I need to meter pixel on web page or on the screen. I used orange pixel meter is any other program similar to mater pixel on screen.
Check this addon for Firefox/Chrome/Safari: http://www.kevinfreitas.net/extensions/measureit/
I can't really tell what you mean but if you want to get the RGB value of a pixel at a particular coordinate, you can use this python script:
#!/usr/bin/python -W ignore::DeprecationWarning
import sys
import gtk
def get_pixel_rgb(x, y):
pixbuf = gtk.gdk.Pixbuf(gtk.gdk.COLORSPACE_RGB, False, 8, 1, 1)
pixbuf.get_from_drawable(gtk.gdk.get_default_root_window(),
gtk.gdk.colormap_get_system(),
x, y, 0, 0, 1, 1)
return pixbuf.get_pixels_array()[0][0]
print get_pixel_rgb(int(sys.argv[1]), int(sys.argv[2]))
via #htorque
Related
I have 2 co-located images, both created in a similar way and both have the size of 7,221 x 119 pixels.
I want to write a logic like this:
If the R,G,B values of a certain pixel (called it x) in image 1 = 0,0,0 (black) And the R,G,B values of pixel x in image 2 = 0,0,0 (black) then change the R,G,B values of pixel x in image 1 to 255,255,255 (white), Else no change.
How can I do this in either Matlab or Python?
You should be able to do this in python with the Pillow package. You need to load the two pixels, check if all the color channels are 0 and if so make them 255, then save the image again. In Python 0 is interpreted as False, so not any(vals) will be True when vals includes only zeros.
from PIL import Image
im1 = Image.open("image1.jpg")
im2 = Image.open("image2.jpg")
pixel = (0, 0)
newcolor = (255,)*3
if not any(im1.getpixel(pixel)) and not any(im2.getpixel(pixel)):
im1.putpixel(pixel, newcolor)
im1.save('image1conv.jpg')
Note that not any(im1.getpixel(pixel)) and not any(im2.getpixel(pixel)) could be rewritten as not any(im1.getpixel(pixel) + im2.getpixel(pixel)), but I think the first way has clearer logic.
I am using imsave() sequentially to make many PNGs that I will combine as an AVI and I would like to add moving text annotations. I use ImageJ to make AVIs or GIFs.
I don't want the axes, numbers, borders or anything, just the color image (as imsave() provides for example) with text (and maybe arrows) inside. These will change frame by frame. Pardon the use of jet.
I could use savefig() with ticks off and then do cropping as post processing, but is there a more convenient, direct, or "matplotlibithic" way to do this that wouldn't be so hard on my hard drive? (final thing will be pretty big).
A code snippet, added by request:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
nx, ny = 101, 101
phi = np.zeros((ny, nx), dtype = 'float')
do_me = np.ones_like(phi, dtype='bool')
x0, y0, r0 = 40, 65, 12
x = np.arange(nx, dtype = 'float')[None,:]
y = np.arange(ny, dtype = 'float')[:,None]
rsq = (x-x0)**2 + (y-y0)**2
circle = rsq <= r0**2
phi[circle] = 1.0
do_me[circle] = False
do_me[0,:], do_me[-1,:], do_me[:,0], do_me[:,-1] = False, False, False, False
n, nper = 100, 100
phi_hold = np.zeros((n+1, ny, nx))
phi_hold[0] = phi
for i in range(n):
for j in range(nper):
phi2 = 0.25*(np.roll(phi, 1, axis=0) +
np.roll(phi, -1, axis=0) +
np.roll(phi, 1, axis=1) +
np.roll(phi, -1, axis=1) )
phi[do_me] = phi2[do_me]
phi_hold[i+1] = phi
change = phi_hold[1:] - phi_hold[:-1]
places = [(32, 20), (54,25), (11,32), (3, 12)]
plt.figure()
plt.imshow(change[50])
for (x, y) in places:
plt.text(x, y, "WOW", fontsize=16)
plt.text(5, 95, "Don't use Jet!", color="white", fontsize=20)
plt.show()
Method 1
Using an excellent answer to another question as a reference, I came up with the following simplified variant which seems to work nicely - just make sure the figsize (which is given in inches) aspect ratio matches the size ratio of the plot data:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
test_image = np.eye(100)
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(4,4))
ax = plt.axes(frameon=False, xticks=[],yticks=[])
ax.imshow(test_image)
plt.savefig('test.png', bbox_inches='tight', pad_inches=0)
Note that I am using imshow with a test_image, which might behave differently from other plotting functions... please let me know in a comment in case you'd like to do something else.
Also note that the image will be (re-) sampled, so the figsize will influence the resolution of the written image.
As pointed out in the comments, the figsize setting doesn't match the size of the output image (or the size on screen, for that matter). To overcome this, use...
Method 2
Reading the FAQ entry Move the edge of an axes to make room for tick labels, I found a way to make the figsize parameter set the output image size directly, by moving the axes' ticks out of the visible area:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
test_image = np.eye(100)
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(4,4))
ax = fig.add_axes([0,0,1,1])
ax.imshow(test_image)
plt.savefig('test.png')
Note that savefig has a default DPI setting (100 in my case) which - in combination with figsize - determines the number of pixels in x and y directions of the saved image. You can override this with the dpi keyword argument to savefig.
If you want to display the image on screen rather than saving it (by using plt.show() instead of the plt.savefig line in the code above), the size of the figure is dependent on (apart from the already familiar figsize parameter) the figure's DPI setting, which also has a default (80 on my system). This value can be overridden by passing the dpi keyword argument to the plt.figure() call.
I am trying to come up with an algorithm to determine the dominant color in an image (either taken from a devices camera or by selecting an existing photo in the photo library). I have written an iOS 8 application in Swift that can grab the RGB value of each pixel in the image, but I don't really know what to do from there.
For pixels that have a distinct dominant color, say RGB(230, 15, 30), it's pretty easy to determine the dominant color. However, I don't really know what to do for pixels that have RGB values where 2 of the 3 values are similar, say RGB(200, 215, 30).
My original thought was to keep 3 counters (one for each color) and add each pixels corresponding RGB values to that counter. At the end I would divide each counter by the total number of pixels and the max of the 3 values would be the dominant color. However, like I mentioned before, when the results are close to each other I can't say that one color necessarily dominates the other.
Just looking for some thoughts and suggestions
I came up with this problem a few weeks ago, and having read many posts talking about it, I found the best method is Hierarchical Quantization presented by this post: http://aishack.in/tutorials/dominant-color/. Also, I have implemented it in python: https://github.com/wenmin-wu/dominant-colors-py . You can install it with pip:pip install dominantcolors and use it as following:
from dominantcolors import get_image_dominant_colors
dominant_colors = get_image_dominant_colors(image_path='/path/to/image_path',num_colors=3)
An idea:
First step is to reduce the number of colors, for example "Color Quantization using K-Means". In the example from the link, the number of colors was reduced to 64 from 96K.
Second step is to calculate the ratio for every color and pick the biggest value.
You can check my hobby project to find the dominant color in a UIImage: https://github.com/ruuki/ColorFinder
What it does basically is creating clusters of colors of the image and returns the most dominant one in a completion block. You can tweak threshold parameters within the source code. Hope it helps.
i had a similar task to do, here is my python code:
import picamera
import picamera.array
import numpy as np
from math import sqrt, atan2, degrees
def get_colour_name(rgb):
rgb = rgb / 255
alpha = (2 * rgb[0] - rgb[1] - rgb [2])/2
beta = sqrt(3)/2*(rgb[1] - rgb[2])
hue = int(degrees(atan2(beta, alpha)))
std = np.std(rgb)
mean = np.mean(rgb)
if hue < 0:
hue = hue + 360
if std < 0.055:
if mean > 0.85:
colour = "white"
elif mean < 0.15:
colour = "black"
else:
colour = "grey"
elif (hue > 50) and (hue <= 160):
colour = "green"
elif (hue > 160) and (hue <= 250):
colour = "blue"
else:
colour = "red"
if DEBUG:
print rgb, hue, std, mean, colour
return str(int(hue)) + ": " + colour
def scan_colour:
with picamera.PiCamera() as camera:
with picamera.array.PiRGBArray(camera) as stream:
camera.start_preview()
camera.resolution = (100, 100)
for foo in camera.capture_continuous(stream, 'rgb', use_video_port=False, resize=None, splitter_port=0, burst=True):
stream.truncate()
stream.seek(0)
RGBavg = stream.array.mean(axis=0).mean(axis=0)
colour = get_colour_name(RGBavg)
print colour
scan_colour()
What i thought is to build the mean Color of all Pixels and to determine the Color out of the hue angle. For getting grayscale answers i wanted to check if the Color is near the middle line of the Color corpus.
I am plotting a greyscale version of this image:
SOURCE: http://matplotlib.org/examples/pylab_examples/griddata_demo.html
I have used the following code:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.cm as cm
from PIL import Image
file_name = 'griddata_demo.png'
def func_grey(fname):
image = Image.open(fname).convert("L")
arr = np.asarray(image)
plt.imshow(arr, cmap = cm.Greys_r)
plt.show()
func_grey(file_name)
Display image as grayscale using matplotlib
The setup I am working is has python 2.7 and Pandas and I have installed Pillow with easy install.
Background information about the image and the requirements:
The image come from data found here. Ideally, the greyscale
version of this image should be generated directly from this raw
data.i.e. do not save it as a colored image and then try to convert
to greyscale - rather just produce a greyscale version of the plot.
I do not know the colors that correspond to the z-values - these
colors can be set arbitrarily.
The color map of the image can also be chosen arbitrarily - there is no preference. It
is the greyscale version that is of concern.
My question is related to the color scheme shown in the colorbar. I need to display a color scheme where the color bar has colors from light grey (lowest intensity) to dark grey (highest intensity).
After running the above code, a greyscale image is produced. In the color bar of the greyscale image, the intensity level -0.36 is dark grey. At 0.00, it is light grey. But then 0.48 is also dark grey.
Question:
Is is possible to change the colormap such that -0.36 is light grey and 0.48 is dark grey? I mean, is it possible to display to colorbar from light to dark?
I think this question may be about how to use a grayscale colormap in matplotlib. If so, then it's straightforward. Here's an example using different colormaps (based on the code for the op image):
from numpy.random import uniform, seed
from matplotlib.mlab import griddata
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# make up data.
#npts = int(raw_input('enter # of random points to plot:'))
def f(spi, the_colormap):
plt.subplot(spi)
seed(0)
npts = 200
x = uniform(-2, 2, npts)
y = uniform(-2, 2, npts)
z = x*np.exp(-x**2 - y**2)
xi = np.linspace(-2.1, 2.1, 100)
yi = np.linspace(-2.1, 2.1, 200)
zi = griddata(x, y, z, xi, yi, interp='linear')
CS = plt.contour(xi, yi, zi, 15, linewidths=0.5, colors='k')
CS = plt.contourf(xi, yi, zi, 15, cmap=the_colormap,
vmax=abs(zi).max(), vmin=-abs(zi).max())
plt.colorbar() # draw colorbar
# plot data points.
plt.scatter(x, y, marker='o', c='b', s=5, zorder=10)
plt.xlim(-2, 2)
plt.ylim(-2, 2)
plt.title('griddata test (%d points)' % npts)
f(131, plt.cm.rainbow)
f(132, plt.cm.gray)
f(133, plt.cm.hot)
plt.show()
If one actually wants to convert to grayscale using PIL (a far less favorable, but sometimes necessary task), it's best to start with a colormap that has monotonic brightness, like hot above, but not rainbow. Also, in the comments I suggested using cubehelix but that's not standard with matplotlib, instead see here. See here for an image of the available matplotlib colormaps.
this solution works for me, and is a lot simpler
from PIL import Image
im = Image.open("image.png")
im.convert('L').show()
im.convert('L').save("image.png")
note that if you want to mix up the file types, you can (.png to .jpg for example)
I am generating 2D arrays on log-spaced axes (for instance, the x pixel coordinates are generated using logspace(log10(0.95), log10(2.08), n).
I want to display the image using a plain old imshow, in its native resolution and scaling (I don't need to stretch it; the data itself is already log scaled), but I want to add ticks, labels, lines that are in the correct place on the log axes. How do I do this?
Ideally I could just use commands line axvline(1.5) and the line would be in the correct place (58% from the left), but if the only way is to manually translate between logscale coordinates and image coordinates, that's ok, too.
For linear axes, using extents= in the call to imshow does what I want, but I don't see a way to do the same thing with a log axis.
Example:
from matplotlib.colors import LogNorm
x = logspace(log10(10), log10(1000), 5)
imshow(vstack((x,x)), extent=[10, 1000, 0, 100], cmap='gray', norm=LogNorm(), interpolation='nearest')
axvline(100, color='red')
This example does not work, because extent= only applies to linear scales, so when you do axvline at 100, it does not appear in the center. I'd like the x axis to show 10, 100, 1000, and axvline(100) to put a line in the center at the 100 point, while the pixels remain equally spaced.
In my view, it is better to use pcolor and regular (non-converted) x and y values. pcolor gives you more flexibility and regular x and y axis are less confusing.
import pylab as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib.colors import LogNorm
from matplotlib.ticker import LogFormatterMathtext
x=np.logspace(1, 3, 6)
y=np.logspace(0, 2,3)
X,Y=np.meshgrid(x,y)
z = np.logspace(np.log10(10), np.log10(1000), 5)
Z=np.vstack((z,z))
im = plt.pcolor(X,Y,Z, cmap='gray', norm=LogNorm())
plt.axvline(100, color='red')
plt.xscale('log')
plt.yscale('log')
plt.colorbar(im, orientation='horizontal',format=LogFormatterMathtext())
plt.show()
As pcolor is slow, a faster solution is to use pcolormesh instead.
im = plt.pcolormesh(X,Y,Z, cmap='gray', norm=LogNorm())
Actually, it works fine. I'm confused.
Previously I was getting errors about "Images are not supported on non-linear axes" which is why I asked this question. But now when I try it, it works:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
x = np.logspace(1, 3, 5)
y = np.linspace(0, 2, 3)
z = np.linspace(0, 1, 4)
Z = np.vstack((z, z))
plt.imshow(Z, extent=[10, 1000, 0, 1], cmap='gray')
plt.xscale('log')
plt.axvline(100, color='red')
plt.show()
This is better than pcolor() and pcolormesh() because
it's not insanely slow and
is interpolated nicely without misleading artifacts when the image is not shown at native resolution.
To display imshow with abscisse log scale:
ax = fig.add_subplot(nrow, ncol, i+1)
ax.set_xscale('log')