How to deal with NFS latency in shell scripts - bash

Question

I'm writing shell scripts where quite regularly some stuff is written
to a file, after which an application is executed that reads that file. I find that through our company the network latency differs vastly, so a simple sleep 2 for example will not be robust enough.
I tried to write a (configurable) timeout loop like this:
waitLoop()
{
local timeout=$1
local test="$2"
if ! $test
then
local counter=0
while ! $test && [ $counter -lt $timeout ]
do
sleep 1
((counter++))
done
if ! $test
then
exit 1
fi
fi
}
This works for test="[ -e $somefilename ]". However, testing existence is not enough, I sometimes need to test whether a certain string was written to the file. I tried
test="grep -sq \"^sometext$\" $somefilename", but this did not work. Can someone tell me why?
Are there other, less verbose options to perform such a test?

Answer 1

You can set your test variable this way:
test=$(grep -sq "^sometext$" $somefilename)
The reason your grep isn't working is that quotes are really hard to pass in arguments. You'll need to use eval:
if ! eval $test

Answer 2

I'd say the way to check for a string in a text file is grep.
What's your exact problem with it?
Also you might adjust your NFS mount parameters, to get rid of the root problem. A sync might also help. See NFS docs.

Answer 3

If you're wanting to use waitLoop in an "if", you might want to change the "exit" to a "return", so the rest of the script can handle the error situation (there's not even a message to the user about what failed before the script dies otherwise).
The other issue is using "$test" to hold a command means you don't get shell expansion when actually executing, just evaluating. So if you say test="grep \"foo\" \"bar baz\"", rather than looking for the three letter string foo in the file with the seven character name bar baz, it'll look for the five char string "foo" in the nine char file "bar baz".
So you can either decide you don't need the shell magic, and set test='grep -sq ^sometext$ somefilename', or you can get the shell to handle the quoting explicitly with something like:
if /bin/sh -c "$test"
then
...

Answer 4

Try using the file modification time to detect when it is written without opening it. Something like
old_mtime=`stat --format="%Z" file`
# Write to file.
new_mtime=$old_mtime
while [[ "$old_mtime" -eq "$new_mtime" ]]; do
sleep 2;
new_mtime=`stat --format="%Z" file`
done
This won't work, however, if multiple processes try to access the file at the same time.

Answer 5

I just had the exact same problem. I used a similar approach to the timeout wait that you include in your OP; however, I also included a file-size check. I reset my timeout timer if the file had increased in size since last it was checked. The files I'm writing can be a few gig, so they take a while to write across NFS.
This may be overkill for your particular case, but I also had my writing process calculate a hash of the file after it was done writing. I used md5, but something like crc32 would work, too. This hash was broadcast from the writer to the (multiple) readers, and the reader waits until a) the file size stops increasing and b) the (freshly computed) hash of the file matches the hash sent by the writer.

Answer 6

We have a similar issue, but for different reasons. We are reading s file, which is sent to an SFTP server. The machine running the script is not the SFTP server.
What I have done is set it up in cron (although a loop with a sleep would work too) to do a cksum of the file. When the old cksum matches the current cksum (the file has not changed for the determined amount of time) we know that the writes are complete, and transfer the file.
Just to be extra safe, we never overwrite a local file before making a backup, and only transfer at all when the remote file has two cksums in a row that match, and that cksum does not match the local file.
If you need code examples, I am sure I can dig them up.

Answer 7

The shell was splitting your predicate into words. Grab it all with $# as in the code below:
#! /bin/bash
waitFor()
{
local tries=$1
shift
local predicate="$#"
while [ $tries -ge 1 ]; do
(( tries-- ))
if $predicate >/dev/null 2>&1; then
return
else
[ $tries -gt 0 ] && sleep 1
fi
done
exit 1
}
pred='[ -e /etc/passwd ]'
waitFor 5 $pred
echo "$pred satisfied"
rm -f /tmp/baz
(sleep 2; echo blahblah >>/tmp/baz) &
(sleep 4; echo hasfoo >>/tmp/baz) &
pred='grep ^hasfoo /tmp/baz'
waitFor 5 $pred
echo "$pred satisfied"
Output:
$ ./waitngo
[ -e /etc/passwd ] satisfied
grep ^hasfoo /tmp/baz satisfied
Too bad the typescript isn't as interesting as watching it in real time.

Answer 8

Ok...this is a bit whacky...
If you have control over the file: you might be able to create a 'named pipe' here.
So (depending on how the writing program works) you can monitor the file in an synchronized fashion.
At its simplest:
Create the named pipe:
mkfifo file.txt
Set up the sync'd receiver:
while :
do
process.sh < file.txt
end
Create a test sender:
echo "Hello There" > file.txt
The 'process.sh' is where your logic goes : this will block until the sender has written its output. In theory the writer program won't need modifiying....
WARNING: if the receiver is not running for some reason, you may end up blocking the sender!
Not sure it fits your requirement here, but might be worth looking into.
Or to avoid synchronized, try 'lsof' ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lsof
Assuming that you only want to read from the file when nothing else is writing to it (ie, the writing process has finished) - you could check whether nothing else has file handle to it ?