Related
When I googled about React.js what I got is: React.js is a Framework that is used to create user interfaces. If a particular part of the website is frequently updated that means we can use react. But I am confused that Ajax has been used for this only. We can update a part of site using Ajax without page refresh. For templating we would be using handlebars and mustache. Could somebody explain me in what ways react is different from Ajax and why we should use it.
In short, React uses AJAX. They are not related in the way you're asking.
Keep reading for a crash course in what React is, what AJAX is, and how they are used to make modern web applications.
This is probably a more simple explanation than you're looking for, but for anyone else who may be confused...
AJAX and Airplanes
Think about an Airplane. The most important part of an airplane is that it flies. But an airplane also has wheels. And the wheels serve a very important purpose, because without them the airplane would never fly or land, and despite all the awesome stuff a plane could do in the air, it wouldn't matter without wheels.
This is the same relationship that React has with AJAX. React is the airplane, and AJAX are the wheels. But, ya know, other things have wheels too. Tractors, cars, even some boats have wheels, and they're all very important, and crippled without wheels. So too is AJAX to other web technologies, but when you're talking about airplanes, its wheels are usually the farthest thing from your mind.
So React is to AJAX, what an Airplane is to Wheels.
But let's talk about AJAX. What is it? Why is it so important? How it is used in websites today. Then I'll show how it's used by React. Then show you what React does that's so impressive, it makes you forget about AJAX - Like an Airplane to its wheels.
Remember Websites in the 90's?
When you clicked anything, a new page would have to load to show the effect of your click - even if it was nothing. Here's an awesome example. Go to that page and click around... See how clicks whisk you away to a completely different page? That is the Internet before AJAX.
Now, take a look at this very page: next to each answer is an Up Arrow... Go ahead and click one of them... Notice the page doesn't reload, but you are given feedback: the arrow turns Orange. This may seem insignificant, but it represents big advancements in web technology: AJAX, or more accurately: the AJAX approach to web development.
The AJAX approach allows that to happen! And this is no big deal now; it's so intrinsic to the web experience, it's difficult to imagine the Internet without it.
AJAX and a Clock Face
A good analogy of the AJAX methodology, and how it changed the web is a simple wrist watch, or a wall clock... Imagine the minute, hour and second hands moving around the clock's face to show time. Now, suppose every movement of the second hand caused the entire clock to be destroyed and rebuilt?
All that effort of destroying and rebuilding just to show a tiny change?! Well, that would be an outrageous waste of resources, and that was the Internet of the 90's. Thankfully, we have AJAX now. Just as a clock seamlessly displays the time, AJAX allows web pages to show changes in data immediately, without the page needing to be refreshed; you click an up arrow, and it turns orange. No page reload needed!
Originally, AJAX was just the name given to using existing technologies together to show simple updates to the user, but it has become so intrinsic to the web experience that unless you know what you're doing, you wouldn't even know you're using it. For instance, fetch is the preferred way to accomplish the AJAX approach since 2015. Before that it was XMLHttpRequest - even though JSON was used to transfer data more often because it's less verbose. JQuery is the only web technology that actually says AJAX ($.ajax()) to my knowledge, but you typically wouldn't (and shouldn't unless you really know what you're doing) use JQuery with a react application.
And AJAX works just like webpages:
The user performs an action (like pressing an up arrow)
A client (A Web Browser like Firefox) requests data from a server (like the Stack Overflow (SO) Server).
The server processes the request (updates the database to record the upvote).
The server sends a response back to the client that says if the action was successful or not.
Finally, some of the code already loaded into the web page, decides how to process this new information (in our example, javascript would add a class to the up-arrow and CSS rules would dictate that elements with that class are orange).
The user only sees that the arrow is orange. All the other steps are hidden so it seems like one seamless, responsive action.
Single-Page Applications
Since we're not rebuilding the entire page with every click, you can keep information about the site stored in the browser. This can be used throughout your entire visit and future visits.
The first time you visit Stack Overflow, all of the CSS, JS, and HTML is loaded. These three languages define the style (CSS), behavior (JS), and structure (HTML) of the data sent back and forth from the server. And guess how that data is sent! AJAX.
This is how most of the web works now. Google, Facebook, Amazon, Youtube, Reddit, every site built with WordPress and WIX, even Stack Overflow - they all use this basic paradigm for delivering their sites to users efficiently. The difference comes in how the Single-page application is built and managed...
React.js
React is a javascript library for building and maintaining Single-Page Applications.
But that's not even that big of a deal. The big deal about React is how it allows you to build applications...
Basically, you build things separately, then put them together: Components come together to form an Application. So take a look at this totally plausible but fake code for all the answers on this page:
answerArray.map(a => <Answer answerData={a}></Answer>)
This is one line that shows most of the information on this page. That is a big deal. The developers at Stack Overflow created their own component, called "Answer" and its only job is to show an Answer. You run that in a loop, and bam, all the intricacies of all the answers are abstracted, hidden in the Answer Component, which is completely separate from other components.
Now take a look at this:
<App>
<Header />
<LeftSidebar />
<Question>
{ answerArray.map(a => <Answer answerData={a} /> )}
</Question>
<RightSidebar />
<Footer/>
</App>
This is the whole Stack Overflow site.
Each tag (Header, Question, Answer, etc.) is a component. These components are completely separate and have self-contained code, but here they are used together to build the more complex application.
Composition
An important concept of React is composition, and we just defined it above. "Composition allows you to build more complex functionality by combining small and focused functions" (flaviocopes). Our Application is composed of smaller components.
It's also important to note that each component contains its own functionality. That means if the user clicks a button and a warning appears, the button and the code that makes the warning appear are in the same component.
Functional Programming
Surprise, we already defined this too. Functional programming, for our purposes, means 1. objects; and 2. how they behave; are in the same place. Like the button example above. Click a button, get a warning. And that's all in the same file.
This is different than pre-React development where all the buttons would be in one file, and all effects of the buttons would be in another. And this isn't necessarily a wrong way to do things, but for web development, it is easier to think in terms of self-contained building blocks, rather than widely dispersed tools that don't work by themselves.
Why you shouldn't care about Moustache and Handlebars
These two technologies have been cannibalized by React. Similar to how React uses AJAX but makes it easier, Moustache and Handlebars are already inside React, and you're using them all the time without even knowing it. And to me, that's ok. There are arguments to the contrary, and knowledge is never a bad thing, so investigate further if you want, but this is already long enough, so that's all I'll say about that.
Instead, I will tell you about 3 technologies you should care about.
What you should care about instead...
Node
The main point of Node.js is that it executes JavaScript outside a browser. Big whoop, right? Well, it turns out this is one of the most influential advancements for web developers ever. In fact, downloading Node is often done before downloading React.
Node is important for 2 huge reasons:
It lets you download other stuff
It lets you process JavaScript before sending it to a browser
I could write pages and pages about Node, but your takeaway from this should be "Node is important, I should be on the lookout for more knowledge about Node and how it relates to React and web development."
NPM
NPM does not stand for "Node Package Manager", but it should, because that's exactly what it does. React, SASS, Angular, Vue, pretty much everything mentioned here you will probably use npm to install and keep updated.
Webpack
Webpack is a "module bundler". It takes all your js and css files and writes them to one file so you only have to worry about writing one <script> tag.
Each React component will have at least one js file associated with it. Each component should have its own file too. Keeping track of all those files is very demanding. Webpack does it for you, it just makes life easier, so learn about it early and don't shy away from it.
This is something so inherent to React Apps that most of the time it will just be working and you won't even know it. For instance, create-react-app installs it automatically, and does not require you to do anything - same with Babel...
Babel
Translates all your code to ECMA5 so it can be read by most browsers and most versions of those browsers.
Again, this can be installed with npm, or if you just want to play around with React and not get too bogged down with the minutia like this, you can run create-react-app, and this will just work with automatic settings and will be out of your hair while you learn.
They make stuff easier
NPM, Webpack, Babel, and many other Node packages are only there to make your life easier. Building web apps require a lot of maintenance - or small, non-programming annoyances that typically you don't even need to think about.
Try not to be intimidated by new packages because wielding their power can mean countless hours devoted to more interesting things.
Conclusion
Hopefully, this post has helped you learn the difference between React, AJAX, and the ongoing nature of web application development. React and AJAX are not comparable, but React uses AJAX, or rather you - the developer - use AJAX in React to get data without the page needing to reload.
AJAX and other technologies were monumental to the advancement of web applications, but because of how absolutely essential they were to applications, they were assimilated into new technologies so much so that you don't even have to know about them to reap their benefits.
My goal was to correct some misconceptions on your path of learning; explain the "why" of the current state of web dev; and introduce technologies you didn't mention but should know about: Node, npm, Babel.
If you want to continue learning, I highly recommend doing a tutorial in React. I have done some at platform.ui.dev/, and enjoy their approach to learning and their payment structure (I haven't been paid to say this). Good luck out there, and I hope this was helpful.
Ajax is used to refresh a web page without having to reload it : it sends a request to the server, but typically the response is processed by the javascript that displays dynamically a new element on the browser without having to reload the entire page.
React is a javascript library that dynamically update the page with inferface components. The components are calculated either by javascript interactions or by an ajax request that go through the server. So ReactJS can also use Ajax requests to update the page.
Mustache and Handlebars are a bit different from ReactJS as the main goal is to transform a template in a component that will be displayed in a page. It can also use Ajax to get data (for getting templates or json datas).
Ajax
We are using Ajax to send http requests. And we can't re-render a particular area of the page(DOM) by using Ajax alone. We need jQuery to re-render the page after an ajax call came up with the response. Actually comparing jQuery + HTML and React.js is far better than comparing ajax and React.js.
React.js
The role of the react.js is dividing page(DOM) into small pieces (Components). ex:- Profile image area, Main Navigation, Sidebar, Textfield, Button. etc. from Big pieces to small pieces. Most importantly we can bind functionalities into these components. Example:- Let's assume users need a popup to upload a profile image by clicking on above "Profile image area". We can write a function to open a popup. And also we can write another function to upload profile image to the database. In this way we can use ajax inside the React.js
Please follow this tutorial.
To simply put, React is a JavaScript library built by Facebook. It is commonly looked as a framework because of its many extensions but the official docs label it as a library for building user interfaces. Ajax on the other hand is not a library or a framework or a language at all. Ajax is a technique used by programmers to call web APIs without having the flow of your code be interrupted at all. At the end of that day, your JavaScript code is run synchronously line by line and Ajax is run asynchronously within your synchronous code but in a way in which it will never pause your code from and have it wait for the API call to be sent and received. With Ajax, sending and receiving data is all done in the background so you won't have to worry about the delay that it takes to get that data. You can actually use Ajax in your React code. Ajax uses something called Fetch to actually call an API and you can use a variety of methods to handle the data that you receive from the API such as .then and .catch or Async/Await. You also aren't required to use Fetch at all, there are other third party ways of calling an API with Ajax such as by using Axios. I'd advise you to watch a video on how to use these different tools because when you figure out how they all work, you'll find that React and Ajax can be used together to build a great application. Hope this helped, please vote however way you felt about this answer. I'm pretty new to this website.
If you've scrolled down to this point you probably have this feeling of missing something in these answers which are great though. For me, it was hard to grasp what AJAX is. I had to look it up on Wikipedia. You can find a very good explanation there. I also read Jesse James Garrett archived article from 2005 where he coined this term (AJAX) and described it as a new approach to web applications. To dig deeper you can visit MDN.
Asynchronous requests are so obvious today in web development that it's hard to imagine there were websites without them. That's the key to understanding AJAX. At that time XMLHttpRequest API was something new. Now we have Fetch API in JavaScript or we could use Axios.
Google Maps approach was revolutionary in 2005. You could zoom in, grab a map, and scroll around. This instant response you had without page reloading was a result of the approach called AJAX. It consisted of a set of technologies like XMLHttpRequest, DOM, html & css, javascript.
As you can see AJAX is an old term to describe an approach in web development that makes applications more responsive (more than 20 years ago). Thus no matter what framework you use (Vue, Angular) or a library like React you use AJAX approach whenever your calls to API are asynchronous and they don't stop the user from interacting with your app which is a standard approach today.
BTW React is a library because it doesn't have a built-in state management tool, or routing tool in contrast to Ember.js, Angular, or Vue. We often talk about React stack, a set of separate tools for building react apps (Redux, Zustand, context api, react-router).
Is there a significant difference in performance between the two for relatively small post-backs? I'm taking in user input on a website, calculating some values from it and the returning it. Adding AJAX with update panel was really really quick obviously, but I'm wondering if I should just use jQuery instead.
Also, how to the two methods compare in their ability to degrade gracefully?
Thanks.
Not to sound like a salesman, but I recently picked up a copy of Ajax Security (http://www.amazon.com/Ajax-Security-Billy-Hoffman/dp/0321491939/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1278874728&sr=8-1) and it had a good one chapter explanation and comparison of various Ajax libraries and frameworks in terms of not only security but also speed. If you don't find your answer, I would recommend that book.
I personally would use jQuery because you have a finer control over what is actually loaded. The Update Panel, as I understand, updates all of its contents. You can't pick and choose what is updated inside it, whereas with jQuery, you have absolute control.
As for degrading gracefully: The only reason I can think of why the Update Panel or jQuery AJAX wouldn't work (assuming the server is configured correctly and there are no errors in the JS) is that the browser doesn't support Ajax. If this is the case, neither methods will work. So, I wouldn't worry about the differences between the two in that regard.
I am trying to find the optimal architecture for an ajax-heavy Django application I'm currently building. I'd like to keep a consistent way of doing forms, validation, fetching data, JSON message format but find it exceedingly hard to find a solution that can be used consistently.
Can someone point me in the right direction or share their view on best practice?
I make everything as normal views which display normally in the browser. That includes all the replies to AJAX requests (sub pages).
When I want to make bits of the site more dynamic I then use jQuery to do the AJAX, or in this case AJAH and just load the contents of one of the divs in the sub page into the requesting page.
This technique works really well - it is very easy to debug the sub pages as they are just normal pages, and jQuery makes your life very easy using these as part of an AJA[XH]ed page.
For all the answers to this, I can't believe no one's mentioned django-piston yet. It's mainly promoted for use in building REST APIs, but it can output JSON (which jQuery, among others, can consume) and works just like views in that you can do anything with a request, making it a great option for implementing AJAX interactions (or AJAJ [JSON], AJAH, etc whatever). It also supports form validation.
I can't think of any standard way to insert ajax into a Django application, but you can have a look to this tutorial.
You will also find more details on django's page about Ajax
Two weeks ago I made a write up how I implement sub-templates to use them in "normal" and "ajax" request (for Django it is the same). Maybe it is helpful for you.
+1 to Nick for pages displaying normally in the browser. That seems to be the best starting point.
The problem with the simplest AJAX approaches, such as Nick and vikingosegundo propose, is that you'll have to rely on the innerHTML property in your Javascript. This is the only way to dump the new HTML sent in the JSON. Some would consider this a Bad Thing.
Unfortunately I'm not aware of a standard way to replicate the display of forms using Javascript that matches the Django rendering. My approach (that I'm still working on) is to subclass the Django Form class so it outputs bits of Javascript along with the HTML from as_p() etc. These then replicate the form my manipulating the DOM.
From experience I know that managing an application where you generate the HTML on the server side and just "insert" it into your pages, becomes a nightmare. It is also impossible to test using the Django test framework. If you're using Selenium or a similar tool, it's ok, but you need to wait for the ajax request to go return so you need tons of sleeps in your test script, which may slow down your test suite.
If the purpose of using the Ajax technique is to create a good user interface, I would recommend going all in, like the GMail interface, and doing everything in the browser with JavaScript. I have written several apps like this using nothing but jQuery, state machines for managing UI state and JSON with ReST on the backend. Django, IMHO, is a perfect match for the backend in this case. There are even third party software for generating a ReST-interface to your models, which I've never used myself, but as far as I know they are great at the simple things, but you of course still need to do your own business logic.
With this approach, you do run into the problem of duplicating code in the JS and in your backend, such as form handling, validation, etc. I have been thinking about solving this with generating structured information about the forms and validation logic which I can use in JS. This could be compiled at deploy-time and be loaded as any other JS file.
Also, avoid XML. The browsers are slow at parsing it, it is a pain to generate and a pain to work with in the browser. Use JSON.
Im currently testing:
jQuery & backbone.js client-side
django-piston (intermediate layer)
Will write later my findings on my blog http://blog.sserrano.com
The context is that I don't want to use Zend MVC - controllers, helpers, decorators etc - that's overkill for what I am writing.
I've scoured the jQuery site plugins section and these issues bother me most:
I have to search a lot for plugins - it is tedious.
I have to check dependencies with jQuery versions. Thankfully I decided to stick with only jQuery or noConflict() would have driven me crazy.
I have to hook-up all the id's and names of form elements across HTML+CSS+JQuery through Controllers, Views etc.
And all this because there is no other simpler PHP wrapper over jQuery plugins than ZendX_JQuery - and plugins is where the attractive scripts and effects are.
Writing a in-house replacement to ZendX_JQuery will be a huge task in itself. But if you have to wrap third party jQuery plugins in PHP and maintain the thing it is full time job in itself.
So I want to know if Zend_Dojo is much easier than ZendX_JQuery. I'm asking before trying out because I'd have to spend a couple more days installing, configuring and testing all the standard Dojo controls and then I can decide. All that's tedious for a rather simple app which may grow later on.
The alternative would be a "jQuery-inside" PHP widget library that is stable and will work for a year without being broken or upgraded.
Something like GWT or ZK or ASP.Net where you don't have to do low-level HTML+jQuery coding and hand-tweaking for every page with all the ajax controls and form elements.
Or should I just drop an MVC framework altogether and replace it with a custom set of scripts only using Zend components where necessary - like Zend_Validate, Zend_Form etc.
I've been working on desktop apps for some time and the switch to AJAX + MVC + Zend is proving a bit too unwieldy, especially given the abundance of design patterns in Zend MVC.
My recommendation would be to use neither ZendX_JQuery or Zend_Dojo. By the sounds of it, that's overkill for you as well. My thoughts may be coloured by the fact that I don't like to mix PHP and JavaScript code except where absolutely necessary - yes, it may be easier to let a component write your JavaScript for you, but it's never going to be as clean as you could write it yourself.
That way, you also maintain separation between behaviour and presentation - always a good thing, as it makes it easier to use the concepts of progressive enhancement.
I agree with Stephen Orr- I use neither jquery nor dojo (after trying both). I use Zend_Form filters / decorators heavily because client side validation has to be redone on the server side anyway. With some custom decorators, you can do it all in html/php.
I try and avoid ajax where possible, and use prototype / scriptaculous where it cannot be avoided. They are lightweight and provide handy shortcuts to use in other JS code.
Our team is experienced in web development (tomcat/Oracle) but not with AJAX on our existing projects. This is new technology for us, so I want to introduce this carefully and correctly.
What should I look at in terms of frameworks or best practice or common pitfalls?
read this:
progressive enhancement
and use a library such as jQuery, mootools, or YUI it'll save you many headaches with cross-browser implementation. this will show you why you want to use a library.
My first recommendation would be to explore the different frameworks available and see what your team prefers in terms of coding style. Most of the frameworks have the same basic features so a lot of it comes down to preference. I prefer jQuery, so that is my first recommendation, but I worked with YUI, MooTools, Prototype and EXT JS before making my decision.
Secondly, I would recommend working AJAX functionality as a progressive enhancement, allowing your apps to work with and without JavaScript. I find that this approach also ensures a solid, working application before worrying about adding the bells and whistles.
Head First Ajax is a good book IMO for getting started with the basic concepts behind working with Ajax. It would probably be a good place to start for your team to gain some knowledge of what is happening behind the scenes in whatever framework you choose.
One thing we struggled with when starting to use ajax was how often to use it.
We had no exact requirement as to where we were supposed to use ajax and not, and initially we erred to the side of using it too much. This affected application complexity quite a lot.
If you think of your inter-page-structure as a state-machine, ajax introduces nested state-machines within each page-state. The moment your sub-state machine ends up with a number of distinct states (I'd say anything over 2), you should think really hard about using a traditional approach.
The best starting point is to try to get a mix og full page reloads and ajax, and be conservative until you're sure you're getting really good at it.
Don't use it where you don't need it.
Long running operations that need to send the client some status updates? Use AJAX.
Markup for major UI elements (menus, ect)? Use plain old HTML.
Basically, use AJAX for transmitting data only. If you try do fancy things like dynamically pulling in UI elements on the client side with AJAX, you are in for a world of hurt when you get a client who wants to use ie5 (they exist), or a non-pc based browser.
first, look at the user interface you already have, and consider where it might make sense for its elements to be able to change/react independently. This is where your ajax enhancements might make sense
second, look at libraries as noted in the other answers (I like AJAXPRO for its simplicity, but it has been discontinued)
if you find that all of your page elements tie together and cannot change independently, then there is really no need for ajax
otherwise, consider how you will access the page state from your ajax enhancement points - depending on which ajax framework you use, you may or may not have access to the entire page object, session state, original request parms, etc. Consider these issues up front to avoid coding yourself into a hole and/or having to make messy workarounds.
If you were on .Net or Mono I would encourage you to use Ra-Ajax which abstracts away JavaScript completely. Though I work for Ra-Ajax (inventor) so I am biased...