ActivePerl Installation on Windows operating system - windows

I have installed ActivePerl on my Windows OS. I have followed below URL
procedure to install
ActivePerl Installation
After having done that, I have tried to run "perl -v " on the command line. But it reports the following error.
The system cannot execute the
specified program
What do I need to do to solve these issues?

I was facing a similar issue... but the thing was that I could execute the file by right clicking the file and opening it with perl command line interpreter.... but still the perl-v command would give the error... all I had to do was execute this command
set PATH=C:\Perl\bin;%PATH%
This solved the issue...

You need to make sure the directory where the Perl executable lives (it might be C:\perl\bin, but basically wherever you told ActiveState Perl to be installed) is in your PATH environmental variable (you can find the variable value by typing set PATH command on command line prompt in Windows).
If you're not sure where you installed Perl to (and can't find it in the default C:\perl\bin), you can find the directory by going to Start menu, finding ActiveState Perl folder, and right-clicking on "Perl Package Manager" icon, then pick "Properties" from the right-click menu. Properties window (in the "Shortcut" tab) will have a "Target" line showing the directory.

I was getting a similar error after installing ActiveState Perl on Windows 8 x64 bit edition and trying to invoke 'perl' at the command line.
'perl' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
program or batch file.
I remember selecting the option during installation to add the Perl directory to the system PATH environment, and after checking the system properties, it was indeed showing in the system PATH.
I tried installing 'Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 x86 and x64 redistributable setup' files as suggested by a few places but it still did not resolve the issue, until I tried some of the suggestions in this thread.
At the command prompt I entered:
set PATH
And surprisingly it did not list the Perl directories as being included in the PATH variables.
So to remedy that I entered this into the command prompt and hit enter:
set PATH=C:\Perl64\bin;C:\Perl64\site\bin;%PATH%
(The directory paths are for the 64 bit edition of Perl, adjust according to your installation) the %PATH% portion is important and ensures your existing settings are kept and not wiped out and overwritten when you set the PATH.
That fixed it and entering 'perl -v' into command prompt successfully replies your Perl version. If you had a PowerShell window open before setting the PATH variable, you will need to close it and re-open another instance of PowerShell.
I believe the original underlying issue was something to do with different PATH variables for 32-bit and 64-bit environments and possibly some internal Windows redirection that takes place automatically.

This doesn't sound like a problem with PATH - I would expect it to give the message 'perl' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
I have not seen this error message, but http://nirlevy.blogspot.com/2008/03/system-cannot-execute-specified-program.html makes some suggestion for related programs.
Or maybe ask on an Active State forum.

I had the same error. I was able to solve it by changing the order of the Perl64 entries in the PATH variable in the Environment Variables. I moved the C:\Perl64\bin to be before C:\Perl64\site\bin and it worked.

I had a similar error which was solved by adding the .pl extension to the script name, which I had forgotten to do.
I could not get it to work otherwise even with my Perl's location (C:\Apps\Perl\bin) verified as in %PATH%.

The problem lies in the installation directory.
The Perl PATH variable will be set to C:\Program Files\perl (depends on 32 or 64 bit of course), BUT, the default installation directory is C:\perl. This is kind of sneaky actually as you would assume the installer would be more intelligent about this, but it sets the environment variable to that directory no matter WHERE you install the damned thing.

Related

installed program "cppcheck" but command "where cppcheck" (on windows command line) can't find anything

I downloaded and installed the program "cppcheck" (http://cppcheck.sourceforge.net/).
This program has both a GUI (which I can access without problems) and a command line interface.
However, when I go to the windows command prompt and type "where cppcheck", nothing can be found.
Am I crazy? Or is the command line interface for cppcheck only accessible on Unix systems?
Since I usually don't work with Windows, I didn't realise that the "where" command just looks in the current folder and child folders of the current folder. That's why I didn't get any results.
You have to add it in the environment variables since the cppcheck installer does not add it automatically. This way you can use the where command from any folder as it also checks the environment variables too.

Makefile.mak giving error [duplicate]

I have Windows 7 and tried to use the 'make' command but 'make' is not recognized as an internal or external command.
I did Start -> cmd -> run -> make, which outputs:
'make' is not recognized as an internal or external command,operable program or batch file.
Then I typed 'mingw32-make' instead of 'make' (Start -> cmd -> run -> mingw32-make) and I get the same output:
'mingw32-make' is not recognized as an internal or external command,operable program or batch file.
What shall I do next in order to fix this problem?
In Windows10, I solved this issue by adding C:\MinGW\bin to Path and then called it using MinGW32-make not make.
Your problem is most likely that the shell does not know where to find your make program. If you want to use it from "anywhere", then you must do this, or else you will need to add the full path each time you want to call it, which is quite cumbersome. For instance:
"c:\program files\gnuwin32\bin\make.exe" option1=thisvalue option2=thatvalue
This is to be taken as an example, it used to look like something like this on XP, I can't say on W7. But gnuwin32 used to provide useful "linux-world" packages for Windows. Check details on your provider for make.
So to avoid entering the path, you can add the path to your PATH environment variable. You will find this easily.
To make sure it is registered by the OS, open a console (run cmd.exe) and entering $PATH should give you a list of default pathes. Check that the location of your make program is there.
This is an old question, but none of the answers here provide enough context for a beginner to choose which one to pick.
What is make?
make is a traditional Unix utility which reads a Makefile to decide what programs to run to reach a particular goal. Typically, that goal is to build a piece of software from a set of source files and libraries; but make is general enough to be used for various other tasks, too, like assembling a PDF from a collection of TeX source files, or retrieving the newest versions of each of a list of web pages.
Besides encapsulating the steps to reach an individual target, make reduces processing time by avoiding to re-execute steps which are already complete. It does this by comparing time stamps between dependencies; if A depends on B but A already exists and is newer than B, there is no need to make A. Of course, in order for this to work properly, the Makefile needs to document all such dependencies.
A: B
commands to produce A from B
Notice that the indentation needs to consist of a literal tab character. This is a common beginner mistake.
Common Versions of make
The original make was rather pedestrian. Its lineage continues to this day into BSD make, from which nmake is derived. Roughly speaking, this version provides the make functionality defined by POSIX, with a few minor enhancements and variations.
GNU make, by contrast, significantly extends the formalism, to the point where a GNU Makefile is unlikely to work with other versions (or occasionally even older versions of GNU make). There is a convention to call such files GNUmakefile instead of Makefile, but this convention is widely ignored, especially on platforms like Linux where GNU make is the de facto standard make.
Telltale signs that a Makefile uses GNU make conventions are the use of := instead of = for variable assignments (though this is not exclusively a GNU feature) and a plethora of functions like $(shell ...), $(foreach ...), $(patsubst ...) etc.
So Which Do I Need?
Well, it really depends on what you are hoping to accomplish.
If the software you are hoping to build has a vcproj file or similar, you probably want to use that instead, and not try to use make at all.
In the general case, MinGW make is a Windows port of GNU make for Windows, It should generally cope with any Makefile you throw at it.
If you know the software was written to use nmake and you already have it installed, or it is easy for you to obtain, maybe go with that.
You should understand that if the software was not written for, or explicitly ported to, Windows, it is unlikely to compile without significant modifications. In this scenario, getting make to run is the least of your problems, and you will need a good understanding of the differences between the original platform and Windows to have a chance of pulling it off yourself.
In some more detail, if the Makefile contains Unix commands like grep or curl or yacc then your system needs to have those commands installed, too. But quite apart from that, C or C++ (or more generally, source code in any language) which was written for a different platform might simply not work - at all, or as expected (which is often worse) - on Windows.
First make sure you have MinGW installed.
From MinGW installation manager check if you have the mingw32-make package installed.
Check if you have added the MinGW bin folder to your PATH. type PATH in your command line and look for the folder. Or on windows 10 go to Control Panel\System and Security\System --> Advanced system settings --> Environment Variables --> System Variables find Path variable, select, Edit and check if it is there. If not just add it!
As explained here, create a new file in any of your PATH folders. For example create mingwstartup.bat in the MinGW bin folder. write the line doskey make=mingw32-make.exe inside, save and close it.
open Registry Editor by running regedit. As explained here in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE or HKEY_CURRENT_USER go to \Software\Microsoft\Command Processor right click on the right panel New --> Expandable String Value and name it AutoRun. double click and enter the path to your .bat file as the Value data (e.g. "C:\MinGW\bin\mingwstartup.bat") the result should look like this:
now every time you open a new terminal make command will run the mingw32-make.exe. I hope it helps.
P.S. If you don't want to see the commands of the .bat file to be printed out to the terminal put #echo off at the top of the batch file.
If you already have MinGW installed in Windows 7, just simply do the following:
Make another copy of C:\MinGW\bin\mingw32-make.exe file in the same folder.
Rename the file name from mingw32-make.exe to make.exe.
Run make command again.
Tested working in my laptop for above steps.
For window-10 resolved error- make' is not recognized as an internal or external command.
Download MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows from here https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/
install it
While installation mark all basic setup packages like shown in image
Apply changes
After completion of installation
copy C:\MinGW\bin
paste in system variable
Open MyComputer properties and follow as shown in image
You may also need to install this
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuwin32/
As other answers already suggested, you must have MinGW installed. The additional part is to add the following two folders to the PATH environment variable.
C:\MinGW\bin
C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\bin
Obviously, adjust the path based on where you installed MinGW. Also, dont forget to open a new command line terminal.
'make' is a command for UNIX/Linux. Instead of it, use 'nmake' command in MS Windows. Or you'd better use an emulator like CYGWIN.
Search for make.exe using the search feature, when found, note down the absolute path to the file. You can do that by right-clicking on the filename in the search result and then properties, or open location folder (not sure of the exact wording, I'm not using an English locale).
When you open the command line console (cmd) instead of typing make, type the whole path and name, e.g. C:\Windows\System32\java (this is for java...).
Alternatively, if you don't want to provide the full path each time, then you have to possibilities:
make C:\Windows\System32\ the current working directory, using cd at cmd level.
add C:\Windows\System32\ to you PATH environment variable.
Refs:
use full path: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ff678296.aspx
cd: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731237.aspx
PATH: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490963.aspx
I am using windows 8. I had the same problem. I added the path "C:\MinGW\bin" to system environment variable named 'path' then it worked. May be, you can try the same. Hope it'll help!
try download & run my bat code
======run 'cmd' as admin 2 use 'setx'=====
setx scoop "C:\Users%username%\scoop" /M
echo %scoop%
setx scoopApps "%scoop%\apps" /M
echo %scoopApps%
scoop install make
=======Phase 3: Create the makePath environment variable===
setx makePath "%scoopApps%/make" /M
echo %makePath%
setx makeBin "%makePath%/Bin" /M
echo %makeBin%
setx Path "%Path%;%makeBin%" /M
echo %Path%
use mingw32-make instead of cmake in windows

Perl not running in Windows 10

I've just downloaded ActivePerl for Windows 10 on my 64 bit laptop, but when I go to the command prompt, perl -v fails unless the directory is C:\Perl64\bin in which case it tells me that I have Perl 5.20.2 Copyright Larry Ullman etc, but if I try and open perl files anywhere, nothing happens, if I run perl.exe it just shows me a command window with a flashing bar and nothing happens, and when I try and run .pl programs in Eclipse it tells me predictably that because perl-v failed it won't run.
What can I do to get .pl files running?
You must create a file association between the .pl file extension and the Perl runtime.
At a command prompt type the following.
assoc .pl=PerlScript
ftype PerlScript=c:\perl\bin\perl.exe %1 %*
Choose perl.exe or wperl.exe, depending on your need to get a visible command window.
To get perl to be recognized, you must add C:\Perl64\bin to the PATH environment variable. Go to Control Panel > System > Advanced System Settings > Environment Variables. Edit the line containing PATH in the top box marked User variables for , and add ;C:\Perl64\bin (note the semicolon) to the end. Be sure not to corrupt anything that's already there.
installing perl in windows 7

Problems Installing PostgreSQL 9.2

I've been trying to install the 64bit version of PostgreSQL 9.2 for Windows on my machine (Windows 7 64bit) and get this error:
The environment variable COMPSPEC does not seem to point to the cmd.exe or there is a trailing semi colon present.
I've installed it as Administrator.
I disabled the antivirus (Microsoft Security Essentials) and the firewall.
Running:
"%COMSPEC%" /C "echo test ok"
returned test ok
I've checked my System Environment Variables for trailing semi colon and I couldn't find any.
I then installed the 32bit version and managed to get to the end of the install with a different error message stating: Problem running post-install step. Installation may not complete correctly Error reading the C:\Program Files (x86)\PostgreSQL\9.2\data\postgresql.conf but there is no postgresql.conf file in that directory. It did install the application and when I try to connect the server with the red X on it it says fail at the bottom and it won't connect after I type in my password.
How can I connect to this server connection?
ComSpec is a generic error message for any installation failure.
Identifying the problem
Navigate to below path
c:\Users\XXXXXX\AppData\Local\Temp
Open 'bitrock_installer_XXXX.log'
Check, if you are getting below error:
Script stderr:
'"C:\Users\XXXXX\AppData\Local\Temp\POSTGR~1\TEMP_C~1.BAT"' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
Error running
C:\Users\XXXXX\AppData\Local\Temp/postgresql_installer_47b21c4ea1/temp_check_comspec.bat :
'"C:\Users\XXXXX\AppData\Local\Temp\POSTGR~1\TEMP_C~1.BAT"' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
This is a problem with '8.3 file names and directories' (e.g. '\Postgres Install' -> '\POSTGR~1')
Microsoft article on disabling 8.3 file names and directories: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/kb/121007
Solution:
Open command prompt in admin mode
Execute following command to change the format based on your drive or all drives
Sample commands:
fsutil 8dot3name set 1" - disable 8dot3 name creation on all volumes
fsutil 8dot3name set C: 1" - disable 8dot3 name creation on c:
Execute the installation as a user having admin privileges
After install, consider resetting the 8dot3name setting to default (2) to avoid unintended consequences
Hope it solves the problem!
Very easy fix:
Just open Advanced System Settings in Control Panel and create a new System Variable( in the System Variable instead of User Variable section).
In the variable name, enter ComSpec and then in the variable value , enter C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe.
Alternative fix:
If you have already the ComSpec variable in the System Variable section, remove the ;at the end of it this should fix it.
It's not COMPSPEC it's just COMSPEC. Please show the output of:
echo %COMSPEC%
Note that COMSPEC could be set to something different in the Administrator account you're running the installer as. I'm not sure how to find that out, but it might appear in the PostgreSQL installer log, so please upload that and link to it in your post. See Reporting an installation error for info on where to get the installer log.
See the PostgreSQL for Windows FAQ entry Check the COMSPEC environment variable.
Here's a report I made suggesting that the installer should test for this explicitly and here's my blog post on the topic.
I got the same problem, and i found in the log:
Script stderr:
'C:\Users\S300' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Error running C:\Users\S300 (i5)\AppData\Local\Temp/postgresql_installer_56caeadbd6/temp_check_comspec.bat : 'C:\Users\S300' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
I change in User Variables TEMP to D:\TEMP and TMP to D:\TEMP.
And Solved My Problem.
In my case , the Installer was in %USERPROFILE%\DownloadsP{ Windows download folder}, I moved the installer to desktop and ran again. weird it worked lol.
I had a similar problem. After installation, the data folder contained no postgres.conf file. It only contained a single folder named "pg_log".
I described the solution that I used here: Postgres Installation Error reading file postgresql.conf
Basically, it would be helpful to check if the user has full permissions for the postgres folder, and run "init_db" and "pg_ctl start" commands again. If the path contains a space character, try using a relative path for the pg_ctl data folder argument.
I'm running Windows Server 2003 R2, and I have been unable to resolve this problem with the installer, so I resorted to using the binary PostgreSQL package. Hopefully this will be an alternative for others who do not want to perform an OS reinstall.
First, some background (hopefully useful to the developers)
It started out with the postgres service failing to start (the server had been running reliably for over a year). I assumed it was a corrupted PostgreSQL installation, so I uninstalled and attempted to reinstall. I encountered the following error:
There has been an error.
The environment variable COMSPEC does not seem to point to the cmd.exe or there is a trailing semicolon present.
Please fix this variable and restart installation.
However, the COMSPEC variable is set properly, verified with:
echo %COMSPEC%
C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe
and:
"%COMSPEC%" /C "echo test ok"
test ok
Since this is Windows Server 2003, there is no UCA wrapper around the Administrator account, so that is not causing the problem.
Manual Installation
NET USER postgres /ADD
C:\pgsql\bin\initdb.exe -U postgres -A password -E utf8 -W -D C:\pgsql\data
runas /user:postgres "C:\pgsql\bin\pg_ctl -D C:/pgsql/data -l C:/pgsql/logfile.txt start"
just do it run as administrator and change the environment system variable
like create a new variable 'ComSpec' and value type 'C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe'.
If the installer exe is on a network share that mapped drive might actually not be accessible to the installer as it runs as administrator. This can often happen in some virtual machine arrangements such as running windows in a parallels VM. Copy the installer to a local drive first and you won't have a problem.
What worked for me after trying to enter the commandline given her in cmd.exe
I found it was named cmd1.exe in system32.. so i copied the file and renamed it as cmd.exe and installation finished
Open Environment Variables, you can do this on Windows 7 by typing environment variables in the Search program and files bar when pressing the start button at the bottom left of the desktop. And create a new System Variable(in the 'System Variable' instead of 'User Variable' section).
In the variable name, enter ComSpec and then in the variable value , enter C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe.
That's all. Hope it works!
Alternative fix:
If you already got the ComSpec variable in the System Variable section, remove the ; at the end of it this should fix it.
First find the path to cmd.exe(mostly it is C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe).
Go to the enviornment variable and add this path to system variable path.And also create new variable in user variable called ComSpec and add this path as value. And you are ready to go.

Cygwin GCC + WinXP cmd.exe does nothing

My basic problem is that if I run GCC from the windows command line (cmd.exe in Windows XP) and it does nothing: no .o files are created, no error messages, nothing. It will only throw an error message if I use DOS-style paths, but nothing else. When I run from the Cygwin shell then it will throws error messages as appropriate for the errors in the source and produces the .o files as it needs. Using 'make' from the DOS command line doesn't work either. Has anyone encountered this behavior before?
I've actually made some progress on this. Background:
I have WinAVR installed and its bin directories set in my PATH. WinAVR is GCC and associated development utilities but for the AVR 8-bit microcontroller. It shares many utility names with regular GCC.
In the past I remember Cygwin putting its bin directories in the PATH. It didn't seem to do this this time, so I put 'C:\cygwin\bin' into the PATH and then later 'C:\cygwin\usr\bin' there as well.
The latest release of Cygwin has issues with the way it handles files. Basically, gcc.exe is not an executable, but a type of symlink to the actual executable (which is either gcc-3.exe or gcc-4.exe depending on what you have installed). In the BASH shell these symlinks are easily resolved, in cmd.exe they are not. This means that if you attempt to enter 'gcc' into cmd.exe as a command it will respond 'Access is denied'. The solution for that is to call the actual GCC file name (gcc-4) instead of the symlink.
The solution seems to have come by rearranging my PATH. To edit the PATH environment variable, right click on 'My Computer' and go to properties, then Advanced and then Environment Variables. Under 'System Variables' find 'Path' and double click it to edit. Remove all entries that have C:\cygwin in them and then go to the FRONT of the PATH and enter them there. For me it was C:\cygwin\bin and C:\cygwin\usr\bin. The important part for me was making sure that the Cygwin entries were before the WinAVR entries. I noticed that when I tried to call 'make' in cmd.exe it was calling the WinAVR version instead of the Cygwin version. This lead me to rearrange my path and after some fooling around it became clear that using gcc-4 from the cmd.exe shell was working. It then worked in Code::Blocks as well and I was off.
Alternatively, it might have just fixed itself from something else entirely. Computers have a way of doing that.
Alternatively you can delete file: gcc.exe which is a file link and rename
the actual gcc executable file: gcc-3.exe (or gcc-4.exe depends on your version) to gcc.exe

Resources