The Make and Shell Command Option in g77 - makefile

What do the make and shell option mean in g77? For example, if I have the following script in my Makefile:
FC = g77
FFLAGS = -O2 -mno-cygwin
LDFLAGS =
CD = cd
LN = ln
LNFLAGS = -s
MAKE = /bin/make
RM = rm
RMFLAGS = -f
SHELL = /bin/sh
Does this mean that make operation needs to make use of /bin/make.exe?
On a side note: when I run the compilation, using the above command line, I got an error:
/bin/sh: line 4: Making: command not
found
Not sure whether the two are related.
Edit: This is my Makfile:
arpacklib:
#( \
for f in $(DIRS); \
do \
$(CD) $$f; \
$(ECHO) Making lib in $$f; \
$(MAKE) $(PRECISIONS); \
$(CD) ..; \
done );
$(RANLIB) $(ARPACKLIB)

These are just variables holding the location of programs on your computer. There will probably be rules like $(SHELL) a_shell_script.sh using these variables. The FC, CD, LN and RM are similar, they just don't have the path explicitly listed. Having programs as variables makes it simple to change them, for example if you want to use a different version.
Your error looks like the shell is trying to run the command Making. A possible cause is there is an undefined variable in front of this, eg a rule
all:
$(ECHO) Making something
which would expand to Making something when run instead of echo Making something. Without seeing the relevant line that's the best I can think of.

Related

How can I build two interactive web-sites from one GNU makefile and mostly the same source?

I'm using GNU Make to build a dynamic web site but I need to build two versions. As a net result currently I run my makefile using two command line incantations. This is inefficient and can result in errors (I don't always remember to run both versions or make a typing error and they fail) thus I want to make it one build.
The Command Line incantations are:
sudo make release build=test
sudo make release build=release
The two incantations activate ifeq blocks that set the path and modify some files.
Part of the much simplified (to help readability) top level makefile:
subs = today tomorrow
files = index.php foot.php
ifeq ($(build),test)
export path = /var/www/html/cgi-test
$(shell cp -f head-test.php head.php)
$(shell sed -i '/"DB"/c\ define("DB", "db_test");' subs.php)
else ifeq ($(build),release)
export path = /var/www/html/cgi-new
$(shell cp -f head-release.php head.php)
$(shell sed -i '/"DB"/c\ define("DB", "db_new");' subs.php)
endif
.PHONY: all go
all:
$(MAKE) go
#for ALL in $(subs);\
do $(MAKE) -C $$ALL all || exit $$?;\
done;
go:
cp $(files) $(path)/.
The sub-makefiles have a very similar structure but don't need the ifeq blocks because the files and paths have already been setup.
I think I can simply move the shell commands into the .PHONY rules but I can't do that with the exports because I get errors "export: : bad variable name".
I could do it with a batch file and call the makefile twice but that sidesteps the problem rather than cures it and I wish to learn from the process.
So can anybody show me the way to do this in a makefile?
Thanks to Tripleee here is the answer that finally worked back ported to match my starting post. The one major change is that I have gone back to 'all' as the rule I expect to start the build habits die hard! - Thanks
.PHONY: all both rel-test rel-release
cgi-test := cgi-test
db-test := db_test
cgi-release := cgi-new
db-release := db_new
subs = today tomorrow
files = index.php foot.php
all: both
both: rel-test rel-release
rel-test rel-release: rel-%:
cp -f head-$*.php head.php
sed -i '/"DB"/c\ define("DB", "$(db-$*)");' subs.php
$(MAKE) go path=/var/www/html/strutts/$(cgi-$*)
#for ALL in $(subs);\
do $(MAKE) build=$* path=/var/www/html/strutts/$(cgi-$*) -C $$ALL all || exit $$?;\
done;
Something like this?
.PHONY: both rel-test rel-release
both: rel-test rel-release
cgi-test := cgi-test
db-test := db_test
cgi-release := cgi-new
db-release := db_new
rel-%:
cp -f head-$*.php head.php
sed -i '/"DB"/c\ define("DB", "$(db-$*)")' subs.php
$(MAKE) release build=$* path=/var/www/html/$(cgi-$*)
The reason the export can't be moved into a recipe is that you are using the export command of make itself, not the shell's command with the same name.
You absolutely should not use sudo unless you specifically require the output files to be owned and only writable by root. Even then, running as much as possible as a regular user would be proper hygiene; maybe add a sudo command inside the Makefile to copy the files to their final location.

Makefile - Execute a rule for every field in a variable

I have my project binary located at my repository's root, along with a Makefile used to build it.
This binary uses many of my self-made libraries, located in my lib/ folder
For the purpose of building (and cleaning) my repository's binary, I want to implement the following execution :
Instead of hardcoding the following lines,
clean_binaries:
make -C clean lib/folder1 -s
make -C clean lib/folder2 -s
make -C clean lib/another_folder -s
I created the BIN_PATH variable, containing the previous paths.
BIN_PATHS = lib/folder1 \
lib/folder2 \
lib/another_folder
And made a simple rule like this one :
clean_binaries: $(BIN_PATHS)
make -C clean $< -s
BUT it only executes the line for the first field of the variable (lib/folder1), which is not what I want to do.
I thought about using implicit rules(?), just like I compile the .c files, but I couldn't get it right.
In the end, I simply wonder how to execute a rule for every field of a given variable, and this inside a Makefile, if there is any way to do so.
Thank you for your answers :]
The way you get GNU make to generate a sequence of commands that vary by the
fields in a variable is to use the foreach function, e.g.
Makefile
BIN_PATHS := lib/folder1 lib/folder2 lib/another_folder
.PHONY: clean_binaries
clean_binaries:
$(foreach path,$(BIN_PATHS),make -C $(path) clean ;)
which runs like:
$ make
make -C lib/folder1 clean -s; make -C lib/folder2 clean -s; make -C lib/another_folder clean -s;
not requiring a shell-loop.
Note also that you need to correct:
make -C clean <directory>
to:
make -C <directory> clean

Makefile cutting out variables in for loop

I'm writing my first complex Makefile for a highly-modularized project.
I have various sub-directories, each one has its own Makefile which supports at least the all and the clean targets.
These sub-Makefiles work just fine, however I have a problem with the main Makefile, that should call all the sub-Makefiles automatically from the list contained in the variable COMPONENTS.
I tried with the following Makefile:
OUTFILE = diskimage.bin
export NASM = nasm
COMPONENTS = bootloader
.PHONY = all clean FORCE $(OUTFILE) $(COMPONENTS)
all: $(OUTFILE)
$(OUTFILE): $(COMPONENTS)
./make_image
$(COMPONENTS): FORCE
for component in $(COMPONENTS); do \
make -C $component; \
done
FORCE:
clean:
for component in $(COMPONENTS); do \
make -C $component clean; \
done
This results in the following error message:
for component in bootloader; do \
make -C omponent; \
done
make: *** omponent: No such file or directory. Stop.
make: *** [bootloader] Error 2
as if the $component expression was only parsed as $c. I don't understand why that happens and how to fix it.
Just double the dollar sign:
$(COMPONENTS): FORCE
for component in $(COMPONENTS); do \
make -C $$component; \
done
The trouble is that with your makefile, Make expands $component before executing the rule. And since $c has no value (there is no such variable), it expands to nothing, leaving "omponent", which it passes to she shell, which complains that there's no such directory. (If you had written $(component), Make would have expanded it to nothing, since Make knows of no such variable, and then the shell would have complained that you were not specifying a directory at all.)
With the double dollar sign, Make expands $$component to $component, which it then passes to the shell, which interprets it as the loop variable, and everything proceeds as planned.
You really should have played around with a simple loop in a command, before attempting to do actual work with one.
Several issues.
.PHONY should be written as a dependency, not a macro definition
Don't write shell loops, use make syntax instead
When you call make recursively, you must do it via the ${MAKE} macro invocation
Leading to
OUTFILE = diskimage.bin
export NASM = nasm
COMPONENTS = bootloader
.PHONY: all
all: ${OUTFILE}
.PHONY: ${OUTFILE}
${OUTFILE}: ${COMPONENTS}
./make_image
.PHONY: ${COMPONENTS}
${COMPONENTS}:
${MAKE} -C $#
The advantage of this formulation is that it is parallel make friendly.
Always a test of a good Makefile.
Here make -j5 all will cause make to keep 5 commands running at once,
across all invocations of make.
Nice if you have 4 CPUs.
What about clean?
(Personally I hate clean targets—it's a sign of dodgy dependencies,
and of unhygienic mixing of source and target folders.)
Just add -clean (say) to each of the component names,
and repeat the pattern above.
CLEANS := $(addsuxffix -clean,${COMPONENTS})
.PHONY: clean
clean: ${CLEANS} ; #echo Clean succesful
.PHONY: ${CLEANS}
${CLEANS}: %-clean:
${MAKE} -C $* clean
These two sections can tidied up and combined into one if you feel so inclined.
Tip
Always run make with --warn (or --warn-undefined-variables to give it its full name) to catch inadvertent expansion of $c in things like $component.

GNU Make: "dir not expected at this moment"

I have a makefile including the following lines:
buildrepo:
#$(call make-repo)
define make-repo
for dir in $(C_SRCS_DIR); \
do \
mkdir -p $(OBJDIR)/$$dir; \
done
endef
On the line with the commands for dir in $(C_SRCS_DIR); \ I get the following error message:
"dir not expected at this moment"
make: *** [buildrepo] Error 255
I am using GNU make.
Can anybody tell me what is going wrong?
Actually this for ... in ... ; do ... done statement is a Unix command not a GNU make command, therefore I guess you are using a Windows machine (or any other one). You have to find the equivalent for your system.
But GNU make has a foreach function which works like this :
$(foreach dir,$(C_SRCS_DIR),mkdir -p $(OBJDIR)/$(dir);)
Also note that in your very specific case (not related to GNU make but to Windows) you can create all the dirs without a for/foreach loop, just like this :
mkdir -p $(addprefix $(OBJDIR)/,$(C_SRCS_DIR))

Getting the name of the makefile from the makefile

How to get the name of the makefile in the makefile?
Thanks.
Note:
I would need that because I would like my makefile to call itself, but the makefile is not called Makefile, so I'd like to write something like this:
target:
($MAKE) -f ($MAKEFILENAME) other_target
location = $(CURDIR)/$(word $(words $(MAKEFILE_LIST)),$(MAKEFILE_LIST))
WHERE_ART_THOU := $(location)
$(warning $(WHERE_ART_THOU))
I also believe this is GNU make-specific, but I'm not too sure.
(Should you have any questions, refer to amazingly written GNU make manual. But remember, that, just like Makefile, this manual should be read completely before putting the concepts into practice).
I couldn't figure out how it is done easily. As far as I understand, you'll have to do some manual job.
Later I will describe how it could be done and show scripts that introduce current_makefile variable. But I would like to stress an important concept at the first place.
You should understand that if we had some kind of variable current_makefile, that expands to the current makefile name, then it will have to change during the process of reading makefiles. That means that it should be used withinin "immediate" expansion context -- i.e. within commands that are executed during reading the makefile. Most commands, however, are executed after makefiles are read. Therefore, some commands will print the correct value smoothly, while in certain places, where "deferred" expansion is used, it will always expand to the root makefile name.
If you would want to use this variable within rule text, for example, you'll have to do tricks, because rule text always has deferred expansion. So, if your have the rule
rule:
echo In makefile $(current_makefile):
echo Making target $#
it will always print the name of the root makefile. Instead, to force immediate expansion, you will have to create another variable with makefile-specific name (i.e. names of such variables should be different in each makefile):
this_makefile_unique_name := $(current_makefile)
rule:
echo In makefile $(current_makefile):
echo Making target $#
or use eval:.
define make_rule
rule:
echo In makefile $(1):
echo Making target $$#
$(eval $(call make_rule,$(current_makefile)))
If you want to use the name of current makefile for debug purpose only, consider special debugging functions, like warning or info:.
$(warning We're in makefile $(current_makefile))
These functions use "immediate" expansion and will print the correct value.
How to define such a $(current_makefile)?
You have to manually maintain stack of makefile inclusions. When you include a makefile, its name is placed to the top of the stack; when you return from included makefile to the outer one, the topmost name is popped out of stack. This is achieved by inserting special calls to the beginning and the end of makefile:
# Beginning of makefile
$(eval $(makefile_names_push))
#... makefile text
$(warning $(current_makefile))
#...
$(eval $(makefile_names_pop))
#End of file
Now define the functions at the beginning of your root makefile.
lastword=$(word $(words $(1)),$(1))
define makefile_names_push
current_makefile := $$(CURDIR)/$$(call lastword,$$(MAKEFILE_LIST))
makefile_stack :=$$(makefile_stack) $$(current_makefile)
endef
define makefile_names_pop
makefile_stack := $$(filter-out $$(current_makefile),$$(makefile_stack))
current_makefile := $$(call lastword,$$(makefile_stack))
endef
If you're sure your make is new enough (version 3.81+), replace lastword call with builtin function:.
#inctead of $$(call lastword,$$(MAKEFILE_LIST))
$$(lastword $$(MAKEFILE_LIST))
Is it useful?
Totally useless. An only use that might be useful here is to make 100 makefiles that are symlinks to one makefile, the rules in these makefiles depending on their names. But it can be achieved within one makefile and foreach-eval technique described in the manual. So my post was a complete waste of time, though I had some fun :-)
This returns the name of the first Makefile called, i.e. the one at the bottom of the call stack:
MAKEFILE_JUSTNAME := $(firstword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))
MAKEFILE_COMPLETE := $(CURDIR)/$(MAKEFILE_JUSTNAME)
When used in non-cross-recursive situations (e.g. for makedepend), it is just the name of the current makefile.
I wanted to do something similar (for echoing the contents of the Makefile) for when I use Make for managing simple repetitive tasks. I came across this page and found it was exactly what I was after and really useful for my limited understanding of make.
My result after reading this page:
# Makefile - 'make' and 'make help' now echo the makefile.
help:
cat $(lastword $(MAKEFILE_LIST))
start:
sudo -u www /path/to/webapp/myhttpd restart
stop:
sudo kill `cat /path/to/webapp/data/httpd.pid`
A quick excursion to Google suggests this site has the answer.
G'day,
If you make a copy of your original makefile, say makefile_test, and then enter the command:
make -np -f makefile_test 2>&1 | tee output
That will evaluate the makefile and your make environment but not execute any of the commands. Looking through the output file for references to makefile_test will show you what is set in make's environment and where that value is being set.
N.B. This can generate a lot of info! And don't add the -d (debug) switch which will generate tons of additional output about make's decision process but minimal additional info about make's env.
HTH
The solutions here addresses 1) POSIX make with 2) Invoked, non included, makefile in 3) A Unix alike platform.
What the OP asked for:
target:
#pid=$$$$; \
while test `ps -ocomm= $$pid` != make; do \
pid=`ps -oppid= $$pid`; \
done; \
MAKEFILENAME=`ps -oargs= $$pid|sed 's/^.* -f *\([^ ]*\).*$$/\1/'`; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f Makefile && MAKEFILENAME=Makefile; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f makefile && MAKEFILENAME=makefile; \
export MAKEFILENAME; \
$(MAKE) -e -f $$MAKEFILENAME other_target
The targets depends on the makefile, kind of bloated:
TARGET1_MAKEFILENAME = target1_preamble
all: target1 target2...
target1: $(TARGET1_MAKEFILENAME) other_dependencies...
#test $(TARGET1_MAKEFILENAME) == target1_preamble && exit 0; \
built_instructions_for_target1;
target1_preamble:
#pid=$$$$; \
while test `ps -ocomm= $$pid` != make; do \
pid=`ps -oppid= $$pid`; \
done; \
MAKEFILENAME=`ps -oargs= $$pid|sed 's/^.* -f *\([^ ]*\).*$$/\1/'`; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f Makefile && MAKEFILENAME=Makefile; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f makefile && MAKEFILENAME=makefile; \
export MAKEFILENAME; \
$(MAKE) -e -f $$MAKEFILENAME target1;
Can be a bit simplified if make is invoked only for all targets.
MAKEFILENAME = invoked_makefile_placeholder
all: target1 target2...
target1: $(MAKEFILENAME) other_dependencies...
#test $(MAKEFILENAME) == invoked_makefile_placeholder && exit 0; \
built_instructions_for_target1;
invoked_makefile_placeholder:
#pid=$$$$; \
while test `ps -ocomm= $$pid` != make; do \
pid=`ps -oppid= $$pid`; \
done; \
MAKEFILENAME=`ps -oargs= $$pid|sed 's/^.* -f *\([^ ]*\).*$$/\1/'`; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f Makefile && MAKEFILENAME=Makefile; \
test -z "$$MAKEFILENAME" -a -f makefile && MAKEFILENAME=makefile; \
export MAKEFILENAME; \
$(MAKE) -e -f $$MAKEFILENAME
With the previous approach is trivial to implement a solution for included makefiles based in grep and a unique pattern contained in the makefile.
I never answer when I feel the question got a proper solution.

Resources