In my Ruby app, I've used the following method and regular expression to remove all HTML tags from a string:
str.gsub(/<\/?[^>]*>/,"")
This regular expression did just about all I was expecting it to, except it caused all quotation marks to be transformed into “
and all single quotes to be changed to ”
.
What's the obvious thing I'm missing to convert the messy codes back into their proper characters?
Edit: The problem occurs with or without the Regular Expression, so it's clear my problem has nothing to do with it. My question now is how to deal with this formatting error and correct it. Thanks!
Use CGI::unescapeHTML after you perform your regular expression substitution:
CGI::unescapeHTML(str.gsub(/<\/?[^>]*>/,""))
See http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/CGI.html#M000547
In the above code snippet, gsub removes all HTML tags. Then, unescapeHTML() reverts all HTML entities (such as <, “) to their actual characters (<, quotes, etc.)
With respect to another post on this page, note that you will never ever be passed HTML such as
<tag attribute="<value>">2 + 3 < 6</tag>
(which is invalid HTML); what you may receive is, instead:
<tag attribute="<value>">2 + 3 < 6</tag>
The call to gsub will transform the above to:
2 + 3 < 6
And unescapeHTML will finish the job:
2 + 3 < 6
You're going to run into more trouble when you see something like:
<doohickey name="<foobar>">
You'll want to apply something like:
gsub(/<[^<>]*>/, "")
...for as long as the pattern matches.
This regular expression did just about
all I was expecting it to, except it
caused all quotation marks to be
transformed into “ and all
single quotes to be changed to ”
.
This doesn't sound as if the RegExp would be doing this. Are you sure it's different before?
See this question here for information about the problem, it has got an excellent answer:
Get non UTF-8 form fields as UTF-8 in php.
I've run into a similar problem with character changes, this happened when my code ran through another module that enforced UTF-8 encoding and then when it came back, I had a different file (slurped array of lines) on my hands.
You could use a multi-pass system to get the results you are looking for.
After running your regular expression, run an expression to convert &8220; to quotes and another to convert &8221; to single quotes.
Related
Some tags were flattened into text and I'm trying to find them so we can fix them.
<p>Random Paragraph <list-type>optional</list-type></p>
<p>Equation: 5 > 3 + 1</p>
I want to include the / so I don't have to sift through a bunch of equations with actual less than or greater than signs as in the second paragraph - fairly common in this dataset.
This doesn't work and I can find nothing about actually escaping or literal /
//text()[matches(., "</")]
Yes, I saw the post with nearly the exact same title - the solution was something about namespaces and not useful.
I suspect the problem is with the < not with the slash.
You haven't said what the host language for your XPath expression is. When XPath is embedded in XML, you need to use XML escaping conventions, so < is written as <, newline is written as
. If XPath is embedded in (say) Java, you need to use Java escaping conventions so newline is written as \n but < is written (unescaped) as <.
Just use single quotes.
//text()[matches(.,'</')]
I'd tried that before and it spit out errors, must have had something else wrong.
I'm completely new to Ruby so I was just wondering if someone could help me out.
I have the following String:
"<planKey><key>OR-J8U</key></planKey>"
What is the regex I have to write to get the center part OR-J8U?
Use the following:
str = "<planKey><key>OR-J8U</key></planKey>"
str[/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/]
#=> "OR-J8U"
This captures anything in between opening and closing 'key' tags using lookahead and lookbehinds
If you want to get the string OR-J8U then you could simply use that string in the regular expression; the - character has to be escaped:
/OR\-J8U/
Though, I believe you want any string that is enclosed within <planKey><key> and </key></planKey>. In that case ice's answer is useful if you allow for an empty string:
/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/
If you don't allow for an empty string, replace the * with +:
/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/
If you prefer a more general approach (any string enclosed within any tags), then I believe the common opinion is not to use a regular expression. Instead consider using an HTML parser. On SO you can find some questions and answers in that regard.
I'm having an issue trying to capture a group on a string:
"type=gist\nYou need to gist this though\nbecause its awesome\nright now\n</code></p>\n\n<script src=\"https://gist.github.com/3931634.js\"> </script>\n\n\n<p><code>Not code</code></p>\n"
My regex currently looks like this:
/<code>([\s\S]*)<\/code>/
My goal is to get everything in between the code brackets. Unfortunately, it's matching up to the 2nd closing code bracket Is there a way to match everything inside the code brackets up until the first occurrence of ending code bracket?
All repetition quantifiers in regular expressions are greedy by default (matching as many characters as possible). Make the * ungreedy, like this:
/<code>([\s\S]*?)<\/code>/
But please consider using a DOM parser instead. Regex is just not the right tool to parse HTML.
And I just learned that for going through multiple parts, the
String.scan( /<code>(.*?)<\/code>/ ){
puts $1
}
is a very nice way of going through all occurences of code - but yes, getting a proper parser is better...
My question is this: is it possible to write an xpath in which parentheses are interpreted as part of a string?
My selenium script keeps failing as soon as I use parentheses in a contains function.
For example:
//li/div/span[contains(text(),"Komkommer (BONUS)")]
I have the same problem. It has to do with encoding. Your parenthesis string may have different encoding than the comparison base.
I need to find strings with * and / using reg-exes, I am writing in Ruby.The reason for this need to find lots of * and / is that I am building a tokenizer for an language and there are multi-line comments that use the C style of multi-line comments (/* */). I have the single line comments handled already.
Is there a way to use reg-ex without having to use the two foreword slashes to indicate some regular expression because I am finding it impossible to find my mistakes due to the insane amount of escaping. Or can someone give me advise on how to handle the escaping in a sane matter? I already tried writing the sequence first then escaping it.
Thank you for your time and advise.
One trick that might help is the %r literal:
%r{http://www\.google\.com}
I like to use pipes myself, when they're not in the regex.
%r|http://www\.google\.com|
You can also create new instances of Regexp via Regexp.new and pass a string.
Finally, you might also look at Regexp.quote:
Escapes any characters that would have special meaning in a regular expression. Returns a new escaped string, or self if no characters are escaped. For any string, Regexp.new(Regexp.escape(str))=~str will be true.