I have a problem concerning libstdc++.so.
I installed a new version of gcc and tried to compile C++ code. The compiling worked, but when I try to execute the binary (m5.opt is its name) I've got the following error:
build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt).
Do I need to replace libstdc++.so? And if so, where can I download the version I want? On the GCC-website they say libstdc++ is a part of gcc now.
Details
GCC:
I had gcc 4.1.2 before, but I downloaded gcc 4.2.4. From the untarred gcc-directory I executed ./configure; make; sudo make install`.
When I tried to use gcc or g++ to compile, it's default version was still 4.1.2. To overcome this I replaced some links:
mv /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/gcc_bak
ln -s /usr/local/bin/gcc gcc
mv /usr/bin/g++ /usr/bin/g++_bak
ln -s /usr/local/bin/g++ g++
GLIBC(++) -- libstdc++:
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 -> libstdc++.so.6.0.8
/usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so -> libstdc++.so.6.0.9
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.5.so -> libc-2.5.so
Linux-version:
uname -a gives:
Linux madmax 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 4 12:51:10 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The problem is that you built your new GCC incorrectly: on Linux you should use
./configure --prefix=/usr
The default installation prefix is /usr/local, which is why make install put gcc and g++ binaries into /usr/local/bin, etc.
What's happening to you now is that you compile and link using the new (symlinked) GCC 4.2.4, but at runtime your program binds to the old /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (version 6.0.8, instead of required 6.0.9). You can confirm that by running ldd build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt: you should see that it uses /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.
There are several fixes you could do.
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64 ldd build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt
should show you that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is sufficient to redirect the binary to correct library, and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64 build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt
should just run. You could "bake" this path into m5.opt binary by relinking it with -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib64.
A more permanent solution is to fix the libraries the same way you fixed the binaries:
cd /usr/lib64 && mv libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6_bak &&
ln -s /usr/local/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 .
An even better solution is to reconfigure the new GCC with --prefix=/usr, and then make all install.
I know this is a very old question, but ...
It's not usually a good idea to replace the system compiler (i.e. the one in /usr) because the entire system will have been built with it and depend on it.
It's usually better to install the new compiler to a separate location and then see the libstdc++ FAQ How do I insure that the dynamically linked library will be found? and Finding Dynamic or Shared Libraries in the manual for how to ensure the correct libstdc++.so is found at runtime.
The other answers here should be fine, but the 'quick and easy' solution if you do happen to have gcc installed to /usr/local/ is to just add the new libs to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib64
You can also check the to see if you have the right versions of GLIBC installed using
strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
strings /usr/local/lib64/libstdc++.so.18 | grep GLIBC
I got this last tip from another forum so credits due where credits due!
Related
I have XCode installed (Version 7.2.1 (7C1002)) in Yosemite and have downloaded and installed command line tools. When I try to check the gcc version I get:
$ gcc -v
Segmentation fault: 11
$
The output for:
$ type -a gcc
gcc is /usr/local/bin/gcc
gcc is /usr/bin/gcc
$
From what I understand, that should mean that I have it installed so I still don't understand why I can't check it's version. Since I will need gcc for other applications I would like to have it fixed...any suggestions? Do I need to link it somehow?
You have a faulty third-party version of gcc (or perhaps another compiler masquerading as gcc) installed in /usr/local. This may be something put there by Homebrew or maybe you installed this build of gcc yourself or something.
A short-term fix would be to modify your PATH environment variable so that /usr/bin comes before /usr/local/bin. Or, you could just always specify the full path to gcc, such as /usr/bin/gcc -v.
Longer term, you probably want to remove the broken gcc that's been installed to /usr/local. How you do that exactly depends on how you originally installed it there.
Can you (reasonably) get Fedora 21 to where it only has llvm/clang/libc++/libc++abi? (I found some things suggesting no, but they were all about 3 years old, and llvm/clang has come a long way since then.)
With a fresh install, I tried
yum install gcc gcc-c++
(downloaded, built, installed llvm/cfe(clang)/compiler-rt/libcxx/libcxxabi from svn)
yum remove gcc gcc-c++
added to /etc/profile: export CC=/usr/local/bin/clang \ export CXX=/usr/local/bin/clang++
(in case of hard wiring)
ln -s /usr/local/bin/clang /usr/local/bin/gcc
ln -s /usr/local/bin/clang /usr/local/bin/cc
ln -s /usr/local/bin/clang++ /usr/local/bin/g++
ln -s /usr/local/bin/clang++ /usr/local/bin/c++
ldconfig
I was all happy, then went to build something, and I got:
ld: cannot find crtbegin.o
ld: cannot find -lgcc
ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
clang -v includes
Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.9.2
ldconfig && ldconfig -p | grep libgcc does show
libgcc_s.so.1 (libc6,x86-64) => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
And /lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib64. And, /usr/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 is a symlink to /usr/lib64/libgcc_s-4.9.2-20150212.so.1, which exists as a real file (92816 bytes.)
So, I don't get what ld's problem is on -lgcc_s. crtbegin is nowhere to be found, and gcc (no _s) is nowhere to be found.
yum install libgcc says it's already installed and latest version, nothing to do.
Since I have an installed clang source build, can I re-build clang, this time using clang rather than gcc, to get rid of the dependency? (Maybe then the "candidate GCC installation" bit goes away.)
Can I force -stdlib=c++ and -lc++abi to be default, or at least have libc++ and libc++abi installed without gcc?
Having spent some time trying to get clang to work with libc++ and libc++abi without GCC, I have found that it is indeed possible, even if a bit problematic given the current state of LLVM/clang. In addition to small test programs, I've been able to build CMake and some other software packages written in C++ with no GCC installed, and with the resulting binaries being independent of libstdc++; they only depend on libc++/libc++abi according to ldd output. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to build clang itself with clang that was build using GCC. I've been experimenting on different Linux platforms (Fedora 21 32-bit, Amazon Linux release 2015.3 (RPM-based) 64-bit, CentOS 7.1 64-bit, and Ubuntu 14.04 64-bit).
Even though one can build software with clang using libc++/libc++abi without dependency on libstdc++ and without GCC compiler present, a typical Linux installation is so tied to libgcc and libstdc++ that getting rid of these is not practical. Try removing these two packages and you will see how much of the system depends on them. Even on FreeBSD 10.1, with clang being the default compiler and no GCC installed, libgcc.a, libgcc_s.so, and a few crt*.o files are used when building a program as revealed by the -v option. Also, on FreeBSD 10.1, resulting binaries depend on libgcc according to ldd. On Ubuntu, which has dpkg as the package manager, the files
libgcc.a
libgcc_s.so
crtbegin.o
crtbeginT.o
crtbeginS.o
crtendS.o
crtend.o
are in the libgcc-devel package, while on an RPM-based system, such as Fedora, these are in the gcc package. In addition, you might possibly need these files, even though I didn't need them for the code I tried building:
crtfastmath.o
crtprec32.o
crtprec80.o
crtprec64.o
Thus one might argue that the aforementioned files better belong in libgcc, rather than in gcc. As far as I can tell, the following needs to be done on an RPM-based system before removing the gcc package:
1) Create the symlink
libgcc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1
in whatever directory libgcc_s.so.1 is located.
2) Copy the crt*.o files listed above to that directory.
3) In the same directory create the symlink (libstdc++.so.x should already be there; x is a number):
libstdc++.so -> libstdc++.so.x
You only need this if you are going to use libstdc++; this isn't needed if you only plan to use libc++. On some
systems libstdc++.so, which is a symlink to libstdc++.so.x belonging to the libstdc++ package, is placed by the libstdc++-devel package into the GCC library directory, so you can remove that directory after uninstalling GCC and just create the symlink in the same directory where libstdc++.so.x lives.
Now you should be able to do the following:
1) Build a C program:
clang progname.c
2) Build a C++ program using libstdc++ headers/libs:
clang++ -I<location of headers> progname.cpp
On RPM-based systems I've looked at, the libstdc++ headers are part of the libstdc++-devel package and their location can be found from rpm -ql on the package.
3) Build a C++ program using libc++ headers/libs:
clang++ -I/<location of headers> progname.cpp -nodefaultlibs -lc++ -lc++abi -lm -lc -lgcc -lgcc_s
The location of the headers is wherever they were installed when you built LLVM+clang etc.
Please see http://libcxx.llvm.org/ for additional information. When building C++ code using libc++/libc++abi, you may use -stdlib=libc++ instead of the -I flag, but in my testing that only worked with clang built from source, not with clang installed from a repository (you can install clang from repo and use it to build libc++/libc++abi; or you can use gcc to build libc++(abi), then remove gcc and use the libs with the repo-provided clang).
When configuring a software package to build it using clang + libc++, you might need to set the following:
LIBS="-nodefaultlibs -lc++ -lc++abi -lm -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc"
CXX=clang++
CXXFLAGS="-stdlib=libc++"
CC=clang
Please note that to configure CMake source in order to build it I had to use a wrapper script like this:
#!/bin/bash
MYLFLAGS="-nodefaultlibs -lc++ -lc++abi -lm -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc"
# Catch the case when we only want to compile; this helps us avoid some warnings:
if echo "$#" | egrep "(^-c | -c | -c$)" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
MYLFLAGS=""
fi
/usr/local/bin/clang++ -stdlib=libc++ "$#" $MYLFLAGS
It might be useful for other purposes as well.
For more information please see my article at http://www.omniprog.info/clang_no_gcc.html
I am trying to build GraphChi on OS X Yosemite but get the following error:
fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found
From this question - How to include omp.h in OS X? - I learned that Yosemite uses Clang instead of gcc, which does not include omp.h.
$ which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
$ gcc -v
Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0
Thread model: posix
Next, I installed gcc via Homebrew
$ brew info gcc
gcc: stable 4.9.2 (bottled)
http://gcc.gnu.org
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1 (1092 files, 177M)
Built from source with: --without-multilib
and updated $PATH to include the path to the new gcc version
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1:usr/local/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
however, gcc -v and which gcc still point to the old version, and building GraphChi still doesn't work due to the missing omp.h file
Does anyone know what else I need to do?
Update
locate omp.h returned:
/usr/local/Cellar/apple-gcc42/4.2.1-5666.3/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin11/4.2.1/include/omp.h
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include/omp.h
/usr/local/Cellar/gfortran/4.8.2/gfortran/lib/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0/4.8.2/include/omp.h
my ~/.profile:
export PATH=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include:/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/bin:usr/local/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
I solved this with installing gcc with homebrew:
brew install gcc --without-multilib
and then building the source code with
CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 cmake ..
CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 make -j7
Once you have installed gcc-4.9 with homebrew, it will automatically be in your path. To use OpenMP, you just need to make sure you are using the newly installed gcc-4.9, and it will be able to find omp.h.
In the case of GraphChi, you will have to go change line 3 of the Makefile to be gcc-4.9. From there, running make should just work. They describe this in their README, but at least the version they describe is out of date https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-cpp#problems-compiling-on-mac.
clang does not support OpenMP yet. Also gcc by default links to Apple's LLVM clang compiler (not the GCC installed from brew).
Instead gcc-4.9 would link to GCC. I think if -fopenmp is specified omp.h is included automatically.
It is possible to manually build a version of clang with OpenMP support, see http://clang-omp.github.io
You shouldn't add the include path to PATH; instead, specify it as CFLAGS, including the -I option. You can export the CFLAGS variable, or set it on the fly.
Depending on how you compile things, you could do
CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include/omp.h gcc <whatever>
Of course, in this case you can specify it directly on the gcc command (as -I/usr/local/....), but the CFLAGS variable also works with configure (as configure often won't have an option to specify where it should look for specific include files); probably with make, or even for those installing a Python package: CFLAGS=-I... pip install <some-package>.
Other flags to consider are
CXXFLAGS: C++ specific pre-processor flags
LDFLAGS: linker specific flags (e.g. LDFLAGS=-L/some/path/... for linking with dynamic libraries).
CC: specify the C compiler to use. This is an easy way to avoid the built-in gcc alias for clang on OS X. Just use CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc-4 make or similar.
CXX: specify the C++ compiler to use.
Unfortunately I'm forced to use gcc-4.1 and I'm using debian wheezy. Since gcc-4.1 is not in repository I'm trying to build gcc from sources.
But I'm getting compiling error:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so when searching for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a when searching for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crti.o' is incompatible with i386 output
/usr/bin/ld: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crtn.o' is incompatible with i386 output
It looks that ld is picking wrong version of libraries, but I checked my /usr/lib32 and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ and it contains those files:
/usr/lib32/libc.a
/usr/lib32/libc.so
/usr/lib32/crtn.o
/usr/lib32/crti.o
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crtn.o
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crti.o
And ld should have access to them
~$ echo $LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/usr/lib32/
So I have no idea where the problem is.
I managed to work around the problem.
Run configure with:
./configure --disable-multilib ...
But than I encountered another problem with makeinfo, if you have newer version >=4.10 than it might not be found by configure. So simple fix in generated makefile worked for me:
Change this line:
MAKEINFO = /home/lecopivo/Downloads/gcc412/gcc412/gcc-4.1.2/missing makeinfo
To this:
MAKEINFO = makeinfo
I found this helpful.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is only for running programs already linked.
You probably need to set LDFLAGS when you configure gcc:
./configure LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib32" .....
It might be LDFLAGS_FOR_HOST or LIBS or something like that though.
I had this problem recently and finally solved it this way:
ln -s /usr/lib32 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
Notes:
I assumed you do not have /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu directory in your 64bit linux. If this directory exists and is empty, please delete it and make the above link.
If the directory already exists and is not empty, you have to make links inside it for (32bit) libraries which cause build error one by one; e.g.:
ln -s /usr/lib32/crti.o /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/crti.o
ln -s /usr/lib32/crtn.o /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/crtn.o
...
If 32bit development libraries are not installed, you may have to install them first. I've searched different forums and found that installing following set of packages in ubuntu will provide them:
libc6-dev libc6-dev-i386
gcc-multilib g++-multilib
zlib1g-dev lib32z1-dev
libncurses5-dev lib32ncurses5-dev libncursesw5-dev lib32ncursesw5-dev
Also adjust LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LIBRARY_PATH variables so that they contain /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu (i.e. multiarch lib-dirs). I am not sure which one of above variables is effective, so I adjust both of them the same.
If you use ./configure --disable-multilib as it is frequently suggested on web, though gcc will be built, but when you want to use that gcc for compiling e.g. legacy grub, you probably get error of "gcc cannot build executable" (or such).
Optionally, you can make similar linking for these pair of libdirs:
ln -s /lib32 /lib/i386-linux-gnu
Doing so, I managed to compile gcc-3.4.6 in a Ubuntu 16.04.6-amd64 used for compiling old 32bit programs like SDL 1.2 and legacy GRUB4DOS 0.4.4.
Also take a look at my answer to similar (though opposite) error here.
Good luck.
I am attempting to compile gcc 4.4.0 on opensolaris 2009.6
Currently in the box (which is a AMD 64bit machine), I have the gcc 3.4.6 installed.
I unpacked the gcc 4.4.0 tarball.
I set the following env variables:
export CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++
export CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc
Then I ran "configure && make" and this is the error message that I got:
checking for i386-pc-solaris2.11-gcc... /export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.11/gcc/xgcc -B/export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.11/gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/sys-include -m64
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in `/export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libgcc':
configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details.
Anyone has any suggestion as to how to work around this error message?
/Edit:
Content of the config.log is posted here: link text
Normally the GCC build is bootstrapped, i.e. first it uses the system compiler to build GCC C compiler, and then it uses the freshly built compiler to recompile GCC once again (and then even once more time again). The configure line shows that it is not the system compiler but the already-built GCC compiler which is used for configure test there.
Since it fails, the problem is that the freshly-built GCC is somehow "stillborn" here. If config.log will not help you, I'd suggest to ask at gcc-help#gcc.gnu.org.
EDIT: Ah-ha, I think it is the assembler. You are using GNU assembler, but the unsupported options look like they were meant for Sun assembler. This should be solved by adding --with-gnu-as configure option (and then possibly having to specify its path explicitly with --with-as=/usr/gnu/bin/as)
You can also take a look at Solaris-specific GCC build instructions.
There's a readily available build for gcc4, which you can try updating. Its current version is 4.3.3. To get started, install pkg-get from OpenCSW and check out the build from the subversion repository:
svn co https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/gcc4/trunk/ gcc4
cd gcc4
gmake package