I have 2 tables here:
Auction and Article.
1 Auction has 1 Article.
1 Aricle has x Auctions.
Now I load a list of auctions:
using (APlattformDatabaseDataContext dc = new APlattformDatabaseDataContext())
{
List<Auktion> auctionlist = (from a in dc.Auktion
where a.KäuferID == null
select a).ToList();
return auctionlist;
}
But when I want to "txtBla.Text = auction[0].Article.Text;" it isn't loaded.
The question isn't why (it is logic that it isn't loaded allready and can't be loaded because the DC is closed), but how can I solve this without letting the DC open?
You can do the following:
DataLoadOptions options = new DataLoadOptions();
options.LoadWith<Auktion>(a => a.Article);
dc.LoadOptions = options;
If you want to eager load the associations like that you should use the DataContext.LoadOptions property like so...
using (APlattformDatabaseDataContext dc = new APlattformDatabaseDataContext())
{
var dlo = new DataLoadOptions();
options.LoadWith<Auktion>(o => o.Article);
dc.LoadOptions = dlo;
List<Auktion> auctionlist = (from a in dc.Auktion
where a.KäuferID == null
select a).ToList();
return auctionlist;
}
That way your articles will be loaded when your Auktion objects are retrieved from the database.
Related
my linq method system from EF6 is returning $ref when I monitor results in fiddler. If I watch the local window in my webapi everything is populated correctly, but not in the actual results that are returned. It only affects the nested entries. anyone know what I am doing wrong? (I created models from database in EF6)
var student = dbEF.Accounts
.Where(x => x.AccountNumber == acctNum)
.Select(x => new DTOCrmDetails()
{
AccountNumber = x.AccountNumber,
CommissionId = x.CommissionId,
Commission = x.Commission,
ManagerID = x.ManagerID,
ManagerName = x.Manager.ManagerName,
Manager = x.Manager,
Employees = x.Manager.Employees,
WireInstructionsUSD = x.Manager.WireInstructionsUSDs
//Mapping_ManagersExecutingBrokers = x.Manager.Mapping_ManagersExecutingBrokers
}).FirstOrDefault();
return student;
these are my settings.
var json = config.Formatters.JsonFormatter; json.SerializerSettings.PreserveReferencesHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.PreserveReferencesHandling.Objects; config.Formatters.Remove(config.Formatters.XmlFormatter); config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.Formatting = Newtonsoft.Json.Formatting.Indented; config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.ContractResolver = new CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver();
You need to disable your lazy loading in the entity framework dbcontext.
something like this way:
dbEF.Configuration.LazyLoadingEnabled = false;
I was doing project in MVC3 with Entity framework. I have a LINQ query with foreach. Everything is fine. But when the data size goes up, i was facing performance issues. I dont have much experience with LINQ. So I couldn't fix my issue. Pls have a look at my code and provide a better suggestion for me.
Code
List<int> RouteIds = db.Cap.Where(asd => asd.Type == 3).Select(asd => asd.UserId).ToList();
var UsersWithRoutingId = (from route in db.RoutingListMembers
where RouteIds.Contains(route.RoutingListId.Value) && route.User.UserDeptId == Id
select
new RoutingWithUser
{
UserId = route.UserId,
RoutingId = route.RoutingListId
});
var ListRouteValue = (from cap in db.CareAllocationPercents
where cap.Type == 3
select new UserWithDeptId
{
Year = (from amt in db.CareAllocations where amt.CareItemId == cap.CareItemId select amt.Year).FirstOrDefault(),
UserId = cap.UserId,
UserDeptId = (from userdept in db.Users where userdept.Id == cap.UserId select userdept.UserDeptId).FirstOrDefault(),
});
List<UserWithDeptId> NewRouteList = new List<UserWithDeptId>();
ListRouteValue = ListRouteValue.Where(asd => asd.Year == Year);
foreach (var listdept in ListRouteValue)
{
foreach (var users in UsersWithRoutingId)
{
if (users.RoutingId == listdept.UserId)
{
UserWithDeptId UserwithRouteObj = new UserWithDeptId();
UserwithRouteObj.UserId = users.UserId;
UserwithRouteObj.Year = listdept.Year;
UserwithRouteObj.UserDeptId = db.Users.Where(asd => asd.Id == users.UserId).Select(asd => asd.UserDeptId).FirstOrDefault();
NewRouteList.Add(UserwithRouteObj);
}
}
}
NewRouteList = NewRouteList.Where(asd => asd.UserDeptId == Id).ToList();
Thanks,
You have to use join in first statement. Examples of how to do this are for example here: Joins in LINQ to SQL
I have some idea for you:
First:
Take care to complete your where close into your linq query to get just what you need to.
With Linq on collection, you can remove one foreach loop. I don't know the finality but, i've tryied to write something for you:
var UsersWithRoutingId = (from route in db.RoutingListMembers
where RouteIds.Contains(route.RoutingListId.Value) && route.User.UserDeptId == Id
select
new RoutingWithUser
{
UserId = route.UserId,
RoutingId = route.RoutingListId
});
var ListRouteValue = (from cap in db.CareAllocationPercents
where cap.Type == 3
select new UserWithDeptId
{
Year = (from amt in db.CareAllocations
where amt.CareItemId == cap.CareItemId && amt.Year == Year
select amt.Year).FirstOrDefault(),
UserId = cap.UserId,
UserDeptId = (from userdept in db.Users
where userdept.Id == cap.UserId && userdept.UserDeptId == Id
select userdept.UserDeptId).FirstOrDefault(),
});
List<UserWithDeptId> NewRouteList = new List<UserWithDeptId>();
foreach (var listdept in ListRouteValue)
{
var user = UsersWithRoutingId.Where(uwri => uwri.RoutingId == listdept.UserId).FirstOrDefault();
if (user != null)
{
NewRouteList.Add(new UserWithDeptId { UserId=user.UserId, Year=listdept.Year, UserDeptId=listdept.UserDeptId });
}
}
return NewRouteList
Is that right for you ?
(i don't poll the db.user table do get the UserDeptId for the NewRouteList assuming that the one in the listdept is the good one)
Second:
Take care of entity data loading, if you have tables with foreign key, take care to remove the lazy loading if you don't need the children of your table to be loaded at same time. Imagine the gain for multiple table with foreign key pointing to others.
Edit:
Here is a link that explain it:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/dd456846%28v=vs.100%29.aspx
I have question on eager loading in entity framework.
I have two tables ScrappyTemplate and ScarppyTemplateFields, the relationship between the tables is one to many. Note that both the tables have IsActive flag
I want to fetch the data from ScrappyTemplate and ScrappyTemplateFields where IsActive==True, im using the below code to fetch the data via eager loading
using (Entities entities = new Entities())
{
var content = entities.ScrappyTemplates.Include(entities.GetTableName<ScrappyTemplateField> (false)).Where(c => c.ContentSourceId == contentSourceId && c.IsActive == true && c.ScrappyTemplateFields.Any(d=>d.IsActive==true)).ToList<ScrappyTemplate>();
}
Im getting the resultset, which is not right!!, i want to get the result set of Child table i.e ScrappyTemplateFields where IsActive=true, but it is returning all rows ir-respective IsActive flag.
Please any one help me, how to place a condition in Child table.
Thanks in advance
.Include() does not allow filtering on the related entities. Try this:
using (Entities entities = new Entities())
{
var query = from template in entities.ScrappyTemplates
where template.ContentSourceId = contentSourceId && template.IsActive = true && template.ScrappyTemplateFields.Any(d=>d.IsActive==true)
select new {
Template = template,
TemplateFields = template.ScrappyTemplateFields.Where(d=>d.IsActive==true)
};
var content = query.ToList().Select(t=>t.Template);
}
I'm using LINQ to manipulate a datatable. I have 3 columns - I would like group by one and then select the remaining 2 columns together. At the moment I have something like this
var query = reportDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(c => c["Code"])
.Select(g =>
new {
Code = g.Key,
Rank = g.Select(f => new
{ f["rank"],
f["Name"]}).ToArray()
});
but I get issues due to anonymous types. I know this syntax would work if I could reference the the column headers directly (in say a list or w/e). How can I get around this with DataTables? Cheers.
Edit:
Well I'd like to be able to reference the fields later when I come to populate the data into a different datatable:
foreach (var q in query)
{
DataRow df = dp.NewRow();
df["Code"] = q.Code;
foreach (var rank in q.Rank)
{
df[rank.name] = rank.rank;
}
dp.Rows.Add(df);
}
define your Rank fields, Also if you have a class for it, call related class constructor,
you can see this in bellow code, before ToArray.
var query = reportDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(c => c["Code"])
.Select(g =>
new { Code = g.Key, Rank =
g.Select(f => new { rank = f["rank"], name = f["Name"]})
.ToArray() });
I have entities Group and User.
the Group entity has Users property which is a list of Users.
User has a property named IsEnabled.
I want to write a linq query that returns a list of Groups, which only consists of Users whose IsEnabled is true.
so for example, for data like below
AllGroups
Group A
User 1 (IsEnabled = true)
User 2 (IsEnabled = true)
User 3 (IsEnabled = false)
Group B
User 4 (IsEnabled = true)
User 5 (IsEnabled = false)
User 6 (IsEnabled = false)
I want to get
FilteredGroups
Group A
User 1 (IsEnabled = true)
User 2 (IsEnabled = true)
Group B
User 4 (IsEnabled = true)
I tried the following query, but Visual Studio tells me that
[Property or indexer 'Users' cannot be assigned to -- it is read only]
FilteredGroups = AllGroups.Select(g => new Group()
{
ID = g.ID,
Name = g.Name,
...
Users = g.Users.Where(u => u.IsInactive == false)
});
thank you for your help!
There is no "nice" way of doing this, but you could try this - project both, Group and filtered Users onto an anonymous object, and then Select just the Groups:
var resultObjectList = AllGroups.
Select(g => new
{
GroupItem = g,
UserItems = g.Users.Where(u => !u.IsInactive)
}).ToList();
FilteredGroups = resultObjectList.Select(i => i.GroupItem).ToList();
This isn't a documented feature and has to do with the way EF constructs SQL queries - in this case it should filter out the child collection, so your FilteredGroups list will only contain active users.
If this works, you can try merging the code:
FilteredGroups = AllGroups.
Select(g => new
{
GroupItem = g,
UserItems = g.Users.Where(u => !u.IsInactive)
}).
Select(r => r.GroupItem).
ToList();
(This is untested and the outcome depends on how EF will process the second Select, so it would be nice if you let us know which method works after you've tried it).
I managed to do this by turning the query upside down:
var users = (from user in Users.Include("Group")
where user.IsEnabled
select user).ToList().AsQueryable()
from (user in users
select user.Group).Distinct()
By using the ToList() you force a roundtrip to the database which is required because otherwise the deferred execution comes in the way. The second query only re-orders the retrieved data.
Note: You might not be able to udpate your entities afterwards!
try something like this and you'll still have your entities:
FilteredGroups = AllGroups.Select(g => new
{
Group = g,
Users = g.Users.Where(u => u.IsInactive == false)
}).AsEnumerable().Select(i => i.Group);
That way you should still be able to use Group.Users
If you want to retain your entity structure, try this:
var userGroups = context.Users.Where(u => !u.IsInactive).GroupBy(u => u.Group);
foreach (var userGroup in userGroups)
{
// Do group stuff, e.g.:
foreach (var user in userGroup)
{
}
}
And you certainly can modify your entities!
Use inner linq query
var FilteredGroups = (from g in AllGroups
select new Group()
{
ID = g.ID,
Name = g.Name,
...
Users = (from user in g.Users
where user.IsInactive == false
select user).ToList()
});