My developing/producing environments are all CentOS-7.7.
In order to compile my program with gcc-8.3.0, I have installed "devtoolset-8" on my developing env, but it can not be used in the way same as gcc-4.8.5 that was shipped with CentOS7 oringinally.
Every time I need to compile a program, I must use "scl enable devtoolset-8 -- bash" to switch to gcc8 instead of gcc4.8.5.
When the program was deploying onto the producing-env, there is no gcc8, nor libstdc++.so.6.0.25, so it can not run.
I guess libstdc++.so.6.0.25 should be released with gcc8? I can neither install "devtoolset-8" on the producing-env, nor build gcc8 from source on the producing env.
The version of libstdc++ that can be installed from the official yum repo of CentOS, is libstdc++.so.6.0.19, hence my programs can not be loaded at the producing-env.
How to let such programs to run?
Thanks!
Pls forgive my Ugly English.
In order to not have to copy or ship a separate libstdc++.so but rather link statically (as suggested in a comment) against the C++ runtime, one can link C++ programs with -static-libstdc++ (also specifying -static-libgcc will also make sure that the program does not depend on a recent enough version of libgcc_s.so on the system - although that should rarely be a problem).
There can also be the issue of the target system having a version of glibc that is too old (relative to the build system). In that case, one could anyhow compile gcc of no matter how recent of a version on the older system, so that the resulting C++ executables as well as libstdc++ are linked against the older glibc. Linking C++ programs with -static-libstdc++ will again help to not depend on the program having to be able to find libstdc++.so at run-time.
Finally, the C++ program could also be linked with -static not depending on any dynamic libraries at all.
If I'm not mistaken, the compiler etc. installed as part of XCode use llvm. But I can't find an llvm-config binary to generate proper flags for command-line compilation to an llvm target. Where is such a thing on macOS?
I know I can install a new llvm via MacPorts or Homebrew, but I don't want to duplicate what's already there; I just want a way to get at the system configuration.
llvm-config is used to build programs that would link against LLVM.
Xcode does not distribute the LLVM libraries, and does not support linking against clang itself, so llvm-config is of no use in this context. What is your use case?
I'm having trouble building the hmatrix library on OS X Lion. Looking at the .cabal file, it requires the gsl library, so I installed it with macports. The .a files are in /opt/local/lib and the .h files are in /opt/local/include/gsl
As suggested here I changed the built-type from Custom to Simple. (without that change I get a similar error).
When I use cabal configure I get the following output:
* Missing C library: gsl
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system package that
provides this library (you may need the "-dev" version). If the library is
already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the flags
--extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where it is.
So I tried cabal --extra-include-dirs=/opt/local/include --extra-lib-dirs=/opt/local/lib configure, but I still get the same error. I can compile and link a c program that includes gsl. What files is cabal looking for? If I have the right files, how do I tell it how to find them?
libgsl.a is a universal binary:
$ file /opt/local/lib/libgsl.a
/opt/local/lib/libgsl.a: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/opt/local/lib/libgsl.a (for architecture x86_64): current ar archive random library
/opt/local/lib/libgsl.a (for architecture i386): current ar archive random library
ghc looks like it's 64-bit:
$ ghc --info
[("Project name","The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System")
,("GCC extra via C opts"," -fwrapv")
,("C compiler command","/usr/bin/llvm-gcc")
,("C compiler flags"," -m64 -fno-stack-protector -m64")
,("ar command","/usr/bin/ar")
,("ar flags","clqs")
,("ar supports at file","NO")
,("touch command","touch")
,("dllwrap command","/bin/false")
,("windres command","/bin/false")
,("perl command","/usr/bin/perl")
,("target os","OSDarwin")
,("target arch","ArchX86_64")
,("target word size","8")
,("target has GNU nonexec stack","False")
,("target has subsections via symbols","True")
,("Project version","7.4.2")
,("Booter version","7.4.2")
,("Stage","2")
,("Build platform","x86_64-apple-darwin")
,("Host platform","x86_64-apple-darwin")
,("Target platform","x86_64-apple-darwin")
,("Have interpreter","YES")
,("Object splitting supported","NO")
,("Have native code generator","YES")
,("Support SMP","YES")
,("Unregisterised","NO")
,("Tables next to code","YES")
,("RTS ways","l debug thr thr_debug thr_l thr_p dyn debug_dyn thr_dyn thr_debug_dyn")
,("Leading underscore","YES")
,("Debug on","False")
,("LibDir","/usr/local/Cellar/ghc/7.4.2/lib/ghc-7.4.2")
,("Global Package DB","/usr/local/Cellar/ghc/7.4.2/lib/ghc-7.4.2/package.conf.d")
,("Gcc Linker flags","[\"-m64\"]")
,("Ld Linker flags","[\"-arch\",\"x86_64\"]")
]
As an alternative to mac-ports you can use the nix package manager for mac. It does a pretty good job of taking care of the c dependancies for for the libraries available through it. In general I have been more happy with it then any other package manager on mac.
Unfortunately mac(darwin) unlike for linux does not have as many binaries available through nix so installing ghc often means waiting for it to compile.
The commands to install ghc and hmatrix after installation of nix are:
nix-env -iA nixpkgs-unstable.haskellPackages.ghc
nix-env -iA nixpkgs-unstable.haskellPackages.hmatrix
All of the needed dependencies will be taken care of for you.
I just tried it on my macbook pro and hmatrix seems to be working correctly in ghci after trying commands from the first few pages of the tutorial.
I'm not a mac person, but it really sounds like you haven't installed the "-dev" version. For a mac, I suspect you need to install gsl-devel in addition to gsl. If the problem persists, verify that you have libgsl0-dev on your library path.
I have a Kubuntu 11.10 system with Eclipse-CDT Indigo. gcc-4.6 was installed along with Eclipse. I have since installed gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.2 via Ubuntu packages.
I can switch the /usr/bin/gcc symlink to 4.4 or 4.6 and Eclipse builds my code either way. However when I set the symlink to use gcc-4.2 I get the following error (and many more):
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/cstring:52,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/i486-linux-gnu/bits/c++locale.h:47,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/iosfwd:45,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ios:43,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ostream:45,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/iostream:45,
from ../ProjStructure.h:4,
from ../Scanner.h:3,
from ../Scanner.cpp:1:
/usr/include/string.h:29: error: ‘__BEGIN_DECLS’ does not name a type
So it appears that the string.h I have in /usr/include expects __BEGIN_DECLS to be defined by one of the compiler specific includes.
/usr/include/string.h comes from the libc6-dev package, which does not seem to have compiler specific versions. I expected the package system to handle this and install all the right versions of things.
I've read the GNU documents on multiple versions of GCC, but they don't say anything about include files/directories.
What am I doing wrong here?
From which Ubuntu is your gcc-4.2 package?
It is probably from an older Ubuntu release. New Ubuntu releases have changed some header and library directories, which break older compilers.
So I just downloaded mingw-w64-bin_i686-mingw_20110410.zip from here (GCC 4.7 apparently), and discovered it had a very recent version of the GCJ compiler.
I tried using it, but apparently gcj requires ecj1.exe, which is the Eclipse compiler for Java... so, where do I find a compatible version of the binaries of ECJ and the associated Java libraries that are needed (libgcj, etc.)?
Ideally this would be found on the MinGW-w64 project page, but it doesn't seem to exist.
(I've already tried copying them from a slightly older GCC version; it doesn't work.)
The cause for an openSUSE version of the gcc is basically this:
If the configure step of the compilation of gcc did not find the ecj.jar
file, ecj1 will be missing at the time when gcj, which has just been build,
is called.
ecj.jar can be taken from ftp://sourceware.org/pub/java/ecj-4.8.jar
for example.
The two options are:
i) Put ecj.jar in $HOME/share/java/ecj.jar, reconfigure gcc with
./configure .... --with-ecj-jar=$HOME/java/ecj.jar
and recompile gcc. Future compilations with that gcc will not require
ecj1 .
ii) Put ecj.jar in $HOME/share/java/ecj.jar and create ecj1(.exe)
through a compilation like
gcj -o$HOME/bin/ecj1(.exe) --main=org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain $HOME/share/java/ecj.jar
assuming that the $HOME/bin is in the PATH for subsequent calls of gcj.
The thing that is actually "broken" here the fact that gcc 4.8.* is not shipped
by default with ecj.jar at some standard place.
That is a very old version of a MinGW-w64 toolchain.
I would suggest downloading one of my builds, I've had reports of gcj working (without libgcj, which does not work on Windows), although I can't seem to find a link to the discussion I had long ago with a user. The user's case had something to do with creating a JNI interface or something, which didn't require libgcj.
My old builds can be found here for 32-bit and here for 64-bit. I checked the 4.8 release build, and it contains the gcj compiler.
Would you be opposed to downloading the source and building it? I looked over the build doc in basic and advanced build docs. I didn't see anything about the GCJ compiler or ECJ, but you'll need gcc 4.5.1 in order to build it.