I have a question regarding Hibernate bidirectional. Lets say I have 2 classes, Class A and Class B and bidirectionally related. That means when I query Class A, I also can get Class B and vice versa. My question is how hibernate work when I do this
ClassA classA = ClassA.findClassAById(1);
ClassB = classA.getClassB().getClassA().getClassB();
I know I can get ClassB with just classA.getClassB();, but I also can get classA.getClassB().getClassA().getClassB().getClassA().getClassB()...;
Can someone explain to me how hibernate work with bidirectional query?
I'm concerned about performance.
Hibernate employes an efficient first level cache also known as the PersistantContext
If an object is loaded in the context , hibernate does not hit the database to get the same object.
In the problem statement when findClassAById(1) is called classA object is loaded in the persistance context. classB object is loaded at the same time or later depending on the lazy loading/eager loading strategy adopted. Following which the database should not be hit ideally for all future calls.
You can very well google Persistance Context for more information about how it works.
Related
I have a spring boot application (based off spring-boot-starter-data-jpa. I have an absolute minimum of configuration going on, and only a single table and entity.
I'm using CrudRepository<Long, MyEntity> with a couple of findBy methods which all work. And I have a derived deleteBy method - which doesn't work. The signature is simply:
public interface MyEntityRepository<Long, MyEntity> extends CrudRespository<> {
Long deleteBySystemId(String systemId);
// findBy methods left out
}
The entity is simple, too:
#Entity #Table(name="MyEntityTable")
public class MyEntity {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name="MyEntityPID")
private Long MyEntityPID;
#Column(name="SystemId")
private String systemId;
#Column(name="PersonIdentifier")
private String personIdentifier;
// Getters and setters here, also hashCode & equals.
}
The reason the deleteBy method isn't working is because it seems to only issue a "select" statement to the database, which selects all the MyEntity rows which has a SystemId with the value I specify. Using my mysql global log I have captured the actual, physical sql and issued it manually on the database, and verified that it returns a large number of rows.
So Spring, or rather Hibernate, is trying to select the rows it has to delete, but it never actually issues a DELETE FROM statement.
According to a note on Baeldung this select statement is normal, in the sense that Hibernate will first select all rows that it intends to delete, then issue delete statements for each of them.
Does anyone know why this derived deleteBy method would not be working? I have #TransactionManagementEnabled on my #Configuration, and the method calling is #Transactional. The mysql log shows that spring sets autocommit=0 so it seems like transactions are properly enabled.
I have worked around this issue by manually annotating the derived delete method this way:
public interface MyEntityRepository<Long, MyEntity> extends CrudRespository<> {
#Modifying
#Query("DELETE FROM MyEntity m where m.systemId=:systemId")
Long deleteBySystemId(#Param("systemId") String systemId);
// findBy methods left out
}
This works. Including transactions. But this just shouldn't have to be, I shouldn't need to add that Query annotation.
Here is a person who has the exact same problem as I do. However the Spring developers were quick to wash their hands and write it off as a Hibernate problem so no solution or explanation to be found there.
Oh, for reference I'm using Spring Boot 2.2.9.
tl;dr
It's all in the reference documentation. That's the way JPA works. (Me rubbing hands washing.)
Details
The two methods do two different things: Long deleteBySystemId(String systemId); loads the entity by the given constraints and ends up issuing EntityManager.delete(…) which the persistence provider is about to delay until transaction commits. I.e. code following that call is not guaranteed that the changes have already been synced to the database. That in turn is due to JPA allowing its implementations to actually do just that. Unfortunately that's nothing Spring Data can fix on top of that. (More rubbing, more washing, plus a bit of soap.)
The reference documentation justifies that behavior with the need for the EntityManager (again a JPA abstraction, not something Spring Data has anything to do with) to trigger lifecycle events like #PreDelete etc. which users expect to fire.
The second method declaring a modifying query manually is declaring a query to be executed in the database, which means that entity lifecycles do not fire as the entities do not get materialized upfront.
However the Spring developers were quick to wash their hands and write it off as a Hibernate problem so no solution or explanation to be found there.
There's detailed explanation why it works the way it works in the comments to the ticket. There are solutions provided even. Workarounds and suggestions to bring this up with the part of the stack that has control over this behavior. (Shuts faucet, reaches for a towel.)
I started with smaller projects to learn how to use Spring. Actually I have a big problem.
Code Redundacy
Maybe I missunderstood something but I have #Entity Classes to describe how my SQL Tables/Structure must be. On the otherside I have serializable classes. Example:
#Entity class UserEntity
and
class User implements Serializable
On CRUD operations I must transfer Values between this two. But why? This two classes are like the same for me. They have same members and getters/setters. Is there an elegant way to avoid this redundacy?
Maybe I do it completley wrong?
I would assume that your question is "Why do I need to make DTO for Entities? Isn't that redutant?"
Simple answer : Safety reason.
Complex answer :
So there are some risk with JSP and MVC where if you put your managed entities into frontend, there are posibilities where you can inject data into database. Which is bad for site of course : )
For more detail information check https://o2platform.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/ounce_springframework_vulnerabilities.pdf
I'm new to using Spring with Neo4j and I have a question about #Autowire for a GraphRepository.
Most examples I've seen use one #Autowire per Controller, but I have two Nodes I need to modify at the same time when a particular method is called in the controller. Should I simply #Autowire the repositories for both nodes (eg per the code below)? Is there any impact if I do this in a second controller with the same repositories as well (so if I had a ChatSessionController which also #Autowired ChatMessageService and ChatSessionService)?
ChatMessageController.java
#Controller
public class ChatMessageController {
#Autowired
private ChatMessageService chatMessageService;
#Autowired
private ChatSessionService chatSessionService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/message/add/{chatSessionId}", method = RequestMethod.POST)
#ResponseBody
#Transactional
public void addMessage(#RequestBody ChatMessagePack chatMessagePack,
#PathVariable("chatSessionId") Long chatSessionId) {
ChatMessage chatMessage = new ChatMessage(chatMessagePack);
chatMessageService.save(chatMessage);
// TODO: Make some modifications to the ChatSession as well
}
}
Any help would be much appreciated! I've been googling and looking through Stackoverflow to understand this better but I haven't found anything yet. Any pointers in the right directions would be great.
Another underlying question is, should I be (and can I?) modifying other Nodes in a GraphRepository that handles a particular node? Eg Should my GraphRepository be able to modify my GraphRespository?
Thanks!
I'm not convinced that this is a SO question, it's not really a Neo4J or Spring question either, it is more about the architecture of your application. However assuming that you understand the negatives of class fan out, and how to use the #Transactional annotation to achieve what you want then the answer to your question is that it is just fine to have many Repositories (Neo4J or otherwise, autowired or otherwise) in your class and in as many classes as you want.
Neo4J transactions default to Isolation level READ_COMMITTED and if you need anything else, you need to add the guards/locks yourself. Nested transactions are consideredd tobe the same transaction. The Spring #Transactional annotation relies on proxies that you should be aware of as they have implications when calling methods from within the same class.
I would go through this tuotorial over at Spring Data and get your head around how real world vs domain vs node models differ, there will be cases where one repository impacts another node type but I would think it is often transparent to you (i.e adding relationships). You can do what you like in each repository (the generic nature of them is largely confined to all of the built in CRUD and queries derived from finder-method names (see documentation ) using the #Query annotation, and some queries have side effects, but largely you should avoid it.
As you start adding multiple repositories to multiple controllers I think that your code will begin to smell bad and that you should consider encapsulating this business logic off on its own somewhere, neatly unit tested. I also wouldn't tie myself to one controller per data object, it would be fine to have a single ChatController with a POST/chat/ to create a new session and POST /chat/{sessionId} to add a message. Intersting questions on Programmers:
How accurate is "Business logic should be in a service, not in a model?"
Best Practices for MVC Architecture
MVC Architecture — How many Controllers do I need?
I'm struggling with a problem I and can not find out proper solution or even a cause neither in hibernate docs, sources nor S/O.
I have spring/hibernate application with DAO-Service-RPC layers, where DAO provides Hibernate entities and Service DTOs for RPC. Therefore I'm converting (mapping by Dozer) Entities to DTOs in service methods and mapping DTOs back to Entities there as well.
Mapping is as follows (not full method, checking ommited):
#Transactional
public updateAuthor(Author author) {
AuthorEntity existingEntity = this.authorDao.findById(author.getId());
this.authorDao.detach(existingEntity);
this.authorAssembler.toEntity(author, existingEntity, null);
this.authorDao.merge(existingEntity);
}
I have unit test classes annotated by #Transactional to avoid test data bleeding. Now, I realized, that there is something, I don't understand, going on in Service.
When I have my test class annotated by #Transactional, calling detach() seems to work (i.e. Hibernate is not reporting org.hibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: A different object with the same identifier value was already associated with the session, but #Version number on entity is not incremented properly (as if the parent (unit test)) TX was still holding on.
When I remove my test class annotation, mapping throws org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: failed to lazily initialize a collection - which makes sense on it's own, because the entity is detached from session. What I don't understand is, why this exception is NOT thrown when the test class is annotated. As I understand, entity is detached from the current session in both cases.
My other question is - assuming the entity is behaving correctly - how to avoid missing such errors in unit tests and avoid test bleeding as well, as it seems to be, this type of error manifests only with unannotated test class.
Thank you!
(JUnit4, Spring 4.0.2.RELEASE, Hibernate 4.3.1.Final)
how will i load my entities in my flex application using lazy loading .I have a deep object graph
GraniteDS, together with its data management framework, lets you transparently load your uninitiated associations: see documentation here. So, basically, you don't have to do anything special in order to initialize your lazy collections/proxies, you only need to access one of them on the client side (asking for the size of a collection for example) and it will trigger a call to the server and fetch the uninitialized data.
If you don't want or can't use transparent lazy-loading, you need to write a specific initialization method which must have access to an EntityManager, receive your entity as a parameter, initialize the required association and send the entity back to the client.
AFAIK it's impossible. You should have opened hibernate session to do this.
In my project I'm doing what you need this way:
I have spring service like this:
public interface SomeObjectManager {
List<SomeObject> getObjects(); // here we have lazy loading for SomeObject's properties
SomeObject getFullObject(long objectId); // here we're loading full object
}
Some properties of SomeObject use lazy loading. To load them I use HQL query like this:
SELECT s FROM SomeObject s
LEFT JOIN FETCH s.child children
LEFT JOIN FETCH children.items items
LEFT JOIN FETCH items.property
WHERE s.id=:id
This query forces hibernate to load properties defined lazy.
So if you don't need fully loaded SomeObject instances you use getObjects() method. If then you need details on concrete SomeObject instance you use getFullObject() method.
Hope this helps.