Is it possible to Trigger an exe to run on a failed build? Can you do this within Team City?
If you specifically want the failed builds, you can set up the dependent build as Eric said, and have that secondary buildscript use the REST API to pull up a list of the failed builds for the actual project.
If the latest build is in that failed builds list, then tell the build script to run the executable. If not, then you're all done!
http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/TW/REST+API+Plugin
I don't think it's possible to trigger an executable to run only on failed TeamCity builds. TeamCity usually allows you to do things either always or only upon successful builds.
It would be possible to trigger an executable to run after this build is finished (failed or successful).
If that would work for you, you could set up a new build configuration that runs the executable. The new build configuration would have a "finish build" trigger. This would cause the executable to be run whenever the other build is completed.
You should add another build step with the exe you want to run and set the correct option to execute.execution options
Related
I have a TeamCity build that sometimes fails too early.
What I mean by that is that the first few steps are for "provisioning" (setting up the testing environment) and the testing of my code itself comes later.
Sometimes (for whatever reason) the build fails during one of the "provisioning" steps. This is not a problem since running the build again usually works fine.
But - the "changes" are not passed along to the next run of the build.
I am using this command as part of my build to output the "changes" that came from my codebase:
copy "%system.teamcity.build.changedFiles.file%" changelog.txt
So I need a way to tell TeamCity "hey, ignore the last run, that failure doesn't count because it didn't test my code, I want the next run to contain the same 'changes' in system.teamcity.build.changedFiles.file"
How can I do that?
Have you tried build chains with dependencies? They can be set up to only execute if the build (including tests) is successful: http://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2012/04/teamcity-build-dependencies-2/
I've used Google and looked at the Docs but can't find an answer.
I want to trigger another build or a rake script to do some cleaning up of files after a successful build. I currently use Rake to do my build and pass in %teamcity.build.branch% to it.
I would like to know if I can pass the same branch name of the successful build to the triggered build or script. I can then use this to do some tidying up.
Thanks
In addition to finished build trigger, you need to add snapshot dependency, with "Run build on the same agent" option enabled. This way, cleanup will run after each build, on the same agent.
You then will be able to refer to original build's branch name using dependencies parameters:
%dep.<original_bt_id>.teamcity.build.branch%
How do I run MSTest as part of my build process in TeamCity? What are the pitfalls?
This answer is specifically for TeamCity 7.1 on Windows, but may apply to other environments.
In your TeamCity build configuration, on the General Settings page
Artifact paths: Artifacts\MSTest => MSTest
Create a new Command Linebuild step
Custom script: if not exist Artifacts\MSTest mkdir Artifacts\MSTest
Create a new MSTestbuild step
List assembly files: **\bin\**\*.Tests.dll
Results file: Artifacts\MSTest\testResults.trx
Pitfalls
Using wildcards when specifying which test assemblies to run
You can use wildcards when specifying which test assemblies to run in the MSTest build step, although it is unclear exactly how they work. A bug report has been filed.
The build process doesn't stop when tests fail
Be aware that if some of your tests fail and the build is marked as failed, the MSTest build step itself does not fail. This causes problems if you have build steps after the MSTest build step which you don't want to run if you have test failures (e.g. it may not make sense to produce an installer or documentation of a build you know has bugs). The problem will hopefully be fixed in later versions of TeamCity.
If you want your build process to stop when you have test failures, you can create a new build step that uses the TeamCity REST API to detect if the current build has been marked as failed (remember that when tests fail, the build step is not marked as failed, but the build is), and then fail the current build step explicitly. Example:
Create a new Powershell build step
Script: Source code
Source code: See script below
Make sure your newly created build step comes immediately after your MSTest build step
Make sure every build step after this one has Execute step set to Only if all previous steps were successful
Script:
$xml = [xml](curl --request GET http://USERNAME:PASSWORD#HOSTNAME/httpAuth/app/rest/builds/%teamcity.build.id%)
Microsoft.PowerShell.Utility\Select-Xml $xml -XPath "/build" | % { $status = $_.Node.status }
if ($status -eq "FAILURE") {
throw "Failing build step on purpose"
}
I'm setting up Jenkins for the first time and running into an issue where Jenkins does not appear to even attempt to execute the Ant task I've specified.
I've defined my JDK and Ant installations under Manage Jenkins.
I've setup my Job to Invoke Ant using the Targets 'war-all'
Whether I force a build or wait for it to naturally execute after the next commit, there is nothing in the Build Console Output about attempting to execute the ant task.
Here is a sample Console Output:
Any ideas as to why it might not be executing would be appreciated. Also tips on how I can find more logging from Jenkins which might provide clues as to why it is not executing would be helpful. I'm not sure what Logger I might specify or even then where the logging information is written on the file system.
The problem was that I was selecting "Build multi-configuration project" as the type of my job. When I select "Build a free-style software project" as my job type the Ant task will execute after the SVN update.
Looks like your svn doesn't see any changes and therefor is not re-building the module.
Try deleting the workspace and re-trigger the build, or change the check-out strategy to 'Always check out a fresh copy'.
I faced the same problem when upgraded to 1.417 from 1.413.
The combobox "Ant version" disappeared from "Invoke ant" build step. It should be here.
I just downgraded to 1.413 and continue to work.
So, the answer is - you should specify "Ant version" in project settings. But you cannot do it in 1.417.
It seems like Jenkins doesn't like when you create a job before configuring JDK. If that happens, job will never work properly. So, for me the solution was:
Delete job.
Configure JDK
Re-create job.
Probably the same problem may arise when job's JDK is deleted.
In my case,ant default target was not being picked up from build.xml so I had to explicitly mention the target in jenkins option.
I resolved this by changing the jdk to default and then again switched to what was set earlier.This is a workaround but not sure how this resolved.
i'm new to world of continuous integration and software developement.
I wanted to try hudson so i installed it on my ubuntu machine and created a new job. i pointed it to an open source project's svn (keepassx) just to try.
Hudson downloaded everything from the repository and marked blue for successful build.
aren't i suppose to be able to execute the software now somehow ? i thought once it is built i can run it, but i can't find any executable in the project's home page under hudson user home dir.
thanks.
A Hudson/Jenkins build breaks down into three steps:
update source code in workspace
run build
publish build artifacts
It sounds like you've got step 1 covered.
If the project you linked to has instructions for building (ant, maven, etc.), you can enter these as build steps into the "Build" section of the project configuration.
You can then take the resulting files ("artifacts"--jar, exe, so, bin, whatever) and publish these using the "Post-build Actions", or if necessary you can grab them directly from the workspace filesystem.
Assuming the build artifact was an executable, you could then run it after downloading it from Hudson, or make a build step or post-build action which moved it into the appropriate location and ran it.
It helps to run the build locally before trying to get Hudson to handle it--then you know what the build steps are, and what the final build artifacts are.
How would jenkins/hudson know how to 'execute' some arbitrary package that you told it to download and build? It's up to you to write a program or script to run what you want to run, and then make a downstream job (for example) to do so.