I want to search records which two column combination equals to the parameter, why it does not work?
public RDCheck SearchByUserPlusId(string uid)
{
RDCheckDataContext dc = new RDCheckDataContext(_connString);
var query = (from r in dc.RDChecks
where (r.login + r.id).Equals(uid)
select r).FirstOrDefault();
return query;
}
for example, one record in table is
id:4/login:test
So I pass parameter uid=test4 but it returns null, why?
Use ToString() before the concatenation
public RDCheck SearchByUserPlusId(string uid)
{
RDCheckDataContext dc = new RDCheckDataContext(_connString);
var query = (from r in dc.RDChecks
where (r.login.ToString() + r.id.ToString()).Equals(uid)
select r).FirstOrDefault();
return query;
}
Related
I have a linq query which joins a couple of tables and returns the value into an object. The query was working fine, till i added a where clause to in. Aftre the where clause, my query returns null.
Here's the code:
List<Int32> resourceSupervisorIdList = new List<Int32>();
resourceSupervisorIdList.Add(searchCriteriaTimesheet.ResourceId);
foreach (resource res in allSubordinateResources)
{
if (!resourceSupervisorIdList.Contains(res.id_resource))
resourceSupervisorIdList.Add(res.id_resource);
}
using (tapEntities te = new tapEntities())
{
var timesheetAll = (from tsh in te.timesheet_header
join rs in te.resources on tsh.id_resource equals rs.id_resource
join tsd in te.timesheet_detail on tsh.id_timesheet equals tsd.id_timesheet
where (resourceSupervisorIdList.Contains(rs.id_resource_supervisor))
select new TimesheetHeaderDetailsItem()
{
OrganizationId = rs.id_organization,
ProjectId = tsd.id_project,
StartDate = tsh.dte_period_start,
EndDate = tsh.dte_period_end,
ApprovedDate = tsh.dte_approved,
RejectedDate = tsh.dte_rejected,
SubmittedDate = tsh.dte_submitted,
});
if (timesheetAll == null || timesheetAll.Count() == 0)
{
return result;
}
}
Now, after adding the where clause, the code runs into the if condition. There are matching records in the table, but still i'm not able to get any records.
rs.id_resource_supervisor
is of type int in the mysql db.
I am trying to get a record from database using linq but it keep return no record
it is very basic sql statment
select * where productid ='12553'
however the following code does not return any result. Please advise. thx you
private static IEnumerable<ProductModel> GetAllProduct(string productId)
{
using (var dc = new TestEntities())
{
var result = (from a in dc.Products
where a.productid == productId
select new ProductModel
{
ProductId = a.productid,
Name = a.ProductName
});
return result.Distinct().ToList();
}
}
You don't need projection here:
using (var dc = new TestEntities())
{
var result = from a in dc.Products
where a.productid == productId
select a;
return result.Distinct().ToList();
}
I am trying to get a ; demlimited string of all the relatives that a person has.
Four tables are involved:
USERTAB
PERSON
PERSON_RELATION
RELATION_TAB
Query
from u in USERTAB
select new
{
Person = from p in PERSON where p.USERID == u.USERID
select new
{
PNo = p.NO,
Name = p.NAME
Relatives = (from r in PERSON_RELATION where r.PSEQ == p.PSEQ select new
{
Description = (from rel in RELATION_TYPE where rel.TYPE_SEQ == r.TYPE_SEQ select rel.DESCRIPTION).ToArray() //(or also tried .ToString())
})
}
}
I'd like the Description field to be a ";" delimited list of all the relatives a user (person) has.
Using a ToString on my Relatives object it only fails runtime with. LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.String ToString()' method
Example: Description = "Father, Brother, Cousin"
You need to be clear about what parts of your query get translated to SQL to run on the server, and what parts run in your local application. The key is to construct a simple query to retrieve all the data, then use .AsEnumerable() to ensure that the remaining transformations don't get translated to SQL, and finally transform the data into a form useful for you. Something like
var query =
from u in USERTAB
select new
{
Person =
from p in PERSON
where p.USERID == u.USERID
select new
{
PNo = p.NO,
Name = p.NAME
Relatives =
from r in PERSON_RELATION
where r.PSEQ == p.PSEQ
select new
{
Description =
from rel in RELATION_TYPE
where rel.TYPE_SEQ == r.TYPE_SEQ
select pos.DESCRIPTION
}
}
}
};
var enumerable =
from u in query.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
Person =
from p in u.Person
select new
{
PNo = p.PNo,
Name = p.Name
Relatives =
string.Join(", ",
from r in p.Relatives
from d in r.Description
select d.Description)
}
}
};
should do the trick.
This should work: write an extension method for strings of array, like so:
public static ToCsv(this string[] strings)
{
return String.Join("," strings);
}
Then just tack .ToCsv() at the end of your .ToArray() call above, and it should do the trick!
I have a array of string say:
String[] Fields=new String[]{RowField,RowField1}
In which I can use the below query to get the values by specifying the values is query i.e RowField and RowField1:
var Result = (
from x in _dataTable.AsEnumerable()
select new
{
Name = x.Field<object>(RowField),
Name1 = x.Field<object>(RowField1)
})
.Distinct();
But if suppose I have many values in the Array like:
String[] Fields= new String[]
{
RowField,
RowField1,
RowField2,
.......
RowField1000
};
How can I use the query here without specifying each of the rowfield in the query?
How can i iterate through the array items inside the LINQ?
According to some suggestions in LINQ query and Array of string I am trying to get the result using the code below.
var result = (from row in _dataTable.AsEnumerable()
let projection = from fieldName in fields
select new {Name = fieldName, Value = row[fieldName]}
select projection.ToDictionary(p=>p.Name,p=>p.Value))
.Distinct();
But the problem is it does not return the distinct values.Any ideas?
Start with distinct DataRows by using this overload of Distinct():
_dataTable.AsEnumerable().Distinct(new DataRowEqualityComparer())
Where DataRowEqualityComparer is:
public class DataRowEqualityComparer : IEqualityComparer<DataRow>
{
public bool Equals(DataRow x, DataRow y)
{
return x.ItemArray.SequenceEqual(y.ItemArray);
}
public int GetHashCode(DataRow obj)
{
return string.Join("", obj.ItemArray).GetHashCode();
}
}
Because of some business decisions I need to change a bit of what I was doing. Yay me. :)
Currently, I have:
public IOrderedQueryable<ProductDetail> GetProductList(string productGroupName, string productTypeName, Dictionary<string,List<string>> filterDictionary)
{
string whereClause = "ProductGroupName='" + productGroupName + "' AND ProductTypeName='" + productTypeName + "'";
string comma = "";
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, List<string>> myKVP in filterDictionary)
{
comma = "";
if (myKVP.Value.Count > 0)
{
whereClause = String.Format("{0} AND FieldName = {1} AND FieldValue IN (", whereClause, myKVP.Key);
foreach (string value in myKVP.Value)
{
whereClause = String.Format("{0}{1}'{2}'", whereClause, comma, value);
comma = ",";
}
whereClause = String.Format("{0})", whereClause);
}
}
var q = db.ProductDetail
.Where (whereClause)
.OrderBy ("ProductTypeName");
return q;
}
Instead of foing this directly, I now need to join through 2 other tables to apply the filter correctly. I'm trying to figure out how to correctly join in a dynamic LINQ query. In TSQL it would be something like:
SELECT pd.*
FROM ProductDetail pd
INNER JOIN ProductFilterAssignment pfa ON pd.ProductID = pfs.ProductID
INNER JOIN ProductFilter pf ON pfs.FIlterID = pf.FIlterID
WHERE pf.FieldName = 'var1' AND pf.FieldValue IN ('var1a','var1b','var1c',etc)
AND pf.FieldName = 'var2' AND pf.FieldValue IN ('var2a','var2b','var2c',etc)
Ouch. Yeah, that's a complicated requirement. You know, lambdas are cumulative, so you can do this much simpler if you use successive linq expressions. Note that subsequent linq expressions are using the prior expression result and the entire isn't actually executed until iterated.
public IOrderedQueryable<ProductDetail> GetProductList(string productGroupName, string productTypeName, Dictionary<string,List<string>> filterDictionary)
{
// Initial select on productGroupName and productTypeName
var products = from product in db.ProductDetail
where product.ProductGroupName == productGroupName && product.ProductTypeName == productTypeName
select product;
// Now add each filter item present.
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, List<string>> myKVP in filterDictionary)
{
products = from product in products
join pfa in db.ProductFilterAssignment on product.ProductID equals pfa.ProductID
join pf in db.Product on pfa.FilterID equals pf.FilterId
where pf.FieldName == myKVP.Key && myKVP.Value.Contains(pf.FieldValue)
select product;
}
return products.OrderBy ("ProductTypeName");
}
I don't have a good "answer" for you, but more of an aside. Check out LINQPad. You might even see an ad on the right-hand side of this page, too. It is very slick for writing LINQ queries. It might help in writing and validating this and any other future LINQ query you write.
Try to use Spolty Framework. It helps to do dynamic query for Linq To SQL and Entity Framework. You can dynamically create left/inner join, add conditions, orderings and other things. If you use Spolty Framework then your code will be look like below:
public IQueryable<ProductDetail> GetProductList(string productGroupName, string productTypeName, Dictionary<string, List<string>> filterDictionary)
{
// create root node
JoinNode productDetailNode = new JoinNode(typeof(ProductDetail));
productDetailNode.AddConditions(new Condition("ProductGroupName", productGroupName),
new Condition("ProductTypeName", productTypeName));
// if there are conditions than we create joins
if (filterDictionary.Count > 0)
{
// create joinNode
// INNER JOIN ProductFilterAssignment pfa ON pd.ProductID = pfs.ProductID
JoinNode productFilterAssignmentNode = new JoinNode(typeof(ProductFilterAssignment));
productDetailNode.AddChildren(productFilterAssignmentNode);
// create joinNode
// INNER JOIN ProductFilter pf ON pfs.FIlterID = pf.FIlterID
JoinNode productFilterNode = new JoinNode(typeof(ProductFilter));
productFilterNode.AddChildren(productFilterNode);
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, List<string>> myKVP in filterDictionary)
{
// create condition pf.FieldName = {1} And AND pf.FieldValue IN ('var1a','var1b','var1c',etc)
productFilterNode.AddConditions(new Condition("FieldName", myKVP.Key),
OrCondition.Create("FieldValue", myKVP.Value.ToArray()));
}
}
// create result query by JoinNode productDetailNode
QueryDesigner queryDesigner = new QueryDesigner(db, productDetailNode).
OrderBy(new Ordering("ProductTypeName"));
return queryDesigner.Cast<ProductDetail>();
}