I have a build script where i create a text report file and output various log type stuff to it. The data is all being built onto an external hd which (according to 'mount') has file format "fuseblk" (which i've never heard of).
The building all seems to work ok but my report files are being saved as executables, which linux interprets as SOR files. I'd like them to just be regular text files, openable by default in my regular text editor.
I'm making the file, and writing to it, like this:
#report = File.open(File.join(DESTINATION_BUILD_FOLDER, "#{title.folder_name}_report.txt"),"w")
...
s = "making modules folder inside resource_library folder";puts s; #report.puts s
...
#report.close
I've done this lots of times before and never encountered this problem. Any ideas anyone?
cheers, max
ps i know that i can edit the saved files to make them non-executable, my question is 'why is this happening in the first place?'. Cheers :)
I don't think there's anything wrong with your program. The fuseblk just means it's being mounted through FUSE, which allows filesystem drivers to run as userspace programs, instead of kernel modules. Most likely, the filesystem is NTFS or FAT32.
The problem here is that Linux is assuming everything on the drive has the execute bit set. This is because neither NTFS nor FAT32 have the capability to store Linux permission bits (NTFS has a very different permissions system, FAT32 has virtually none). And I bet you're trying to double-click on the log files in something like the gnome file explorer, right?
Well, go there with the command line and use less or your favorite command-line editor to view them. Or right click on them in the file explorer, or open them with File -> Open from a text editor. If you ask your question to people who know Gnome (or KDE?) better, you'll probably get a better answer.
Related
So I have quite a few "Grab'n'Go" Windows games and programs that I've stuffed onto an external harddrive, and it is a little daunting to have all their saves end up on my C: drive. What I'm looking to do, and I hope this can be done on Windows XP at the least (if not 7 or 10), is to create a BAT file to trick each program to save their files somewhere else but C:\Documents\User\My Documents, and preferably a different folder for each program (Dungeon Siege to G:\DS_saves, RCT3 to H:\RCT3, etc).
Is such a thing possible? And is it a different command per Windows version?
You can't "trick" games while they're running, since you have no access to their code or the running threads.
However, you can accomplish what you're trying to do by simply right-clicking the Documents folder, go to Properties, then Location and change the target folder.
This will change the directory for Documents in your system, and your games/apps will use the new folder even if it's on a different drive.
This can be done for all system default directories, and it's very useful for SSD-based machines where space is essential.
I store the MRU of logins to my application in a file called login.ini and I save it in widnows application folders.
I noticed that on some systems — I don't know why; I cannot find a common cause — the user cannot create the file, whereas it creates all other files in the same folder.
The only reason I can think of is that some antivirus/windows setting/... doesn't allow this particular user to create the file on this system.
I solved the problem by renaming the file and it seems ok, but I'd like to be sure. Does anyone know more?
Note for bounty:
This is a related question I asked that details a little more what I am doing.
A little Google-fu turns up that other Windows developers have sucessfully created login.ini for their programs, and others use it in a third-party Windows login management program, so I would expect that its "reservedness" is partially dependent on its location in the file system (i.e. in the system files). However, I don't think the name "login.ini" is a system-wide reserved name, no.
I think you're right - certain antivirus programs MAY be messing with the creation of that file, as it is a fairly likely candidate imho for a virus filename. It looks as if it may already have been used for that purpose somewhere (apparently outside of the US), tho don't quote me on that.
So, if a different name works for you, I'd go with that. :)
Anti-virus is a definite possibility for messing with your file. Stuff like that happened all the time to me when I was using Norton.
'login.ini' is not a system-wide reserved name, it would only mess things up with the OS if you had it in the (assuming your drive is C:) C:\WINDOWS or C:\WINDOWS\System32 directories.
If you just have the file in an application files directory (like C:\Program Files or C:\All Users\Application Settings and such) it shouldn't interfere with the system.
If you determine that anti-virus is a definite problem, you could change the name to something like loginData and maybe make up a new file extension if you want to (assuming you are just going to read the file from a program, where the extension doesn't matter. otherwise stick to a recognized file extension)
I want that an exe file can't be copied or cut from the Windows file system to paste somewhere.
The exe is made in C#. which must have to be in only one PC.
I have worked with FileSystemWatcher, NSIS, Clipboard. but for all I need to detect whether that file is being copied.
I also have seen 'Prevent'(http www free-download-blog.com disable-cut-paste-copy-delete-rename-functions-using-prevent ), but I need to prevent only that particular exe from being copied or cut.
Any pointer or idea will help.
As others have suggested you won't be able to disable the copy/cut behaviour so easily.
An alternative would be to disable the execution of the copied versions. In your executable you could check many things like :
The path of the present executable is explicitly your_path
The name of the machine and user is the one you authorise
You could even prevent the file of being executed more than once using Windows register entries (if already 1 don't launch). It won't be perfect since any experimented user could tweak that out, assuming they are seeking for that. But depending on your users profile it might be sufficient.
If you need the exe to be executable, you need to permit loading it into memory.
As soon as you do, anyone can read it to memory using ReadFile and then write to an arbitrary location using WriteFile. No shell-detectable copying involved.
A good reading: Raymond's post and its comments on preventing copying.
Well, this is a hard problem. Even if you get explorer.exe to disable cut&paste, what prevents a user from using the command window? Or writing their own exe to do it? Booting up in linux and reading it?
Still, you have a few options (there will be more, most likely) which you could try:
Use the right permissions: Set the
permissions such that the users who
you don't want to cut&paste cannot
read the file.
Write a device driver which can hook
onto the filesystem calls and do that
for you.
Encrypt the file.
And some hacky options like:
Use the APPINIT_DLLS regkey to put your own dll to be loaded into each process ( I am not sure if this will work with console process though). Then on your dll load, do IAT hooking to replace the kernel32.dll file calls.
Replace kernel32.dll with your own version. Might have to do some messing around with the PE format etc.
There are no guarantees though. If for instance, you expect them to be able to execute it, but not copy it, you are probably stuck.
Any local admin will be able to undo anything you do to prevent copying. I can pretty much guarantee the program on that page you mention relies on a service or background process to prevent copy-and-paste, and therefore is easily circumventable. If your users are in a closed environment where none of them are admins and they have very limited rights to their PCs, then you have a chance.
if you could completly block explorer from copying or moving files, then all u need is a 3rd party software for copying files (but make sure it can filter file extensions) for example Copy Handler
Set up an ENVIRONMENT variable in your machine
In your code add a check
if (ENVIRONMENT Variable=='Same as defined')
//Execute code
else
//Suspend execution
I am trying to copy C source files from a vms alpha to a windows machine to allow easier editing of the code. (VMS editor is just a text editor and it would be nice to have syntax highlighting etc)
I can copy this across using Exceed FTP and this handles the issue of duplicate filenames with version suffix that vms has:
File.c;1
File.c;2
Flle.c;3
But when I open a file I've transferred, all the line breaks have been lost and the entire file is just one line.
Can anyone recommend a solution to this or offer any hints?
Thanks in advance
ps. I need to be able to copy the files back to vms and still maintain format.
It may be off interest by now, but in case you still wonder about "one-line" text files after FTP transfer.
The short answer: force the FTP transfer mode to ASCII (or text) in your FTP client. This will make sure that the C-files you transferring (in fac all files) are treated as text, otherwise they're assumed to be binary, so you get a byte-stream.
Long answer: There're 2 FTP transfer modes: ASCII/text and binary/image. The default is sometimes clent or server-specific.
Many clients have Auto-mode that interprets the file extension to set the proper transfer mode (.TXT,.CSV etc..)
When you access the VMS server via FTP client, too often the [Win-based] client is not VMS friendy, so it does not parse the file-list properly. Thus it gets confused by version number appended to the "usual" file-name:
filename.ext;ver ==> file.c;1
So instead of seeing .C (and assuming text), it sees .C;1 and thinks it's binary.
I use Filezilla FTP client to/from VMS and so far it does it properly (though version-support is not as I'd sometimes like).
Copying a file to and from your windows desktop every time you want to edit gets old very quickly.
You may be able to implement a much nicer alternative. There is some software under VMS that permits a VMS directory tree to be treated as a "network disk" under windows. Once you've set it up, and set up your windows to recognize the network disk, you can just open the file with a windows text editor without moving it from VMS to windows. You can also browse the directory tree, which appears like a tree of folders.
When you issue a save from your text editor, the saved copy supercedes the previous version over in VMS land. And it mediates correctly between RMS format and embedded newline format. It's a whole lot more convenient than FTP, for this purpose.
After doing a quick Google search, I think the name of the VMS software is PATHWORKS. But I'm not sure.
A few points I have on this
PATHWORKS is fairly old and (as far as I recall - I dont use it) doesnt work well with recent windows versions, such as supporting Active Directory. Within the last few years HP have ported SAMBA to VMS and this is the way to go if you want to make areas of disk visible to windows machines. Should be easyt to find on HP web site.
If you want to try the FTP/SFTP route I would try SFTP and go for VMS version of at least 8.2. TheTCPIP suite was rewritten (or reported from a Unix version) at this point.
VMS supports a number of formats for text files. As well as the complex record structure described above, there is STREAM_LF which is the same as a unix file and STREAM_CRLF
I found some interesting information about OpenVMS text file structure. That corresponds with a vague memory I have of how VMS handles text files; they're not stored as streams of bytes like Windows and Unix systems, but as a sequence of records (each record is a text line). Records can be either fixed width or variable width. Whatever reads the file is responsible for the "paper control", what we normally call newlines these days.
You might check the options in Exceed FTP to make sure that you're transferring the file in an appropriate ASCII mode. There might be special options you need to set on the FTP server to read and write the files in the appropriate mode too.
I'm no expert - let's get that out and in the open ;)
I have been having similar problems in FTPing files from OVMS Alphaserver to Win7 desktop so I can migrate to SQL.
FTP [Attachmate & WIn CLI] workled fine under WinNT.
I suspect Win7 does not like the name.ext;version format of the OVMS file.
Filezilla - doesn't work.
PuTTY - doesn't work
Window CLI FTP - doesn't work [partial file transfer; times out & truncates file].
Using Attachmate's "Reflections for the Web 2011" to emulate Vax terminal - works fine.
Think I'll have to go back to Attachmate for assistance but partially hamstrung by our [Australian Fed Govt] IT services which has the final say
Some editors, such as BBEdit on the Mac, support directly opening/saving files via FTP/SFTP/etc. (BBEdit also supports various different line endings as used on different platforms, which would help with your other problem). I expect there must be a Windows editor with similar functionality - my Windows-using colleagues all rave about something called CodeWrite (or CodeWright ?) so I guess I would take a look at something like that.
I have a process with an open filehandle to a file. I need to detect if this file has been deleted by another process (there may be a file with the same name in its place). On UNIX I was comparing the inodes of my filehandle and the file-path via stat, but this doesn't work on Win32. How can I do this in Perl?
Thanks,
-Peter
I may be mistaken (I'm not a Windows programmer), but I thought files can't be deleted or replaced when they are opened in Win32, or at least by default it isn't possible.
This is a hard problem to solve, especially across both Windows and Unix.
Let's back up. Why are you trying to detect if the file has been replaced? My guess would be that you have some sort of race condition, two programs both trying to write to the same file. Perhaps file locking would help here? Or to use a real database? SQLite and Berkley DB come to mind.
I'd try comparing size, mtime, and atime; should be very difficult for those to be the same (barring nonsense like, say, stat on a filehandle on win32 giving you the information for the current file in the filesystem regardless of whether your filehandle is on a deleted instance). If it's possible for your file to be deleted and replaced with an identical file multiple times within a given second, and you have to detect this, then you may have to go to an architectural solution like using numbered versions of your file or something.
Look at the Win32::ChangeNotify package to register for notification of changes to a file or directory. It's also possible to open the file via the Win32API::File package such that it can't be deleted while you have it open (see createFile() and OsFHandleOpen() particularly, as well as the CreateFile() docs on MSDN).