Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Some months ago I found a project-management / time-estimation software that would ask you to sort out your tasks in terms of difficulty (1, 2 or 3) and would then estimate the time you would take to deploy.
The system would auto-adapt as you were working.
I've forgot the software name. For the past days I've been digging emails and searching Google with no results.
Can anyone pin the software name by my description?
Its not http://www.fogcreek.com (though I've found it to be a great piece of software.
Thank you in advance.
Could it be "Construx Estimate" from Steve McConnell?
After almost a year and 1/2 I've found the exact same page I had seen the day before asking this question.
All in all what I saw was LiquidPlanners estimation in ranges and, probably during sleep, I've come to think of it as something completely different.
How about a software that would allow you to estimate a commitment date (by when you think you will deliver on a request) and communicate the date to the requester? As you work on your tasks the date re-calculates and if it slips you communicate a new commitment date so the requester could plan his work accordingly.
This is a tool we're working on, if you want to give it a try (it is in beta though):
http://yoxel.com/personal-commitment-manager.html
Cheers
It wouldn't be this by any chance would it ...
http://www.supermemo.com/help/taskman.htm
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
In programming, a lot of problems require you to find an efficient algorithm. So, if I want to be able to craft good algorithms that satisfy such criteria, what could I do? Is there any resources that help in training your algorithm development skills?
Help appreciated thanks!
Edit: I know that this question received hate, probably because it is not very agreeable to StackOverflow policies. Nevertheless, thanks Dylan Wright for taking the time to answer!
So most people are probably going to rip you apart for asking this question. No worries, just ignore. Algorithm go hand in hand with data structures in large amounts of data and/or some repetitive task. The key to the algorithm has a lot of different possibilities so there is no real straight forward answers. It mostly goes with what is the solution to what you are trying to improve. An algorithm is something as simple as parsing through an array of street addresses for your address application. To understand algorithms is really knowing what are common algorithms and how they work. Then you can educate yourself and maybe create one of your own. You should do some research on this.
To start look on blog sites like Medium.com
https://medium.com/#_marcos_otero/the-real-10-algorithms-that-dominate-our-world-e95fa9f16c04
Or just Google
http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/top-algorithms-and-data-structures-for-competitive-programming/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am a high school student who live out side of the USA.
So... please excuse any mistake.
I am planning to study for Olympiad in Informatics(I have never participated in this contest) and I am going to try on next year since it begin in April in our country I think I still have a time to prepare for it. And actually, I am kind of interested in data structure and algorithms . Although I cant get a good result from the contest, it would be worth experience to me.
However, there are no one who have ever participated in this contest in our school. So, I have no idea how to prepare.
I sure know how to code with python ,C ,C++ (but I am not good at it..)
So... If you guys know about it, please just give me some information. like books and way to prepare.
First research what the contest is about.
Learn your stuff. If it's algorithms, then I suggest something like Skiena, The Algorithm Design Manual. I think there's also a competitive programming book by Skiena.
Then practice. It looks like it might be similar to "classical" programming contest, so it would make sense to try:
- https://uva.onlinejudge.org/
- http://www.spoj.com/
- Any of the numerous online judge systems.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I need a library to help with parsing international phone number. I tried a couple of them like phone_number, phone, phony, and phoney. After playing with them the whole afternoon, none of them is perfect or as good as Google's libphonenumber (Java though). However, I am forced to choose one for my current project so I go with phoney gem, which seems active and provides more international support. Does anyone know anything better?
There was a similar question below but it's more than a year ago and focused on US phone numbers.
Is there a gem that normalizes and format US phone numbers in ruby?
Check out Phoner. It seems to parse both US and international numbers well.
The most current and supported (as for now) is https://github.com/floere/phony
Also you can have a look on https://github.com/carr/phone and https://github.com/habermann24/phoney/
I wrote a gem called ItuCodes that does basic parsing of country codes, paying special attention to complex cases like North America, Russia & Kazakhstan:
* https://github.com/bowsersenior/itu_codes
ItuCodes does not aim to fully parse area codes for every country code, but such a tool could be built on top of it.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Have their been any studies related to the importance of how good a software looks in terms of perception or saleability?
I have a feeling this is much more important then people give it credit for, but I would really like to see some hard data to back it up.
The keywords you are after is "Human-Computer-Interaction". There is loads of studies in that area, I even spent a full semester at uni on the subject, where it was spoken of as "HCI".
However, they do focus on the usability of a software program. The perception of a software program does impact the usability, however, under the theory that the more familiar a program is to the user, the less difficulty the user will have with using it.
The saleability, however... I doubt that's even related to the software, let alone its user interface other than that it satisfies a checklist that the consumer may have.
Donald Norman has done a bunch on this, going as far as stating that "Good looking things work better". I'm currently reading his book "Emotional Design" and I'm finding myself slowly persuaded, though on first face I disagreed vehemently.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
...And have they published the results where I can afford to read them?
There are several people doing things along those lines. Look through the papers at John Rushbie's PVS site, and look at Coq's papers.
Searching Citeseer will probably do some good too — almost everyone nowadays publishes their preprints to Citeseer, so a little looking around will usually get you the same paper, or something very very similar to the paper published in the expensive journal.
Ah, there is a proof of soundness for the process calculus underlying the Pict programming language in David N.Turner's thesis.
The Archive of Formal Proofs has several entries in the category "Process Calculi" listed in its topics, such as CCS and Pi Calculus.