If I open a solution in Visual Studio 2008 and run a unit test then VS creates a new .vsmdi file in the Solution Items folder and gives it the next number available e.g. My Solution2.vsmdi.
Any idea why VS is doing this and how I can get it to stop doing this?
It appears that the VSMDI problem is a known bug and has been around since VS2005 Team System but it has no clear fix as yet. Another reason to NOT use MS Test.
An MSDN blog details how to run unit tests without VSMDI files.
Assuming that the VSMDI file is under source control, here's a Microsoft Support article about this issue: Multiple vsmdi Files after Running Team Test with VSMDI file under Source Control
Which says:
Someone ran a test while someone else was modifying the vsmdi file.
Team Test detects that the VSMDI file is out of sync;therefore, Team
Test it makes one and thus you see the incrementing vsmdi files.
And:
Going forward you want to make sure the file is not marked for auto
checkout when it is modified. When the current tester has the VSMDI
file checked out you, do not want other users to be able to check it
out. You want your developers to checkout the file, run a test, and
check it back in.
I work around this by always checking out the .vsmdi.
It seems that this only happens when the .vsmdi file is read-only, e.g. not checked-out in a version control system that uses that kind of lock-local-files behavior (Perforce etc).
An old post but vsmdi is a meta data file created by the test system.
Related
When I use Visual Studio 2010 to debug a crash dump file (native code), it attempts to load C/C++ source files from the original build folder (and it gives the message "The source file is different from when the module was built. Would you like the debugger to use it anyway?"). The message is correct; the file is not the correct version.
What I would like VS2010 to do is to check out the source file using source server. If the file does not currently exist in its original build location, VS2010 will correctly use source server and retrieve the appropriate revision of the file (from Subversion). In order to force it to check out the correct revision, I have to physically delete the file from the original build location.
As a side note, VS2005 works as desired (well ... as I desire, perhaps not as others desire). VS2005 will always check out the correct revision from source control regardless of whether a copy of the file exists in the original build folder.
I believe the question comes down to one of the following:
Is there some kind of setting available that will change VS2010's precedence for finding source files?
Alternatively, is it possible to make VS2010 offer a choice/option to check out the source file in question? (Currently the only option I see in this situation is to browse for it.)
Or is it possible to completely exclude a specific path (folder) from the search?
I have the same problem with VS2010 and made an attempt to figure it out. I monitored devenv.exe with procmon but didn't see anything out of the order with the files & registry keys it was accessing. Pretty much the same information you see in the error report when VS2010 can't find the source. My solution is to use VS2005 as it works fine. I did see some correspondence on MSDN about a similar (if not the same) bug and they claimed it would be fixed in the final release of 2012. I believe I have that final release of 2012 and it has the same problem.
Here's a maybe slightly complicated solution
1) Create a script that will download and replace the pdb file (a .bat, a python script, whatever)
2) Create a new External Tool within VS2010 (Tools -> External Tools -> Add)
3) Point the tool to your script and pass any project-specific stuff to it as arguments
4) Create a post-build or pre-build step in your project that will call your new External Tool (project properties -> Build Events -> whatever)
This is a lot of work, but at least it will fully integrate it into your building process.
Note: Sometimes I've noticed that my post-build steps won't run unless I've compiled at least on cpp file. I usually press F7 and build some source and then build fully, to make sure everything works as expected.
You can change the local source directory to a different name when you are debugging crash dump file.
Or you can change the build directory to a different path with your local directory.
I am using PowerShell to modify a series of configuration files within a solution. The solution is under TFS 2010 control.
The solution has many projects and the configuration files are all xml files. The easy part is if I just need to modify a file, I check it out using the checkout command then save the file when I'm done. All good. I go into Visual Studio and see the modified files are updated with pending changes as I would expect
The part I'm having difficulty with is when I have a configuration file that is no longer needed and can be deleted. Using the delete command does, in fact, mark the file for a pending delete, but it does not modify the project file where the deleted file is contained.
When I delete a file via Visual Studio, it automatically checks out and modifies the project file for me. I'm not getting the same result when using a command line delete.
It's not practical for me to do this by hand as I am eliminating over 1,000 files.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you.
There are two components at work here. When you are running inside VS, the project system processes all file commands (adds, deletes, edits, etc.) and then calls into the TFS Object Model to actually pend the changes in TFS. The project system is also the one responsible here for removing the reference from the project file. The TFS OM has no knowledge of whether a file is part of a project or not when it is run outside of Visual Studio.
If you have a list of the xml files that you need to delete your best bet is to write a script that reads these in and removes them from the project file (after pending an edit on the project file, of course).
-Taylor,
TFS Version Control Development Lead
Thank you all for your responses. After much digging and trial and error, I figured it out. It was way more simple than I was making it.
In short, I used DTE and ran my script from within VS using the PowerShell console. It went something like this:
$mySolution = $dte.Solution
$projectItem = $mySolution.FindProjectItem($fileToRemove)
if ( $projectItem -ne $null )
{
$projectItem.Remove()
}
Executing the Remove() command on the ProjectItem checks out the corresponding project and edits it accordingly.
Again, thank you again for the time you all took to look at my question and respond. Hope this helps someone else someday!
I'm in the process of adding a WIX project to my solution and I'm using HEAT to create the files list. I've been having trouble getting builds to work unless the files list(wxs) is checked out.
I came across this tutorial and it says:
"If you have source control you have to include the FilesFragment.wxs
into your project but remove its source control binding. "
Is this possible in TFS 2010 with VS2010?
Click/Select on the file.
In VS, go File Menu / Source Control / Exclude file from source control.
This method only allows you to do this one file at a time.
The file will still be in your project and will not be under source control.
I don't like dynamically emitting installation authoring at build time for abouta dozen reasons but if you really are going to do it, perhaps you should consider checking it out and checking it in so that you have some histroy of what actually happened from build to build.
Otherwise if your installation behavior changes from one build to another build in an unexpected and undesirable way, you really aren't going to have any tracability other then diffing MSI's as to what went wrong.
I'd like to use visual studio to store in source control xml files coming from a server.
I have a request like http://server/query.aspx?FILE_ID=1234 that allows me to download an xml file. Those file are part of our development activities, that's why I'm looking for a convenient way of integrating those file in source control.
I'd like to have a project containing all the xml files I want to check-in in source control and add a pre-build command allowing to download the files, but I did not find any convenient way of doing it.
People have a tendency to forgetting to do it manually, and we have already seen all the possible scenarios: lost files, released version without the ability to know the exact configuration used, ... I'd like to automated this step so that it does not happen again in the future.
I'm sure there is a simple and smart solution, but I could not find it. Any suggestion would be appreciated.
You should be able to use wget in a pre-build action to fetch the latest version of the files. I can't think of a reason why that wouldn't work.
Personally i would consider finding a way to automatically commit those files to source control whenever they change on the server. I've never used tfs, but I assume there is a commandline-client which allows you to commit files in a scripted way. If you don't have any control over when the files change you could do this every N minutes on a machine which is always on.
You can write a (powershell) script that does the fetching, and checkin of the file before your build starts. That's how we fetch external assemblies to be included in our build.
To get you started, take a look at these powershell functions for TFS interaction:
http://www.brokenwire.net/bw/Programming/73/ (TFS 2008)
I'm trying to build a small VS 2005 solution I've just checked out of source control, and I'm getting this easy to understand error:
...\AssemblyInfo.cs' could not be
opened ('The system cannot find the
file specified. ') (The file is fairly
obviously missing)
Because this file's automatically generated, I've never paid it much heed before, and in VS 2003 (which I still work with day to day - pity me) it never seems to matter if it's missing.
So 2 questions:
1. How can I get VS 2005 to regenerate the file.
2. Could anyone explain to me in a couple of sentences what the assembly info file is all about, why it's generated, why it's a good idea to have an automatically generated file critical to my solution building etc etc.
Thanks - Andrew.
Edit: OK, I've googling some more, and it's probably significant that this is in an Nunit Test Project.
Update: Deleting the reference in solution explorer an Alex suggested did the trick, and the project now builds, but I'm not entirely happy with that as a solution. If the file is so unimportant, why is it generated in the first place? And if the file does perform a vital task, what am I missing out on by just deleting it?
Also, is it even possible to get it back? Either by getting VS to regenerate it, or by manually hacking one up (possibly using another as a template)?
This file contains assembly-wide settings like assembly version, name, etc. It is automatically generated when you change those settings using properties pages of the project. You should have this file in the project with sort of transparent icon (I think it is in resource folder or something like this by default). Locate it in the project tree and delete it. Visual studio will stop looking for it during build.
PS: assuming the path starts with .. and not ... then this file should be located one folder up from the project in the source control. So you can try looking there.