Where can I find the IIS object schema? All I found from MSDN was a picture of the class hierarchy.
To be clear, I want to configure IIS through either WMI or ADSI and I'm looking for something like the Active Directory schema, only for IIS. I want a list of all the objects I can configure, which objects they can be contained in and what their properties are.
While I can't point you to a definitive document, you might find this even better: WMI code creator:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=2cc30a64-ea15-4661-8da4-55bbc145c30e&DisplayLang=en
I've used this tool to query IIS WMI objects and it will even script the queries or WMI method calls for you in C# (I used them as examples).
If you run it on a machine with IIS installed, you'll see the root\MicrosoftIISv2 namesspace, which has tons of queryable objects in it, and all their properties and methods. You are probably looking for something like the IIsWebVirtualDirSetting object - try starting with that as it's got most of the properties you'll see on the IIS config panel.
Can't you find some information here : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa737439.aspx ?
Related
I am trying to get the information of all the files related to an instance of ibm bpm but the following query does not work for me and there is no error in the javascript console either. I am using ECM Document List and in configuration I am adding a variable which contains the query.
"SELECT cmis:name, IBM_BPM_Document_FileNameURL,IBM_BPM_Document_UserId FROM IBM_ WHERE IBM_BPM_Document_ProcessInstanceId = 75774"
Thanks
I would assume that you are using and external ECM server and not the embedded ECM that comes along with IBM BPM/BAW.
Looking at the problem, I would approach the debugging in the following order;
Use a relevant ECM browser (ACCE in case of Filenet) to check if the
documents have a property that holds the value for the instanceID.
Because, by default external ECM servers don't have such a document
property.
If the document has such a property, then use that in the
"WHERE" clause of the query. If it doesn't then talk to whoever
maintains the ECM environment to create such a property and make
sure that is set properly (to the correct instanceId) for the
documents.
Another solution if you have access to it can be using the "BPM Document List" and "BPM File Uploader" which has the feature (as a configuration option) to associate documents with the current process instance.
I'm working on a System Service project with SYSTEM privilege (cleaning utility)... It does not interactive with any user interface.
My goal is to check files in "Desktop" and "AppData" folders for any user that exists on the PC.
I'm using NetUserEnum() to get the user list on the PC. Then I want to get the path of each user's Desktop and AppData with SHGetKnownFolderPath(), but I can't find a way to get each user's access token for SHGetKnownFolderPath(). Without a token defined in SHGetKnownFolderPath(), it returns the path for SYSTEM and not specific users.
Q1. How can I get the token of each user for SHGetKnownFolderPath()?
Q2. If no answer for Q1, is there any documented way to get the desktop & appdata path of each user in the PC?
I understand this can be achieved with dirty way ---> Registry key with some string replacement. However, the Registry key method is undocumented, which may easily break in future updates to Windows.
Edit Update:
#RaymondChen Thanks for pointing out that some user profiles may not exist. Also,
About Q1 : #Remy Lebeau provides a solution with LogonUser/Ex(),login to each user with their credentials,might be the only answer that fits the need of Q1.
About Q2 : There might have no documented way to achieve this. The only method might have to stick with Windows Registry (Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders) , as #Remy Lebeau and #Olaf Hess said. I tried to dig more information on Microsoft Community Forum and I got Microsoft would never allow access other users' profile with their native API for security reason. They do not provide APIs that can possibly violate the security rules. Each user profile can only access by its credentials.
btw, I totally understand that "Cleaning utility" aka "Windows-breaking tool", especially when the tool is not being well codded(ex. compatibility problem). For the sake of avoiding to make it become a totally Windows-Destroyer, I tried to use more documented API as possible.
For Windows Vista with SP1 / Server 2008 and better you can query the existing user profiles using the WMI class Win32_UserProfile. This allows you to retrieve the profile path and check whether it is a local or roaming profile and to get status information. The rest (retrieving the paths to APPDATA, DESKTOP, etc.) is likely going to involve reading values straight from the registry (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User Shell Folders or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders).
I recently created a script for checking running services using the GetObject("WinNT://" & computer) method. It uses a .filter method to only get "Service" items. I have used similar scripts for querying other items from a computer. However, I can't seem to find a list of everything that I should be able to query from a computer using this connection (prior to the filter)
Would someone be able to point me in the correct direction for finding out all of the possible properties I can access when using this type of connection?
Check out the following section in MSDN:
ADSI Objects of WinNT
It describes the available objects and their methods and properties.
First of all, I know that the error I am getting can be resolved by creating reference project (of type Database Server) and then referencing it in my Database project...
However, I find this to be overkill, especially for small teams where there is no specific role separation between developers and db admins..But, let's leave this discussion for another time... Same goes for DACs...Can't use DAC b/c of limited objects supported...
Question
Now, the question is: Can I (and how), disable SQL03006 error when building my Database project. In my case this error is generated because I am creating some users whose logins are "unresolved"...I think this should be possible I hope, since I "know" that logins will exist on the server before I deploy the script...I also don't want to maintain database server project just so I can keep refs resolved (I have nothing besides logins at server level)...
Workaround
Using pre/post deployment scripts, it is trivial to get the secript working...
Workaround Issue
You have to comment out user scripts (which use login references) for workaround...
As soon as you do that, the .sqlpermissions bomb out, saying there is no referenced users...And then you have to comment permissions out and put them in post deploy scripts...
The main disadvantage of this workaround is that you cannot leverage schema compare to its fullest extent (you have to specify to ignore users/logins/permissions)
So again, all I want is
1. to maintain only DB project (no references to DB Server projects)
2. disable/suppress SQL03006 error
3. be able to use schema compare in my DB project
Am I asking for impossible? :)
Cheers
P.S.
If someone is aware of better VS2010 database project templates/tools (for SQL Server 2008 R2) please do share...
There are two workarounds:
1.
Turn off any schema checking (Tools > Options > Database Tools > Schema Compare > SQL Server 200x, then the Object Type tab) for anything user or security related. This is a permanent fix
2.
Go through the schema comparison and mark anything user or security related as Skip and then generate your SQL compare script. This is a per schema comparison fix.
It should be obvious but if you already have scripts in your project that reference logins or roles then delete them and they won't get created.
On the project I am working on, there are some proxy items that were added at some point from source location A to location B. However right now is not possible to check the source of the proxy and the proxy folder in B does not show anything that suggests that it's a proxy, besides the visual cue that it's grayed out.
When I analysed this article, I looked into the web.config and found this:
<proxiesEnabled>false</proxiesEnabled>
<publishVirtualItems>true</publishVirtualItems>
This seems to suggest that when the proxies were published they were published as regular items, losing any connection to their source, so since I want to recreate the proxies, due to some weird issues related to layout on the standard values item on the template not propagating correctly to the proxied items, I wanted to try to rename the old proxy folder and create a new one, however when I wanted to rename I got a modal alert with this message:
"This item occurs in other locations. If you rename it, the item will be renamed in the other locations as well. Are you sure you want to rename 'MyFoo'?"
Does this means the item still is attached to the source?
I am using Sitecore 6.2.0 (rev. 100701)
I suppose that the settings you mentioned are for master database. Now if you take a closer look at the article you reference, it lists 2 valid cases of proxies setup:
when web database also relies on proxies
when web database contains regular items only which came from publishing
These both cases assume that master database has proxiesEnabled='true'. Look, it doesn't have any sense otherwise - if proxies are disabled, the rest of the mechanism doesn't work, there are no virtual items.
And I can see proxiesEnabled='false' in the example you mentioned.
I'm not sure about the message you get. But if I need to change the proxy definition, I would do the following:
make sure proxiesEnabled='false' for web database (I guess this is your intention)
disable proxies for master database and change the proxies definition the way you want
set publishVirtualItems to true for master database
turn the proxies on for master database
make sure virtual items are in place and publish the site
Try this on some test environment and experiment to get the behavior you'd like - playing with the live site is a bad karma :)