I have a CakePHP ticketing app where I am using Revision Behavior to keep revision history of each tickets. The problem I have using this behavior is, it does not display validation error messages. Here is the line I have added in the model.
public $actsAs = array('Revision' => array('limit'=>10));
When I comment this line, it displays error messages and otherwise it does not. Also, when I debug it using x-debug, I see validationErrors variable is set and has all error message values set properly.
Please shed some light here.
Edit: I am using Cake 2.1
First, be sure to get the last version of this behavior : http://alkemann.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/models/behaviors/revision.php
for integration in CAKE 2.X, the problem comes from line 980 in the createShadowModel() function:
$Model->ShadowModel->alias = $Model->alias;
The behavior gives the same alias to the base model and its shadowmodel it will save in the _revs table and that seems to mess up the validation messages.
The problem is that this behavior is loaded automatically when you access your model, and the createShadowModel() function is called even if your input doesn't validate.
One of the solution would be to comment out this line from createShadowModel() and then to add it only to every function in the behavior that will make an operation in the DB . There is surely a better way than that, like detecting in the setup() if there is need to go further to initialization, but couldn't find how to do it. So that's my first step towards at least allowing to use this behavior in Cake 2.X.
There are a few things that could be happening here. Too much for one to simply tell you what is happening since we don't have any of your code. However, I am pretty certain that this behavior, being that it was written in 2008, will have issues with CakePHP version 2.1, which just released its first alpha. There have been a lot of changes to the infrastructure of Cake that could cause this not to work. I'd say this would probably work with version 1.3 and definitely with 1.2, but getting support for 2.1 probably won't happen without updates.
That said, this is a behavior, which should only alter model code. So, there should be not impact (theoretically) on your view. Are you sure you are using the proper conventions in your code to display errors (even though commenting it out changes displayed messages).
I'd look for a 2.0+ compatible version of the behavior. Or, you could throw the code on Github and start to port it yourself. You may get some help from some Cake people.
Related
I am migrating a project from Richfaces to Primefaces and I am having problems getting file download to work again. The original uses a standard h:commandLink which tells the webflow to start the download by calling a function on the controller. The actual downloading is written to the output stream instead of being returned as a file.
Now my problem is the previous code sends a FilterServletResponseWrapper, but after changing the rich tags to prime, it now returns HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository$SaveToSessionResponseWrapper. These wrappers are not specified anywhere and I suspect rich sends such a type internally. So if I want to specify my own wrapper to send, how could I possibly go about that? In particular I want to use Spring's ContentCachingResponseWrapper since I need to use it's .getContentInputStream() method.
P.S. I have intentionally omitted the code, because of NDA, I am hoping this is enough information to represent the problem sufficiently. If not I will be glad to clear out any questions.
Thanks
I´m using OptaPlanner to solve optimization problems, I´m working with HardMediumSoftBigDecimalScore and OptaPlanner said me:
field private org.optaplanner.core.api.score.buid
in.hardmediumsoftbigdecimal.HardMediumSoftBigDecimalScore asota.lubricantselection.lsopt.domain.bearinglubricantsolution.BearingLubricantSolution.score) that returns a scoreType (class org.optaplanner.core.api.score.buildin.hardmediumsoftbigdecimal.HardMediumSoftBigDecimalScore) that is not recognized
as a default Score implementation.
If you intend to use a custom implementation, maybe set a scoreDefinition in the PlanningScore annotation.
I tried with 7.43.1 version and 7.40.0 version the same error persist.
Thank you in advance, I look forward to your comments.
I remember fixing this bug for master the other day. It was simply not hooked in.
The fix will be part of the 8.0.0.Beta1 release. The fix is not backported to 7.x at this point (if a customer submits a support ticket, we will prioritize the backport).
Workaround wise, there's nothing I can immediately think about... sorry.
I'm having an Issue with a blog extension in Magento CE 1.6.2.0.
I installed this extension: Neotheme_nBlog.
I created an entry in the administrator.
Then I went to http://www.example.com/index.php/blog/ to see the recently created entry.
What I saw was an error like this:
Fatal error: Call to a member function getName() on a non-object
in /home/example.com/public_html/app/design/frontend/default/caramel/template/magicat/left.phtml
I searched in google the terms: "template/magicat/left.phtml" getName and what I only found is sites having this issue, but no support at all.
Please note: I know what does that error mean in PHP ("unfortunately" I'm not new at that). What I don't understand is what's happening with such [NON/null] object and how to fix it without killing a dozen of kittens.
Question: What can I do to solve it? What is the nature of the error, regarding Magento?(again: not PHP).
Notes: The Magento site (http://magento.stackexchange.com) is somewhat poor and strict to bring support of such nature, so asking there is not an option.
Edit (as answer to comment, and to clarify):
Neotheme is still not responding the request.
Don't know what should I look on such file (instances are not initialized there, but only accessed).
I'm using the default theme (caramel), which has esthetical changes (does not have layout changes).
It's hard to say without seeing your system specifically, but on this
template/magicat/left.phtml
It looks like you've added a template named magicat/left.phtml to your system -- either via an extension or custom development. Somewhere in this file PHP's called getName on a non-object. There's a variety of reasons this could be happening, and without seeing the specific line of code PHP's complaining about in your system, it's hard to say. It'd also be helpful to know if magicat is part of the extension or something else.
The most common reason for this error in a template is code that relies on a block being there that's been removed by another extension (eitehr via layout XML or observer methods)
$this->getLayout()->getBlock('some_block')->getName();
The next most common is people using the registry to communicate between templates and views, but a registry key not being set
Mage::registry('some_item')->getName();
Without knowing the variable and context, it's doubtful anyone will be able to help you.
Short description
I'm getting used to CakePHP right now and am wondering about how to get more debug-information about what is happening inside the framework.
Let me please explain my situation a little more detailed
As you know CakePHP does a lot for you without putting you into the need to write additional code. One example is the handling of models.
I just created a model User and added validation-rules (no other methods). As described in the API methods like save will just work.
After that I created the needed controller and view to add a new user. When I try to add a user from the view I just receive the flash-message The user could not be created. Please, try again. No validation-violations are flashed.
I also did set the debug-level to 2: Configure::write('debug', 2); but do not receive any errors. The error.log inside \tmp\logs is also empty.
I really do want to learn how to solve those issues in the future.
So what else can I do to debug / display inner processes of cake?
Thank you very much for your help!
DebugKit is an official plugin that gives you lots of information on the request, queries and variables produced by Cake:
https://github.com/cakephp/debug_kit
You can also use trace() and other methods in the Debugger to show what is being executed in the background:
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/development/debugging.html
Use a PHP IDE with an integrated debugger. That will allow you to follow execution line by line as it is executed and even inspect variable values as you go. Netbeans is a free one.
I have a Managed Object Context to which I add two different SQLite stores. I use Configurations in the Mananged Object Model to assign certain entities to one store and other entities to the other. The Configurations are called "UserDB" and "MainDB".
Everything works okay until I try to use automatic migration. After creating a new Managed Object Model version, and adding a new attribute to one of the entities in the UserDB Configuration, I get an exception when adding the old version store (for the UserDB related store) to the store coordinator: 'Model does not contain configuration 'UserDB'.' I can find no hits for this error on Google. Anyone out there using multiple stores with Configurations? Anyone have an idea what I might be doing wrong?
The stack looks like this:
objc_exception_throw
-[NSManagedObjectModel isConfiguration:compatibleWithStoreMetadata:]
-[NSStoreMigrationPolicy sourceModelForStoreAtURL:metadata:error:]
-[NSStoreMigrationPolicy(InternalMethods) _gatherDataAndPerformMigration:]
-[NSPersistentStoreCoordinator addPersistentStoreWithType:configuration:URL:options:error:]
-[MyAppDelegate persistentStoreCoordinator]
This looks like a bug with migration+configurations. I was able to work around the problem by going through the same motions and passing nil for configuration when calling addPersistentStoreWithType. The migration happens, and then I can make a new persistent store coordinator and add the stores again with the proper Configuration string arguments.
This is the second configuration related bug I've run into. Not a well tested feature apparently.
I had the same problem. The fact pattern was identical and the error message the same. It turned out, however, to be the result of my own mistake.
Let's say the old model was Blah.xcdatamodel and the new Blah 2.xcdatamodel. I had started making changes to Blah before realising my mistake and creating Blah 2. I then used my version control system (Git) to revert to the old Blah and then recreated Blah 2. Everything looked right. But I must have done something wrong in the reversion process, because when I thought to double check that Blah.xcdatamodel in my current project folder was really the same as Blah.xcdatamodel in the project folder I used to build the previous version of the app (fortunately I always keep a zipped archive of the project folder for each released version as I don't fully trust version control systems), I found that they were in fact different, albeit that they looked identical in XCode. The file size was different, for instance.
I substituted the old Blah into my current project folder, and lo and behold it all went perfectly, without any need for the workaround described by Ken.
I am not saying that Ken had necessarily made a similar mistake, but if you do encounter this message it is at least worth confirming that the model you are migrating from is REALLY the model that was used to create the data in question.