeWith? The default ReactiveHttpOutputMessage implementation ReactorClientHttpRequest doesn't but I'm not sure if it's intended or if it's a bug.
Related
I have some plugin's which are basically input and output type definitions. I have a generic controller which i can add to the mvc pipeline. All works fine.
but I'm having trouble setting the api version on this generic controller. I know you can set this based upon an attribute on top of the controller class. But since you can't have this dynamic (attribute) don't allow it, i have no way to set the version for each instance of the generic controller.
Currently i just compile the controller for each instance on runtime and register i using the roslyn compiler.
is there a way to set the api-version somewhere in the pipeline of registering controllers in the mvc pipeline and endup with different api versions endpoints.
This can be achieved by using the Conventions API. It was designed to support this exact type of scenario:
https://github.com/microsoft/aspnet-api-versioning/wiki/API-Version-Conventions
This will only work on closed-generics, but it shouldn't be too much work to make that happen. Here's a couple of basic examples:
// typed, closed generic
options.Conventions.Controller<GenericController<PlugIn1>>().HasApiVersion(1,0);
// untyped, closed generic
var controllerType = typeof(GenericController<>).MakeGenericType(new []{typeof(PlugIn1)});
options.Conventions.Controller(controllerType).HasApiVersion(1,0);
You can also author your own custom conventions a la IControllerConvention. This approach could be used to version all controllers that inherit from GenericController<>. Then you just need to add it to the conventions like this:
options.Conventions.Add(new PlugInControllerConvention());
Hopefully that's enough to get you started. Feel free to ask more questions.
I'm trying to write a new language detector plugin for i18next for integration with hapi. There's an existing hapi-i18next plugin that is quite old (it uses an extemely old version of i18next, 1.7.10 ) and so mostly useless. And the i18next API docs are pretty vague about how to write new plugins and exactly what the language detection process is. Does it run every time the t() function runs? should it be asynchronous? Has anybody else out there recently integrated hapi with i18next? I realize this is rather general but i'm not sure where else to turn.
Never used hapi so far, but seems hapi evolved a lot since version 8 (what's actually used here)
I don't know if that project is still maintained...
Perhaps you could try to create a new hapi-i18next plugin... (was not that much code)
To create a languageDetector plugin, it should not be a big thing... start here and continue by comparing how the express language detection works
In i18next the languageDetector is triggered here
...so on init/load and on a potential language change
I hope this helps.
What I ended up doing is writing a hapi server extension rather than a plugin, and a module that runs at startup that decorates the hapi server object with the initialized i18next object. The extension is installed to run onPreHandler and it basically clones the i18next object, attaches that instance to the request object, and detects the language (from the request header or from a query parameter), then sets the cloned instance to that language. This way, whenever a route handler uses the t() function attached to the instance that's attached to the current request, we know we'll be translating into the right language. Note that this is still for Hapi 16 (I need to port to 17/18 soon)...
I'm trying to modify the behaviour of the NewIssuesEmailTemplate in SonarQube 4.0. I want to put richer information into the generated emails. It looks as if everything I need is put in the Notification by IssueNotifications.
What I want to know is if it's possible to override the fact that NewIssuesEmailTemplate is the handler for Notifications of type "new-issues".
I'm going to hazard that this can be done by creating a new plugin that overrides the specific behaviour of CorePlugin, and making sure that this gets loaded first, but I don't really know how to go about it.
Has anyone done anything like this before? I don't seem to be able to find any hints to get me started.
You cannot change the fact that NewIssuesEmailTemplate is the handler for notifications of type "new-issues".
All you can do is to add new channels or dispatchers using the extensions available in the notification API. You can check how this is done by the Core Email plugin.
I have a CakePHP ticketing app where I am using Revision Behavior to keep revision history of each tickets. The problem I have using this behavior is, it does not display validation error messages. Here is the line I have added in the model.
public $actsAs = array('Revision' => array('limit'=>10));
When I comment this line, it displays error messages and otherwise it does not. Also, when I debug it using x-debug, I see validationErrors variable is set and has all error message values set properly.
Please shed some light here.
Edit: I am using Cake 2.1
First, be sure to get the last version of this behavior : http://alkemann.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/models/behaviors/revision.php
for integration in CAKE 2.X, the problem comes from line 980 in the createShadowModel() function:
$Model->ShadowModel->alias = $Model->alias;
The behavior gives the same alias to the base model and its shadowmodel it will save in the _revs table and that seems to mess up the validation messages.
The problem is that this behavior is loaded automatically when you access your model, and the createShadowModel() function is called even if your input doesn't validate.
One of the solution would be to comment out this line from createShadowModel() and then to add it only to every function in the behavior that will make an operation in the DB . There is surely a better way than that, like detecting in the setup() if there is need to go further to initialization, but couldn't find how to do it. So that's my first step towards at least allowing to use this behavior in Cake 2.X.
There are a few things that could be happening here. Too much for one to simply tell you what is happening since we don't have any of your code. However, I am pretty certain that this behavior, being that it was written in 2008, will have issues with CakePHP version 2.1, which just released its first alpha. There have been a lot of changes to the infrastructure of Cake that could cause this not to work. I'd say this would probably work with version 1.3 and definitely with 1.2, but getting support for 2.1 probably won't happen without updates.
That said, this is a behavior, which should only alter model code. So, there should be not impact (theoretically) on your view. Are you sure you are using the proper conventions in your code to display errors (even though commenting it out changes displayed messages).
I'd look for a 2.0+ compatible version of the behavior. Or, you could throw the code on Github and start to port it yourself. You may get some help from some Cake people.
I was looking at the NSURLConnection class which could be used to establish a sync or async connection to an URL and then retrieve its data... a lot of changes have been made to this class with IOS 5 and I've seen they introduced some formal protocols related to authentication or download, but I don't see, for example, if the connection:didReceiveResponse: message (that was previously sent to the delegate and that it is no more available) is still available in some protocols.. How do you implement an async connection and retrieve, for example, HTTP headers as soon as the Response is received? I'm sure there is a way better than using NSURLConnection along with the connection:didReceiveResponse: message.. methods like stringWithContentsOfURL do always load content synchronously? What do you use to implement async downloads in your apps avoiding deprecated methods and reacting to events such as _http response received_m etc ? Do you launch synchronous downloads in background tasks, if possible?
NSURLConnectionDelegate has become a formal protocol (it was an informal protocol in previous versions). In this protocol, the following (non-deprecated) methods are declared:
connection:didFailWithError:
connectionShouldUseCredentialStorage:
connection:willSendRequestForAuthenticationChallenge:
Furthermore, there are two subprotocols that conform to NSURLConnectionDelegate:
NSURLConnectionDataDelegate is used for delegates that load data to memory, and declares the following methods, some of which I’m sure you’ll find familiar:
connection:willSendRequest:redirectResponse:
connection:didReceiveResponse:
connection:didReceiveData:
connection:needNewBodyStream:
connection:didSendBodyData:totalBytesWritten:totalBytesExpectedToWrite:
connection:willCacheResponse:
connectionDidFinishLoading:
NSURLConnectionDownloadDelegate is used for delegates that store data directly to a disk file, and declares the following methods:
connection:didWriteData:totalBytesWritten:expectedTotalBytes:
connectionDidResumeDownloading:totalBytesWritten:expectedTotalBytes:
connectionDidFinishDownloading:destinationURL:
As you can see, you can still use your previous delegates, possibly with some minor modifications.
For more information, see the iOS 4.3 to iOS 5.0 API Differences document and NSURLConnection.h in your local Xcode installation. When a new SDK version is released, it’s not uncommon for the documentation inside the header files to be more reliable than the documentation available on the developer library. It takes a while for the latter to be up-to-date.
I just encountered this same issue. Looks like sending an asynchronous request is more simplified with blocks and NSOperationQueue.
+ (void)sendAsynchronousRequest:(NSURLRequest *)request queue:(NSOperationQueue *)queue completionHandler:(void (^)(NSURLResponse*, NSData*, NSError*))handler
This means that the delegate is now only used for authentication and failure issues.
NO!
They are NOT limited to use for authentication and failure issues if you look carefully through the Apple's library.
Since introducing +(void)sendAsynchronousRequest:queue:completionHandler: to NSConnection class object, Many things which can perform as many NSConnectionDelegate method as before can now be used in formal protocols called "NSConnectionDataDelegate" & NSConnectionDownloadDelegate, opening a new room to add more feature to NSURLConnection methods. (from iOS5 on)
So I think it is an improvement, not limiting their use.
Even I havent found the documentation on the Apple website
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Cocoa/Reference/Foundation/Classes/NSURLConnection_Class/Reference/Reference.html
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Foundation/Reference/NSURLConnectionDelegate_Protocol/Reference/Reference.html
It should have been available over here