Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any tool, other than KCacheGrind, being able to view callgrind results? Preferably for Windows platform?
I have compiled kcachegrind on windows using QT4.7, here is the binary bundle (including the dot utility to generate call graph):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/precompiledbin/files/kcachegrind.zip/download
Try WebGrind: https://github.com/jokkedk/webgrind
Runs on your local PHP server. Be careful, use XDebug profiling with the XDEBUG_PROFILE flag or otherwise you'll risk overwriting your profiling output when you open WebGrind (Since WebGrind is also a PHP web application). The WebGrind website also details other approaches to work around this. Cheers.
You can try WinCacheGrind.
It seems that WinCacheGrind cannot open output of callgrind. I have not tried opening output of cachegrind, but it should work, I guess.
From the Valkyrie page, (as of date) "Currently, Valkyrie supports Memcheck only, although work is in progress to handle Cachegrind and Massif."
alleyoop and valkyrie (broken link) are alternative front ends.
May have enough suport for what you want, you can use mingw to compile for Windows native if SUA does not work out of the box.
There's a new project called XCallGraph for viewing cachegrind files on Windows.
I have tried these:
QCacheGrind
KCachegrind
WinCacheGrind
XCallGraph
They're very similar but differ in details. I can recommend the QCacheGrind which is the most feature packed and has also a graphical representation, which can help to identify problems much faster.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I can't seem to find a way to generate documentation for Clojure code on Windows.
Marginalia seems to be broken on all platforms since 1.7 (see here:
https://github.com/gdeer81/marginalia/issues/158).
Codox has an issue
open on this topic (https://github.com/weavejester/codox/issues/110).
The Autodoc plugin for Lein 2 seems to be broken as well (not
enough reputation to post more than two links, but there's an issue
open on this over at GitHub).
Has anyone succeeded in running any of these three on Windows? Should I try something else?
Note:
I do not have a choice here, it must run on Windows.
As I'm building a case for clojure in the company, it must play well with leiningen, which is used to build and test our code.
Another option is autodoc - seems to still be active, but from the README it seems there are no promises it works on windows - still you could give it a try.
I think codox might still be your best bet. It's pretty popular and well maintained (there's only 4 open bugs right now and they're pretty newish - one of which is the one you referenced in your question). So maybe give it some time.
Finally, I know this is probably obvious and not ideal, but you could at least do one-off generations of documentation on a *nix system for the time being.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
VB6 came with WinDiff.
Is there a free modern version of WinDiff available that is able to ignore case?
Along with WinMerge and the WinDiff from the latest SDK, I also have SourceGear's free DiffMerge.
I use WinMerge (which hasn't changed for a while either -- don't ignore blank lines; that exercises bugs) most, especially its ability to open two blank editable pages and you can paste anything, such as from a Remote Desktop to a machine that does not have any visual diff installed, and the differences automatically (or manually if you prefer) update.
DiffMerge's feature I like is its display of differences, which seems to cater for spuriously different line breaks better.
And, to answer your question, the WinDiff from the latest SDK (or at least the one included with Visual Studio 2010), WinMerge, and DiffMerge can all ignore case.
WinDiff is part of the Windows SDK, it still ships with it. But no, the SDK is targeted to programmers that write code in case-sensitive languages, C and C++.
The source code of WinDiff was once part of the SDK samples. You can still get it from this web page, assuming you're into hacking C code and have an old compiler laying around. You'll need to adapt line.c, the line_gethashcode() and line_compare() functions. Lower-casing the line is easiest.
Well, that was the programmer's answer. Plenty of other fish in the sea, Beyond Compare typically gets a lot of nods.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any tool, other than KCacheGrind, being able to view callgrind results? Preferably for Windows platform?
I have compiled kcachegrind on windows using QT4.7, here is the binary bundle (including the dot utility to generate call graph):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/precompiledbin/files/kcachegrind.zip/download
Try WebGrind: https://github.com/jokkedk/webgrind
Runs on your local PHP server. Be careful, use XDebug profiling with the XDEBUG_PROFILE flag or otherwise you'll risk overwriting your profiling output when you open WebGrind (Since WebGrind is also a PHP web application). The WebGrind website also details other approaches to work around this. Cheers.
You can try WinCacheGrind.
It seems that WinCacheGrind cannot open output of callgrind. I have not tried opening output of cachegrind, but it should work, I guess.
From the Valkyrie page, (as of date) "Currently, Valkyrie supports Memcheck only, although work is in progress to handle Cachegrind and Massif."
alleyoop and valkyrie (broken link) are alternative front ends.
May have enough suport for what you want, you can use mingw to compile for Windows native if SUA does not work out of the box.
There's a new project called XCallGraph for viewing cachegrind files on Windows.
I have tried these:
QCacheGrind
KCachegrind
WinCacheGrind
XCallGraph
They're very similar but differ in details. I can recommend the QCacheGrind which is the most feature packed and has also a graphical representation, which can help to identify problems much faster.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm really interested in participating as a new developer in an OpenSource project.
My Problem now is - what is the best way to participate with a Mac on an OSS Project? (Without using a Virtual Machine or DualBoot.)
As there is no usual apt-get system, what is the best way of working on such an existing project? Would you use Xcode or Eclipse or something else completely?
The setup for all those steps (Building, linking libraries etc.) has always been the part that never worked properly for me. Is there a tutorial which explains how to set the stuff up properly with these IDEs?
Thank you!
Fink is a package system for Mac, it gives you most of what apt-get does on a Linux system.
Xcode is the best choice, I think, irrespective of project
I can give you a very simple recipe.
Pick a Java open source project.
Install Eclipse on MacOS.
Go to work.
No libraries, no linking, no fuss, no muss, no bother.
If you want to work in C or C++, the question is going to be whether you are the only person. For a project that has already been ported to mac, you just do what the others are doing. You run 'configure', and all is well, and you use and editor to edit and gdb to debug.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Where is the code for the terminal command 'tee' located in Mac OS?
[Added] Is it possible to read the exact code, that my mac is using (not the online codes)?
By "code", I guess you mean source code, right? See there
EDIT: I see the question has been made more precise.
See exactly in the "plain" BSD code here as a Apple Developer login (free) is required to browse their code.
It's BSD, not Linux, code.
http://www.pell.portland.or.us/~orc/Code/bsd/bsd-current/tee/tee.c
http://www.ss64.com/osx/
Do you mean, where is the executable? If that's what you're asking, it's at /usr/bin/tee. You can locate any command in your path by using the which utility. It will print out the full path to the command. For example:
$ which tee
/usr/bin/tee
$
If you're asking about the actual source code, a number of answers are already here that provide you with links to Apple's source code. The utilities themselves are split amongst a number of packages and there's no real index, so you'll have to browse the names and check packages that sound like they might contain the source for any given utility.
Here is the source code of Apple's unix:
http://developer.apple.com/Darwin/
If it is up-to-date this is the exact code that your mac uses.