omp.h not found, OS X Yosemite not using newest gcc version - xcode

I am trying to build GraphChi on OS X Yosemite but get the following error:
fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found
From this question - How to include omp.h in OS X? - I learned that Yosemite uses Clang instead of gcc, which does not include omp.h.
$ which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
$ gcc -v
Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0
Thread model: posix
Next, I installed gcc via Homebrew
$ brew info gcc
gcc: stable 4.9.2 (bottled)
http://gcc.gnu.org
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1 (1092 files, 177M)
Built from source with: --without-multilib
and updated $PATH to include the path to the new gcc version
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1:usr/local/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
however, gcc -v and which gcc still point to the old version, and building GraphChi still doesn't work due to the missing omp.h file
Does anyone know what else I need to do?
Update
locate omp.h returned:
/usr/local/Cellar/apple-gcc42/4.2.1-5666.3/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin11/4.2.1/include/omp.h
/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include/omp.h
/usr/local/Cellar/gfortran/4.8.2/gfortran/lib/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0/4.8.2/include/omp.h
my ~/.profile:
export PATH=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include:/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/bin:usr/local/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH

I solved this with installing gcc with homebrew:
brew install gcc --without-multilib
and then building the source code with
CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 cmake ..
CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 make -j7

Once you have installed gcc-4.9 with homebrew, it will automatically be in your path. To use OpenMP, you just need to make sure you are using the newly installed gcc-4.9, and it will be able to find omp.h.
In the case of GraphChi, you will have to go change line 3 of the Makefile to be gcc-4.9. From there, running make should just work. They describe this in their README, but at least the version they describe is out of date https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-cpp#problems-compiling-on-mac.

clang does not support OpenMP yet. Also gcc by default links to Apple's LLVM clang compiler (not the GCC installed from brew).
Instead gcc-4.9 would link to GCC. I think if -fopenmp is specified omp.h is included automatically.
It is possible to manually build a version of clang with OpenMP support, see http://clang-omp.github.io

You shouldn't add the include path to PATH; instead, specify it as CFLAGS, including the -I option. You can export the CFLAGS variable, or set it on the fly.
Depending on how you compile things, you could do
CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.9.2_1/lib/gcc/4.9/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/4.9.2/include/omp.h gcc <whatever>
Of course, in this case you can specify it directly on the gcc command (as -I/usr/local/....), but the CFLAGS variable also works with configure (as configure often won't have an option to specify where it should look for specific include files); probably with make, or even for those installing a Python package: CFLAGS=-I... pip install <some-package>.
Other flags to consider are
CXXFLAGS: C++ specific pre-processor flags
LDFLAGS: linker specific flags (e.g. LDFLAGS=-L/some/path/... for linking with dynamic libraries).
CC: specify the C compiler to use. This is an easy way to avoid the built-in gcc alias for clang on OS X. Just use CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc-4 make or similar.
CXX: specify the C++ compiler to use.

Related

osx - C++14 compiler not detected, multiple versions of gcc when compiling graph-tool in anaconda

My ultimate goal is to get python package graph_tool working on my system and also on ipynb if possible. I have already brew install graph-tool, as indicated here, but that's still insufficient.
So I follow conda instructions here, and I make decent progress, until I encounter a compiler issue with the configuration.
$ conda create -n py36env python=3.6.3 anaconda
(py36env) $ conda install -c conda-forge cgal
... and so forth with the other required libraries
(py36env) Tams-MacBook-Pro:graph-tool-2.25 tamtam$ ./configure --prefix=/Users/tamtam/anaconda3/envs/py36env/ --with-python-module-path=/Users/tamtam/anaconda3/envs/py36env/lib/python3.6/site-packages
.
.
.
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features by default... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++14... no
checking whether g++ supports C++14 features with -std=gnu++1y... no
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++14 language features is required.
I'm not very familiar with compiler things, but I check my system as follows:
(py36env) Tams-MacBook-Pro:graph-tool-2.25 tamtam$ conda list | grep gcc
gcc 4.8.5 8
And outside of the conda env:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/Users/tamtam/anaconda3/envs/py36env/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2/4.8.5/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/Users/ray/mc-x64-3.5/conda-bld/gcc-4.8_1477649012852/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.5 (GCC)
And with Homebrew
$ brew list --versions | grep gcc
gcc 7.1.0 7.2.0
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc-7 --version
gcc-7 (Homebrew GCC 7.2.0) 7.2.0
$ echo $PATH
/Users/tamtam/anaconda3/bin:/Users/tamtam/anaconda/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/Library/TeX/texbin
So my questions are: EDITS INCLUDED
1) What's the difference between the conda gcc 4.8.5 and Homebrew gcc 7.2 on my system? I'm confused because they're each up-to-date packages.
EDIT: Nowhere online that I perused explicitly states this, but I am understanding (aka educated guess bc it's 3am and I need sleep) conda gcc 4.8.5 to just be equivalent to brew gcc 4.8.5, and that Anaconda is just way behind on developing an 'official' gcc supporting C++14. In the meantime I conda install -c salford_systems gcc-5 and ./configure seems to find itself a C++14 compiler. YAY (but this also led me to a new problem T.B.A.)
NOTE: I had also tried running the ./configure file with both conda gcc 4.8.5 and brew gcc 7.2.0 (switching of default gcc compiler guided here), but still same error of ./configure not finding C++14 compile (so ignore this)
2) I also have Xcode 8.3.3 that also comes with clang, which is what gcc is symlinked to... ?? No idea about the setup/relation
3) How can I adjust my system (for example, paths) so that the configuration process will detect a C++14 compiler? EDIT: resolved per 1)
(This solution is also included within the edits at the bottom of my question.)
Nowhere online that I perused explicitly states this, but I am understanding (aka educated guess bc it's 3am and I need sleep) conda gcc 4.8.5 to just be equivalent to brew gcc 4.8.5, and that Anaconda is just way behind on developing an 'official' gcc supporting C++14. In the meantime I conda install -c salford_systems gcc-5 and ./configure seems to find itself a C++14 compiler. YAY (but this also led me to a new problem)
NOTE: I had also tried running the ./configure file with both conda gcc 4.8.5 and brew gcc 7.2.0 (switching of default gcc compiler guided here), but still same error of ./configure not finding C++14 compile arises (so ignore this)
As a rule of thumb, if a product provides its own build tools (compiler, C headers, static libraries, include/library paths etc) instead of using the system's ones, you should use those when building things to use within its environment.
That's because, depending on include files, compiler, compiler version, compiler flags, predefined macros etc the same sources and libraries built with different toolchains can be binary incompatible. This goes double for C++ where there are no ABI standards at all. (In C, there are de facto ones for most platforms where there are competing compilers due to the need to do system calls.)
Now, what you have on your system:
The system's stock gcc (if any) is at /usr/bin (so includes are at /usr/include, static libraries at /usr/lib etc)
Homebrew's gcc 7.2 at /usr/local/bin (includes are probably at /usr/local/include)
Anaconda also has a gcc package that, if installed, would reside somewhere like /Users/<login>/anaconda3/envs/<env name>/bin
If an environment provides an own toolchain, it provides some way to make build scripts select that toolchain when building things. A common way is to set relevant environment variables (PATH, INCLUDE, LIB) - either directly or through some tool that the environment provides. Homebrew executables reside in /usr/local/bin which is always present in UNIX PATH as per the FHS; Anaconda adds itself to PATH whenever its environment is activated.
So, as you yourself guessed, since Anaconda provides its own gcc packages (thus enforces the compatibility of their output with its binary packages via package metadata - if there are known incompatibilities, the installation will fail due to requirement conflicts), you need to install one that meets graph-tool requirements -- which is gcc 5, available via gcc-5 package from salford_systems channel. Then specify --prefix as you already have.
You may need to install other dependencies, too, if you didn't already or you need optional features that they're required for.

gcc -v Segmentation fault:11

I have XCode installed (Version 7.2.1 (7C1002)) in Yosemite and have downloaded and installed command line tools. When I try to check the gcc version I get:
$ gcc -v
Segmentation fault: 11
$
The output for:
$ type -a gcc
gcc is /usr/local/bin/gcc
gcc is /usr/bin/gcc
$
From what I understand, that should mean that I have it installed so I still don't understand why I can't check it's version. Since I will need gcc for other applications I would like to have it fixed...any suggestions? Do I need to link it somehow?
You have a faulty third-party version of gcc (or perhaps another compiler masquerading as gcc) installed in /usr/local. This may be something put there by Homebrew or maybe you installed this build of gcc yourself or something.
A short-term fix would be to modify your PATH environment variable so that /usr/bin comes before /usr/local/bin. Or, you could just always specify the full path to gcc, such as /usr/bin/gcc -v.
Longer term, you probably want to remove the broken gcc that's been installed to /usr/local. How you do that exactly depends on how you originally installed it there.

How to build boost with mpi support on homebrew?

According to this post (https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/pull/2953), the flag "--with-mpi" should enable boost_mpi build support for the related homebrew formula, so I am trying to install boost via homebrew like this:
brew install boost --with-mpi
However, the actual boost mpi library is not being build and can not be found.
There is currently some work being done around this, according to: https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/pull/15689
In summary, I can currently build boost, but it seems the "--with-mpi" flag is being ignored. Could someone please check, if I should be able to build boost (with mpi support) on Mac OS X Mountain Lion (10.8)?
The (verbose) output generates these lines:
MPI auto-detection failed: unknown wrapper compiler mpic++
Please report this error to the Boost mailing list: http://www.boost.org
You will need to manually configure MPI support.
warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library.
note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam.
note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam.
note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message.
Not sure how exactly I can fix this and get the mpi stuff to be build - any ideas?
Just in case this helps anyone else along the line, here's how I fixed this. The main error is MPI auto-detection failed: unknown wrapper compiler mpic++, any typing mpic++ at the command line verified that it was not working properly for me. I used brew to install open-mpi, but the same error was showing in the verbose output for installing boost. A run of brew doctor showed that openmpi was not linked properly, so I fixed those errors and reran brew -v install boost --with-mpi --without-single and it finally built and installed all of the libraries without a problem
To anyone that comes across this, the package migrated to boost-python and boost-mpi separate from boost. Use brew install boost-mpi
Just get it worked on OSX 10.11.5. I've tried brew, but with no luck.
Suppose you already have gcc installed. Here are what I've done:
1. Find and disable (but do not remove) clang
clang alway cause headaches. There would be a lot of warnings when building Boost.
which clang, which should give you /usr/bin/clang
Rename it: sudo mv clang clang_mac_remove, also for clang++: sudo mv clang++ clang++_mac_remove. You can change the names back if you need them in future.
2. Install OpenMPI
If you already installed using brew, uninstall first. Becasue it would have used clang as the compiler wrapper by default. You need to change the wrapper to gcc.
Download the package.
Specify the wrapper compiler to gcc and g++:
./configure CC=gcc CXX=g++ F77=ifort FC=ifort --prefix=/usr/local
Below may take a long time.
make all
sudo make install
Reference: https://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/HUGG/Open+MPI+install+on+Mac+OS+X
3. Install Boost MPI
Download the package.
Run ./bootstrap.sh (can open it first and specify the toolset to gcc, otherwise, the default option is darwin for mac).
Add using mpi ; in project-config.jam file. Then ./b2 —with-mpi will only build the mpi library.
Then, all built libraries can be found in the folder ~/Downloads/boost_1_61_0/stage/lib.
Copy or move them to /usr/local/lib or any other commonly used library path.
Reference: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_61_0/doc/html/mpi/getting_started.html
4. Compile with Boost MPI
LIBRARY DIR = -L/usr/local/lib
INCLUDE = -I/usr/local/include/
LINKER = -lboost_mpi -lboost_serialization
e.g.
mpic++ -std=c++11 -I/usr/local/include/ -c boost_test.cpp -L/usr/local/lib -lboost_mpi -lboost_serialization
Good luck!

GLIBCXX_3.4.9 not found

I have a problem concerning libstdc++.so.
I installed a new version of gcc and tried to compile C++ code. The compiling worked, but when I try to execute the binary (m5.opt is its name) I've got the following error:
build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt).
Do I need to replace libstdc++.so? And if so, where can I download the version I want? On the GCC-website they say libstdc++ is a part of gcc now.
Details
GCC:
I had gcc 4.1.2 before, but I downloaded gcc 4.2.4. From the untarred gcc-directory I executed ./configure; make; sudo make install`.
When I tried to use gcc or g++ to compile, it's default version was still 4.1.2. To overcome this I replaced some links:
mv /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/gcc_bak
ln -s /usr/local/bin/gcc gcc
mv /usr/bin/g++ /usr/bin/g++_bak
ln -s /usr/local/bin/g++ g++
GLIBC(++) -- libstdc++:
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 -> libstdc++.so.6.0.8
/usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so -> libstdc++.so.6.0.9
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.5.so -> libc-2.5.so
Linux-version:
uname -a gives:
Linux madmax 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 4 12:51:10 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The problem is that you built your new GCC incorrectly: on Linux you should use
./configure --prefix=/usr
The default installation prefix is /usr/local, which is why make install put gcc and g++ binaries into /usr/local/bin, etc.
What's happening to you now is that you compile and link using the new (symlinked) GCC 4.2.4, but at runtime your program binds to the old /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (version 6.0.8, instead of required 6.0.9). You can confirm that by running ldd build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt: you should see that it uses /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.
There are several fixes you could do.
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64 ldd build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt
should show you that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is sufficient to redirect the binary to correct library, and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64 build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt
should just run. You could "bake" this path into m5.opt binary by relinking it with -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib64.
A more permanent solution is to fix the libraries the same way you fixed the binaries:
cd /usr/lib64 && mv libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6_bak &&
ln -s /usr/local/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 .
An even better solution is to reconfigure the new GCC with --prefix=/usr, and then make all install.
I know this is a very old question, but ...
It's not usually a good idea to replace the system compiler (i.e. the one in /usr) because the entire system will have been built with it and depend on it.
It's usually better to install the new compiler to a separate location and then see the libstdc++ FAQ How do I insure that the dynamically linked library will be found? and Finding Dynamic or Shared Libraries in the manual for how to ensure the correct libstdc++.so is found at runtime.
The other answers here should be fine, but the 'quick and easy' solution if you do happen to have gcc installed to /usr/local/ is to just add the new libs to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib64
You can also check the to see if you have the right versions of GLIBC installed using
strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
strings /usr/local/lib64/libstdc++.so.18 | grep GLIBC
I got this last tip from another forum so credits due where credits due!

Problem compiling gcc 4.4.0 on OpenSolaris 2009.6

I am attempting to compile gcc 4.4.0 on opensolaris 2009.6
Currently in the box (which is a AMD 64bit machine), I have the gcc 3.4.6 installed.
I unpacked the gcc 4.4.0 tarball.
I set the following env variables:
export CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++
export CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc
Then I ran "configure && make" and this is the error message that I got:
checking for i386-pc-solaris2.11-gcc... /export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.11/gcc/xgcc -B/export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/host-i386-pc-solaris2.11/gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/sys-include -m64
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in `/export/home/me/wd/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libgcc':
configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details.
Anyone has any suggestion as to how to work around this error message?
/Edit:
Content of the config.log is posted here: link text
Normally the GCC build is bootstrapped, i.e. first it uses the system compiler to build GCC C compiler, and then it uses the freshly built compiler to recompile GCC once again (and then even once more time again). The configure line shows that it is not the system compiler but the already-built GCC compiler which is used for configure test there.
Since it fails, the problem is that the freshly-built GCC is somehow "stillborn" here. If config.log will not help you, I'd suggest to ask at gcc-help#gcc.gnu.org.
EDIT: Ah-ha, I think it is the assembler. You are using GNU assembler, but the unsupported options look like they were meant for Sun assembler. This should be solved by adding --with-gnu-as configure option (and then possibly having to specify its path explicitly with --with-as=/usr/gnu/bin/as)
You can also take a look at Solaris-specific GCC build instructions.
There's a readily available build for gcc4, which you can try updating. Its current version is 4.3.3. To get started, install pkg-get from OpenCSW and check out the build from the subversion repository:
svn co https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/gcc4/trunk/ gcc4
cd gcc4
gmake package

Resources